ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
144 7. Tripartite entanglement in three-mode Gaussian states squeezing dB 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Promiscuous Sharing Fully Inseparable Fully Separable BiSeparable Tripartite Bound Entangled 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 noise dB Figure 7.6. Summary of separability and entanglement properties of threemode squeezed thermal states, or noisy GHZ/W states, in the space of the two parameters n and s. The separability is classified according to the scheme of Sec. 7.1.1. Above the dotted line the states are fully inseparable (Class 1); below the solid line they are fully separable (Class 5). In the narrow intermediate region, noisy GHZ/W states are three-mode biseparable (Class 4), i.e. they exhibit tripartite bound entanglement. The relations defining the boundaries for the different regions are given in Eqs. (7.54–7.56). In the fully inseparable region, the residual (Gaussian) contangle Eq. (7.57) is depicted as a contour plot, growing with increasing darkness from Gres τ = 0 (along the dotted line) to Gres τ ≈ 1.9 (at n = 0 dB, s = 7 dB). On the left side of the dashed line, whose expression is given by Eq. (7.59), not only genuine tripartite entanglement is present, but also each reduced two-mode bipartition is entangled. In this region, Gres τ is strictly larger than in the region where the two-mode reductions are separable. This evidences the promiscuous sharing structure of multipartite CV entanglement in symmetric, even mixed, threemode Gaussian states. states are summarized, as functions of the parameters n and s expressed in decibels. 20 Explicitly, one finds that for n ≥ √ 3 , (7.58) the entanglement sharing can never be promiscuous, as the reduced two-mode entanglement is zero for any (even arbitrarily large) squeezing s. Otherwise, applying PPT criterion, one finds that for sufficiently high squeezing bipartite entanglement 20 The noise expressed in decibels (dB) is obtained from the covariance matrix elements via the formula Nij(dB) = 10 log 10 (σij).
7.4. Promiscuous entanglement versus noise and asymmetry 145 is also present in any two-mode reduction, namely n < √ √ 2n 3 , s > √ ⇒ promiscuous sharing . (7.59) 3 − n2 Evaluation of Eq. (7.57), as shown in Fig. 7.6, clearly demonstrates that the genuine tripartite entanglement increases with increasing bipartite entanglement in any two-mode reduction, unambiguously confirming that CV quantum correlations distribute in a promiscuous way not only in pure [GA10, GA11], but also in mixed [GA16] symmetric three-mode Gaussian states. However, the global mixedness is prone to affect this sharing structure, which is completely destroyed if, as can be seen from Eq. (7.58), the global purity µ falls below 1/(3 √ 3) ≈ 0.19245. This purity threshold is remarkably low: a really strong amount of global noise is necessary to destroy the promiscuity of entanglement distribution. 7.4.3. Basset hound states: a ‘traditional’ sharing of entanglement Let us finally consider an instance of tripartite entangled states which are not fully symmetric, but merely bisymmetric pure Gaussian states (in this specific case, invariant under the exchange of modes 2 and 3, see the general definition in Sec. 2.4.3). Following the arguments summarized in Fig. 5.1, they will be named basset hound states. Such states are denoted by a CM σ p B of the form Eq. (2.20) for N = 3, with a + 1 σ1 = a2, σ2 = σ3 = 2, (7.60) ε23 = a−1 2 2, ε12 = ε13 = diag 2 √ a2 − 1 √ , − 2 √ a 2 − 1 √ 2 . (7.61) They belong to a family of states introduced in Ref. [238] as resources for optimal CV telecloning (i.e. cloning at distance, or equivalently teleportation to more than one receiver) of single-mode coherent states. A more detailed discussion of this protocol will be given in Sec. 12.3. 7.4.3.1. Tripartite entanglement. From a qualitative point of view, basset hound states are fully inseparable for a > 1 and fully separable for a = 1, as already remarked in Ref. [238]; moreover, the PPT criterion (see Sec. 3.1.1) entails that the two-mode reduced state of modes 2 and 3 is always separable. Following the guidelines of Sec. 7.2.2, the residual Gaussian contangle Gres τ is easily computable. From Eq. (7.37), it follows that the minimum in Eq. (7.36) is attained if one sets either mode 2 or mode 3 (indifferently, due to the bisymmetry) to be the probe mode. Let us choose mode 3; then we have with G res τ (σ p B ) = G3|(12) τ (σ p B ) − G3|1 τ (σ p B ) , (7.62) G 3|(12) τ (σ p B ) = arcsinh2 G 3|1 τ (σ p B ) = arcsinh2 1 (a − 1)(a + 3) , 2 (7.63) (3a + 1) 2 − 1 (a + 3) 2 . (7.64) The tripartite entanglement Eq. (7.62) is strictly smaller than that of both GHZ/W states and T states, but it can still diverge in the limit of infinite squeezing (a → ∞)
- Page 108 and 109: 94 5. Multimode entanglement under
- Page 110 and 111: 96 5. Multimode entanglement under
- Page 112 and 113: 98 5. Multimode entanglement under
- Page 114 and 115: 100 5. Multimode entanglement under
- Page 116 and 117: 102 5. Multimode entanglement under
- Page 118 and 119: 104 5. Multimode entanglement under
- Page 121: Part III Multipartite entanglement
- Page 124 and 125: 110 6. Gaussian entanglement sharin
- Page 126 and 127: 112 6. Gaussian entanglement sharin
- Page 128 and 129: 114 6. Gaussian entanglement sharin
- Page 130 and 131: 116 6. Gaussian entanglement sharin
- Page 132 and 133: 118 6. Gaussian entanglement sharin
- Page 134 and 135: 120 6. Gaussian entanglement sharin
- Page 136 and 137: 122 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 138 and 139: 124 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 140 and 141: 126 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 142 and 143: 128 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 144 and 145: 130 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 146 and 147: 132 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 148 and 149: 134 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 150 and 151: 136 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 152 and 153: 138 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 154 and 155: 140 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 156 and 157: 142 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 160 and 161: 146 7. Tripartite entanglement in t
- Page 162 and 163: 148 8. Unlimited promiscuity of mul
- Page 164 and 165: 150 8. Unlimited promiscuity of mul
- Page 166 and 167: 152 8. Unlimited promiscuity of mul
- Page 168 and 169: 154 8. Unlimited promiscuity of mul
- Page 171: Part IV Quantum state engineering o
- Page 174 and 175: 160 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in
- Page 176 and 177: 162 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in
- Page 178 and 179: 164 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in
- Page 180 and 181: 166 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in
- Page 182 and 183: 168 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in
- Page 184 and 185: 170 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in
- Page 186 and 187: 172 9. Two-mode Gaussian states in
- Page 189 and 190: CHAPTER 10 Tripartite and four-part
- Page 191 and 192: 10.1. Optical production of three-m
- Page 193 and 194: (out) (in) TRITTER 10.1. Optical pr
- Page 195 and 196: 10.2. How to produce and exploit un
- Page 197 and 198: CHAPTER 11 Efficient production of
- Page 199 and 200: 11.2. Generic entanglement and stat
- Page 201 and 202: 11.2. Generic entanglement and stat
- Page 203 and 204: 11.2. Generic entanglement and stat
- Page 205 and 206: 11.3. Economical state engineering
- Page 207: Part V Operational interpretation a
7.4. Promiscuous entanglement versus noise and asymmetry 145<br />
is also present in any two-mode reduction, namely<br />
n < √ √<br />
2n<br />
3 , s > √ ⇒ promiscuous sharing . (7.59)<br />
3 − n2 Evaluation of Eq. (7.57), as shown in Fig. 7.6, clearly demonstrates that the<br />
genuine tripartite entanglement increases with increasing bipartite entanglement in<br />
any two-mode reduction, unambiguously confirming that CV quantum correlations<br />
distribute in a promiscuous way not only in pure [GA10, GA11], but also in mixed<br />
[GA16] symmetric three-mode Gaussian states. However, the global mixedness is<br />
prone to affect this sharing structure, which is completely destroyed if, as can be<br />
seen from Eq. (7.58), the global purity µ falls below 1/(3 √ 3) ≈ 0.19245. This purity<br />
threshold is remarkably low: a really strong amount of global noise is necessary to<br />
destroy the promiscuity of entanglement distribution.<br />
7.4.3. Basset hound states: a ‘traditional’ sharing of entanglement<br />
Let us finally consider an instance of tripartite entangled states which are not fully<br />
symmetric, but merely bisymmetric pure Gaussian states (in this specific case, invariant<br />
under the exchange of modes 2 and 3, see the general definition in Sec. 2.4.3).<br />
Following the arguments summarized in Fig. 5.1, they will be named basset hound<br />
states. Such states are denoted by a CM σ p<br />
B of the form Eq. (2.20) for N = 3, with<br />
<br />
a + 1<br />
σ1 = a2, σ2 = σ3 = 2, (7.60)<br />
ε23 = <br />
a−1<br />
2 2, ε12 = ε13 = diag<br />
2<br />
√<br />
a2 − 1<br />
√ , −<br />
2<br />
√ a 2 − 1<br />
√ 2<br />
<br />
. (7.61)<br />
They belong to a family of states introduced in Ref. [238] as resources for optimal<br />
CV telecloning (i.e. cloning at distance, or equivalently teleportation to more than<br />
one receiver) of single-mode coherent states. A more detailed discussion of this<br />
protocol will be given in Sec. 12.3.<br />
7.4.3.1. Tripartite entanglement. From a qualitative point of view, basset hound<br />
states are fully inseparable for a > 1 and fully separable for a = 1, as already<br />
remarked in Ref. [238]; moreover, the PPT criterion (see Sec. 3.1.1) entails that<br />
the two-mode reduced state of modes 2 and 3 is always separable. Following the<br />
guidelines of Sec. 7.2.2, the residual Gaussian contangle Gres τ is easily computable.<br />
From Eq. (7.37), it follows that the minimum in Eq. (7.36) is attained if one sets<br />
either mode 2 or mode 3 (indifferently, due to the bisymmetry) to be the probe<br />
mode. Let us choose mode 3; then we have<br />
with<br />
G res<br />
τ (σ p<br />
B ) = G3|(12) τ (σ p<br />
B ) − G3|1 τ (σ p<br />
B ) , (7.62)<br />
G 3|(12)<br />
τ (σ p<br />
B ) = arcsinh2<br />
G 3|1<br />
τ (σ p<br />
B ) = arcsinh2<br />
<br />
1<br />
(a − 1)(a + 3) ,<br />
2<br />
<br />
(7.63)<br />
(3a + 1) 2<br />
<br />
− 1<br />
(a + 3) 2 . (7.64)<br />
The tripartite entanglement Eq. (7.62) is strictly smaller than that of both GHZ/W<br />
states and T states, but it can still diverge in the limit of infinite squeezing (a → ∞)