30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 1. Characterizing entanglement<br />

isotropic states in arbitrary dimension [231, 257], and for symmetric twomode<br />

Gaussian states [95]. The additivity of the entanglement of formation<br />

is currently an open problem [1].<br />

• Entanglement cost.— The entanglement cost EC(ϱ) [24] quantifies how<br />

much Bell pairs |Φ〉 = (|00〉 + |11〉)/ √ 2 one has to spend to create the<br />

entangled state ϱ by means of LOCC. It is defined as the asymptotic ratio<br />

between the minimum number M of used Bell pairs, and the number N<br />

of output copies of ϱ,<br />

EC(ϱ) = min<br />

M<br />

lim<br />

{LOCC} N→∞<br />

in<br />

. (1.36)<br />

N out<br />

The entanglement cost, a difficult quantity to be computed in general<br />

[252], is equal to the asymptotic regularization of the entanglement of<br />

formation [110], EC(ϱ) = limN→∞[EF (ϱ ⊗N )/N], and would coincide with<br />

EF (ϱ) if the additivity of the latter was proven.<br />

• Distillable entanglement.— The converse of the entanglement cost is the<br />

distillable entanglement [24], which is defined as the asymptotic fraction<br />

M/N of Bell pairs which can be extracted from N copies of the state ϱ<br />

by using the optimal LOCC distillation protocol,<br />

ED(ϱ) = max<br />

lim<br />

{LOCC} N→∞<br />

M out<br />

. (1.37)<br />

N in<br />

The distillable entanglement vanishes for bound entangled states. The<br />

quantity EC(ϱ)−ED(ϱ) can be regarded as the undistillable entanglement.<br />

It is strictly nonzero for all entangled mixed states [276], meaning that<br />

LOCC manipulation of quantum states is asymptotically irreversible apart<br />

from the case of pure states (one loses entanglement units in the currency<br />

exchange!).<br />

• Relative entropy of entanglement.— An intuitive way to measure entanglement<br />

is to consider the minimum “distance” between the state ϱ and the<br />

convex set D ⊂ H of separable states. In particular, the relative entropy<br />

of entanglement ER(ϱ) [244] is the entropic distance [i.e. the quantum<br />

relative entropy Eq. (1.18)] between ϱ and the closest separable state σ ⋆ ,<br />

ER(ϱ) = min<br />

σ ⋆ ∈D Tr [ϱ (log ϱ − log σ⋆ )] . (1.38)<br />

Note that the closest separable state σ ⋆ is typically not the corresponding<br />

product state ϱ ⊗ = ϱ1⊗ϱ2; the relative entropy between ϱ and ϱ ⊗ is indeed<br />

the mutual information Eq. (1.17), a measure of total correlations which<br />

therefore overestimates entanglement (being nonzero also on separable,<br />

classically correlated states).<br />

Let us recall that the all the above mentioned entanglement measures coincide<br />

on pure states, EF (|ψ〉) = EC(|ψ〉) = ER(|ψ〉) = ED(|ψ〉) ≡ EV (|ψ〉), while for<br />

generic mixed states the following chain of analytic inequalities holds [120, 69, 117],<br />

EF (ϱ) ≥ EC(ϱ) ≥ ER(ϱ) ≥ ED(ϱ) . (1.39)<br />

• Negativities.— An important class of entanglement measures is constituted<br />

by the negativities, which quantify the violation of the PPT criterion for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!