2007, Piran, Slovenia
2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia
Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 Table 1: Experimental conditions for the acclimation series (Griefahn, 1997). Air velocity was 0.5 ms -1 for the radiation and 0.3 ms -1 for the other series. Type of Air Wet-bulb Mean radiant Duration of climate temp. (Ta) temp. (Twb) temp. (Tr) series warm-humid 37°C 32.0°C Tr = Ta 15 days hot-dry 50°C 26.5°C Tr = Ta 15 days radiation 25°C 16.2°C Tr = 90.8 °C 15 days neutral 25°C 19.5°C Tr = Ta 12 days Figure 1: Change in time response of Tco of a person during acclimation to dry heat. The grey shaded area indicates heat exposure time. Ta was 22°C in the first and final resting periods. Table 2: ANOVA results for the development of resting and final Tco over the first 12 days in 4 climates. Nominator and denominator degrees of freedom (df1, df2), F- and p-values. 386 Effect Resting Tco Final Tco df1 df2 F p df1 df2 F p day 11 308 3.22 0.0004 11 308 6.52
Acute and chronic heat exposure Figure 2: Change in resting and final Tco (AM ± SE) during acclimation to different climates. Figure 3: Regression line with 95% prediction limits (dashed lines) for changes in resting and final Tco after acclimation to heat with equivalent WBGT. Dotted lines mark the change in final Tco on average (-0.46°C) and at zero change in resting Tco (-0.29°C). Averaged over the three heat stress conditions, resting Tco was lowered by 0.20°C whereas the final Tco was reduced by 0.46°C at the end of the acclimation procedure (Figure 3). The decrease of the final values without lowering of the resting Tco (0°C) calculated from the regression line in Figure 3 amounted to 0.29°C. Thus, the component of the averaged effect of heat acclimation on final Tco that was attributable to lowering resting Tco could be calculated as 0.46–0.29°C = 0.17°C corresponding to 37% of the effect size. DISCUSSION The results confirm as well the lowering of final rectal temperatures as of resting rectal temperatures during acclimation (Buono et al., 1998). Additionally the analysis quantifies the fraction of lowering of final Tco that may be attributed to the lowering of resting Tco values for the individuals, thus underpinning more anecdotal reports by some other studies. 387
- Page 335 and 336: Cold water immersion REFERENCES Cho
- Page 337 and 338: Cold water immersion were: 1 metre
- Page 339 and 340: Cold water immersion surf beaches.
- Page 341 and 342: Cold water immersion Table 1. Break
- Page 343 and 344: Cold water immersion ARM INSULATION
- Page 345 and 346: Cold water immersion RESULTS Experi
- Page 347 and 348: Cold water immersion thermogenesis
- Page 349 and 350: Cold water immersion The other comp
- Page 351 and 352: Cold water immersion REFERENCES And
- Page 353 and 354: Thermal comfort THERMAL SENSATIONS
- Page 355 and 356: Exer - cise PC Wind (m·s -1 ) 0 ne
- Page 357 and 358: Thermal comfort and heart rate usin
- Page 359 and 360: Thermal comfort A NEW METHOD FOR EV
- Page 361 and 362: Thermal comfort DEVELOPMENT OF AN I
- Page 363 and 364: Thermal comfort DISCUSSION This new
- Page 365 and 366: Thermal comfort limit of exposure d
- Page 367 and 368: Table 2: Statistical summary. Gende
- Page 369 and 370: Thermal comfort comfortable”), wh
- Page 371 and 372: Thermal comfort RELATION BETWEEN TH
- Page 373 and 374: Thermal comfort Figure 2. Skin wett
- Page 375 and 376: Thermal comfort THE EVALUATION OF T
- Page 377 and 378: Temp.ˇ ]˘ Jˇ ^ 42 40 38 36 34 32
- Page 379 and 380: time(min) Thermal comfort WHY DO JA
- Page 381 and 382: Thermal comfort TCT : THERMAL COMFO
- Page 383 and 384: Thermal comfort INTERNATIONAL STAND
- Page 385: Acute and chronic heat exposure PHY
- Page 389 and 390: Acute and chronic heat exposure EFF
- Page 391 and 392: Acute and chronic heat exposure 2.2
- Page 393 and 394: Acute and chronic heat exposure EFF
- Page 395 and 396: Acute and chronic heat exposure A N
- Page 397 and 398: Acute and chronic heat exposure of
- Page 399 and 400: Acute and chronic heat exposure PHY
- Page 401 and 402: Acute and chronic heat exposure Tab
- Page 403 and 404: Acute and chronic heat exposure INT
- Page 405 and 406: probability plot 99 95 80 60 40 20
- Page 407 and 408: Acute and chronic heat exposure HAN
- Page 409 and 410: Acute and chronic heat exposure ALL
- Page 411 and 412: Acute and chronic heat exposure Tab
- Page 413 and 414: Acute and chronic heat exposure UNC
- Page 415 and 416: Thermal Sensation Scale 10 9 8 7 6
- Page 417 and 418: Acute and chronic heat exposure RES
- Page 419 and 420: Acute and chronic heat exposure eve
- Page 421 and 422: Acute and chronic heat exposure 30%
- Page 423 and 424: Acute and chronic heat exposure REF
- Page 425 and 426: RADIANT FLOW THROUGH BICYCLE HELMET
- Page 427 and 428: Figure 2. Difference in heat transf
- Page 429 and 430: Manikins DEVELOPMENT OF A LYING DOW
- Page 431 and 432: IT = 6.45( _ ,Tsk - _ ,Tair)/(Q/A)
- Page 433 and 434: Manikins cases. If the body is even
- Page 435 and 436: Heat balance components 100% 80% 60
Acute and chronic heat exposure<br />
Figure 2: Change in resting and final Tco (AM ± SE) during acclimation to different climates.<br />
Figure 3: Regression line with 95% prediction limits (dashed lines) for changes in resting and<br />
final Tco after acclimation to heat with equivalent WBGT. Dotted lines mark the change in<br />
final Tco on average (-0.46°C) and at zero change in resting Tco (-0.29°C).<br />
Averaged over the three heat stress conditions, resting Tco was lowered by 0.20°C whereas the<br />
final Tco was reduced by 0.46°C at the end of the acclimation procedure (Figure 3). The<br />
decrease of the final values without lowering of the resting Tco (0°C) calculated from the<br />
regression line in Figure 3 amounted to 0.29°C. Thus, the component of the averaged effect of<br />
heat acclimation on final Tco that was attributable to lowering resting Tco could be calculated<br />
as 0.46–0.29°C = 0.17°C corresponding to 37% of the effect size.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The results confirm as well the lowering of final rectal temperatures as of resting rectal<br />
temperatures during acclimation (Buono et al., 1998). Additionally the analysis quantifies the<br />
fraction of lowering of final Tco that may be attributed to the lowering of resting Tco values for<br />
the individuals, thus underpinning more anecdotal reports by some other studies.<br />
387