30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

RESULTS<br />

ARIMA models combine as many as three types of processes based on the concept of random<br />

disturbances or shocks: autoregression (i.e., AR), integration/differencing (i.e., I) and moving<br />

averages (i.e., MA). Between two observations in a time series, a disturbance (in this case<br />

hot/cold water immersion) occurs that somehow affects the level of the series (e.g., heat<br />

storage) as well as the level of another series (e.g., finger blood flow). These disturbances as<br />

well as the association between the two time series can be mathematically described by<br />

ARIMA models. Using the appropriate model-building procedure for the best possible series<br />

model (Box and Jenkins, 1976) the identification of the processes underlying the time series<br />

was conducted to determine the integers for autoregression, differencing and moving average.<br />

ARIMA models demonstrated that the most efficacious independent variable to explain the<br />

behaviour of the dependent variables was the body heat storage.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The results of the present study demonstrate that, across time, fluctuations in body heat<br />

storage are systematically followed by fluctuations in sweat rate, finger blood flow and finger<br />

temperature. It should be noted, however, that our analyses do not fully establish causality<br />

between body heat storage and the body’s responses to preserve its homeostasis. Establishing<br />

causality in endothermic thermoregulation is a major challenge because the underlying<br />

mechanisms implicated are exceedingly complex. According to deterministic models of<br />

causality “phenomena have causes and if these causes are present in proper time windows, the<br />

phenomena will follow” (Olsen, 2003). Using this premise, although the present design<br />

cannot fully establish causality, our results demonstrate very strong longitudinal associations<br />

because the independent variable (i.e., body heat storage) existed before the dependent<br />

variables in time. Ergo, the heat regulation model was more efficacious than the temperature<br />

regulation model in explaining the phenomena occurring in the present experiment.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Box, G. E. P. & Jenkins, G. M., 1976. Time series analysis: Forecasting and control, rev. ed.,<br />

San Francisco, Holden-Day.<br />

Mitchell, D. & Wyndham, C. H., 1969. Comparison of weighting formulas for calculating<br />

mean skin temperature. J Appl Physiol, 26, 616-22.<br />

Olsen, J., 2003. What characterises a useful concept of causation in epidemiology? J<br />

Epidemiol Community Health, 57, 86-8.<br />

Tikuisis, P., 2003. Heat balance precedes stabilization of body temperatures during cold water<br />

immersion. J Appl Physiol, 95, 89-96.<br />

466

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!