2007, Piran, Slovenia
2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia
Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 Figure 1. The typical example of local warming and cooling of four body regions. The regional characteristics in thermal comfort/discomfort should be helpful to maintain the function of vital organs in each region. During heat exposure (Experiment 1) the face was most sensitive to local warming to produce discomfort, and also to local cooling to produce comfort. This characteristic should be useful to keep the head surface as cool as possible and to avoid heat-induced damage to the brain. On the other hand, during cold exposure (Experiment 2) the abdomen was most sensitive to local cooling to produce discomfort, and also to local warming to produce comfort. These characteristics should be useful to keep the warmth of abdominal surface and aiding in maintaining the functionality of the underlying organs. DISCUSSION The regional difference of temperature sensation and thermal comfort/discomfort was shown by local temperature stimulation of four areas; the face, chest, abdomen and thigh. The face displayed the strongest comfort by cooling during mild hot exposure, and the weakest uncomfortable by cooling during mild cold exposure. The abdomen displayed the weakest comfort by cooling during mild heat exposure, and the strongest comfort by warming during mild cold exposure. REFERENCES Crawshaw L. I., Nadel E. R., Stolwijk J. A. J., 1975. Stamford B.A., Effect of local cooling on sweating rate and cold sensation. Pflugers Arch. 354, 19-27. Cotter J. D., Taylor N. A. S., 2005. The distribution of cutaneous sudomotor and alliesthesial thermosensitivity in mildly heat-stressed humans: an open-loop approach. J Physiol. 565, 335-345. Hensel H., 1981. Thermoreception and temperature regulation. Academic Press Inc, London. Mower G. D., 1976. Perceived intensity of peripheral thermal stimuli is independent of internal body temperature. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 90, 1152-1155. Nadel E. R., Mitchell J.W., Stolwijk J.A., 1973. Differential thermal sensitivity in the human skin. Pflugers Arch. 340, 71-76. Nakamura M., Esaki H., Yoda T., Yasuhara S., Kobayashi A., Konishi A., Osawa N., Nagashima K., Crawshaw L. I., and Kanosue K., 2006. A new system for the analysis of thermal Judgments: Multipoint measurements of skin temperatures and, temperature- related sensations, and their joint visualization. J physiol sci. 56, 459-464. Stevens J. C., Marks L. E., Simonson D. C., 1974. Regional sensitivity and spatial summation in the warmth sense. Physiol Behav. 13, 825-836. 370 Skin Temperature ( ) 40.0 38.0 36.0 34.0 32.0 Ta = 32 - 33 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 time (min) face chest abdomen thigh
Thermal comfort RELATION BETWEEN THERMAL COMFORT LIMIT OF THE WHOLE BODY AND LOCAL HEAT AND WATER VAPOUR TRANSFER Takako Fukazawa*, Yutaka Tochihara, George Havenith Human Thermal Environments Lab., Dept. of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, * Presently with Fukuoka Women’s University, Fukuoka, Japan Contact person: fuka@fwu.ac.jp INTRODUCTION Skin wettedness is one of the most convenient indices for expressing thermal comfort level of the human body. The body does not feel so much discomfort thermally, if skin wettedness is maintained
- Page 319 and 320: Cold physiology REFERENCES Adams, T
- Page 321 and 322: Cold physiology THE EFFECT OF REPEA
- Page 323 and 324: Cold physiology THE EFFECT OF ALTIT
- Page 325 and 326: Cold physiology SKIN SURFACE MENTHO
- Page 327 and 328: Cold physiology COGNITIVE PERFORMAN
- Page 329 and 330: Seconds 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5
- Page 331 and 332: Cold water immersion REFERENCES Mek
- Page 333 and 334: Cold water immersion the formula: M
- Page 335 and 336: Cold water immersion REFERENCES Cho
- Page 337 and 338: Cold water immersion were: 1 metre
- Page 339 and 340: Cold water immersion surf beaches.
- Page 341 and 342: Cold water immersion Table 1. Break
- Page 343 and 344: Cold water immersion ARM INSULATION
- Page 345 and 346: Cold water immersion RESULTS Experi
- Page 347 and 348: Cold water immersion thermogenesis
- Page 349 and 350: Cold water immersion The other comp
- Page 351 and 352: Cold water immersion REFERENCES And
- Page 353 and 354: Thermal comfort THERMAL SENSATIONS
- Page 355 and 356: Exer - cise PC Wind (m·s -1 ) 0 ne
- Page 357 and 358: Thermal comfort and heart rate usin
- Page 359 and 360: Thermal comfort A NEW METHOD FOR EV
- Page 361 and 362: Thermal comfort DEVELOPMENT OF AN I
- Page 363 and 364: Thermal comfort DISCUSSION This new
- Page 365 and 366: Thermal comfort limit of exposure d
- Page 367 and 368: Table 2: Statistical summary. Gende
- Page 369: Thermal comfort comfortable”), wh
- Page 373 and 374: Thermal comfort Figure 2. Skin wett
- Page 375 and 376: Thermal comfort THE EVALUATION OF T
- Page 377 and 378: Temp.ˇ ]˘ Jˇ ^ 42 40 38 36 34 32
- Page 379 and 380: time(min) Thermal comfort WHY DO JA
- Page 381 and 382: Thermal comfort TCT : THERMAL COMFO
- Page 383 and 384: Thermal comfort INTERNATIONAL STAND
- Page 385 and 386: Acute and chronic heat exposure PHY
- Page 387 and 388: Acute and chronic heat exposure Fig
- Page 389 and 390: Acute and chronic heat exposure EFF
- Page 391 and 392: Acute and chronic heat exposure 2.2
- Page 393 and 394: Acute and chronic heat exposure EFF
- Page 395 and 396: Acute and chronic heat exposure A N
- Page 397 and 398: Acute and chronic heat exposure of
- Page 399 and 400: Acute and chronic heat exposure PHY
- Page 401 and 402: Acute and chronic heat exposure Tab
- Page 403 and 404: Acute and chronic heat exposure INT
- Page 405 and 406: probability plot 99 95 80 60 40 20
- Page 407 and 408: Acute and chronic heat exposure HAN
- Page 409 and 410: Acute and chronic heat exposure ALL
- Page 411 and 412: Acute and chronic heat exposure Tab
- Page 413 and 414: Acute and chronic heat exposure UNC
- Page 415 and 416: Thermal Sensation Scale 10 9 8 7 6
- Page 417 and 418: Acute and chronic heat exposure RES
- Page 419 and 420: Acute and chronic heat exposure eve
Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />
Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />
Figure 1. The typical example of local warming and cooling of four body regions.<br />
The regional characteristics in thermal comfort/discomfort should be helpful to maintain the<br />
function of vital organs in each region. During heat exposure (Experiment 1) the face was<br />
most sensitive to local warming to produce discomfort, and also to local cooling to produce<br />
comfort. This characteristic should be useful to keep the head surface as cool as possible and<br />
to avoid heat-induced damage to the brain. On the other hand, during cold exposure<br />
(Experiment 2) the abdomen was most sensitive to local cooling to produce discomfort, and<br />
also to local warming to produce comfort. These characteristics should be useful to keep the<br />
warmth of abdominal surface and aiding in maintaining the functionality of the underlying<br />
organs.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The regional difference of temperature sensation and thermal comfort/discomfort was shown<br />
by local temperature stimulation of four areas; the face, chest, abdomen and thigh. The face<br />
displayed the strongest comfort by cooling during mild hot exposure, and the weakest<br />
uncomfortable by cooling during mild cold exposure. The abdomen displayed the weakest<br />
comfort by cooling during mild heat exposure, and the strongest comfort by warming during<br />
mild cold exposure.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Crawshaw L. I., Nadel E. R., Stolwijk J. A. J., 1975. Stamford B.A., Effect of local cooling<br />
on sweating rate and cold sensation. Pflugers Arch. 354, 19-27.<br />
Cotter J. D., Taylor N. A. S., 2005. The distribution of cutaneous sudomotor and alliesthesial<br />
thermosensitivity in mildly heat-stressed humans: an open-loop approach. J Physiol. 565,<br />
335-345.<br />
Hensel H., 1981. Thermoreception and temperature regulation. Academic Press Inc, London.<br />
Mower G. D., 1976. Perceived intensity of peripheral thermal stimuli is independent of<br />
internal body temperature. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 90, 1152-1155.<br />
Nadel E. R., Mitchell J.W., Stolwijk J.A., 1973. Differential thermal sensitivity in the human<br />
skin. Pflugers Arch. 340, 71-76.<br />
Nakamura M., Esaki H., Yoda T., Yasuhara S., Kobayashi A., Konishi A., Osawa N.,<br />
Nagashima K., Crawshaw L. I., and Kanosue K., 2006. A new system for the analysis of<br />
thermal Judgments: Multipoint measurements of skin temperatures and, temperature-<br />
related sensations, and their joint visualization. J physiol sci. 56, 459-464.<br />
Stevens J. C., Marks L. E., Simonson D. C., 1974. Regional sensitivity and spatial summation<br />
in the warmth sense. Physiol Behav. 13, 825-836.<br />
370<br />
Skin Temperature ( )<br />
40.0<br />
38.0<br />
36.0<br />
34.0<br />
32.0<br />
Ta = 32 - 33<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
time (min)<br />
face<br />
chest<br />
abdomen<br />
thigh