30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 2. Gaussian states: structural properties<br />

Standard form.— Let σβN be the CM of a fully symmetric N-mode Gaussian state.<br />

The 2×2 blocks β and ζ of σβN , defined by Eq. (2.60), can be brought by means of<br />

local, single-mode symplectic operations S ∈ Sp ⊕N<br />

(2,) into the form β = diag (b, b)<br />

and ζ = diag (z1, z2).<br />

In other words, the standard form of fully symmetric N-mode states is such<br />

that any reduced two-mode state is symmetric and in standard form, see Eq. (2.54).<br />

Symplectic degeneracy.— The symplectic spectrum of σβN is (N − 1)-times degenerate.<br />

The two symplectic eigenvalues of σβN , ν −<br />

β and ν+<br />

βN , read<br />

where ν −<br />

β<br />

ν −<br />

β = (b − z1)(b − z2) ,<br />

ν +<br />

β N = (b + (N − 1)z1)(b + (N − 1)z2) ,<br />

is the (N − 1)-times degenerate eigenvalue.<br />

(2.61)<br />

Obviously, analogous results hold for the M-mode CM σ α M of Eq. (2.60), whose<br />

2 × 2 submatrices can be brought to the form α = diag (a, a) and ε = diag (e1, e2)<br />

and whose (M − 1)-times degenerate symplectic spectrum reads<br />

ν − α = (a − e1)(a − e2) ,<br />

ν +<br />

α M = (a + (M − 1)e1)(a + (M − 1)e2) .<br />

(2.62)<br />

2.4.3.2. Bisymmetric M × N Gaussian states. Let us now generalize this analysis to<br />

the (M + N)-mode Gaussian states, whose CM σ result from a correlated combi-<br />

nation of the fully symmetric blocks σ α M and σ β N ,<br />

<br />

σαM Γ<br />

σ =<br />

Γ T<br />

σ β N<br />

<br />

, (2.63)<br />

where Γ is a 2M × 2N real matrix formed by identical 2 × 2 blocks γ. Clearly,<br />

Γ is responsible of the correlations existing between the M-mode and the N-mode<br />

parties. Once again, the identity of the submatrices γ is a consequence of the local<br />

invariance under mode exchange, internal to the M-mode and N-mode parties.<br />

States of the form of Eq. (2.63) will be henceforth referred to as “bisymmetric”<br />

[GA4, GA5]. A significant insight into bisymmetric multimode Gaussian states can<br />

be gained by studying the symplectic spectrum of σ and comparing it to the ones<br />

of σ α M and σ β N .<br />

Symplectic degeneracy.— The symplectic spectrum of the CM σ Eq. (2.63) of a<br />

bisymmetric (M + N)-mode Gaussian state includes two degenerate eigenvalues,<br />

with multiplicities M − 1 and N − 1. Such eigenvalues coincide, respectively, with<br />

the degenerate eigenvalue ν − α of the reduced CM σ α M , and with the degenerate<br />

eigenvalue ν −<br />

β of the reduced CM σ β N .<br />

Equipped with these results, we are now in a position to show the following<br />

central result [GA5], which applies to all (generally mixed) bisymmetric Gaussian<br />

states, and is somehow analogous to — but independent of — the phase-space<br />

Schmidt decomposition of pure Gaussian states (and of mixed states with fully<br />

degenerate symplectic spectrum).<br />

Unitary localization of bisymmetric states.— The bisymmetric (M +N)-mode Gaussian<br />

state with CM σ, Eq. (2.63) can be brought, by means of a local unitary (symplectic)<br />

operation with respect to the M × N bipartition with reduced CMs σ α M<br />

and σ β N , to a tensor product of M + N − 2 single-mode uncorrelated states, and of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!