30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 1. Characterizing entanglement<br />

associated to the N possible outcomes. After the measurement, one of these outcomes<br />

will have occurred and we will possess a complete information (certainty)<br />

about the state of our system.<br />

The degree of information contained in a state corresponds to how much certainty<br />

we possess a priori on predicting the outcome of any test performed on the<br />

state [177].<br />

1.1.1. Purity and linear entropy<br />

The quantification of information will in general depend not only on the state<br />

preparation procedure, but also on the choice of the measurement with its associated<br />

probabilities {pk}. If for any test one has a complete ignorance (uncertainty), i.e. for<br />

a system in a N-dimensional Hilbert space one finds pk = 1/N ∀ k, then the state is<br />

maximally mixed, in other words prepared in a totally random mixture, with density<br />

matrix proportional to the identity, ϱm = N/N. For instance, a photon emitted<br />

by a thermal source is called ‘unpolarized’, reflecting the fact that, with respect<br />

to any unbiased polarization measurement, the two outcomes (horizontal/vertical)<br />

have the same probability. The opposite case is represented by pure quantum states,<br />

whose density matrix is a projector ϱp = |ψ〉〈ψ|, such that ϱ 2 p = ϱp . A pure state of<br />

a quantum system contains the maximum information one has at disposal on the<br />

preparation of the system. All the intermediate instances correspond to a partial<br />

information encoded in the state of the system under consideration.<br />

A hint on how to quantify this information comes from the general properties<br />

of a quantum density operator. We recall that<br />

Tr ϱ 2<br />

= 1 ⇔ ϱ pure state ;<br />

< 1 ⇔ ϱ mixed state .<br />

It is thus natural to address the trace of ϱ 2 as purity µ of a state ϱ,<br />

µ(ϱ) = Tr ϱ 2 . (1.1)<br />

The purity is a measure of information. For states of a Hilbert space H with<br />

dim H = N, the purity varies in the range<br />

1<br />

≤ µ ≤ 1 ,<br />

N<br />

reaching its minimum on the totally random mixture, and equating unity of course<br />

on pure states. In the limit of continuous variable systems (N → ∞), the minimum<br />

purity tends asymptotically to zero.<br />

Accordingly, the “impurity” or degree of mixedness of a quantum state ϱ, which<br />

characterizes our ignorance before performing any quantum test on ϱ, can be quantified<br />

via the functional<br />

SL(ϱ) = N<br />

N 2<br />

(1 − µ) = 1 − Tr ϱ<br />

N − 1 N − 1<br />

. (1.2)<br />

The quantity SL (ranging between 0 and 1) defined by Eq. (1.2) is known as linear<br />

entropy and it is a very useful measure of mixedness in quantum information theory<br />

due to its direct connection with the purity and the effective simplicity in its<br />

computation. Actually, the name ‘linear entropy’ follows from the observation that<br />

SL can be interpreted as a first-order approximation of the canonical measure of<br />

lack-of-information in quantum theory, that is Von Neumann entropy. In practice,<br />

the two quantities are not exactly equivalent, and differences between the two will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!