siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL, AND CEEEMOITIAL, LIFE 5<br />
onists and the original occupants of the soil, whose removal to lands<br />
farther west was clamorously urged by the settlers and ultimately<br />
agreed to by the Choctaw themselves at the treaty of Dancing Rabbit<br />
Creek, September 27 and 28, 1830. By this treaty they secured a tract<br />
of land along Red River, in the southeastern part of the present State<br />
of Oklahoma, to which the bulk of the tribe emigrated in 1831, 1832,<br />
and 1833. The first emigrants suffered cruelly, but those who went<br />
later sowed their fields promptly and experienced fewer hardships<br />
than the Indians of most of the other expatriated tribes. A portion<br />
held on in their old territories, though bands of them joined their<br />
western kindred from time to time, 1,000 in 1846, 1,619 in 184T, 118<br />
in 1848, 547 in 1849, 388 in 1853, and more than 300 in 1854. A con-<br />
siderable body still remained, numbering 1,253 in 1910 and 1,665 in<br />
1930. In 1855 the Chickasaw, who had at first enjoyed the privilege<br />
of settling indiscriminately among the Choctaw, were given a separate<br />
territory west of the latter, and an independent government. The<br />
history of the Choctaw national government in Oklahoma would<br />
constitute an interesting contribution to our knowledge of native<br />
American capabilities in the handling of their affairs under a frame<br />
imported from abroad. Like the governments of the other four red<br />
republics of the old Indian Territory, it is now of course a thing of<br />
the past, the Choctaw being citizens of Oklahoma and of the United<br />
States.<br />
THE ORIGIN LEGEND<br />
There are two forms of the Choctaw origin legend, and both are<br />
suggested in the following passage from Du Pratz, which perhaps<br />
contains our earliest reference to it:<br />
According to the tradition of the natives this nation passed so rapidly from<br />
one land to another and arrived so suddenly in the country vphich it occupies<br />
that, when I asked them from whence the Chat-kas came, to express the<br />
suddenness of their appearance they replied that they had come out from<br />
under the earth. Their great numbers imposed respect on the nations near<br />
which they passed, but their wholly unmartial character did not inspire them<br />
with any lust of conquest, so that they entered an uninhabited country the<br />
possession of whicli no one disputed witli them. They have not molested<br />
their neighbors, and the latter did not dare to test their bravery ; this is<br />
doubtless why they have grown, and augmented to their present numbers.^<br />
Romans (1771) says:<br />
These people are the only nation from whom I could learn any idea of a<br />
traditional account of a first origin ; and that is their coming out of a hole<br />
in the ground, which they shew between their nation and the Chickasaws;<br />
they tell us also that tlieir neighbours were surprised at seeing a people rise<br />
at once out of the earth.'<br />
1 Du Pratz, Hist, de La Louisiane, ii, pp. 216-217. Paris, 1758.<br />
* Romans, B., Nat. Hist, of E. and W. Fla., p. 71. New York, 1775.