30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 2. Gaussian states: structural properties<br />

the non-local blocks, while leaving the local ones unaffected (as they are proportional<br />

to the identity). Different sets of N entries in the non-diagonal sub-matrices<br />

can be thus set to zero. For an even total number of modes, all the non-diagonal<br />

blocks σ12, σ34,. . . ,σ (N−1)N describing the correlations between disjoint pairs of<br />

quadratures can be diagonalized (leading to the singular-value diagonal form of each<br />

block), with no conditions on all the other blocks. For an odd number of modes,<br />

after the diagonalization of the blocks relating disjoint quadratures, a further nondiagonal<br />

block involving the last mode (say, σ1N) can be put in triangular form by<br />

a rotation on the last mode.<br />

Notice finally that the locally invariant degrees of freedom of a generic Gaussian<br />

state of N modes are (2N +1)N −3N = 2N 2 −2N, as follows from the subtraction of<br />

the number of free parameters of the local symplectics from the one of a generic state<br />

— with an obvious exception for N = 1, for which the number of free parameters<br />

is 1, due to the rotational invariance of single-mode Williamson forms (see the<br />

discussion about the vacuum state in Appendix A.2.1).<br />

2.4.1.1. Standard form of two-mode Gaussian states. According to the above counting<br />

argument, an arbitrary (mixed) Gaussian state of two modes can be described, up<br />

to local unitary operations, by 4 parameters. Let us briefly discuss this instance<br />

explicitly, to acquaint the reader with the symplectic playground, and since twomode<br />

Gaussian states are the paradigmatic examples of bipartite entangled states<br />

of CV systems.<br />

The expression of the two-mode CM σ in terms of the three 2 × 2 matrices α,<br />

β, γ, that will be useful in the following, takes the form [see Eq. (2.20)]<br />

<br />

α γ<br />

σ =<br />

γT <br />

. (2.53)<br />

β<br />

For any two-mode CM σ there is a local symplectic operation Sl = S1 ⊕ S2 which<br />

brings σ in the standard form σsf [218, 70]<br />

S T ⎛<br />

a<br />

⎜<br />

l σSl = σsf ≡ ⎜ 0<br />

⎝ c+<br />

0<br />

a<br />

0<br />

c+<br />

0<br />

b<br />

0<br />

c−<br />

0<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎠ . (2.54)<br />

0 c− 0 b<br />

States whose standard form fulfills a = b are said to be symmetric. The covariances<br />

a, b, c+, and c− are determined by the four local symplectic invariants Detσ =<br />

(ab − c 2 +)(ab − c 2 −), Detα = a 2 , Detβ = b 2 , Detγ = c+c−. Therefore, the standard<br />

form corresponding to any CM is unique (up to a common sign flip in c− and c+).<br />

Entanglement of two-mode Gaussian states is the topic of Chapter 4.<br />

2.4.2. Pure states<br />

The CM σ p of a generic N-mode pure Gaussian state satisfies the condition<br />

− Ω σ p Ω σ p = . (2.55)<br />

This follows from the Williamson normal-mode decomposition of the CM, σ p =<br />

SS T , where S is a symplectic transformation. Namely,<br />

−Ωσ p Ωσ p = −ΩSS T ΩSS T = −ΩSΩS T = −ΩΩ = .<br />

The matrix identity Eq. (2.55) provides a set of (not mutually independent) polynomial<br />

equations that the elements of a generic CM have to fulfill in order to represent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!