ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20 1. Characterizing entanglement<br />
isotropic states in arbitrary dimension [231, 257], and for symmetric twomode<br />
Gaussian states [95]. The additivity of the entanglement of formation<br />
is currently an open problem [1].<br />
• Entanglement cost.— The entanglement cost EC(ϱ) [24] quantifies how<br />
much Bell pairs |Φ〉 = (|00〉 + |11〉)/ √ 2 one has to spend to create the<br />
entangled state ϱ by means of LOCC. It is defined as the asymptotic ratio<br />
between the minimum number M of used Bell pairs, and the number N<br />
of output copies of ϱ,<br />
EC(ϱ) = min<br />
M<br />
lim<br />
{LOCC} N→∞<br />
in<br />
. (1.36)<br />
N out<br />
The entanglement cost, a difficult quantity to be computed in general<br />
[252], is equal to the asymptotic regularization of the entanglement of<br />
formation [110], EC(ϱ) = limN→∞[EF (ϱ ⊗N )/N], and would coincide with<br />
EF (ϱ) if the additivity of the latter was proven.<br />
• Distillable entanglement.— The converse of the entanglement cost is the<br />
distillable entanglement [24], which is defined as the asymptotic fraction<br />
M/N of Bell pairs which can be extracted from N copies of the state ϱ<br />
by using the optimal LOCC distillation protocol,<br />
ED(ϱ) = max<br />
lim<br />
{LOCC} N→∞<br />
M out<br />
. (1.37)<br />
N in<br />
The distillable entanglement vanishes for bound entangled states. The<br />
quantity EC(ϱ)−ED(ϱ) can be regarded as the undistillable entanglement.<br />
It is strictly nonzero for all entangled mixed states [276], meaning that<br />
LOCC manipulation of quantum states is asymptotically irreversible apart<br />
from the case of pure states (one loses entanglement units in the currency<br />
exchange!).<br />
• Relative entropy of entanglement.— An intuitive way to measure entanglement<br />
is to consider the minimum “distance” between the state ϱ and the<br />
convex set D ⊂ H of separable states. In particular, the relative entropy<br />
of entanglement ER(ϱ) [244] is the entropic distance [i.e. the quantum<br />
relative entropy Eq. (1.18)] between ϱ and the closest separable state σ ⋆ ,<br />
ER(ϱ) = min<br />
σ ⋆ ∈D Tr [ϱ (log ϱ − log σ⋆ )] . (1.38)<br />
Note that the closest separable state σ ⋆ is typically not the corresponding<br />
product state ϱ ⊗ = ϱ1⊗ϱ2; the relative entropy between ϱ and ϱ ⊗ is indeed<br />
the mutual information Eq. (1.17), a measure of total correlations which<br />
therefore overestimates entanglement (being nonzero also on separable,<br />
classically correlated states).<br />
Let us recall that the all the above mentioned entanglement measures coincide<br />
on pure states, EF (|ψ〉) = EC(|ψ〉) = ER(|ψ〉) = ED(|ψ〉) ≡ EV (|ψ〉), while for<br />
generic mixed states the following chain of analytic inequalities holds [120, 69, 117],<br />
EF (ϱ) ≥ EC(ϱ) ≥ ER(ϱ) ≥ ED(ϱ) . (1.39)<br />
• Negativities.— An important class of entanglement measures is constituted<br />
by the negativities, which quantify the violation of the PPT criterion for