30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

improve the prediction except during standing after TN preconditioning, when nose<br />

temperature and heat flux from forehead improved the model significantly.<br />

Table 1 Pearson correlation coefficients (r) at different exposures to exercise and wind. S = standing,<br />

L = light work, M = moderate work. Preconditioning: TN = thermoneutral, C = cool. Hforehead = heat<br />

flux from the forehead.<br />

Exer-<br />

cise<br />

354<br />

Precond.<br />

Tcheek Tforehead Tnose Hforehead Cooling<br />

rate of<br />

cheek<br />

Cooling<br />

rate of<br />

forehead<br />

Cooling<br />

rate of<br />

nose<br />

S TN 0.694** 0.597** 0.195 0.132 -0.024 -0.132 0.108<br />

S C 0.657** 0.474** 0.091 -0.172 -0.152 -0.189 0.040<br />

L TN 0.510** 0.559** 0.137 -0.270** 0.048 -0.010 0.105<br />

M TN 0.587** 0.469** 0.155 0.071 -0.067 -0.100 -0.025<br />

In the beginning of the wind exposure, all face skin temperatures decreased rapidly. Most of<br />

the cooling took place during the first 10 min of the exposure, and later cooling rate was slow,<br />

as cheek temperature shows in the Table 2. After initial sharp increase, average heat flux of<br />

the body stabilized to the level of 130-200 W·m -2 . Heat flux from the forehead stabilized to<br />

230-430 W·m -2 , depending on wind velocity and exercise.<br />

Table 2 Cooling rate at different combinations of exercise, wind and preconditioning (TN =<br />

thermoneutral, C = cool), mean ± SD, n = 8 in each cell. S = standing, L = light work, M = moderate<br />

work.<br />

Cooling rate (°C/10 min)<br />

Exer- Pre- Wind<br />

cise cond. (m·s -1 0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60<br />

) min min min min min min<br />

S TN 0.2 9.0±1.2 2.2±0.4 1.1±0.6<br />

S TN 1.0 11.2±2.1 2.7±0.8 1.8±0.8<br />

S TN 5.0 19.9±3.3 1.3±1.1 0.9±1.0<br />

S C 0.2 3.0±0.7 0.7±0.4 0.7±0.5<br />

S C 1.0 5.5±1.4 0.9±0.6 1.2±0.8<br />

S C 5.0 10.4±0.8 0.9±1.4 0.5±0.9<br />

L TN 0.2 10.6±2.6 1.8±1.4 -0.5±2.1 1.9±2.1 0.1±0.4 0.1±1.9<br />

L TN 1.0 10.5±1.6 2.4±0.5 1.0±1.3 0.1±1.4 0.5±0.3 0.4±0.5<br />

L TN 5.0 17.3±1.4 1.8±1.3 0.5±2.0 -0.1±2.1 0.6±0.9 0.4±1.1<br />

M TN 0.2 9.7±1.5 1.8±0.4 0.7±0.5 0.6±0.7 0.3±0.3 0.4±0.6<br />

M TN 1.0 12.0±1.5 2.2±0.5 0.1±1.2 0.8±1.4 0.6±0.3 0.1±0.4<br />

M TN 5.0 17.5±1.8 2.0±0.8 -1.4±1.9 1.8±1.8 0.4±0.7 -0.1±0.5<br />

During exposure to wind, thermal sensations of the face reached by 10 min, the typical<br />

thermal sensation and remained at that level: in standing measurements -1 to -2 (slightly cool<br />

to cool) at 0.2-1.0 m·s -1 wind and about -3 (cold) at 5.0 m·s -1 wind. During light exercise, the<br />

sensations stabilized to the level of -1 (slightly cool) at 0.2-1.0 m·s -1 wind and -2 (cool) at 5.0<br />

m·s -1 .<br />

At each exposure, there was a wide individual variation both in thermal sensations and in<br />

facial skin temperatures. Table 3 shows the average cheek skin temperatures during the<br />

exposures, associated with each thermal sensation. Wind velocity had a clear effect on the<br />

association between thermal sensation and cheek skin temperature: with increasing wind<br />

velocity, clearly lower skin temperatures were associated with a given thermal sensation.<br />

Likewise, also exercise decreased the skin temperature producing each thermal sensation.<br />

Table 3 Cheek skin temperatures associated with different thermal sensations (ISO 10551). Values are<br />

mean ± SD (n). S = standing, L = light work, M = moderate work. Preconditioning (PC): TN =<br />

thermoneutral, C = cool.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!