2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia

30.04.2013 Views

Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 Table 1: Experimental conditions for the acclimation series (Griefahn, 1997). Air velocity was 0.5 ms -1 for the radiation and 0.3 ms -1 for the other series. Type of Air Wet-bulb Mean radiant Duration of climate temp. (Ta) temp. (Twb) temp. (Tr) series warm-humid 37°C 32.0°C Tr = Ta 15 days hot-dry 50°C 26.5°C Tr = Ta 15 days radiation 25°C 16.2°C Tr = 90.8 °C 15 days neutral 25°C 19.5°C Tr = Ta 12 days Figure 1: Change in time response of Tco of a person during acclimation to dry heat. The grey shaded area indicates heat exposure time. Ta was 22°C in the first and final resting periods. Table 2: ANOVA results for the development of resting and final Tco over the first 12 days in 4 climates. Nominator and denominator degrees of freedom (df1, df2), F- and p-values. 386 Effect Resting Tco Final Tco df1 df2 F p df1 df2 F p day 11 308 3.22 0.0004 11 308 6.52

Acute and chronic heat exposure Figure 2: Change in resting and final Tco (AM ± SE) during acclimation to different climates. Figure 3: Regression line with 95% prediction limits (dashed lines) for changes in resting and final Tco after acclimation to heat with equivalent WBGT. Dotted lines mark the change in final Tco on average (-0.46°C) and at zero change in resting Tco (-0.29°C). Averaged over the three heat stress conditions, resting Tco was lowered by 0.20°C whereas the final Tco was reduced by 0.46°C at the end of the acclimation procedure (Figure 3). The decrease of the final values without lowering of the resting Tco (0°C) calculated from the regression line in Figure 3 amounted to 0.29°C. Thus, the component of the averaged effect of heat acclimation on final Tco that was attributable to lowering resting Tco could be calculated as 0.46–0.29°C = 0.17°C corresponding to 37% of the effect size. DISCUSSION The results confirm as well the lowering of final rectal temperatures as of resting rectal temperatures during acclimation (Buono et al., 1998). Additionally the analysis quantifies the fraction of lowering of final Tco that may be attributed to the lowering of resting Tco values for the individuals, thus underpinning more anecdotal reports by some other studies. 387

Acute and chronic heat exposure<br />

Figure 2: Change in resting and final Tco (AM ± SE) during acclimation to different climates.<br />

Figure 3: Regression line with 95% prediction limits (dashed lines) for changes in resting and<br />

final Tco after acclimation to heat with equivalent WBGT. Dotted lines mark the change in<br />

final Tco on average (-0.46°C) and at zero change in resting Tco (-0.29°C).<br />

Averaged over the three heat stress conditions, resting Tco was lowered by 0.20°C whereas the<br />

final Tco was reduced by 0.46°C at the end of the acclimation procedure (Figure 3). The<br />

decrease of the final values without lowering of the resting Tco (0°C) calculated from the<br />

regression line in Figure 3 amounted to 0.29°C. Thus, the component of the averaged effect of<br />

heat acclimation on final Tco that was attributable to lowering resting Tco could be calculated<br />

as 0.46–0.29°C = 0.17°C corresponding to 37% of the effect size.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The results confirm as well the lowering of final rectal temperatures as of resting rectal<br />

temperatures during acclimation (Buono et al., 1998). Additionally the analysis quantifies the<br />

fraction of lowering of final Tco that may be attributed to the lowering of resting Tco values for<br />

the individuals, thus underpinning more anecdotal reports by some other studies.<br />

387

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!