30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

measured every 5 minutes using a Thermal Sensation Scale (range 0 = unbearably cold to 10<br />

= unbearably hot in 1 unit increments).<br />

Following baseline, participants donned the cooling hood and rested quietly in a chair in a<br />

thermoneutral environment (23°C, 40%RH) for 60 min. The cooling hood was then removed<br />

and a further 10 min of data were collected to investigate the afterdrop of rectal temperature.<br />

No Cooling: the hood was not turned on. True Cooling: the circulating cooling fluid was set at<br />

10°C. Sham Cooling: the goal of the Sham Cooling condition was to give the perception of<br />

cooling while minimal physiological changes occurred. To ensure that participants felt they<br />

were receiving a cold stimulus, upon donning the cooling device the circulating cooling fluid<br />

was set at ~10°C. After 5 min of cooling, the cooling fluid temperature was increased until it<br />

reached ~24°C. After 30 min, the cooling fluid was briefly decreased to ~10°C and was then<br />

increased to ~24°C. This cyclic change in the temperature of the cooling fluid was performed<br />

again at 55 min so that participants felt a chill before they took the cooling hood off.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Upon donning the cooling hood, both the Sham and True Cooling groups experienced a slight<br />

increase in core temperature (Figure 1). However after 5 min, core temperature steadily<br />

decreased in the True Cooling condition, decreasing by 0.37 o C (p0.05). The magnitude<br />

of cooling was significantly greater in True compared to either Sham or No Cooling (p=0.05).<br />

Although core temperature in the True Cooling condition was significantly different from the<br />

Sham and No Cooling conditions, there were no significant differences between the thermal<br />

sensations that participants experienced between and within all conditions (Figure 2).<br />

However, it is worth noting that there is a trend for both the Sham and True Cooling to elicit<br />

lower ratings of thermal sensation than the No Cooling condition.<br />

414<br />

Delta T Rectal<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

-0.1<br />

-0.2<br />

-0.3<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.5<br />

-0.6<br />

0 10 20<br />

Time (min)<br />

30 40 50 60 70<br />

True Cooling<br />

Sham Cooling<br />

No Cooling<br />

Figure 1. Change in rectal temperature over 60 min with cooling hood (dashed vertical line) plus<br />

10 min additional passive rest without hood. * = core temperature significantly different from<br />

time 0 min to time 60 min and 70 min for True Cooling condition only (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!