30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 2. Gaussian states: structural properties<br />

respect to an arbitrary A|B bipartition, therefore, the CM σp of any pure N-mode<br />

Gaussian state is locally equivalent to the form σ p<br />

S = (SA ⊕ SB)σp (SA ⊕ SB) T ,<br />

with<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

σ p<br />

S =<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

NA<br />

<br />

C1 ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ C2 ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄<br />

. .. ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄ ⋄ CNA<br />

S1 ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ S2 ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄<br />

. .. ⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

SNA<br />

⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

NB<br />

<br />

S1 ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ S2 ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄<br />

. .. ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄<br />

C1<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

SNA<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄<br />

⋄ C2 ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄<br />

. .. ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄ ⋄ CNA ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ . . . ⋄<br />

⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ ⋄ <br />

⎟ . (2.57)<br />

⎟<br />

⎠<br />

Here each element denotes a 2 × 2 submatrix, in particular the diamonds (⋄) correspond<br />

to null matrices, to the identity matrix, and<br />

<br />

νk 0<br />

ν2 Ck =<br />

, Sk = k − 1 0<br />

0 νk<br />

0 − ν2 <br />

.<br />

k − 1<br />

The matrices Ck contain the symplectic eigenvalues νk = 1 of both reduced CMs.<br />

By expressing them in terms of hyperbolic functions, νk = cosh(2rk) and by comparison<br />

with Eq. (2.22), one finds that each two-mode CM<br />

<br />

Ck Sk<br />

,<br />

Sk Ck<br />

encoding correlations between a single mode from SA and a single mode from SB, is<br />

a two-mode squeezed state with squeezing rk. Therefore, the Schmidt form of a pure<br />

N-mode Gaussian state with respect to a NA ×NB bipartition (with N = NA +NB,<br />

NB ≥ NA) is that of a direct sum [116, 92]<br />

<br />

σ p<br />

S =<br />

NA<br />

i=1<br />

σ sq<br />

i,j (ri)<br />

N<br />

k=2NA+1<br />

σ 0 k , (2.58)<br />

where mode i ∈ SA, mode j ≡ i + NA ∈ SB, and σ 0 k = 2 is the CM of the vacuum<br />

state of mode k ∈ SB. This corresponds, on the Hilbert space level, to the product<br />

of two-mode squeezed states, tensor additional uncorrelated vacuum modes in the<br />

higher-dimensional subsystem (SB in our notation) [29]. The phase-space Schmidt<br />

decomposition is a very useful tool both for the understanding of the structural<br />

features of Gaussian states in the CM formalism, and for the evaluation of their<br />

entanglement properties. Notice that the validity of such a decomposition can be<br />

extended to mixed states with fully degenerate symplectic spectrum, i.e. Williamson<br />

normal form proportional to the identity [29, 92].<br />

As a straightforward consequence of Eq. (2.58), any pure two-mode Gaussian<br />

state is equivalent, up to local unitary operations, to a two-mode squeezed state<br />

of the form Eq. (2.22), therefore the minimum number of local-unitary degrees of<br />

freedom for pure Gaussian states with N = 2 is just one (the squeezing degree), in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!