ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

maths.nottingham.ac.uk
from maths.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
30.04.2013 Views

144 7. Tripartite entanglement in three-mode Gaussian states squeezing dB 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Promiscuous Sharing Fully Inseparable Fully Separable BiSeparable Tripartite Bound Entangled 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 noise dB Figure 7.6. Summary of separability and entanglement properties of threemode squeezed thermal states, or noisy GHZ/W states, in the space of the two parameters n and s. The separability is classified according to the scheme of Sec. 7.1.1. Above the dotted line the states are fully inseparable (Class 1); below the solid line they are fully separable (Class 5). In the narrow intermediate region, noisy GHZ/W states are three-mode biseparable (Class 4), i.e. they exhibit tripartite bound entanglement. The relations defining the boundaries for the different regions are given in Eqs. (7.54–7.56). In the fully inseparable region, the residual (Gaussian) contangle Eq. (7.57) is depicted as a contour plot, growing with increasing darkness from Gres τ = 0 (along the dotted line) to Gres τ ≈ 1.9 (at n = 0 dB, s = 7 dB). On the left side of the dashed line, whose expression is given by Eq. (7.59), not only genuine tripartite entanglement is present, but also each reduced two-mode bipartition is entangled. In this region, Gres τ is strictly larger than in the region where the two-mode reductions are separable. This evidences the promiscuous sharing structure of multipartite CV entanglement in symmetric, even mixed, threemode Gaussian states. states are summarized, as functions of the parameters n and s expressed in decibels. 20 Explicitly, one finds that for n ≥ √ 3 , (7.58) the entanglement sharing can never be promiscuous, as the reduced two-mode entanglement is zero for any (even arbitrarily large) squeezing s. Otherwise, applying PPT criterion, one finds that for sufficiently high squeezing bipartite entanglement 20 The noise expressed in decibels (dB) is obtained from the covariance matrix elements via the formula Nij(dB) = 10 log 10 (σij).

7.4. Promiscuous entanglement versus noise and asymmetry 145 is also present in any two-mode reduction, namely n < √ √ 2n 3 , s > √ ⇒ promiscuous sharing . (7.59) 3 − n2 Evaluation of Eq. (7.57), as shown in Fig. 7.6, clearly demonstrates that the genuine tripartite entanglement increases with increasing bipartite entanglement in any two-mode reduction, unambiguously confirming that CV quantum correlations distribute in a promiscuous way not only in pure [GA10, GA11], but also in mixed [GA16] symmetric three-mode Gaussian states. However, the global mixedness is prone to affect this sharing structure, which is completely destroyed if, as can be seen from Eq. (7.58), the global purity µ falls below 1/(3 √ 3) ≈ 0.19245. This purity threshold is remarkably low: a really strong amount of global noise is necessary to destroy the promiscuity of entanglement distribution. 7.4.3. Basset hound states: a ‘traditional’ sharing of entanglement Let us finally consider an instance of tripartite entangled states which are not fully symmetric, but merely bisymmetric pure Gaussian states (in this specific case, invariant under the exchange of modes 2 and 3, see the general definition in Sec. 2.4.3). Following the arguments summarized in Fig. 5.1, they will be named basset hound states. Such states are denoted by a CM σ p B of the form Eq. (2.20) for N = 3, with a + 1 σ1 = a2, σ2 = σ3 = 2, (7.60) ε23 = a−1 2 2, ε12 = ε13 = diag 2 √ a2 − 1 √ , − 2 √ a 2 − 1 √ 2 . (7.61) They belong to a family of states introduced in Ref. [238] as resources for optimal CV telecloning (i.e. cloning at distance, or equivalently teleportation to more than one receiver) of single-mode coherent states. A more detailed discussion of this protocol will be given in Sec. 12.3. 7.4.3.1. Tripartite entanglement. From a qualitative point of view, basset hound states are fully inseparable for a > 1 and fully separable for a = 1, as already remarked in Ref. [238]; moreover, the PPT criterion (see Sec. 3.1.1) entails that the two-mode reduced state of modes 2 and 3 is always separable. Following the guidelines of Sec. 7.2.2, the residual Gaussian contangle Gres τ is easily computable. From Eq. (7.37), it follows that the minimum in Eq. (7.36) is attained if one sets either mode 2 or mode 3 (indifferently, due to the bisymmetry) to be the probe mode. Let us choose mode 3; then we have with G res τ (σ p B ) = G3|(12) τ (σ p B ) − G3|1 τ (σ p B ) , (7.62) G 3|(12) τ (σ p B ) = arcsinh2 G 3|1 τ (σ p B ) = arcsinh2 1 (a − 1)(a + 3) , 2 (7.63) (3a + 1) 2 − 1 (a + 3) 2 . (7.64) The tripartite entanglement Eq. (7.62) is strictly smaller than that of both GHZ/W states and T states, but it can still diverge in the limit of infinite squeezing (a → ∞)

7.4. Promiscuous entanglement versus noise and asymmetry 145<br />

is also present in any two-mode reduction, namely<br />

n < √ √<br />

2n<br />

3 , s > √ ⇒ promiscuous sharing . (7.59)<br />

3 − n2 Evaluation of Eq. (7.57), as shown in Fig. 7.6, clearly demonstrates that the<br />

genuine tripartite entanglement increases with increasing bipartite entanglement in<br />

any two-mode reduction, unambiguously confirming that CV quantum correlations<br />

distribute in a promiscuous way not only in pure [GA10, GA11], but also in mixed<br />

[GA16] symmetric three-mode Gaussian states. However, the global mixedness is<br />

prone to affect this sharing structure, which is completely destroyed if, as can be<br />

seen from Eq. (7.58), the global purity µ falls below 1/(3 √ 3) ≈ 0.19245. This purity<br />

threshold is remarkably low: a really strong amount of global noise is necessary to<br />

destroy the promiscuity of entanglement distribution.<br />

7.4.3. Basset hound states: a ‘traditional’ sharing of entanglement<br />

Let us finally consider an instance of tripartite entangled states which are not fully<br />

symmetric, but merely bisymmetric pure Gaussian states (in this specific case, invariant<br />

under the exchange of modes 2 and 3, see the general definition in Sec. 2.4.3).<br />

Following the arguments summarized in Fig. 5.1, they will be named basset hound<br />

states. Such states are denoted by a CM σ p<br />

B of the form Eq. (2.20) for N = 3, with<br />

<br />

a + 1<br />

σ1 = a2, σ2 = σ3 = 2, (7.60)<br />

ε23 = <br />

a−1<br />

2 2, ε12 = ε13 = diag<br />

2<br />

√<br />

a2 − 1<br />

√ , −<br />

2<br />

√ a 2 − 1<br />

√ 2<br />

<br />

. (7.61)<br />

They belong to a family of states introduced in Ref. [238] as resources for optimal<br />

CV telecloning (i.e. cloning at distance, or equivalently teleportation to more than<br />

one receiver) of single-mode coherent states. A more detailed discussion of this<br />

protocol will be given in Sec. 12.3.<br />

7.4.3.1. Tripartite entanglement. From a qualitative point of view, basset hound<br />

states are fully inseparable for a > 1 and fully separable for a = 1, as already<br />

remarked in Ref. [238]; moreover, the PPT criterion (see Sec. 3.1.1) entails that<br />

the two-mode reduced state of modes 2 and 3 is always separable. Following the<br />

guidelines of Sec. 7.2.2, the residual Gaussian contangle Gres τ is easily computable.<br />

From Eq. (7.37), it follows that the minimum in Eq. (7.36) is attained if one sets<br />

either mode 2 or mode 3 (indifferently, due to the bisymmetry) to be the probe<br />

mode. Let us choose mode 3; then we have<br />

with<br />

G res<br />

τ (σ p<br />

B ) = G3|(12) τ (σ p<br />

B ) − G3|1 τ (σ p<br />

B ) , (7.62)<br />

G 3|(12)<br />

τ (σ p<br />

B ) = arcsinh2<br />

G 3|1<br />

τ (σ p<br />

B ) = arcsinh2<br />

<br />

1<br />

(a − 1)(a + 3) ,<br />

2<br />

<br />

(7.63)<br />

(3a + 1) 2<br />

<br />

− 1<br />

(a + 3) 2 . (7.64)<br />

The tripartite entanglement Eq. (7.62) is strictly smaller than that of both GHZ/W<br />

states and T states, but it can still diverge in the limit of infinite squeezing (a → ∞)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!