30.04.2013 Views

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which, together with Inequality (7.1), implies<br />

7.1. Three-mode Gaussian states 123<br />

∆ij = Det σij + 1 , ∀ i, j : i = j . (7.4)<br />

The last equation shows that any reduced two-mode state of a pure three-mode<br />

Gaussian state saturates the partial uncertainty relation Eq. (7.1). The states<br />

endowed with such a partial minimal uncertainty (namely, with their smallest symplectic<br />

eigenvalue equal to 1) are states of minimal negativity for given global and<br />

local purities, alias GLEMS (Gaussian least entangled mixed states) [GA2, GA3],<br />

introduced in Sec. 4.3.3.1. In general, by invoking the phase-space Schmidt decomposition<br />

(see Sec. 2.4.2.1) [116, 29, 92], it immediately follows that any (N −1)-mode<br />

reduced state of a N-mode pure Gaussian state is a mixed state of partial minimum<br />

uncertainty (a sort of generalized GLEMS), with N −2 symplectic eigenvalues<br />

fixed to 1 and only one, in general, greater than 1 — shortly, with symplectic rank<br />

ℵ = 1, see Sec. 2.2.2.2 — thus saturating Eq. (2.35). This argument is resumed in<br />

Appendix A.2.<br />

In fact, our simple proof, straightforwardly derived in terms of symplectic invariants,<br />

provides some further insight into the structure of CMs characterizing<br />

three-mode Gaussian states. What matters to our aims, is that the standard form<br />

CM of Gaussian states is completely determined by their global and local invariants,<br />

as discussed in Sec. 2.4. Therefore, because of Eq. (7.3), the entanglement<br />

between any pair of modes embedded in a three-mode pure Gaussian state is fully<br />

determined by the local invariants Det σl, for l = 1, 2, 3, whatever proper measure<br />

we choose to quantify it. Furthermore, the entanglement of a σ i|(jk) bipartition of<br />

a pure three-mode state is determined by the entropy of one of the reduced states,<br />

i.e. , once again, by the quantity Det σi. Thus, the three local symplectic invariants<br />

Det σ1, Det σ2 and Det σ3 fully determine the entanglement of any bipartition of<br />

a pure three-mode Gaussian state. We will show that they suffice to determine as<br />

well the genuine tripartite entanglement encoded in the state [GA11].<br />

For ease of notation, in the following we will denote by al the local single-mode<br />

symplectic eigenvalue associated to mode l with CM σl,<br />

al ≡ Det σl . (7.5)<br />

Eq. (2.37) shows that the quantities al are simply related to the purities of the<br />

reduced single-mode states, i.e. the local purities µl, by the relation<br />

µl = 1<br />

al<br />

. (7.6)<br />

Since the set {al}, l = 1, 2, 3, fully determines the entanglement of any of the<br />

1 × 2 and 1 × 1 bipartitions of the state, it is important to determine the range<br />

of the allowed values for such quantities. This is required in order to provide<br />

a complete quantitative characterization of the entanglement of three-mode pure<br />

Gaussian states. To this aim, let us focus on the reduced two-mode CM σ12 and<br />

let us bring it (by local unitaries) in standard form [70, 218], so that Eq. (2.20) is<br />

recast in the form<br />

σl = diag{al, al} , l = 1, 2 ;<br />

ε12 = diag{c12, d12} , (7.7)<br />

where c12 and d12 are the intermodal covariances, and, as we will show below,<br />

can be evaluated independently in pure three-mode Gaussian states. Notice that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!