30.04.2013 Views

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

2007, Piran, Slovenia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />

Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />

Thermal and physical load: The study was conducted in a climatic chamber (40 o C, relative<br />

humidity 30%, wind speed 02 m·s -1 ), while participants walked on a treadmill (3 km · h -1 ).<br />

This exercise was continued until one of the following limits was reached: core temperature<br />

of 38.0 o C, heart rate of 80% of the individual maximum heart rate, 100% relative humidity<br />

measured at two places (under protective clothing), or subjective signs of fatigue.<br />

Measurements: Core temperature in the external auditory canal (Tac), skin temperature at four<br />

places [3], heart rate (HR) as well as the temperature and relative humidity under clothing at<br />

four places (right chest, left shoulder, left arm, right thigh) were monitored every minute.<br />

Mean weighted skin temperature (Tsk) was calculated according to EN ISO 9886:2004 [3].<br />

Body and clothing weights were determined before and after exposure. Sweat loss was<br />

calculated as a difference between body weight after and before the exposure. Subjective<br />

ratings of climate [4], skin wetness [5] and perceived exertion were collected every 10<br />

minutes.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Studies were conducted in April this year so the result are not yet available. The results will<br />

be presented at the conference.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Conclusions from the study indicating which kind of modifications of the basic model of<br />

protective clothing L2 was the most comfortable for users will be presented at the conference.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Holmer I., 1995. Protective clothing and heat stress. Ergonomics 38(1),166-182.<br />

[2] Marszałek A., 2006. Physiological response during exercise in a hot environment in<br />

chemical protective clothing. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Protective<br />

Clothing (ECPC) and NOKOBETEF 8, Gdynia, Poland, May 10-12.<br />

[3] EN ISO 9886:2004 Ergonomics – Evaluation of thermal strain by physiological<br />

measurements.<br />

[4] EN ISO 10551:2001 Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Assessment of the<br />

influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales.<br />

[5] Nielsen R., Endrusick T.L. 1990. Sensations of temperature and humidity during<br />

alternative work/rest and influence of underwear knit structure. Ergonomics 33(2), 221-<br />

234<br />

228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!