30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

5<br />

10<br />

IΣAR7.5<br />

0<br />

14.3. Distributed Gaussian entanglement due to both accelerated observers 247<br />

1<br />

r<br />

(a)<br />

2<br />

3<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

s<br />

3<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1.5 2 IΣAR<br />

p<br />

EVΣAR 0<br />

1<br />

r<br />

(b)<br />

2<br />

3<br />

0<br />

Figure 14.5. Total correlations between Alice and the non-inertial observer<br />

Rob, moving with acceleration given by the effective squeezing parameter r.<br />

In an inertial frame the two observers shared a two-mode squeezed state with<br />

squeezing degree s. Plot (a) depicts the evolution of the mutual information<br />

I(σA|R), given by Eq. (14.14), as a function of r and s. In plot (b) the same<br />

quantity is normalized to the entropy of entanglement as perceived by inertial<br />

observers, EV (σ p<br />

), Eq. (14.15). Notice in (a) how the mutual information<br />

A|R<br />

is an increasing function of the initial shared entanglement, s; at variance with<br />

the entanglement (see Fig. 14.2), it saturates to a nonzero value in the limit<br />

of infinite acceleration. From plot (b), one clearly sees that this asymptotic<br />

value is exactly equal to the inertial entropy of entanglement.<br />

of entanglement of Eq. (14.15), meaning that the two parties are correlated both<br />

quantumly and classically to the same degree. When Rob is under acceleration<br />

(r = 0), the entanglement shared with Alice is degraded by the Unruh effect (see<br />

Fig. 14.2), but the classical correlations are left untouched. In the limit r →<br />

∞, all entanglement is destroyed and the remaining mutual information I(σA|R), quantifying classical correlations only, saturates to EV (σ p<br />

A|R ) from Eq. (14.15).<br />

For any s > 0 the mutual information of Eq. (14.14), once normalized by such<br />

entropy of entanglement [see Fig. 14.5(b)], ranges between 2 (1 normalized unit<br />

of entanglement plus 1 normalized unit of classical correlations) at r = 0, and 1<br />

(all classical correlations and zero entanglement) at r → ∞. The same behavior<br />

is found for classical correlations in the case of Alice and Rob sharing a bosonic<br />

two-qubit Bell state in an inertial perspective [88].<br />

14.3. Distributed Gaussian entanglement due to both accelerated observers<br />

A natural question arises whether the mechanism of degradation or, to be precise,<br />

distribution of entanglement due to the Unruh effect is qualitatively modified<br />

according to the number of accelerated observers, or it only depends on the establishment<br />

of some relative acceleration between the observers. One might guess that<br />

when both observers travel with constant acceleration, basically the same features<br />

as unveiled above for the case of a single non-inertial observer will manifest, with<br />

a merely quantitative rescaling of the relevant figures of merit (such as bipartite<br />

entanglement decay rate). Indeed, we will now show that this is not the case [GA20].<br />

We consider here two non-inertial observers, with different names for ease of<br />

clarity and to avoid confusion with the previous picture. Leo and Nadia both travel<br />

1<br />

2<br />

s<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!