30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Manikins<br />

Figure 3: Comparison among theoretical heat needed to warm all the refrigerants in the<br />

cooling vest, real extra heat supply until steady state and that during the first 3 hours<br />

(a) (b)<br />

T em perature( )<br />

40<br />

38<br />

36<br />

34<br />

32<br />

30<br />

28<br />

Heat (K cal)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Time(Hour)<br />

Type A Type B<br />

150<br />

125<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

Heat Flux(W /m 2 )<br />

under<br />

refrigerant 1<br />

under<br />

refrigerant 2<br />

under<br />

refrigerant 3<br />

not under<br />

refrigerant<br />

Heat Flux<br />

Theoretical heat<br />

needed to warm a l<br />

the refrigerants in<br />

torso<br />

Heat supplied until<br />

steady state in<br />

torso<br />

Heat supplied during<br />

the first 3 hours in<br />

torso<br />

Figure 4: Skin temperatures at each point covered by refrigerant 1, 2 and 3 and a noncovered<br />

point by refrigerant in stomach. The stomach zone was covered by 3 pieces of<br />

refrigerant. Under each refrigerant, thermistors were placed onto the skin: (a) cooling by vest<br />

having Type A, (b) cooling by vest having Type B.<br />

Skin temperature under type A refrigerant rose more slowly than type B. At a non-covered<br />

point by refrigerant, skin temperature under type B was higher than type A in the early state<br />

of cooling (Figure 4).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

By using a manikin, the cooling efficiencies of two types of refrigerants were investigated<br />

with fire-fighter’s clothing. The cool vest with 16 packs of refrigerant was dressed on torso of<br />

the thermal manikin in a T-shirt. Though type A refrigerant (100% paraffin) had larger heat<br />

capacitance than type B refrigerant (50% paraffin + 50% water), type A had less cooling<br />

efficiency than type B during the first 3 hours. It is considered that type B absorbed more heat<br />

in the early stage, because it changed the shape to fit the manikin surface, as it was gel. In<br />

contrast, type A was solid, and it would be difficult to fit well to the manikin surface.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study was supported in part by the Research Grant for Fire and Disaster Management in<br />

Japan.<br />

Tem perature( )<br />

40<br />

38<br />

36<br />

34<br />

32<br />

30<br />

28<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Time (Hour)<br />

150<br />

125<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

Heat Flux(W /m 2 )<br />

under<br />

refrigerant 1<br />

under<br />

refrigerant 2<br />

under<br />

refrigerant 3<br />

not under<br />

refrigerant<br />

Heat Flux<br />

449

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!