30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 12. Multiparty quantum communication with Gaussian resources<br />

mom-sqz r 1<br />

noise n 1<br />

BS<br />

50:50<br />

pos-sqz r 2<br />

noise n 2<br />

Figure 12.1. Optical generation of two-mode symmetric mixed Gaussian<br />

states, by superimposing two independently squeezed single-mode noisy beams<br />

at a 50:50 beam-splitter. The output states can be employed as resources<br />

for CV teleportation of unknown coherent states. For r1 = r2 ≡ r and<br />

n1 = n2 = 1 (meaning absence of noise), the output states reduce to those of<br />

Fig. 9.1.<br />

12.2.1. Optimal fidelity of two-party teleportation and bipartite entanglement<br />

The two-user CV teleportation protocol [39] would require, to achieve unit fidelity,<br />

the sharing of an ideal (unnormalizable) EPR resource state [73], i.e. the simultaneous<br />

eigenstate of relative position and total momentum of a two-mode radiation<br />

field. An arbitrarily good approximation of the EPR state, as we know, is<br />

represented by two-mode squeezed Gaussian states of Eq. (2.22) with squeezing<br />

parameter r → ∞.<br />

As remarked in Sec. 9.2, a two-mode squeezed state can be, in principle, produced<br />

by mixing a momentum-squeezed state and a position-squeezed state, with<br />

squeezing parameters r1 and r2 respectively, through a 50:50 ideal (lossless) beamsplitter.<br />

In practice, due to experimental imperfections and unavoidable thermal<br />

noise the two initial squeezed states will be mixed. To perform a realistic analysis,<br />

we must then consider two thermal squeezed single-mode states, 30 described by the<br />

following quadrature operators in Heisenberg picture<br />

ˆq sq<br />

1 = √ n1e r1 ˆq 0 1 , ˆp sq<br />

1 = √ n1e −r1 ˆp 0 1 , (12.5)<br />

ˆq sq<br />

2 = √ n2e −r2 0<br />

ˆq 2 , ˆp sq<br />

2 = √ n2e r2 0<br />

ˆp 2 , (12.6)<br />

where the suffix “0” refers to the vacuum. The action of an ideal (phase-free) beamsplitter<br />

operation ˆ Bi,j(θ) on a pair of modes i and j, corresponding to a phase-space<br />

rotation of an angle θ, is defined by Eq. (2.25).<br />

When applied to the two modes of Eqs. (12.5,12.6), the beam-splitter entangling<br />

operation (θ = π/4) produces a symmetric mixed state [131], depending on the<br />

squeezings r1,2 and on the thermal noises n1,2, as depicted in Fig. 12.1. The CM<br />

30 Any losses due to imperfect optical elements and/or to the fibre or open-air propagation<br />

of the beams can be embedded into the initial single-mode noise factors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!