30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

SHORT-TERM HEAT STRESS EXPOSURE LIMITS BASED ON WBGT<br />

AND ADJUSTED FOR CLOTHING<br />

Thomas E. Bernard and Candi D. Ashley<br />

University of South Florida, Tampa FL, USA<br />

Contact Person: tbernard@health.usf.edu<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Because many uncompensated heat stress exposures may be safe for a limited period of time,<br />

more information on safe time limits is needed for their use in occupational safety and health<br />

practice. For instance, the US Navy physiological exposure limits (PHELs) are WBGT-based<br />

time limits for uncompensable heat stress while wearing standard clothing. It may be possible<br />

that clothing adjustment factors can account for clothing differences in PHEL-like exposure<br />

guidelines. The goal of this study was develop an empirical model of less complexity than<br />

rational models for practical application in evaluating time-limited heat stress exposures and<br />

to include nonwoven fabrics in the development.<br />

METHODS<br />

Thirteen adults participated in the time-limited heat stress exposures. Prior to beginning the<br />

experimental trials to determine critical WBGT, they underwent a 5-day acclimatization to<br />

dry heat. Participants wore a base ensemble of shorts, tee-shirt (or sports bra for women),<br />

socks and shoes.<br />

Three different clothing ensembles over the base ensemble were evaluated: work clothes<br />

(135 g m -2 cotton shirt and 270 g m -2 cotton pants), water-barrier, vapour-permeable ensemble<br />

(NexGen® LS 417), and vapour-barrier ensembles (Tychem QC®, polyethylene-coated<br />

Tyvek® ). The limited-use coveralls had a zippered closure in the front and elastic cuffs at<br />

the arms and legs; and they did not include a hood.<br />

Each participant walked on a treadmill at a moderate rate of work (190 W m -2 ) at five levels<br />

of heat stress. The 15 combinations of clothing and heat stress level (see Table 1) were<br />

completed in random order. During trials, participants were allowed to drink at will. Core<br />

temperature, heart rate and ambient conditions were monitored continuously and recorded<br />

every 5 minutes. The safe exposure time was taken as the time at which the first of the<br />

following conditions was satisfied: (1) Tre reached 38.5 °C, (2) a sustained heart rate greater<br />

than 85% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate, or (3) participant wished to stop.<br />

Table 1. Combinations of Clothing Ensemble and Target Levels of WBGT [°C] at 50%<br />

Relative Humidity<br />

Ensemble L1 L2 L3 L4 L5<br />

Work Clothes 36 37 38 40 44<br />

NexGen 33 34 36 38 41<br />

Tychem QC 29 30 32 34 38<br />

RESULTS<br />

Because the environmental conditions were selected with the ensemble in mind, the heat<br />

stress level was nested within ensemble and an appropriate ANOVA was performed. Table 2<br />

summarizes the safe exposure times for the combinations of ensemble and heat stress level.<br />

An initial analysis of the data pointed to anomalous data for NexGen at Heat Stress Level 2,<br />

in which they were systematically higher than expected from the other data for NexGen and<br />

from the data for work clothes and Tychem QC. For this reason, all the data in that cell were<br />

490

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!