30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 2. Gaussian states: structural properties<br />

The CM of N-mode coherent states (including the vacuum) is instead the 2N ×<br />

2N identity matrix.<br />

2.2.2. Symplectic operations<br />

A major role in the theoretical and experimental manipulation of Gaussian states<br />

is played by unitary operations which preserve the Gaussian character of the states<br />

on which they act. Such operations are all those generated by Hamiltonian terms at<br />

most quadratic in the field operators. As a consequence of the Stone-Von Neumann<br />

theorem, the so-called metaplectic representation [219] entails that any such unitary<br />

operation at the Hilbert space level corresponds, in phase space, to a symplectic<br />

transformation, i.e. to a linear transformation S which preserves the symplectic<br />

form Ω, so that<br />

S T ΩS = Ω . (2.23)<br />

Symplectic transformations on a 2N-dimensional phase space form the (real) symplectic<br />

group Sp (2N,) [10]. Such transformations act linearly on first moments and<br />

by congruence on CMs, σ ↦→ SσS T . Eq. (2.23) implies Det S = 1, ∀ S ∈ Sp (2N,).<br />

Ideal beam-splitters, phase shifters and squeezers are all described by some kind of<br />

symplectic transformation (see e.g. [GA8]). For instance, the two-mode squeezing<br />

operator Eq. (2.21) corresponds to the symplectic transformation<br />

Si,j(r) =<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

cosh r 0 sinh r 0<br />

0 cosh r 0 − sinh r<br />

sinh r 0 cosh r 0<br />

0 − sinh r 0 cosh r<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎠ , (2.24)<br />

where the matrix is understood to act on the couple of modes i and j. In this way,<br />

the two-mode squeezed state, Eq. (2.22), can be obtained as σ sq<br />

i,j (r) = Si,j(r)S T i,j (r)<br />

exploiting the fact that the CM of the two-mode vacuum state is the 4 × 4 identity<br />

matrix.<br />

Another common symplectic operation is the ideal (phase-free) beam-splitter,<br />

whose action ˆ Bi,j on a pair of modes i and j is defined as<br />

<br />

âi ˆBi,j(θ)<br />

→ âi cos θ + âj sin θ<br />

:<br />

, (2.25)<br />

âj → âi sin θ − âj cos θ<br />

with âl being the annihilation operator of mode k. A beam-splitter with transmittivity<br />

τ corresponds to a rotation of θ = arccos √ τ in phase space (θ = π/4<br />

amounts to a balanced 50:50 beam-splitter, τ = 1/2), described by a symplectic<br />

transformation<br />

⎛ √ √ ⎞<br />

τ 0 1 − τ 0<br />

⎜<br />

√ √<br />

Bi,j(τ) = ⎜ √<br />

0 τ 0 1 − τ ⎟<br />

⎝<br />

√ ⎟<br />

1 − τ<br />

√<br />

0 − τ 0 ⎠ . (2.26)<br />

√<br />

0 1 − τ 0 − τ<br />

Single-mode symplectic operations are easily retrieved as well, being just combinations<br />

of planar (orthogonal) rotations and of single-mode squeezings of the<br />

form<br />

Sj(r) = diag ( e r , e −r ) , (2.27)<br />

acting on mode j, for r > 0. In this respect, let us mention that the two-mode<br />

squeezed state Eq. (2.22) can also be obtained indirectly, by individually squeezing<br />

two single modes i and j in orthogonal quadratures, and by letting them interfere

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!