30.04.2013 Views

siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution

siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution

siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL, AND CEEEMOITIAL, LIFE 5<br />

onists and the original occupants of the soil, whose removal to lands<br />

farther west was clamorously urged by the settlers and ultimately<br />

agreed to by the Choctaw themselves at the treaty of Dancing Rabbit<br />

Creek, September 27 and 28, 1830. By this treaty they secured a tract<br />

of land along Red River, in the southeastern part of the present State<br />

of Oklahoma, to which the bulk of the tribe emigrated in 1831, 1832,<br />

and 1833. The first emigrants suffered cruelly, but those who went<br />

later sowed their fields promptly and experienced fewer hardships<br />

than the Indians of most of the other expatriated tribes. A portion<br />

held on in their old territories, though bands of them joined their<br />

western kindred from time to time, 1,000 in 1846, 1,619 in 184T, 118<br />

in 1848, 547 in 1849, 388 in 1853, and more than 300 in 1854. A con-<br />

siderable body still remained, numbering 1,253 in 1910 and 1,665 in<br />

1930. In 1855 the Chickasaw, who had at first enjoyed the privilege<br />

of settling indiscriminately among the Choctaw, were given a separate<br />

territory west of the latter, and an independent government. The<br />

history of the Choctaw national government in Oklahoma would<br />

constitute an interesting contribution to our knowledge of native<br />

American capabilities in the handling of their affairs under a frame<br />

imported from abroad. Like the governments of the other four red<br />

republics of the old Indian Territory, it is now of course a thing of<br />

the past, the Choctaw being citizens of Oklahoma and of the United<br />

States.<br />

THE ORIGIN LEGEND<br />

There are two forms of the Choctaw origin legend, and both are<br />

suggested in the following passage from Du Pratz, which perhaps<br />

contains our earliest reference to it:<br />

According to the tradition of the natives this nation passed so rapidly from<br />

one land to another and arrived so suddenly in the country vphich it occupies<br />

that, when I asked them from whence the Chat-kas came, to express the<br />

suddenness of their appearance they replied that they had come out from<br />

under the earth. Their great numbers imposed respect on the nations near<br />

which they passed, but their wholly unmartial character did not inspire them<br />

with any lust of conquest, so that they entered an uninhabited country the<br />

possession of whicli no one disputed witli them. They have not molested<br />

their neighbors, and the latter did not dare to test their bravery ; this is<br />

doubtless why they have grown, and augmented to their present numbers.^<br />

Romans (1771) says:<br />

These people are the only nation from whom I could learn any idea of a<br />

traditional account of a first origin ; and that is their coming out of a hole<br />

in the ground, which they shew between their nation and the Chickasaws;<br />

they tell us also that tlieir neighbours were surprised at seeing a people rise<br />

at once out of the earth.'<br />

1 Du Pratz, Hist, de La Louisiane, ii, pp. 216-217. Paris, 1758.<br />

* Romans, B., Nat. Hist, of E. and W. Fla., p. 71. New York, 1775.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!