30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126 7. Tripartite entanglement in three-mode Gaussian states<br />

We recall that the form of the CM of any Gaussian state can be simplified<br />

through local (unitary) symplectic operations, that therefore do not affect the entanglement<br />

or mixedness properties of the state, belonging to Sp (2,) ⊕N . Such<br />

reductions of the CMs are called “standard forms”, as introduced in Sec. 2.4. For<br />

the sake of clarity, let us write the explicit standard form CM of a generic pure<br />

three-mode Gaussian state [GA11],<br />

with<br />

e ±<br />

ij ≡<br />

1<br />

4 √ aiaj<br />

σ p<br />

sf =<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

a1 0 e + 12 0 e + 13 0<br />

0 a1 0 e − 12 0 e − 13<br />

e + 12 0 a2 0 e + 23 0<br />

0 e − 12 0 a2 0 e − 23<br />

e + 13 0 e + 23 0 a3 0<br />

0 e − 13 0 e − 23 0 a3<br />

(ai − aj) 2 <br />

2<br />

− (ak − 1) (ai − aj) 2 − (ak + 1) 2<br />

±<br />

⎞<br />

⎟ , (7.19)<br />

⎟<br />

⎠<br />

(ai + aj) 2 <br />

2<br />

− (ak − 1) (ai + aj) 2 − (ak + 1) 2<br />

.<br />

(7.20)<br />

By direct comparison with Eq. (4.39), it is immediate to verify that each two-mode<br />

reduced CM σij denotes a standard form GLEMS with local purities µi = a −1<br />

i and<br />

µj = a −1<br />

j , and global purity µij ≡ µk = a −1<br />

k . Notice also that the standard form of<br />

any pure three-mode Gaussian state, Eq. (7.19), admits all 2×2 subblocks of the CM<br />

simultaneously in diagonal form; this is no longer possible for completely general<br />

pure Gaussian states of N ≥ 4 modes, as clarified in Appendix A.2.1. However,<br />

pure Gaussian states which, for an arbitrary number of modes, are reducible to<br />

such a “block-diagonal” standard form, are endowed with peculiar entanglement<br />

properties [GA14], which will be investigated in Chapter 11.<br />

Let us stress that, although useful in actual calculations, the use of CMs in<br />

standard form does not entail any loss of generality, because all the results derived<br />

in the present Chapter for N = 3 do not depend on the choice of the specific form of<br />

the CMs, but only on invariant quantities, such as the global and local symplectic<br />

invariants.<br />

A first qualitative result which immediately follows from our study [GA11],<br />

is that, regarding the classification of Sec. 7.1.1 [94], pure three-mode Gaussian<br />

states may belong either to Class 5, in which case they reduce to the global threemode<br />

vacuum, or to Class 2, reducing to the uncorrelated product of a single-mode<br />

vacuum and of a two-mode squeezed state, or to Class 1 (fully inseparable state). No<br />

two-mode or three-mode biseparable pure three-mode Gaussian states are allowed.<br />

7.1.3. Mixed states<br />

For the sake of completeness, let us briefly report that the most general standard<br />

form σsf associated to the CM of any (generally mixed) three-mode Gaussian state

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!