30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

THE HEAT TOLERANCE TEST – A VALUABLE SCREENING TOOL<br />

FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TO HEAT<br />

Daniel S. Moran 1 , Yair Shapiro 2 , and Yoram Epstein 1<br />

1 Heller Institute of Medical Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 2 The College of Judea and Samaria, ISRAEL<br />

Contact person: dmoran@sheba.health.gov.il<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Tolerance to sustain heat stress lies within a wide range of individual variations. Under the<br />

extreme conditions of exercise-heat stress, even healthy, well acclimated, and physically fit<br />

individuals will ultimately store heat at a rate that will cause body temperature to rise. In most<br />

cases it is an uneventful condition, but in the extremes it develops into heat stroke.<br />

Those individuals who are not able to sustain heat, and whose body temperature will start<br />

rising earlier and at a higher rate than others under the same conditions, are defined as "heat<br />

intolerant". The reasons underlying heat intolerance are ample. Some of those reasons are<br />

congenital, which reduces the ability to thermoregulate efficiently (e.g., ectodermal dysplasia,<br />

anhidrosis), and thus will always result in heat susceptibility, while other conditions are<br />

acquired and could be considered as temporary, and not affecting the thermoregulatory center<br />

or the heat dissipation mechanisms (e.g., dehydration). However, there are some acquired<br />

circumstances, such as large scarred burnt skin area, that will affect the heat dissipation<br />

mechanism to a degree that will result with a permanent condition of heat intolerance (HI).<br />

For workers in the industry and for soldiers, who are routinely exposed to unfavorable<br />

environmental conditions, the realization whether a previous condition of exertional heat<br />

stroke (EHS) they encountered was due to a temporary or permanent HI is valuable in<br />

protecting them from successive episodes of heat stroke.<br />

METHODS<br />

To identify an individual's susceptibility to exercise-heat stress, a Heat Tolerance Test (HTT)<br />

was performed according to the following protocol: 120 min exposure to 40 o C and 40%<br />

relative humidity in a climatic chamber while walking on a treadmill, dressed in shorts and a<br />

T-shirt, at a pace of 5 km/h and 2% elevation. According to our experience, it is expected that<br />

under these conditions of exercise-heat stress, at the end of the 120 min exposure rectal<br />

temperature of heat tolerant individuals (HT) will be 38.0 ±0.3 o C, their heart rate will be 120<br />

±15 bpm, and their sweat rate -780 ±160 g/h. Accordingly, heat intolerance is ascertained<br />

when throughout the exposure to heat: rectal temperature exceeds 38.5 o C, or heart rate<br />

exceeds 145 bpm. Obviously, the larger deviation from the expected values in a healthy<br />

individual, the more pronounced is the state of heat intolerance (Figure 1; only rectal<br />

temperatures shown).<br />

Two hundred and fourteen formerly exertional heat stroke soldiers underwent the HTT, about<br />

6 weeks following their release from hospital. Roughly, 10% of these subjects were found to<br />

be heat intolerant following the test. Both sub-groups were comparable in all aspects, but<br />

differed in the duration in service. The HT subjects were longer in service, and thus more<br />

experienced, than the HI soldiers. The general characteristics of the two subgroups are<br />

depicted in Table 1.<br />

416

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!