30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124 7. Tripartite entanglement in three-mode Gaussian states<br />

no generality is lost in assuming a standard form CM, because the entanglement<br />

properties of any bipartition of the system are invariant under local (single-mode)<br />

symplectic operations. Now, Eqs. (7.3) and (7.2) may be recast as follows<br />

a 2 3 = a 2 1 + a 2 2 + 2c12d12 − 1 , (7.8)<br />

a 2 3 = (a1a2 − c 2 12)(a1a2 − d 2 12) , (7.9)<br />

showing that we may eliminate one of the two covariances to find the expression<br />

of the remaining one only in terms of the three local mixednesses (inverse purities)<br />

al, Eq. (7.5). Defining the quantity κ as<br />

κ ≡ c12d12 = 1 + a23 − a2 1 − a2 2<br />

,<br />

2<br />

leads to the following condition on the covariance c12,<br />

(7.10)<br />

c 4 12 − 1 2 2<br />

(κ − 1) + a1a 2 2 − a 2 1 − a 2 2<br />

2 c12 + κ 2 = 0 . (7.11)<br />

a1a2<br />

Such a second-order algebraic equation for c 2 12 admits a positive solution if and only<br />

if its discriminant δ is positive,<br />

δ ≥ 0 . (7.12)<br />

After some algebra, one finds<br />

δ = (a1 + a2 + a3 + 1)(a1 + a2 + a3 − 1)<br />

× (a1 + a2 − a3 + 1)(a1 − a2 + a3 + 1)<br />

× (−a1 + a2 + a3 + 1)(a1 + a2 − a3 − 1)<br />

× (a1 − a2 + a3 − 1)(−a1 + a2 + a3 − 1) . (7.13)<br />

Aside from the existence of a real covariance c12, the further condition of positivity<br />

of σ12 has to be fulfilled for a state to be physical. This amounts to impose the<br />

inequality a1a2 − c 2 12 ≥ 0, which can be explicitly written, after solving Eq. (7.11),<br />

as<br />

4 2a 2 1a 2 2 − (κ − 1) 2 + a 2 1a 2 2 − a 2 1 − a 2 √<br />

2 ≥ δ .<br />

This inequality is trivially satisfied when squared on both sides; therefore it reduces<br />

to<br />

2a 2 1a 2 2 − (κ − 1) 2 + a 2 1a 2 2 − a 2 1 − a 2 2 ≥ 0 . (7.14)<br />

Notice that conditions (7.12) and (7.14), although derived by assuming a specific<br />

bipartition of the three modes, are independent on the choice of the modes<br />

that enter in the considered bipartition, because they are invariant under all possible<br />

permutations of the modes. Defining the parameters<br />

a ′ l ≡ al − 1 , (7.15)<br />

the uncertainty principle Eq. (2.35) for single-mode states reduces to<br />

a ′ l ≥ 0 ∀ l = 1, 2, 3 . (7.16)<br />

This fact allows to greatly simplify the existence conditions (7.12) and (7.14), which<br />

can be combined into the following triangular inequality<br />

|a ′ i − a ′ j| ≤ a ′ k ≤ a ′ i + a ′ j . (7.17)<br />

Inequality (7.17) is a condition invariant under all possible permutations of the<br />

mode indexes {i, j, k}, and, together with the positivity of each a ′ l , fully characterizes<br />

the local symplectic eigenvalues of the CM of three-mode pure Gaussian

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!