30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36 2. Gaussian states: structural properties<br />

equilibrium at a temperature Tk, characterized by an average number of thermal<br />

photons ¯nk which obeys Bose-Einstein statistics,<br />

¯nk = νk − 1<br />

2<br />

=<br />

1<br />

. (2.32)<br />

exp − 1<br />

ωk<br />

kBTk<br />

The N quantities νk’s form the symplectic spectrum of the CM σ, and are<br />

invariant under the action of global symplectic transformations on the matrix σ.<br />

The symplectic eigenvalues can be computed as the orthogonal eigenvalues of the<br />

matrix |iΩσ| [207] and are thus determined by N invariants of the characteristic<br />

polynomial of such a matrix [208]. One global symplectic invariant is simply the<br />

determinant of the CM (whose invariance is a consequence of the fact that Det S = 1<br />

∀S ∈ Sp (2N,)), which once computed in the Williamson diagonal form reads<br />

Det σ =<br />

N<br />

k=1<br />

ν 2 k . (2.33)<br />

Another important invariant under global symplectic operations is the so-called<br />

seralian ∆ [GA6], defined as the sum of the determinants of all 2 × 2 submatrices<br />

of a CM σ, Eq. (2.20), which can be readily computed in terms of its symplectic<br />

eigenvalues as<br />

N<br />

∆(σ) = ν 2 k . (2.34)<br />

The invariance of ∆σ in the multimode case [208] follows from its invariance in the<br />

case of two-mode states, proved in Ref. [211], and from the fact that any symplectic<br />

transformation can be decomposed as the product of two-mode transformations<br />

[123].<br />

2.2.2.2. Symplectic representation of the uncertainty principle. The symplectic eigenvalues<br />

νk encode essential information on the Gaussian state σ and provide powerful,<br />

simple ways to express its fundamental properties [211]. For instance, let us<br />

consider the uncertainty relation (2.19). Since the inverse of a symplectic operation<br />

is itself symplectic, one has from Eq. (2.23), S −1T ΩS −1 = Ω, so that Ineq. (2.19) is<br />

equivalent to ν + iΩ ≥ 0. In terms of the symplectic eigenvalues νk the uncertainty<br />

relation then simply reads<br />

νk ≥ 1 . (2.35)<br />

Inequality (2.35) is completely equivalent to the uncertainty relation (2.19) provided<br />

that the CM σ satisfies σ ≥ 0.<br />

We can, without loss of generality, rearrange the modes of a N-mode state such<br />

that the corresponding symplectic eigenvalues are sorted in ascending order<br />

k=1<br />

ν− ≡ ν1 ≤ ν2 ≤ . . . ≤ νN−1 ≤ νN ≡ ν+ .<br />

With this notation, the uncertainty relation reduces to ν− ≥ 1. We remark that the<br />

full saturation of the uncertainty principle can only be achieved by pure N-mode<br />

Gaussian states, for which<br />

νi = 1 ∀i = 1, . . . , N ,<br />

meaning that the Williamson normal form of any pure Gaussian state is the vacuum<br />

|0〉 of the N-mode Hilbert space H . Instead, mixed states such that νi≤k = 1 and<br />

νi>k > 1, with 1 ≤ k ≤ N, only partially saturate the uncertainty principle, with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!