30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2. Mathematical description of Gaussian states 33<br />

As the real σ contains the complete locally-invariant information on a Gaussian<br />

state, we can expect some constraints to exist to be obeyed by any bona fide CM, reflecting<br />

in particular the requirements of positive-semidefiniteness of the associated<br />

density matrix ϱ. Indeed, such condition together with the canonical commutation<br />

relations imply<br />

σ + iΩ ≥ 0 , (2.19)<br />

Ineq. (2.19) is the only necessary and sufficient constraint the matrix σ has to fulfill<br />

to be the CM corresponding to a physical Gaussian state [220, 219]. More in general,<br />

the previous condition is necessary for the CM of any, generally non-Gaussian, CV<br />

state (characterized in principle by the moments of any order). We note that<br />

such a constraint implies σ ≥ 0. Ineq. (2.19) is the expression of the uncertainty<br />

principle on the canonical operators in its strong, Robertson–Schrödinger form<br />

[197, 200, 208].<br />

For future convenience, let us define and write down the CM σ1...N of an Nmode<br />

Gaussian state in terms of two by two submatrices as<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

⎜<br />

σ1...N = ⎜<br />

⎝<br />

σ1 ε1,2 · · · ε1,N<br />

ε T 1,2<br />

.<br />

. ..<br />

. ..<br />

. ..<br />

.<br />

. .. εN−1,N<br />

ε T 1,N · · · ε T N−1,N σN<br />

⎟ . (2.20)<br />

⎟<br />

⎠<br />

Each diagonal block σk is respectively the local CM corresponding to the reduced<br />

state of mode k, for all k = 1, . . . , N. On the other hand, the off-diagonal matrices<br />

εi,j encode the intermodal correlations (quantum and classical) between subsystems<br />

i and j. The matrices εi,j all vanish for a product state.<br />

In this preliminary overview, let us just mention an important instance of twomode<br />

Gaussian state, the two-mode squeezed state |ψ sq 〉i,j = Ûi,j(r) (|0〉i⊗ |0〉j)<br />

with squeezing factor r ∈ , where the (phase-free) two-mode squeezing operator<br />

is given by<br />

<br />

Ûi,j(r) = exp − r<br />

2 (â†<br />

i ↠j<br />

<br />

− âiâj) , (2.21)<br />

In the limit of infinite squeezing (r → ∞), the state approaches the ideal Einstein-<br />

Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) state [73], simultaneous eigenstate of total momentum and<br />

relative position of the two subsystems, which thus share infinite entanglement.<br />

The EPR state is unnormalizable and unphysical: two-mode squeezed states, being<br />

arbitrarily good approximations of it with increasing squeezing, are therefore key<br />

resources for practical implementations of CV quantum information protocols [40]<br />

and play a central role in the subsequent study of the entanglement properties of<br />

general Gaussian states. A two-mode squeezed state with squeezing degree r (also<br />

known in optics as twin-beam state [259]) will be described by a CM<br />

σ sq<br />

i,j (r) =<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

cosh(2r) 0 sinh(2r) 0<br />

0 cosh(2r) 0 − sinh(2r)<br />

sinh(2r) 0 cosh(2r) 0<br />

0 − sinh(2r) 0 cosh(2r)<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎠ . (2.22)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!