30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX A<br />

Standard forms of pure Gaussian states<br />

under local operations<br />

In this Appendix, based on Ref. [GA18], we study the action of local unitary operations<br />

on a general CM of a pure N-mode Gaussian state and compute the minimal<br />

number of parameters which completely characterize pure Gaussian states up to<br />

local unitaries.<br />

A.1. Euler decomposition of symplectic operations<br />

Central to our analysis will be the following general decomposition of a symplectic<br />

transformation S (referred to as the “Euler” or “Bloch-Messiah” decomposition [10,<br />

37]):<br />

S = O ′ ZO, (A.1)<br />

where O, O ′ ∈ K(N) = Sp (2N,) ∩ SO(2N) are orthogonal symplectic transformations,<br />

while<br />

Z = ⊕ N <br />

zj 0<br />

j=1<br />

1 ,<br />

0 zj<br />

with zj ≥ 1 ∀ j. The set of such Z’s forms a non-compact subgroup of Sp (2N,)<br />

comprised of local (single-mode) squeezing operations (borrowing the terminology of<br />

quantum optics, where such transformations arise in degenerate parametric downconversion<br />

processes). Moreover, let us also mention that the compact subgroup<br />

K(N) is isomorphic to the unitary group U(N), and is therefore characterized<br />

by N 2 independent parameters. To acquaint the reader with the flavor of the<br />

counting arguments which will accompany us through this Appendix (and with the<br />

nontrivial aspects contained therein), let us combine the Williamson and the Euler<br />

decompositions to determine the number of degrees of freedom of a generic N-mode<br />

Gaussian state (up to first moments), given by N + 2N 2 + N − N = 2N 2 + N.<br />

The N subtracted from the sum of the numbers of symplectic eigenvalues and of<br />

degrees of freedom of a symplectic operation takes into account the invariance under<br />

single-mode rotations of the local Williamson forms — which ‘absorbs’ one degree<br />

of freedom per mode of the symplectic operation describing the state according to<br />

Eq. (2.29). Actually, the previous result is just the number of degrees of freedom of a<br />

2N × 2N symmetric matrix (in fact, the only constraint σ has to fulfill to represent<br />

a physical state is the semidefinite σ + iΩ ≥ 0, which compactly expresses the<br />

uncertainty relation for many modes [208]).<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!