ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
266 A. Standard forms of pure Gaussian states under local operations<br />
A.2. Degrees of freedom of pure Gaussian states<br />
Pure Gaussian states are characterized by CMs with Williamson form equal to the<br />
identity. As we have seen (Sec. 2.2.2.1), the Williamson decomposition provides a<br />
mapping from any Gaussian state into the uncorrelated product of thermal (generally<br />
mixed) states: such states are pure (corresponding to the vacuum), if and only<br />
if all the symplectic eigenvalues are equal to 1.<br />
The symplectic eigenvalues of a generic CM σ are determined as the eigenvalues<br />
of the matrix |iΩσ|, where Ω stands for the symplectic form. Therefore, a Gaussian<br />
state of N modes with CM σ is pure if and only if<br />
− σΩσΩ = 2N . (A.2)<br />
It will be convenient here to reorder the CM, and to decompose it in the three<br />
sub-matrices σq, σp and σqp, whose entries are defined as<br />
(σq)jk = Tr [ϱˆqj ˆqk], (σp)jk = Tr [ϱˆpj ˆpk], (σqp)jk = Tr [ϱ{ˆqj, ˆpk}/2], (A.3)<br />
such that the complete CM σ is given in block form by<br />
<br />
σq σqp<br />
σ =<br />
. (A.4)<br />
σ T qp<br />
Let us notice that the matrices σq and σp are always symmetric and strictly positive,<br />
while the matrix σqp does not obey any general constraint.<br />
Eqs. (A.2) and (A.4) straightforwardly lead to the following set of conditions<br />
σp<br />
σqσp = N + σ 2 qp , (A.5)<br />
σqpσq − σqσ T qp = 0 , (A.6)<br />
T 2<br />
σpσq = N + σqp , (A.7)<br />
σ T qpσp − σpσqp = 0 . (A.8)<br />
Now, the last two equations are obviously obtained by transposition of the first<br />
two. Moreover, from (A.5) one gets<br />
while Eq. (A.6) is equivalent to<br />
σp = σ −1<br />
q (N + σ 2 qp) , (A.9)<br />
σ −1<br />
q σqp − σ T qpσ −1<br />
q = 0 (A.10)<br />
(the latter equations hold generally, as σq is strictly positive and thus invertible).<br />
Eq. (A.10) allows one to show that any σp determined by Eq. (A.9) satisfies the<br />
condition (A.8). Therefore, only Eqs. (A.5) and (A.6) constitute independent constraints<br />
and fully characterize the CM of pure Gaussian states.<br />
Given any (strictly positive) matrix σq and (generic) matrix σqp, the fulfillment<br />
of condition (A.6) allows to specify the second moments of any pure Gaussian state,<br />
whose sub-matrix σp is determined by Eq. (A.9) and does not involve any additional<br />
degree of freedom.<br />
A straightforward counting argument thus yields the number of degrees of freedom<br />
of a generic pure Gaussian state, by adding the entries of a generic and symmetric<br />
N × N matrix and subtracting the equations of the antisymmetric condition<br />
(A.6): N 2 + N(N + 1)/2 − N(N − 1)/2 = N 2 + N, in compliance with the number<br />
dictated by the Euler decomposition of a symplectic operation:<br />
σ = S T 2N S = O T Z 2 O . (A.11)