30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cold physiology<br />

COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE IS ENHANCED DURING COLD-<br />

WATER IMMERSION AND EXERCISE<br />

John W. Castellani, Ingrid V. Sils, Myra Reese, and Catherine O’Brien<br />

Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division<br />

U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine<br />

Natick, Massachusetts 01760 USA<br />

Contact person: john.castellani@us.army.mil<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Studies suggest that cognitive performance degrades as core temperature falls during resting<br />

studies. However, it is unknown how the rate of cooling affects cognitive performance at a<br />

specific core temperature. The purpose of this study was to determine if the rate of core<br />

temperature cooling affects cognitive function. We hypothesized that cognitive function<br />

would be impaired to a greater degree during cold-water immersion when the rate of rectal<br />

temperature (Tre) cooling was slower compared to trials where core temperature fell faster.<br />

METHODS<br />

Ten men (20 ± 2 yr, 178 ± 7 cm height, 73.4 ± 7.1 kg body weight, VO2peak, 47.2 ± 4.8 ml·kg -<br />

1 ·min -1 , and 15.5 ± 3.9 % body fat) completed 8 different, randomized, trials (which varied in<br />

the rate of cooling) in either 10 or 15°C water, in either chest (C) or waist (W) deep water<br />

while walking at either 0.44 or 0.88 m·s -1 . Subjects also completed a control trial where they<br />

were not immersed. Cognitive function was measured using standard performance tests: 4choice<br />

reaction time, match-to-sample, visual vigilance, grammatical reasoning, and symbol<br />

substitution. Tests were conducted before immersion and during immersion when Tre reached<br />

36.5°C or 2 hours had elapsed. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Data are presented as mean<br />

± SD.<br />

Visual Vigilance. This test of visual vigilance was designed to resemble military tasks<br />

requiring sustained scanning of the visual environment for infrequent, difficult to detect<br />

stimuli such as those during sentry duty. The task required the participant to detect a small,<br />

faint stimulus that randomly appeared for a second at various locations on the computer<br />

screen On the average, presentation of a stimulus occurred once a minute. The participant<br />

was told to respond as quickly as possible when a stimulus was detected. Dependent measures<br />

included correct detections and the response time. Responses made before (or after) stimulus<br />

occurrence were recorded as false alarms. The duration of this test was 20 minutes.<br />

Four-Choice Visual Reaction Time. Volunteers were presented with a series of visual stimuli<br />

at one of four different spatial locations on the computer screen. The volunteer's task was to<br />

indicate the correct spatial location of each stimulus by striking one of four corresponding<br />

keys on the computer keyboard. Dependent measures included the response latency for each<br />

trial, premature errors (responding before the presentation of the stimulus), errors of omission<br />

(response latency >1 sec) and errors of commission (hitting the wrong key). The duration of<br />

this test was approximately 5 minutes.<br />

Delayed Match-to-Sample. This is a subtest of the Walter Reed Performance Assessment<br />

Battery. During this test, a sample pattern of 36 red and green grid squares was presented on<br />

the computer display. The volunteer studied this pattern and then pressed a key on the<br />

keyboard. The sample pattern disappeared and the screen was blank for either 8 or 16<br />

seconds ("delay"). Next, two patterns were presented and the volunteer selected the pattern<br />

327

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!