2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia

30.04.2013 Views

Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 ±0.05°C and 0.41 ±0.06°C in the 1 st and 2 nd rest periods vs. control, respectively (p

Acute and chronic heat exposure ALLEVIATION OF HEAT STRAIN BY COOLING DIFFERENT BODY AREAS DURING RED PEPPER HARVEST Jeong-Wha Choi 1 , Myung-Ju Kim 1 , Joo-Young Lee 2 1 Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA Contact email: leex3140@umn.edu INTRODUCTION One of the heaviest forms of farm work in Korea is the red pepper harvest in summer. The direct sun light, lengthy working hours in a squatting position, the lack of a break, and increased participation by elderly women have all been noted as problems in this work (Choi et al., 2007). The fundamental method to alleviate worker’s heat strain is to reduce the physical thermal burden through mechanization, and improved air-conditioning of occupational fields. However, these ergonomic interventions are not feasible in red pepper fields. Thus, we have developed personal cooling equipment (PCE) with different body surface areas cooled, so that it is more practical for use in harvesting. The trunk is typically cooled using a vest. The head and neck are known as more efficient areas to cool rather than the trunk, arm, hands, leg, and feet (Cohen et al., 1989). The neck presented an advantageous site for heat removal because of the proximity of large blood vessels to the skin in this area (Shvartz, 1976). Based on previous studies, personal devices for cooling the trunk, neck, and head have been developed. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of different types of personal cooling equipments (PCE) on the body’s heat storage, and the alleviation of heat strain during red pepper harvesting, as simulated in a climatic chamber. METHODS Twelve young males (25.4 ±1.6 y, height 173.1 ±5.0 cm, 69.3 ±9.8 kg, 1.86 ±0.14 m 2 ) served as volunteers. Written and informed consent was obtained. The experiment was undertaken under eight conditions: (1) Control (no cooling), (2) Scarf A,( 3) Scarf B, (4) Hat (brimmed hat with face shade and frozen gel on the neck), (5) Vest (cooling vest), (6) Hat+ScarfB, (7) Hat+Vest, and (8) Hat+ScarfB+Vest. The surface area cooled by each condition is given in Table 1. For cooling, frozen gel packs were selected. Subjects wore shirts with long sleeves, long legged training pants, underwear, socks, work gloves, and athletic shoes. The garments worn were based on farm workers’ work wear during the summer (Choi et al., 2007). Table 1. Characteristics of personal cooling equipment (PCE) Scarf A Scarf B Hat Vest Hat c) + ScarfB Hat+ Vest Hat c) +Ves t +ScarfB PCE total mass (g) 74 203 528 807 551 1,155 1,358 SAcooled (cm 2 ) a) 68 154 154 606 154 606 770 SAcooled (% ) b) 0.37 0.83 0.83 3.28 0.83 3.28 4.16 a) Surface area contacted by frozen gel packs; b) Percentage of SAcooled to body surface area; c) A gel pack excluded. The environmental conditions of the climatic chamber were constant at a temperature of 33 ±0.5 o C, 65 ±5% RH air humidity, and 39 ±1 o C black globe temperature (WBGT 33 o C). To simulate the direct sunlight, appropriate lighting was fitted to the ceiling. Before entering the chamber, subjects were fitted with sensors and donned experimental garments. After this, they rested for 1 hour in another chamber, which was kept at a neutral temperature, and then entered the heated chamber. Subjects simulated the red pepper harvest work based on a previous study (Choi et al., 2007). The work lasted 120 min (50min harvest work + 10min 409

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

±0.05°C and 0.41 ±0.06°C in the 1 st and 2 nd rest periods vs. control, respectively (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!