30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

that matched the previous sample pattern. Dependent measures included correct responses,<br />

incorrect responses, time out errors, study time for the sample, and response time. The<br />

delayed match-to-sample test consisted of 20 trials and required about 12 minutes to<br />

complete.<br />

Grammatical Reasoning. The Baddeley Grammatical Reasoning Test was an assessment of<br />

language based reasoning. The test consisted of judging whether or not a series of<br />

grammatical transformations presented in sentence form were true or false. The volunteer<br />

completed as many answers as possible during a three-minute period. The number of items<br />

attempted within the three-minute period and the percent correct were used as indices of<br />

verbal reasoning ability. This test took approximately 4 minutes to complete.<br />

Digit Symbol Substitution Test. This test measures coding ability and is a function of shortterm<br />

memory. Volunteers were presented with a worksheet containing the numbers 1-9 and<br />

an associated code symbol (e.g., X, =, -, etc). The worksheet consisted of a series of numbers<br />

that needed to be coded. Each number had a blank box underneath in which to write the<br />

appropriate code symbol. The volunteer completed as many symbol substitutions as possible<br />

within a 90 second time period. The number of items attempted within the period and the<br />

percent correct were used as indices of the ability to process codes rapidly and accurately.<br />

This test took approximately 2-3 minutes to complete.<br />

RESULTS<br />

There were no differences in cognitive function due to the rate of core temperature cooling so<br />

all trials were collapsed and responses analyzed with dependent t-tests (before immersion vs.<br />

during immersion). The following significant findings were observed (Figures 1, 2, and 3).<br />

These responses were similar whether cognitive performance was measured at 36.5°C or after<br />

2 hours (Tre = 36.67°C, 8 trials).<br />

Milliseconds<br />

328<br />

600<br />

550<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

4-Choice Reaction Time<br />

Before During<br />

*<br />

Figure 1. Four-choice reaction time before and during cold-water immersion. Asterisk<br />

denotes significant difference (p = 0.008) between measurement times.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!