30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200 12. Multiparty quantum communication with Gaussian resources<br />

which minimizes the quantity φ of Eq. (12.13). Being φ a convex function of d, it<br />

suffices to find the zero of ∂φ/∂d, which yields an optimal d ≡ d opt given by<br />

d opt = 1 n1<br />

log . (12.14)<br />

4 n2<br />

For equal noises (n1 = n2), dopt = 0, indicating that the best preparation of the<br />

entangled resource state needs two equally squeezed single-mode states, in agreement<br />

with the results presented in Ref. [32] for pure states. For different noises,<br />

however, the optimal procedure involves two different squeezings, biased such that<br />

r1 −r2 = 2dopt . Inserting dopt from Eq. (12.14), in Eq. (12.13), we have the optimal<br />

fidelity<br />

F opt 1<br />

= , (12.15)<br />

1 + ˜ν−<br />

where ˜ν− is exactly the smallest symplectic eigenvalue of the partial transpose ˜σ<br />

of the CM σ, Eq. (12.7), defined by Eq. (12.9).<br />

Eq. (12.15) clearly shows that the optimal teleportation fidelity depends only<br />

on the entanglement of the resource state, and vice versa. In fact, the fidelity<br />

criterion becomes necessary and sufficient for the presence of the entanglement, if<br />

F opt is considered: the optimal fidelity is classical for ˜ν− ≥ 1 (separable state) and<br />

it exceeds the classical threshold for any entangled state. Moreover, F opt provides a<br />

quantitative measure of entanglement completely equivalent to the negativities and<br />

to the two-mode entanglement of formation [GA9]. Namely, from Eqs. (4.17,12.15),<br />

<br />

1<br />

EF = max 0, h − 1 , (12.16)<br />

F opt<br />

with h(x) defined by Eq. (4.18). In the limit of infinite squeezing (¯r → ∞), F opt<br />

reaches 1 for any amount of finite thermal noise.<br />

On the other extreme, due to the convexity of φ, the lowest fidelity is attained<br />

at one of the boundaries, d = ±¯r. Explicitly, the worst teleportation success,<br />

corresponding to the maximum waste of bipartite entanglement, is achieved by<br />

encoding zero squeezing in the more mixed mode, i.e. r1 = 0 if n1 ≥ n2, and r2 = 0<br />

otherwise. For infinite squeezing, the worst fidelity cannot exceed 1/ max{n1, n2},<br />

easily falling below the classical bound F cl ≡ 1/2 for strong enough noise.<br />

12.2.2. Optimal fidelity of N-party teleportation networks and multipartite entanglement<br />

We now extend our analysis [GA9] to a quantum teleportation-network protocol,<br />

involving N users who share a genuine N-partite entangled Gaussian resource, fully<br />

symmetric under permutations of the modes [236] (see Sec. 2.4.3 for the analysis of<br />

fully symmetric Gaussian states).<br />

Two parties are randomly chosen as sender (Alice) and receiver (Bob), but this<br />

time, in order to accomplish teleportation of an unknown coherent state, Bob needs<br />

the results of N − 2 momentum detections performed by the other cooperating parties.<br />

A nonclassical teleportation fidelity (i.e. F > F cl ≡ 1/2) between any pair<br />

of parties is sufficient for the presence of genuine N-partite entanglement in the<br />

shared resource, while in general the converse is false [see e.g. Fig. 1 of Ref. [236],<br />

reproduced in Fig. 12.3(b)]. Our aim is to determine the optimal multi-user teleportation<br />

fidelity, and to extract from it a quantitative information on the multipartite<br />

entanglement in the shared resources.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!