30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4. Quantifying entanglement via purity measures: the average logarithmic negativity 77<br />

privilege the role of S2. In fact, S2 can indeed, assuming some prior knowledge<br />

about the state (essentially, its Gaussian character), be measured through conceivable<br />

direct methods, in particular by means of single-photon detection schemes [87]<br />

(of which preliminary experimental verifications are available [263]) or of the upcoming<br />

quantum network architectures [80, 86, 165]. Very recently, a scheme to<br />

locally measure all symplectic invariants (and hence the entanglement) of two-mode<br />

Gaussian states has been proposed, based on number and purity measurements<br />

[195]. Notice that no complete homodyne reconstruction [62] of the CM is needed<br />

in all those schemes.<br />

As already anticipated, for p = 2 we can provide analytical expressions for the<br />

extremal entanglement in the space of global and marginal purities [GA2]<br />

<br />

log −<br />

EN max(µ1,2, µ) = −<br />

1<br />

µ +<br />

EN min(µ1,2, µ) = −<br />

log<br />

<br />

µ1+µ2<br />

2µ 2 1 µ2 2<br />

1<br />

µ 2 +<br />

1<br />

1<br />

µ 2 −<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2µ 2 − 1<br />

2 −<br />

<br />

µ1 + µ2 −<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

µ 2 1<br />

(µ1 + µ2) 2 − 4µ2 1 µ2 2<br />

µ<br />

<br />

,<br />

(4.58)<br />

+ 1<br />

µ 2 −<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2µ 2 − 1<br />

2 2 − 1<br />

µ 2<br />

<br />

.<br />

(4.59)<br />

Consequently, both the average logarithmic negativity δ ĒN , defined in Eq. (4.56),<br />

and the relative error δ ĒN , given by Eq. (4.57), can be easily evaluated in terms<br />

of the purities. The relative error is plotted in Fig. 4.6(b) for symmetric states as a<br />

function of the ratio SLi /SL. Notice, as already pointed out in the general instance<br />

of arbitrary p, how the error decays exponentially. In particular, it falls below 5% in<br />

the range SL < SLi (µ > µi), which excludes at most very weakly entangled states<br />

(states with EN 1). 9 Let us remark that the accuracy of estimating entanglement<br />

by the average logarithmic negativity proves even better in the nonsymmetric case<br />

µ1 = µ2, essentially because the maximal allowed entanglement decreases with the<br />

difference between the marginals, as shown in Fig. 4.1(a).<br />

The above analysis proves that the average logarithmic negativity ĒN is a reliable<br />

estimate of the logarithmic negativity EN , improving as the entanglement<br />

increases [GA2, GA3]. This allows for an accurate quantification of CV entanglement<br />

by knowledge of the global and marginal purities. As we already mentioned,<br />

the latter quantities may be in turn amenable to direct experimental determination<br />

by exploiting recent single-photon-detection proposals [87] or in general interferometric<br />

quantum-network setups. Let us stress, even though quite obvious, that<br />

the estimate becomes indeed an exact quantification in the two crucial instances<br />

of GMEMS (nonsymmetric thermal squeezed states) and GLEMS (mixed states of<br />

partial minimum uncertainty), whose logarithmic negativity is completely determined<br />

as a function of the three purities alone, see Eqs. (4.58, 4.59).<br />

9 It is straightforward to verify that, in the instance of two-mode squeezed thermal (symmetric)<br />

states, such a condition corresponds to cosh(2r) µ 1/4 . This constraint can be easily<br />

satisfied with the present experimental technology: even for the quite unfavorable case µ = 0.5<br />

the squeezing parameter needed is just r 0.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!