siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution

siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution

si.pddr.si.edu
from si.pddr.si.edu More from this publisher
30.04.2013 Views

78 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 103 was final. But this practice, like some other of their ancient customs, has gone into disuse." Halbert repeats and supplements this Soon after the creation, the Great Spirit divided tlie Choctaws into "iksa," the " Kashapa Okla," and the " Okla in Holahta," or •' Uattak in Holahta." Stationing one iksa on the north autl the other on the west side of the sacred mound [of Nanih Waiya], the Great Spirit then gave them the law of mar- .riage, which they were forever to keep inviolate. This law was that children were to belong to the iksa of their mother, and that one must marry into the opposite iksa. By this law a man belonging to the Kashapa Okla must marry a woman of the Okla in Holahta. The children of this marriage belong, of course, to the iksa of their mother, and whenever they marry it must be into the opposite iksa. In like manner a man belonging to the Okla in Holahta must marry a woman of the Kashapa Okla, and the children of this marriage from being Kashapa Okla must marry into the Okla in Holahta. Such was the Choctaw lav/ of marriage, given, they say, by Divine authority at Nanih Waiya ,iust after the creation of their race. The iksa lived promiscuously throughout the nation, but as every one knew to which iksa he belonged, no matrimonial mistake could possibly occur.'^ Elsewhere he tells us that In the ancient days the iksa system was regarded so strictly that a man was treated with contempt if he should marry into his own iska. Prior to 1820, a woman thus offending was severely whipped by her uncles and brothers and taken away from her husband. But with the gradual progress of civili- zation, the law was first broken by the half-breeds, who thus set a precedent which began to be followed by the full bloods, so that at the present day among the Choctaws west, the iksa division is now practically extinct." It will be noted that Halbert applies the term iksa only to the moieties, but, while this may have been its original usage, it was later employed for all of the minor subdivisions, and even extended to include Christian sects. The trivial note of a British official in 1772 to the effect that a Choctaw chief named " Concha Oumanstabe " was " of the Immongoulasha or Peace Family of the Town of Chickasawhays," casts a flood of light upon the nature of the moieties."* Evidently the Imoklasha corresponded to the Wliite or peace party among the Creeks and we are quite safe in assuming that the I"hoIahta had to do with war. Each moiety also discharged the burial offices for members of the opposite moiety. In recent times a kind of town or band moiety system existed which made itself evident in the ball games. This is described on " The Missionary Herald, June, 1828, vol. xxiv, No. 6, p. 215. '2 Pubs. Miss. Hist. Sov., ii, p. 230 ; cf. Claiborne, Miss., i, p. 521. This information is based on the communication to the Missionary Herald, above quoted, and " conversations in 1884 with the aged Hemonubbee of Neshoba County, Miss., who clearly remembered the tradition of the iksa system instituted at Nanih Waiya." " The facts in this paragraph were abstracted from the records of the " Court of Claims," p. 927. " Miss. State Archives, English Dominions, vol. 1.

^WANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL LIFE 79 page 153. It may have been formed under Creek influence or may have been a late sporadic growth, yet it is possible that it per- petuates something more ancient. Clans and Local Groups There are only the faintest traces of groups with truly totemic designations, the animal and plant names which occur seeming not to have had a totemic connotation. The most important apparent exception is furnished by Adam Hodgson, who traversed the terri- tory of most of the large southeastern tribes on a missionary journey in the year 1820. On the banks of the Yalobusha Kiver " he reached the dwelling of a half-breed Choctaw, whose wife was a Chickasaw, and whose hut was on the frontier of the two nations." This man, who " spoke English very well," told him among other matters " that there were tribes or families among the Indians, somewhat similar to the Scottish clans ; such as, the Panther family, the Bird family, the Raccoon family, the Wolf family : he belonged to the Raccoon family, but his children to the family of his wife." All of these totemic groups except the Wolf are known with certainty to have been present among the Chickasaw, and the Wolf occurs in Morgan's list. It is possible, therefore, that this Choctaw, on marrying into the Chickasaw tribe, had been assigned a totemic group, or that some northern Choctaw had adopted the Chickasaw system. Claiborne states that six clans. Wind, Bear, Deer, Wolf, Panther, and Holly Leaf, extended throughout the Choctaw, Cherokee, and Creek tribes, but his information was evidently derived from the Creeks, it is only partially true of the Cherokee, and otherwise not to be relied upon.^^ Aside from these questionable statements there seems to be nothing to warrant the assumption that totemic groups existed among the Choctaw. There is every reason to believe that the Crawfish people, the only division of any size bearing an animal name, w^ere descended from the originally independent tribe of that name (the Chokchiuma) living between the Choctaw and Chickasaw. But even though there were no totemic iksa, it is quite possible that there were nontotemic divisions corresponding to the Chickasaw totemic clans and differentiated in some manner from the smaller geographical bands. If there were such, the eight " gentes " enumer- ated by Morgan on the authority of Cyrus Byington and the six mentioned by the Rev. Alfred Wright would fall into this category. The former are, in the moiety of the Beloved People, the Chu-fanik'-sii, Is-ku-la'-ni, Chi'-to, and Shak-clmk'-la, and, in the moiety of the Divided People, the Kush-ik'sii,^'' Law-ok'lu, Lu-lak Ik'-sii, "> Claiborne, Miss., i, p. 493. '• Cushman says that the full form of this Is " Kunsba-a-he " (ku''shak ahe), "reed- potato." P. 297. He states that Apushmataha belonged to it.

78 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 103<br />

was final. But this practice, like some other of their ancient customs, has gone<br />

into disuse."<br />

Halbert repeats and supplements this<br />

Soon after the creation, the Great Spirit divided tlie Choctaws into "iksa,"<br />

the " Kashapa Okla," and the " Okla in Holahta," or •' Uattak in Holahta."<br />

Stationing one iksa on the north autl the other on the west side of the sacred<br />

mound [of Nanih Waiya], the Great Spirit then gave them the law of mar-<br />

.riage, which they were forever to keep inviolate. This law was that children<br />

were to belong to the iksa of their mother, and that one must marry into<br />

the opposite iksa. By this law a man belonging to the Kashapa Okla must<br />

marry a woman of the Okla in Holahta. The children of this marriage belong,<br />

of course, to the iksa of their mother, and whenever they marry it must<br />

be into the opposite iksa. In like manner a man belonging to the Okla in<br />

Holahta must marry a woman of the Kashapa Okla, and the children of this<br />

marriage from being Kashapa Okla must marry into the Okla in Holahta.<br />

Such was the Choctaw lav/ of marriage, given, they say, by Divine authority at<br />

Nanih Waiya ,iust after the creation of their race. The iksa lived promiscuously<br />

throughout the nation, but as every one knew to which iksa he belonged, no<br />

matrimonial mistake could possibly occur.'^<br />

Elsewhere he tells us that<br />

In the ancient days the iksa system was regarded so strictly that a man<br />

was treated with contempt if he should marry into his own iska. Prior to<br />

1820, a woman thus offending was severely whipped by her uncles and brothers<br />

and taken away from her husband. But with the gradual progress of civili-<br />

zation, the law was first broken by the half-breeds, who thus set a precedent<br />

which began to be followed by the full bloods, so that at the present day<br />

among the Choctaws west, the iksa division is now practically extinct."<br />

It will be noted that Halbert applies the term iksa only to the<br />

moieties, but, while this may have been its original usage, it was later<br />

employed for all of the minor subdivisions, and even extended to<br />

include Christian sects.<br />

The trivial note of a British official in 1772 to the effect that a<br />

Choctaw chief named " Concha Oumanstabe " was " of the Immongoulasha<br />

or Peace Family of the Town of Chickasawhays," casts a<br />

flood of light upon the nature of the moieties."* Evidently the Imoklasha<br />

corresponded to the Wliite or peace party among the Creeks and<br />

we are quite safe in assuming that the I"hoIahta had to do with war.<br />

Each moiety also discharged the burial offices for members of the<br />

opposite moiety.<br />

In recent times a kind of town or band moiety system existed<br />

which made itself evident in the ball games. This is described on<br />

" The Missionary Herald, June, 1828, vol. xxiv, No. 6, p. 215.<br />

'2 Pubs. Miss. Hist. Sov., ii, p. 230 ; cf. Claiborne, Miss., i, p. 521. This information is<br />

based on the communication to the Missionary Herald, above quoted, and " conversations<br />

in 1884 with the aged Hemonubbee of Neshoba County, Miss., who clearly remembered the<br />

tradition of the iksa system instituted at Nanih Waiya."<br />

" The facts in this paragraph were abstracted from the records of the " Court of<br />

Claims," p. 927.<br />

" Miss. State Archives, English Dominions, vol. 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!