30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 4. Two-mode entanglement<br />

Eqs. (1.13,2.36,4.4) provide an explicit expression for any Sp as a function of µ and<br />

∆. Such an expression can be exploited to study the behavior of ∆ as a function<br />

of the global purity µ, at fixed marginals and global Sp (from now on we will omit<br />

the explicit reference to fixed marginals). One has<br />

<br />

∂µ <br />

<br />

∂∆<br />

Sp<br />

= − 2<br />

R 2<br />

<br />

∂R <br />

<br />

∂∆<br />

Sp<br />

where we have defined the inverse participation ratio<br />

and the remaining quantities Np and Dp read<br />

Np(∆, R) =<br />

−<br />

Dp(∆, R) =<br />

= 2<br />

R2 ∂Sp/∂∆| R<br />

∂Sp/∂R| ∆<br />

= 2<br />

R2 Np(∆, R)<br />

,<br />

Dp(∆, R)<br />

(4.42)<br />

R ≡ 2<br />

µ , (4.43)<br />

<br />

(R + 2 + 2 √ ∆ + R) p−1 − (R + 2 − 2 √ ∆ + R) p−1 √<br />

∆ − R<br />

<br />

(R − 2 + 2 √ ∆ − R) p−1 − (R − 2 − 2 √ ∆ − R) p−1 √<br />

∆ + R ,<br />

<br />

( √ ∆ + R + 1)(R + 2 + 2 √ ∆ + R) p−1<br />

+ ( √ ∆ + R − 1)(R + 2 − 2 √ ∆ + R) p−1 √<br />

∆ − R<br />

<br />

− ( √ ∆ − R + 1)(R − 2 − 2 √ ∆ − R) p−1<br />

+ ( √ ∆ − R − 1)(R − 2 + 2 √ ∆ − R) p−1 √ ∆ + R . (4.44)<br />

Now, it is easily shown that the ratio Np(∆, R)/Dp(∆, R) is increasing with increasing<br />

p and has a zero at p = 2 for any ∆, R; in particular, its absolute minimum<br />

(−1) is reached in the limit (∆ → 2, R → 2, p → 1). Thus the derivative Eq. (4.42)<br />

is negative for p < 2, null for p = 2 (in this case ∆ and S2 = 1 − µ are of course regarded<br />

as independent variables) and positive for p > 2. This implies that, for given<br />

marginals, keeping fixed any global Sp for p < 2 the minimum (maximum) value of<br />

∆ corresponds to the maximum (minimum) value of the global purity µ. Instead,<br />

by keeping fixed any global Sp for p > 2 the minimum of ∆ is always attained at<br />

the minimum of the global purity µ. In other words, for fixed marginal entropies<br />

and global SV , the quantity ∆ decreases with increasing global purity, while for<br />

fixed marginal properties and global Sp (p > 2), ∆ increases with increasing µ.<br />

This observation allows to determine rather straightforwardly the states with<br />

extremal ∆. They are extremally entangled states because, for fixed global and<br />

marginal entropies, the logarithmic negativity of a state is determined only by the<br />

one remaining independent global symplectic invariant, represented by ∆ in our<br />

choice of parametrization. If, for the moment being, we neglect the fixed local<br />

purities, then the states with maximal ∆ are the states with minimal (maximal) µ<br />

for a given global Sp with p < 2 (p > 2) (see Sec. 2.3.2 and Fig. 2.1). As found in<br />

Sec. 2.3.2, such states are minimum-uncertainty two-mode states with mixedness<br />

concentrated in one quadrature. We have shown in Sec. 4.3.3.1 that they correspond<br />

to Gaussian least entangled mixed states (GLEMS) whose standard form is given<br />

by Eq. (4.39). As can be seen from Eq. (4.39), these states are consistent with<br />

any legitimate physical value of the local invariants µ1,2. We therefore conclude

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!