ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
200 12. Multiparty quantum communication with Gaussian resources<br />
which minimizes the quantity φ of Eq. (12.13). Being φ a convex function of d, it<br />
suffices to find the zero of ∂φ/∂d, which yields an optimal d ≡ d opt given by<br />
d opt = 1 n1<br />
log . (12.14)<br />
4 n2<br />
For equal noises (n1 = n2), dopt = 0, indicating that the best preparation of the<br />
entangled resource state needs two equally squeezed single-mode states, in agreement<br />
with the results presented in Ref. [32] for pure states. For different noises,<br />
however, the optimal procedure involves two different squeezings, biased such that<br />
r1 −r2 = 2dopt . Inserting dopt from Eq. (12.14), in Eq. (12.13), we have the optimal<br />
fidelity<br />
F opt 1<br />
= , (12.15)<br />
1 + ˜ν−<br />
where ˜ν− is exactly the smallest symplectic eigenvalue of the partial transpose ˜σ<br />
of the CM σ, Eq. (12.7), defined by Eq. (12.9).<br />
Eq. (12.15) clearly shows that the optimal teleportation fidelity depends only<br />
on the entanglement of the resource state, and vice versa. In fact, the fidelity<br />
criterion becomes necessary and sufficient for the presence of the entanglement, if<br />
F opt is considered: the optimal fidelity is classical for ˜ν− ≥ 1 (separable state) and<br />
it exceeds the classical threshold for any entangled state. Moreover, F opt provides a<br />
quantitative measure of entanglement completely equivalent to the negativities and<br />
to the two-mode entanglement of formation [GA9]. Namely, from Eqs. (4.17,12.15),<br />
<br />
1<br />
EF = max 0, h − 1 , (12.16)<br />
F opt<br />
with h(x) defined by Eq. (4.18). In the limit of infinite squeezing (¯r → ∞), F opt<br />
reaches 1 for any amount of finite thermal noise.<br />
On the other extreme, due to the convexity of φ, the lowest fidelity is attained<br />
at one of the boundaries, d = ±¯r. Explicitly, the worst teleportation success,<br />
corresponding to the maximum waste of bipartite entanglement, is achieved by<br />
encoding zero squeezing in the more mixed mode, i.e. r1 = 0 if n1 ≥ n2, and r2 = 0<br />
otherwise. For infinite squeezing, the worst fidelity cannot exceed 1/ max{n1, n2},<br />
easily falling below the classical bound F cl ≡ 1/2 for strong enough noise.<br />
12.2.2. Optimal fidelity of N-party teleportation networks and multipartite entanglement<br />
We now extend our analysis [GA9] to a quantum teleportation-network protocol,<br />
involving N users who share a genuine N-partite entangled Gaussian resource, fully<br />
symmetric under permutations of the modes [236] (see Sec. 2.4.3 for the analysis of<br />
fully symmetric Gaussian states).<br />
Two parties are randomly chosen as sender (Alice) and receiver (Bob), but this<br />
time, in order to accomplish teleportation of an unknown coherent state, Bob needs<br />
the results of N − 2 momentum detections performed by the other cooperating parties.<br />
A nonclassical teleportation fidelity (i.e. F > F cl ≡ 1/2) between any pair<br />
of parties is sufficient for the presence of genuine N-partite entanglement in the<br />
shared resource, while in general the converse is false [see e.g. Fig. 1 of Ref. [236],<br />
reproduced in Fig. 12.3(b)]. Our aim is to determine the optimal multi-user teleportation<br />
fidelity, and to extract from it a quantitative information on the multipartite<br />
entanglement in the shared resources.