ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7.2. Distributed entanglement and genuine tripartite quantum correlations 129<br />
states the Gaussian measures of entanglement, including Gτ , have been computed<br />
explicitly in Sec. 4.5.2.2 [GA7], yielding<br />
Q = arcsinh 2 <br />
m2 (a, s, d) − 1 + arcsinh 2 <br />
m2 (a, s, −d) − 1 , (7.28)<br />
where m = m− if D ≤ 0, and m = m+ otherwise (one has m+ = m− for D = 0).<br />
Here:<br />
m− =<br />
|k−|<br />
(s − d) 2 − 1 ,<br />
<br />
2 2a<br />
m+ =<br />
2 (1 + 2s2 + 2d2 ) − (4s2 − 1)(4d2 − 1) − a4 − √ <br />
δ<br />
4(s − d)<br />
,<br />
<br />
D = 2(s − d) − 2 k2 − + 2k+ + |k−|(k2 − + 8k+) 1/2 /k+ ,<br />
k± = a 2 ± (s + d) 2 , (7.29)<br />
and the quantity δ = (a − 2d − 1)(a − 2d + 1)(a + 2d − 1)(a + 2d + 1)(a − 2s − 1)(a −<br />
2s + 1)(a + 2s − 1)(a + 2s + 1) is the same as in Eq. (7.12). Note (we omitted the<br />
explicit dependence for brevity) that each quantity in Eq. (7.29) is a function of<br />
(a, s, d). Therefore, to evaluate the second term in Eq. (7.28) each d in Eq. (7.29)<br />
must be replaced by −d.<br />
Studying the derivative of m∓ with respect to s, it is analytically proven that,<br />
in the whole range of parameters {a, s, d} defined by Ineq. (7.27), both m− and m+<br />
are monotonically decreasing functions of s. The quantity Q is then maximized<br />
over s for the limiting value<br />
s = s min a + 1<br />
≡ . (7.30)<br />
2<br />
This value of s corresponds to three-mode pure Gaussian states in which the state<br />
of the reduced bipartition 2|3 is always separable, as one should expect because<br />
the bipartite entanglement is maximally concentrated in the states of the 1|2 and<br />
1|3 reduced bipartitions. With the position Eq. (7.30), the quantity D defined in<br />
Eq. (7.29) can be easily shown to be always negative. Therefore, for both reduced<br />
CMs σ12 and σ13, the Gaussian contangle is defined in terms of m−. The latter,<br />
in turn, acquires the simple form<br />
m−(a, s min 1 + 3a + 2d<br />
, d) = .<br />
3 + a − 2d<br />
(7.31)<br />
Consequently, the quantity Q turns out to be an even and convex function of d,<br />
and this fact entails that it is globally maximized at the boundary<br />
|d| = d max a − 1<br />
≡ .<br />
2<br />
(7.32)<br />
We finally have that<br />
Q max ≡ Q a, s = s min , d = ±d max<br />
= arcsinh 2 a 2 − 1 , (7.33)<br />
which implies that in this case the sharing inequality (6.2) is exactly saturated and<br />
the genuine tripartite entanglement is consequently zero. In fact this case yields