30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

266 A. Standard forms of pure Gaussian states under local operations<br />

A.2. Degrees of freedom of pure Gaussian states<br />

Pure Gaussian states are characterized by CMs with Williamson form equal to the<br />

identity. As we have seen (Sec. 2.2.2.1), the Williamson decomposition provides a<br />

mapping from any Gaussian state into the uncorrelated product of thermal (generally<br />

mixed) states: such states are pure (corresponding to the vacuum), if and only<br />

if all the symplectic eigenvalues are equal to 1.<br />

The symplectic eigenvalues of a generic CM σ are determined as the eigenvalues<br />

of the matrix |iΩσ|, where Ω stands for the symplectic form. Therefore, a Gaussian<br />

state of N modes with CM σ is pure if and only if<br />

− σΩσΩ = 2N . (A.2)<br />

It will be convenient here to reorder the CM, and to decompose it in the three<br />

sub-matrices σq, σp and σqp, whose entries are defined as<br />

(σq)jk = Tr [ϱˆqj ˆqk], (σp)jk = Tr [ϱˆpj ˆpk], (σqp)jk = Tr [ϱ{ˆqj, ˆpk}/2], (A.3)<br />

such that the complete CM σ is given in block form by<br />

<br />

σq σqp<br />

σ =<br />

. (A.4)<br />

σ T qp<br />

Let us notice that the matrices σq and σp are always symmetric and strictly positive,<br />

while the matrix σqp does not obey any general constraint.<br />

Eqs. (A.2) and (A.4) straightforwardly lead to the following set of conditions<br />

σp<br />

σqσp = N + σ 2 qp , (A.5)<br />

σqpσq − σqσ T qp = 0 , (A.6)<br />

T 2<br />

σpσq = N + σqp , (A.7)<br />

σ T qpσp − σpσqp = 0 . (A.8)<br />

Now, the last two equations are obviously obtained by transposition of the first<br />

two. Moreover, from (A.5) one gets<br />

while Eq. (A.6) is equivalent to<br />

σp = σ −1<br />

q (N + σ 2 qp) , (A.9)<br />

σ −1<br />

q σqp − σ T qpσ −1<br />

q = 0 (A.10)<br />

(the latter equations hold generally, as σq is strictly positive and thus invertible).<br />

Eq. (A.10) allows one to show that any σp determined by Eq. (A.9) satisfies the<br />

condition (A.8). Therefore, only Eqs. (A.5) and (A.6) constitute independent constraints<br />

and fully characterize the CM of pure Gaussian states.<br />

Given any (strictly positive) matrix σq and (generic) matrix σqp, the fulfillment<br />

of condition (A.6) allows to specify the second moments of any pure Gaussian state,<br />

whose sub-matrix σp is determined by Eq. (A.9) and does not involve any additional<br />

degree of freedom.<br />

A straightforward counting argument thus yields the number of degrees of freedom<br />

of a generic pure Gaussian state, by adding the entries of a generic and symmetric<br />

N × N matrix and subtracting the equations of the antisymmetric condition<br />

(A.6): N 2 + N(N + 1)/2 − N(N − 1)/2 = N 2 + N, in compliance with the number<br />

dictated by the Euler decomposition of a symplectic operation:<br />

σ = S T 2N S = O T Z 2 O . (A.11)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!