30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.2. Distributed entanglement and genuine tripartite quantum correlations 129<br />

states the Gaussian measures of entanglement, including Gτ , have been computed<br />

explicitly in Sec. 4.5.2.2 [GA7], yielding<br />

Q = arcsinh 2 <br />

m2 (a, s, d) − 1 + arcsinh 2 <br />

m2 (a, s, −d) − 1 , (7.28)<br />

where m = m− if D ≤ 0, and m = m+ otherwise (one has m+ = m− for D = 0).<br />

Here:<br />

m− =<br />

|k−|<br />

(s − d) 2 − 1 ,<br />

<br />

2 2a<br />

m+ =<br />

2 (1 + 2s2 + 2d2 ) − (4s2 − 1)(4d2 − 1) − a4 − √ <br />

δ<br />

4(s − d)<br />

,<br />

<br />

D = 2(s − d) − 2 k2 − + 2k+ + |k−|(k2 − + 8k+) 1/2 /k+ ,<br />

k± = a 2 ± (s + d) 2 , (7.29)<br />

and the quantity δ = (a − 2d − 1)(a − 2d + 1)(a + 2d − 1)(a + 2d + 1)(a − 2s − 1)(a −<br />

2s + 1)(a + 2s − 1)(a + 2s + 1) is the same as in Eq. (7.12). Note (we omitted the<br />

explicit dependence for brevity) that each quantity in Eq. (7.29) is a function of<br />

(a, s, d). Therefore, to evaluate the second term in Eq. (7.28) each d in Eq. (7.29)<br />

must be replaced by −d.<br />

Studying the derivative of m∓ with respect to s, it is analytically proven that,<br />

in the whole range of parameters {a, s, d} defined by Ineq. (7.27), both m− and m+<br />

are monotonically decreasing functions of s. The quantity Q is then maximized<br />

over s for the limiting value<br />

s = s min a + 1<br />

≡ . (7.30)<br />

2<br />

This value of s corresponds to three-mode pure Gaussian states in which the state<br />

of the reduced bipartition 2|3 is always separable, as one should expect because<br />

the bipartite entanglement is maximally concentrated in the states of the 1|2 and<br />

1|3 reduced bipartitions. With the position Eq. (7.30), the quantity D defined in<br />

Eq. (7.29) can be easily shown to be always negative. Therefore, for both reduced<br />

CMs σ12 and σ13, the Gaussian contangle is defined in terms of m−. The latter,<br />

in turn, acquires the simple form<br />

m−(a, s min 1 + 3a + 2d<br />

, d) = .<br />

3 + a − 2d<br />

(7.31)<br />

Consequently, the quantity Q turns out to be an even and convex function of d,<br />

and this fact entails that it is globally maximized at the boundary<br />

|d| = d max a − 1<br />

≡ .<br />

2<br />

(7.32)<br />

We finally have that<br />

Q max ≡ Q a, s = s min , d = ±d max<br />

= arcsinh 2 a 2 − 1 , (7.33)<br />

which implies that in this case the sharing inequality (6.2) is exactly saturated and<br />

the genuine tripartite entanglement is consequently zero. In fact this case yields

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!