ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
206 12. Multiparty quantum communication with Gaussian resources<br />
12.2.3. Operational interpretation of tripartite Gaussian entanglement and how<br />
to experimentally investigate its sharing structure<br />
12.2.3.1. Entanglement of teleportation and residual contangle. Let us focus, for the<br />
following discussion, on the case N = 3, i.e. on three-mode states shared as resources<br />
for a three-party teleportation network. This protocol is a basic, natural<br />
candidate to operationally investigate the sharing structure of CV entanglement in<br />
three-mode symmetric Gaussian states.<br />
A first theoretical question that arises is to compare the tripartite entanglement<br />
of teleportation Eq. (12.26), which possesses a strong operational motivation, and<br />
the tripartite residual (Gaussian) contangle Eq. (7.36) (defined in Sec. 7.2.2), which<br />
is endowed with a clear physical interpretation in the framework of entanglement<br />
sharing and is built on solid mathematical foundations (being an entanglement<br />
monotone under Gaussian LOCC, see Sec. 7.2.2.1). Remarkably, in the case of<br />
pure three-mode shared resources — i.e. CV GHZ/W states, obtained by setting<br />
n1 = n2 = 1 in Eqs. (12.17,12.18), see Sec. 7.3.1 and Fig. 10.3 — the two measures<br />
are completely equivalent, being monotonically increasing functions of each other.<br />
Namely, from Eq. (7.40),<br />
G res<br />
τ (σ GHZ/W<br />
s ) = log 2 2 √ 2ET − (ET + 1) E2 T + 1<br />
(ET − 1) 1<br />
−<br />
ET (ET + 4) + 1 2 log2<br />
E2 T + 1<br />
ET (ET + 4) + 1 ,<br />
(12.28)<br />
where ET ≡ E (3)<br />
T in Eq. (12.26). Let us moreover recall that Gres τ coincides with<br />
the true residual contangle (globally minimized in principle over all, including non-<br />
Gaussian, decompositions), Eq. (7.35), in these states (see Sec. 7.3.1). The residual<br />
(Gaussian) contangle is thus enriched of an interesting meaning as a resource enabling<br />
a better-than-classical three-party teleportation experiment, while no operational<br />
interpretations are presently known for the three-way residual tangle quantifying<br />
tripartite entanglement sharing in qubit systems [59] (see Sec. 1.4.3).<br />
We remark that in the tripartite instance, the optimal teleportation-network<br />
fidelity of Eq. (12.25) (N = 3) achieves indeed its global maximum over all possible<br />
Gaussian POVMs performed on the shared resource, as can be confirmed with the<br />
methods of Ref. [183].<br />
12.2.3.2. The power of promiscuity in symmetric three-mode resources. The relationship<br />
between optimal teleportation fidelity and residual (Gaussian) contangle, embodied<br />
by Eq. (12.28), entails that there is a ‘unique’ kind of three-party CV entanglement<br />
in pure symmetric three-mode Gaussian states (alias CV finite-squeezing<br />
GHZ/W states, introduced in Sec. 7.3.1), which merges at least three (usually<br />
inequivalent) properties: those of being maximally genuinely tripartite entangled,<br />
maximally bipartite entangled in any two-mode reduction, and ‘maximally efficient’<br />
(in the sense of the optimal fidelity) for three-mode teleportation networks. Recall<br />
that the first two properties, taken together, label such entanglement as promiscuous,<br />
as discussed in Sec. 7.3.3. These features add up to the property of tripartite<br />
GHZ/W Gaussian states of being maximally robust against decoherence effects<br />
among all three-mode Gaussian states, as shown in Sec. 7.4.1.<br />
All this theoretical evidence strongly promotes GHZ/W states, experimentally<br />
realizable with current optical technology [8, 34] (see Sec. 10.1.2.1), as paradigmatic<br />
candidates for the encoding and transmission of CV quantum information and in