30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion and Outlook 263<br />

increased (distilled) by resorting to Gaussian operations only [78, 205, 90]. Similarly,<br />

for universal one-way quantum computation using Gaussian cluster states, a<br />

single-mode non-Gaussian measurement is required [155].<br />

There is indeed a fundamental motivation for investigating entanglement in<br />

non-Gaussian states, as the extremality of Gaussian states imposes that they are<br />

the minimally entangled states among all states of CV systems with given second<br />

moments [269]. Experimentally, it has been recently demonstrated [172] that a twomode<br />

squeezed Gaussian state can be “de-Gaussified” by coherent subtraction of a<br />

single photon, resulting in a mixed non-Gaussian state whose non-local properties<br />

and entanglement degree are enhanced (enabling a better efficiency for teleporting<br />

coherent states [132]). Theoretically, the characterization of even bipartite entanglement<br />

(let alone multipartite) in non-Gaussian states stands as a formidable task.<br />

One immediate observation is that any (non-Gaussian) multimode state with a<br />

CM corresponding to an entangled Gaussian state is itself entangled too [235, 269].<br />

Therefore, most of the results presented in this Dissertation may serve to detect entanglement<br />

in a broader class of states of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. They<br />

are, however, all sufficient conditions on entanglement based on the second moments<br />

only of the canonical operators. As such, for arbitrary non-Gaussian states,<br />

they are in general very inefficient — meaning that most entangled non-Gaussian<br />

states fail to be detected by these criteria. The description of non-Gaussian states<br />

requires indeed (an infinite set of) high order statistical moments: as an obvious<br />

consequence, also an inseparability criterion for these states should involve<br />

high order correlations. Recently, some separability criteria based on hierarchies<br />

of conditions involving higher moments of the canonical operators have been introduced<br />

to provide a sharper detection of inseparability in generic non-Gaussian<br />

states [3, 162, 114, 157].<br />

In particular, Shchukin and Vogel [214] introduced an elegant and unifying<br />

approach to separability based on the PPT requirement, that is constructed in<br />

the form of an infinite series of inequalities, and includes as special cases all the<br />

above cited results (including the conditions on second moments [70, 218] qualifying<br />

separability in Gaussian states, see Sec. 3.1.1), thus demonstrating the important<br />

role of PPT in building a strong criterion for the detection of entanglement. The<br />

conditions by Shchukin and Vogel can be applied to distinguish between the several<br />

separability classes in a multipartite CV system [215]. To this aim, entanglement<br />

witnesses are useful as well [125].<br />

The efficiency of some of the above-mentioned inseparability criteria based on<br />

higher order moments, for detecting bipartite entanglement in the non-Gaussian<br />

family of squeezed number states of two-mode radiation fields, has been recently<br />

evaluated [64]. We mention a further interesting approach to non-Gaussian entanglement<br />

reported by McHugh et al. [154], who showed that entanglement of<br />

multiphoton squeezed states is completely characterized by observing that with respect<br />

to a new set of modes, those non-Gaussian states actually assume Gaussian<br />

character.<br />

Future perspectives<br />

Many open issues and unanswered intriguing questions naturally arise when peeping<br />

out of the parental house of Gaussian states. There is always the risk of being<br />

trapped in the infinite mathematical complexity of the CV Hilbert space losing the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!