2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia

30.04.2013 Views

Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 Figure 1. The typical example of local warming and cooling of four body regions. The regional characteristics in thermal comfort/discomfort should be helpful to maintain the function of vital organs in each region. During heat exposure (Experiment 1) the face was most sensitive to local warming to produce discomfort, and also to local cooling to produce comfort. This characteristic should be useful to keep the head surface as cool as possible and to avoid heat-induced damage to the brain. On the other hand, during cold exposure (Experiment 2) the abdomen was most sensitive to local cooling to produce discomfort, and also to local warming to produce comfort. These characteristics should be useful to keep the warmth of abdominal surface and aiding in maintaining the functionality of the underlying organs. DISCUSSION The regional difference of temperature sensation and thermal comfort/discomfort was shown by local temperature stimulation of four areas; the face, chest, abdomen and thigh. The face displayed the strongest comfort by cooling during mild hot exposure, and the weakest uncomfortable by cooling during mild cold exposure. The abdomen displayed the weakest comfort by cooling during mild heat exposure, and the strongest comfort by warming during mild cold exposure. REFERENCES Crawshaw L. I., Nadel E. R., Stolwijk J. A. J., 1975. Stamford B.A., Effect of local cooling on sweating rate and cold sensation. Pflugers Arch. 354, 19-27. Cotter J. D., Taylor N. A. S., 2005. The distribution of cutaneous sudomotor and alliesthesial thermosensitivity in mildly heat-stressed humans: an open-loop approach. J Physiol. 565, 335-345. Hensel H., 1981. Thermoreception and temperature regulation. Academic Press Inc, London. Mower G. D., 1976. Perceived intensity of peripheral thermal stimuli is independent of internal body temperature. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 90, 1152-1155. Nadel E. R., Mitchell J.W., Stolwijk J.A., 1973. Differential thermal sensitivity in the human skin. Pflugers Arch. 340, 71-76. Nakamura M., Esaki H., Yoda T., Yasuhara S., Kobayashi A., Konishi A., Osawa N., Nagashima K., Crawshaw L. I., and Kanosue K., 2006. A new system for the analysis of thermal Judgments: Multipoint measurements of skin temperatures and, temperature- related sensations, and their joint visualization. J physiol sci. 56, 459-464. Stevens J. C., Marks L. E., Simonson D. C., 1974. Regional sensitivity and spatial summation in the warmth sense. Physiol Behav. 13, 825-836. 370 Skin Temperature ( ) 40.0 38.0 36.0 34.0 32.0 Ta = 32 - 33 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 time (min) face chest abdomen thigh

Thermal comfort RELATION BETWEEN THERMAL COMFORT LIMIT OF THE WHOLE BODY AND LOCAL HEAT AND WATER VAPOUR TRANSFER Takako Fukazawa*, Yutaka Tochihara, George Havenith Human Thermal Environments Lab., Dept. of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, * Presently with Fukuoka Women’s University, Fukuoka, Japan Contact person: fuka@fwu.ac.jp INTRODUCTION Skin wettedness is one of the most convenient indices for expressing thermal comfort level of the human body. The body does not feel so much discomfort thermally, if skin wettedness is maintained

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

Figure 1. The typical example of local warming and cooling of four body regions.<br />

The regional characteristics in thermal comfort/discomfort should be helpful to maintain the<br />

function of vital organs in each region. During heat exposure (Experiment 1) the face was<br />

most sensitive to local warming to produce discomfort, and also to local cooling to produce<br />

comfort. This characteristic should be useful to keep the head surface as cool as possible and<br />

to avoid heat-induced damage to the brain. On the other hand, during cold exposure<br />

(Experiment 2) the abdomen was most sensitive to local cooling to produce discomfort, and<br />

also to local warming to produce comfort. These characteristics should be useful to keep the<br />

warmth of abdominal surface and aiding in maintaining the functionality of the underlying<br />

organs.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The regional difference of temperature sensation and thermal comfort/discomfort was shown<br />

by local temperature stimulation of four areas; the face, chest, abdomen and thigh. The face<br />

displayed the strongest comfort by cooling during mild hot exposure, and the weakest<br />

uncomfortable by cooling during mild cold exposure. The abdomen displayed the weakest<br />

comfort by cooling during mild heat exposure, and the strongest comfort by warming during<br />

mild cold exposure.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Crawshaw L. I., Nadel E. R., Stolwijk J. A. J., 1975. Stamford B.A., Effect of local cooling<br />

on sweating rate and cold sensation. Pflugers Arch. 354, 19-27.<br />

Cotter J. D., Taylor N. A. S., 2005. The distribution of cutaneous sudomotor and alliesthesial<br />

thermosensitivity in mildly heat-stressed humans: an open-loop approach. J Physiol. 565,<br />

335-345.<br />

Hensel H., 1981. Thermoreception and temperature regulation. Academic Press Inc, London.<br />

Mower G. D., 1976. Perceived intensity of peripheral thermal stimuli is independent of<br />

internal body temperature. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 90, 1152-1155.<br />

Nadel E. R., Mitchell J.W., Stolwijk J.A., 1973. Differential thermal sensitivity in the human<br />

skin. Pflugers Arch. 340, 71-76.<br />

Nakamura M., Esaki H., Yoda T., Yasuhara S., Kobayashi A., Konishi A., Osawa N.,<br />

Nagashima K., Crawshaw L. I., and Kanosue K., 2006. A new system for the analysis of<br />

thermal Judgments: Multipoint measurements of skin temperatures and, temperature-<br />

related sensations, and their joint visualization. J physiol sci. 56, 459-464.<br />

Stevens J. C., Marks L. E., Simonson D. C., 1974. Regional sensitivity and spatial summation<br />

in the warmth sense. Physiol Behav. 13, 825-836.<br />

370<br />

Skin Temperature ( )<br />

40.0<br />

38.0<br />

36.0<br />

34.0<br />

32.0<br />

Ta = 32 - 33<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

time (min)<br />

face<br />

chest<br />

abdomen<br />

thigh

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!