30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in the lab<br />

OPO / OPA<br />

one-mode<br />

thermal state<br />

one-mode<br />

squeezed beam<br />

BS<br />

50:50<br />

two-mode<br />

GLEMS<br />

Figure 9.2. Possible scheme for the generation of Gaussian least entangled<br />

mixed states (GLEMS), introduced in Sec. 4.3.3.1. A single-mode squeezed<br />

state (obtained, for example, by an optical parametric oscillator or amplifier)<br />

interferes with a thermal state through a 50:50 beam-splitter. The resulting<br />

two-mode state is a minimally entangled mixed Gaussian state at given global<br />

and marginal purities.<br />

The state at the output of the beam-splitter will be a correlated two-mode Gaussian<br />

state with CM σout that reads<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

σout = 1<br />

2<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

n + k 0 n − k 0<br />

0 n + k −1 0 n − k −1<br />

n − k 0 n + k 0<br />

0 n − k −1 0 n + k −1<br />

⎟<br />

⎠ ,<br />

with k = e2r and n = µ −1 . By immediate inspection, the symplectic spectrum of<br />

this CM is ν− = 1 and ν+ = 1/µ. Therefore the output state is always a state with<br />

extremal generalized entropy at a given purity (see Sec. 2.3). Moreover, the state<br />

is entangled if<br />

cosh(2r) > µ2 + 1<br />

2µ = exp (2ω/kBT ) + 1<br />

. (9.3)<br />

exp (2ω/kBT ) − 1<br />

Tuning the experimental parameters to meet the above condition, indeed makes the<br />

output state of the beam-splitter a symmetric GLEMS. It is interesting to observe<br />

that nonsymmetric GLEMS can be produced as well by choosing a beam-splitter<br />

with transmittivity different from 1/2.<br />

9.2. Experimental production and manipulation of two-mode entanglement<br />

Experimentally, CV entanglement can be obtained directly by type-II parametric<br />

interaction deamplifying either the vacuum fluctuations as was demonstrated in the<br />

seminal experiment by Ou et al. [171] (or in recent experiments [139, 254]) or the<br />

fluctuations of a weak injected beam [281]. It can also be obtained indirectly by<br />

mixing on a beam-splitter two independent squeezed beams, as shown in Fig. 9.1.<br />

The required squeezing can be produced by Kerr effects — using optical fibers [217]<br />

or cold atoms in an optical cavity [129] — or by type-I parametric interaction in<br />

a cavity [275, 33]. Single-pass type-I interaction in a non-collinear configuration<br />

can also generate directly entangled beams as demonstrated recently by Wenger et

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!