ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
ENTANGLEMENT OF GAUSSIAN STATES Gerardo Adesso
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.2. Quantification and scaling of entanglement in fully symmetric states 105<br />
grows and, as a consequence, the OLE increases with N. In the limit N → ∞, the<br />
N × N entanglement diverges while the 1 × 1 one vanishes. This exactly holds both<br />
for pure and mixed states, although the global degree of mixedness produces the<br />
typical behavior that tends to reduce the total entanglement of the state.<br />
5.2.3. Discussion<br />
We have shown that bisymmetric (pure or mixed) multimode Gaussian states,<br />
whose structural properties are introduced in Sec. 2.4.3, can be reduced by local<br />
symplectic operations to the tensor product of a correlated two-mode Gaussian<br />
state and of uncorrelated thermal states (the latter being obviously irrelevant as<br />
far as the correlation properties of the multimode Gaussian state are concerned).<br />
As a consequence, all the entanglement of bisymmetric multimode Gaussian states<br />
of arbitrary M × N bipartitions is unitarily localizable in a single (arbitrary) pair<br />
of modes shared by the two parties. Such a useful reduction to two-mode Gaussian<br />
states is somehow similar to the one holding for states with fully degenerate<br />
symplectic spectra [29, 92], encompassing the relevant instance of pure states, for<br />
which all the symplectic eigenvalues are equal to 1 (see Sec. 2.4.2.1). The present<br />
result allows to extend the PPT criterion as a necessary and sufficient condition<br />
for separability to all bisymmetric multimode Gaussian states of arbitrary M × N<br />
bipartitions (as shown in Sec. 3.1.1), and to quantify their entanglement [GA4, GA5].<br />
Notice that, in the general bisymmetric instance addressed in this Chapter, the<br />
possibility of performing a two-mode reduction is crucially partition-dependent.<br />
However, as we have explicitly shown, in the case of fully symmetric states all the<br />
possible bipartitions can be analyzed and compared, yielding remarkable insight<br />
into the structure of the multimode block entanglement of Gaussian states. This<br />
leads finally to the determination of the maximum, or optimal localizable entanglement<br />
that can be unitarily concentrated on a single pair of modes.<br />
It is important to notice that the multipartite entanglement in the considered<br />
class of multimode Gaussian states can be produced and detected [236, 240], and<br />
also, by virtue of the present analysis, reversibly localized by all-optical means.<br />
Moreover, the multipartite entanglement allows for a reliable (i.e. with fidelity<br />
F > Fcl, where Fcl = 1/2 is the classical threshold, see Chapter 12) quantum<br />
teleportation between any two parties with the assistance of the remaining others<br />
[236]. The connection between entanglement in the symmetric Gaussian resource<br />
states and optimal teleportation-network fidelity has been clarified in [GA9], and<br />
will be discussed in Sec. 12.2.<br />
More generally, the present Chapter has the important role of bridging between<br />
the two central parts of this Dissertation, the one dealing with bipartite entanglement<br />
on one hand, and the one dealing with multipartite entanglement on the<br />
other hand. We have characterized entanglement in multimode Gaussian states by<br />
reducing it to a two-mode problem. By comparing the equivalent two-mode entanglements<br />
in the different bipartitions we have unambiguously shown that genuine<br />
multipartite entanglement is present in the studied Gaussian states. It is now time<br />
to analyze in more detail the sharing phenomenon responsible for the distribution<br />
of entanglement from a bipartite, two-mode form, to a genuine multipartite manifestation<br />
in N-mode Gaussian states, under and beyond symmetry constraints.