30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

ESTIMATING CHANGES IN MEAN BODY TEMPERATURE DURING<br />

EXERCISE USING THERMOMETRY<br />

Ollie Jay, Paul Webb, Michel DuCharme, Francis D. Reardon, Tim Ramsay and Glen P.<br />

Kenny<br />

Laboratory for Human Bioenergetics and Environmental Physiology, School of Human<br />

Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. K1N 6N5.<br />

504<br />

Contact Person: ojay@uottawa.ca<br />

Changes in mean body temperature (ΔT b ) estimated by the traditional 2-compartment model<br />

of “core” and “shell” temperatures and an adjusted 2-compartment model incorporating a<br />

correction factor, were compared to values measured by whole-body calorimetry. Sixty<br />

participants (31 males, 29 females) cycled at 40% •<br />

VO2peak for 60 or 90-min in the Snellen<br />

Calorimeter at 30ºC. The “core” compartment was represented by esophageal (Tes), rectal<br />

(Tre) and aural canal (Tau) temperature, and the “shell” compartment was represented by a 12-<br />

point mean skin temperature (T sk ). Using Tre and conventional core-to-shell weightings (X) of<br />

0.66, 0.79 and 0.90, mean ΔT b estimation error for the traditional model was -81.7% [-76.8, -<br />

86.5] to -76.6% [-72.8, -80.5] after 10-min, and -47.2% [-40.9, -53.5] to -46.1% [-39.4, -52.8]<br />

after 90-min. Using Tre, X=0.80 and a correction factor (X0) of 0.40, mean ΔT b estimation<br />

error for the adjusted model was +9.5% [+16.9, +2.1] after 10-min, and -13.7% [-4.2, -23.3]<br />

after 90-min. Quadratic analyses of calorimetry ΔT b data was subsequently used to derive<br />

best-fitting values of X for both models and X0 for the adjusted model for each measure of<br />

“core” temperature. All best-fitting models at all time points for any measure of “core”<br />

temperature showed a systematic underestimation of ΔT b with the traditional model, while the<br />

best-fitting adjusted model at any time point only accounted for 56% of the variation observed<br />

in ΔT b .<br />

In conclusion, throughout exercise the estimation of ΔT b using any measure of “core”<br />

temperature together with mean skin temperature irrespective of weighting is inaccurate even<br />

with a correction factor customized for the specific conditions. Alternative thermometry<br />

approaches will be discussed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!