siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
^WANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL LIFE 79<br />
page 153. It may have been formed under Creek influence or<br />
may have been a late sporadic growth, yet it is possible that it per-<br />
petuates something more ancient.<br />
Clans and Local Groups<br />
There are only the faintest traces of groups with truly totemic<br />
designations, the animal and plant names which occur seeming not<br />
to have had a totemic connotation. The most important apparent<br />
exception is furnished by Adam Hodgson, who traversed the terri-<br />
tory of most of the large southeastern tribes on a missionary journey<br />
in the year 1820. On the banks of the Yalobusha Kiver " he reached<br />
the dwelling of a half-breed Choctaw, whose wife was a Chickasaw,<br />
and whose hut was on the frontier of the two nations." This man,<br />
who " spoke English very well," told him among other matters " that<br />
there were tribes or families among the Indians, somewhat similar<br />
to the Scottish clans ; such as, the Panther family, the Bird family,<br />
the Raccoon family, the Wolf family : he belonged to the Raccoon<br />
family, but his children to the family of his wife." All of these<br />
totemic groups except the Wolf are known with certainty to have<br />
been present among the Chickasaw, and the Wolf occurs in Morgan's<br />
list. It is possible, therefore, that this Choctaw, on marrying into<br />
the Chickasaw tribe, had been assigned a totemic group, or that some<br />
northern Choctaw had adopted the Chickasaw system. Claiborne<br />
states that six clans. Wind, Bear, Deer, Wolf, Panther, and Holly<br />
Leaf, extended throughout the Choctaw, Cherokee, and Creek tribes,<br />
but his information was evidently derived from the Creeks, it is<br />
only partially true of the Cherokee, and otherwise not to be relied<br />
upon.^^ Aside from these questionable statements there seems to<br />
be nothing to warrant the assumption that totemic groups existed<br />
among the Choctaw. There is every reason to believe that the<br />
Crawfish people, the only division of any size bearing an animal<br />
name, w^ere descended from the originally independent tribe of that<br />
name (the Chokchiuma) living between the Choctaw and Chickasaw.<br />
But even though there were no totemic iksa, it is quite possible<br />
that there were nontotemic divisions corresponding to the Chickasaw<br />
totemic clans and differentiated in some manner from the smaller<br />
geographical bands. If there were such, the eight " gentes " enumer-<br />
ated by Morgan on the authority of Cyrus Byington and the six<br />
mentioned by the Rev. Alfred Wright would fall into this category.<br />
The former are, in the moiety of the Beloved People, the Chu-fanik'-sii,<br />
Is-ku-la'-ni, Chi'-to, and Shak-clmk'-la, and, in the moiety<br />
of the Divided People, the Kush-ik'sii,^'' Law-ok'lu, Lu-lak Ik'-sii,<br />
"> Claiborne, Miss., i, p. 493.<br />
'• Cushman says that the full form of this Is " Kunsba-a-he " (ku''shak ahe), "reed-<br />
potato." P. 297. He states that Apushmataha belonged to it.