ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36 2. Gaussian states: structural properties<br />
equilibrium at a temperature Tk, characterized by an average number of thermal<br />
photons ¯nk which obeys Bose-Einstein statistics,<br />
¯nk = νk − 1<br />
2<br />
=<br />
1<br />
. (2.32)<br />
exp − 1<br />
ωk<br />
kBTk<br />
The N quantities νk’s form the symplectic spectrum of the CM σ, and are<br />
invariant under the action of global symplectic transformations on the matrix σ.<br />
The symplectic eigenvalues can be computed as the orthogonal eigenvalues of the<br />
matrix |iΩσ| [207] and are thus determined by N invariants of the characteristic<br />
polynomial of such a matrix [208]. One global symplectic invariant is simply the<br />
determinant of the CM (whose invariance is a consequence of the fact that Det S = 1<br />
∀S ∈ Sp (2N,)), which once computed in the Williamson diagonal form reads<br />
Det σ =<br />
N<br />
k=1<br />
ν 2 k . (2.33)<br />
Another important invariant under global symplectic operations is the so-called<br />
seralian ∆ [GA6], defined as the sum of the determinants of all 2 × 2 submatrices<br />
of a CM σ, Eq. (2.20), which can be readily computed in terms of its symplectic<br />
eigenvalues as<br />
N<br />
∆(σ) = ν 2 k . (2.34)<br />
The invariance of ∆σ in the multimode case [208] follows from its invariance in the<br />
case of two-mode states, proved in Ref. [211], and from the fact that any symplectic<br />
transformation can be decomposed as the product of two-mode transformations<br />
[123].<br />
2.2.2.2. Symplectic representation of the uncertainty principle. The symplectic eigenvalues<br />
νk encode essential information on the Gaussian state σ and provide powerful,<br />
simple ways to express its fundamental properties [211]. For instance, let us<br />
consider the uncertainty relation (2.19). Since the inverse of a symplectic operation<br />
is itself symplectic, one has from Eq. (2.23), S −1T ΩS −1 = Ω, so that Ineq. (2.19) is<br />
equivalent to ν + iΩ ≥ 0. In terms of the symplectic eigenvalues νk the uncertainty<br />
relation then simply reads<br />
νk ≥ 1 . (2.35)<br />
Inequality (2.35) is completely equivalent to the uncertainty relation (2.19) provided<br />
that the CM σ satisfies σ ≥ 0.<br />
We can, without loss of generality, rearrange the modes of a N-mode state such<br />
that the corresponding symplectic eigenvalues are sorted in ascending order<br />
k=1<br />
ν− ≡ ν1 ≤ ν2 ≤ . . . ≤ νN−1 ≤ νN ≡ ν+ .<br />
With this notation, the uncertainty relation reduces to ν− ≥ 1. We remark that the<br />
full saturation of the uncertainty principle can only be achieved by pure N-mode<br />
Gaussian states, for which<br />
νi = 1 ∀i = 1, . . . , N ,<br />
meaning that the Williamson normal form of any pure Gaussian state is the vacuum<br />
|0〉 of the N-mode Hilbert space H . Instead, mixed states such that νi≤k = 1 and<br />
νi>k > 1, with 1 ≤ k ≤ N, only partially saturate the uncertainty principle, with