ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
34 2. Gaussian states: structural properties<br />
The CM of N-mode coherent states (including the vacuum) is instead the 2N ×<br />
2N identity matrix.<br />
2.2.2. Symplectic operations<br />
A major role in the theoretical and experimental manipulation of Gaussian states<br />
is played by unitary operations which preserve the Gaussian character of the states<br />
on which they act. Such operations are all those generated by Hamiltonian terms at<br />
most quadratic in the field operators. As a consequence of the Stone-Von Neumann<br />
theorem, the so-called metaplectic representation [219] entails that any such unitary<br />
operation at the Hilbert space level corresponds, in phase space, to a symplectic<br />
transformation, i.e. to a linear transformation S which preserves the symplectic<br />
form Ω, so that<br />
S T ΩS = Ω . (2.23)<br />
Symplectic transformations on a 2N-dimensional phase space form the (real) symplectic<br />
group Sp (2N,) [10]. Such transformations act linearly on first moments and<br />
by congruence on CMs, σ ↦→ SσS T . Eq. (2.23) implies Det S = 1, ∀ S ∈ Sp (2N,).<br />
Ideal beam-splitters, phase shifters and squeezers are all described by some kind of<br />
symplectic transformation (see e.g. [GA8]). For instance, the two-mode squeezing<br />
operator Eq. (2.21) corresponds to the symplectic transformation<br />
Si,j(r) =<br />
⎛<br />
⎜<br />
⎝<br />
cosh r 0 sinh r 0<br />
0 cosh r 0 − sinh r<br />
sinh r 0 cosh r 0<br />
0 − sinh r 0 cosh r<br />
⎞<br />
⎟<br />
⎠ , (2.24)<br />
where the matrix is understood to act on the couple of modes i and j. In this way,<br />
the two-mode squeezed state, Eq. (2.22), can be obtained as σ sq<br />
i,j (r) = Si,j(r)S T i,j (r)<br />
exploiting the fact that the CM of the two-mode vacuum state is the 4 × 4 identity<br />
matrix.<br />
Another common symplectic operation is the ideal (phase-free) beam-splitter,<br />
whose action ˆ Bi,j on a pair of modes i and j is defined as<br />
<br />
âi ˆBi,j(θ)<br />
→ âi cos θ + âj sin θ<br />
:<br />
, (2.25)<br />
âj → âi sin θ − âj cos θ<br />
with âl being the annihilation operator of mode k. A beam-splitter with transmittivity<br />
τ corresponds to a rotation of θ = arccos √ τ in phase space (θ = π/4<br />
amounts to a balanced 50:50 beam-splitter, τ = 1/2), described by a symplectic<br />
transformation<br />
⎛ √ √ ⎞<br />
τ 0 1 − τ 0<br />
⎜<br />
√ √<br />
Bi,j(τ) = ⎜ √<br />
0 τ 0 1 − τ ⎟<br />
⎝<br />
√ ⎟<br />
1 − τ<br />
√<br />
0 − τ 0 ⎠ . (2.26)<br />
√<br />
0 1 − τ 0 − τ<br />
Single-mode symplectic operations are easily retrieved as well, being just combinations<br />
of planar (orthogonal) rotations and of single-mode squeezings of the<br />
form<br />
Sj(r) = diag ( e r , e −r ) , (2.27)<br />
acting on mode j, for r > 0. In this respect, let us mention that the two-mode<br />
squeezed state Eq. (2.22) can also be obtained indirectly, by individually squeezing<br />
two single modes i and j in orthogonal quadratures, and by letting them interfere