30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

and latex gloves were placed over the top. Immediately following the sample period the pads<br />

were returned to their airtight bags and sealed. The cotton gloves were cut along the borders<br />

of the palm, back of the hand, and the fingers, before being placed in individual airtight bags.<br />

Between the two sample periods, pre-weighed wristbands and absorbent pads were applied to<br />

each wrist on the subject. Following the 60-min squash session, the weight and aural canal<br />

temperature of the subject were recorded. On completion of the experimentation all pads were<br />

reweighed inside their airtight bags. The surface area of each pad was calculated from the dry<br />

weight of each pad and the weight per unit of surface area of a piece of control material. The<br />

sweat rate was calculated in grams per meter square per hour (g.m -2 .h -1 ) using the weight<br />

change of the pad, the pad surface area, and the length of time the pad was applied to the skin.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The data indicate large variation in both individual regional sweat rates and gross sweat loss.<br />

For example, sweat rates for the back of the right hand varied from 160 to 940 g.m -2 .h -1<br />

between subjects, whilst those for the right posterior lower arm range from 184 to 989 g.m -2 .h -<br />

1 . This large variation in sweat rate can be seen across all of the regions which were tested.<br />

Individual gross sweat loss ranged from 278 to 997 g.m -2 .h -1 . Figure 1 illustrates the median<br />

sweat rates for the arms and hands during both sample periods, in addition to the wristbands<br />

which were worn between the two samples. Sweat rates were higher on the arms than the<br />

hands, however the wrists showed the highest values.<br />

Sweat Rate (g.m -2 .h -1 Sweat Rate (g.m )<br />

-2 .h -1 )<br />

286<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Arms<br />

r. r. ant ant upper upper<br />

l. l. ant ant upper upper<br />

r. r. pos pos upper upper<br />

l.pos l.pos upper upper<br />

r.ant r.ant lower lower<br />

l.ant l.ant lower lower<br />

r. r. pos pos lower lower<br />

l. l. pos pos lower lower<br />

r. r. thumb thumb<br />

l. l. thumb thumb<br />

r.finger r.finger 11<br />

l.finger l.finger 11<br />

r. r. finger finger 22<br />

l. l. finger finger 22<br />

r. r. finger finger 33<br />

l. l. finger finger 33<br />

r. r. finger finger 44<br />

l. l. finger finger 44<br />

r. r. palm palm<br />

l. l. palm palm<br />

r. r. hand hand<br />

l.hand l.hand<br />

r. r. wrist wrist<br />

l. l. wrist wrist<br />

Pad Location<br />

Sample 1 (25 min)<br />

Sample 2 (50 min)<br />

Hands<br />

Wrists<br />

Figure 1. Median sweat rates (g.m -2 .h -1 ) and interquartile range for the arms and hands<br />

during a 60-min squash session, with the wristbands applied between samples.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!