siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
188 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 103 away the last stick on the moruiug of the burial day. The old-time Choctaws reckoned time by " sleeps," and by throwing away a stick after each night's sleep, no mistake could be made. When the bone-picker arrives at the house of the deceased, the family, kindred and visitors seat themselves on the mourning benches and go through with their usual weeping and wailing. They then remove the benches and the bone-picker attends to his oflSce. He first makes the coflSn or coflans, ornamenting them to the best of his taste or ability. He then takes down the corpses, with his long finger nails separates the flesh from the bones, scrapes and washes the bones perfectly clean, and puts them in the coffin. Tradition is silent as to the disposition of the decayed flesh and other refuse. According to Bernard Romans' Florida, all this was burned. On the contrary, an old Indian countryman, many years ago, informed the writer that it was buried. This last statement seems to be corroborated by the Journal of the Rev. Lorenzo Dow, page 220, where under the date of December 24, 1804, he thus writes : " We rode about forty miles through Six Towns of the Choctaws, and whilst we were passing it, I observed where they scaffolded the dead, and also the spot where the flesh was buried when the boue-picker had done his oflSce." The probabilities are that some communities may have buried the flesh, while others biirned it. Or, as Dow was a later observer, it may be that in his day the fashion was changed, the flesh being buried instead of being burned. In this connection it may not be amiss to call attention to Claiborne's Mississippi, page 489, where there is a confusion of the ancient and the modern ceremonies. He states that " the shrivelled integuments stripped off by the bone-pickers were buried in a separate place over which a pole was planted." The shrivelled integuments may have been buried, according to the evidence just cited, but no pole was ever planted over them, nor was there any "pole- pulling " ceremony, for, as will be seen farther on, the pole-planting business and the pole-pulling ceremony were introduced afterwards as new ceremonies, when the old bone-picking custom was abolished by the Choctaws. According to the number of corpses the bone pickers may be one or more days at work on their respective tasks. When the work is finished, from each place a procession is formed, and the cotfins are borne to the bone-house, whether situated far or near. As has been stated, it is well known on what day all are to meet at the bone-house, and every procession so manages its business as to arrive there on the appointed day. On their arrival the coffins are placed upon the ground, the uaourners crouch down around them, shroud their heads, then weep and wail a long time. When enough tears have been shed, the cofiins are placed in the bone-house, and all then t;ike their departure to their respective homes. After the bone-house has become full in consequence of successive deposits, the tradition says that men are appointed to cover the house all over with earth, which practically makes a burial mound. As Halbert points out, the tradition which he recorded differs from other narratives at this jDoint. It also differs in stating that the bones of the dead were synchronously brought to the burial scaffold. He suggests that these discrepancies may be accounted for by variations in usage, but to the present writer it looks as though the tradition had substituted a synchronous collection of bones on the scaffold for the synchronous burial of them in a mound. Occasion- ally deaths might have taken place near enough together for the bone
SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL LIFE 189 pickers to treat a number at the same time, but from other narratives it seems that the time allowed to lapse in each case was relatively fixed, and this would have prevented synchronous bestowal of the bones in the cantonal ossuary. Let us hope that the family of a deceased Choctaw were not subjected to the close neighborhood of the remains of their beloved relative longer than was absolutely necessary to enable the " buzzard man " to perform his functions satisfactorily. Halbert continues his discussion by an inquiry into the time when the use of ossuaries became obsolete. He says As a result [of an examination of] all the obtainable sources of information, it may be safely stated that the custom fell into disuse in the early days of the nineteenth century. The custom may have lingered longer in some localities than in others. From the passage quoted above from the Rev. Lorenzo Dow's Journal, it seems certain that this custom still prevailed in 1804 among the Six-Towns Choctaws. The anonymous author of a little work, published in 1830, entitled Conversations on the Choctaw Missions, practically states, on page 211, that the bone-picking custom became obsolete about 1800. Writers describing Choctaw customs subsequent t-o 1812, make no mention of the bone- pickuig custom, thus showing that by this time it had passed away. Colonel Claiborne, in his Life and Times of Sam Dale, pp. 175-6, has somehow drifted into a strange mistake in stating that the custom still existed in 1832. The Rev. Israel Folsom, in his manuscript, does not give the date of the abolition of the bone-picking custom ; but makes the following statment in regard to the new custom : " When the custom of placing the dead upon platforms was aban- doned, which met with strong opposition, they buried their dead in a sitting posture in Vne grave; around the grave they set up half a dozen red poles, about eight feet high, and one about fifteen feet high, at the top of which a white flag was fastened. The occupation of the bone-pickers having been abolished, it then became their business to set up red poles around the graves, and afterwards to remove them at the time of mourning, hence they were called 'pole-pullers.' They were respected by the people, and far less labor being imposed upon them they were pleased with tlie change in the burial of the dead." The above statement from Mr. Folsom seems to corroborate the Choctaw tradition that the bone-pickers of the olden time were not looked upon with much respect. Their office was doubtless considered necessary, but not very elevating. We now pass from the Choctaws of the early years of the nineteenth century down to tlie remnant of the same people still Uving in Mississippi in the last half and in the closing years of the same century. Notwithstanding the seemingly impassive nature of our Mississippi Choctaws, upon the death of a member of the household, the family and relatives often give vent to such a passionate outburst of grief that it is almost appaling to a white person unfa- miliar with Indian life. The frequent and long-drawn out exclamations of grief uttered by the wome:^ "aiyenaheh" [or aiehnahe] and " ikkikkeh " [or ikikki], fall upon the ear with a wild and mournful sound. During these agon- izing scenes the sympathizing friends present are sometimes wont to rub the heads of the mourners with horsemint so as to relieve the headache that is so often caused by excessive grief. Meanwhile preparations are made for the burial. This duty is supervised by the two oldest men in the community, officially called " hattak in tikba," which term may be translated " headman."
- Page 159 and 160: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 161 and 162: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 163 and 164: BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLET
- Page 165 and 166: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 167 and 168: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL, AND CEREMO
- Page 169 and 170: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 171 and 172: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AKD CEREMON
- Page 173 and 174: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEEEMON
- Page 175 and 176: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 177 and 178: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 179 and 180: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEKEMON
- Page 181 and 182: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL, AND CEREMO
- Page 183 and 184: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEEEMON
- Page 185 and 186: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL, AND CEREMO
- Page 187 and 188: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEEEMON
- Page 189 and 190: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 191 and 192: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 193 and 194: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEKEMON
- Page 195 and 196: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 197 and 198: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 199 and 200: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 201 and 202: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 203 and 204: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 205 and 206: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEKEMON
- Page 207 and 208: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 209: SWAXTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 213 and 214: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 215 and 216: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 217 and 218: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 219 and 220: SWANTONj CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 221 and 222: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 223 and 224: SWANToxJ CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 225 and 226: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 227 and 228: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 229 and 230: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 231 and 232: SwANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 233 and 234: SwANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEKEMON
- Page 235 and 236: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 237 and 238: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 239 and 240: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEEEMOI
- Page 241 and 242: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 243 and 244: swanton] choctaw social and ceremon
- Page 247 and 248: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEEEMON
- Page 249 and 250: SWANTONJ CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 251 and 252: SwANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL, AND CEEEMO
- Page 253 and 254: SwANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL, AND CEREMO
- Page 255 and 256: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 257 and 258: SWANTox] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
- Page 259 and 260: SWANTON] CHOCTAW SOCIAL AND CEREMON
188 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 103<br />
away the last stick on the moruiug of the burial day. The old-time Choctaws<br />
reckoned time by " sleeps," and by throwing away a stick after each night's<br />
sleep, no mistake could be made.<br />
When the bone-picker arrives at the house of the deceased, the family,<br />
kindred and visitors seat themselves on the mourning benches and go through<br />
with their usual weeping and wailing. They then remove the benches and<br />
the bone-picker attends to his oflSce. He first makes the coflSn or coflans, ornamenting<br />
them to the best of his taste or ability. He then takes down the<br />
corpses, with his long finger nails separates the flesh from the bones, scrapes<br />
and washes the bones perfectly clean, and puts them in the coffin. Tradition<br />
is silent as to the disposition of the decayed flesh and other refuse. According<br />
to Bernard Romans' Florida, all this was burned. On the contrary, an<br />
old Indian countryman, many years ago, informed the writer that it was<br />
buried. This last statement seems to be corroborated by the Journal of the<br />
Rev. Lorenzo Dow, page 220, where under the date of December 24, 1804, he<br />
thus writes :<br />
" We rode about forty miles through Six Towns of the Choctaws,<br />
and whilst we were passing it, I observed where they scaffolded the dead, and<br />
also the spot where the flesh was buried when the boue-picker had done his<br />
oflSce." The probabilities are that some communities may have buried the<br />
flesh, while others biirned it. Or, as Dow was a later observer, it may be<br />
that in his day the fashion was changed, the flesh being buried instead of being<br />
burned. In this connection it may not be amiss to call attention to Claiborne's<br />
Mississippi, page 489, where there is a confusion of the ancient and the modern<br />
ceremonies. He states that " the shrivelled integuments stripped off by the<br />
bone-pickers were buried in a separate place over which a pole was planted."<br />
The shrivelled integuments may have been buried, according to the evidence<br />
just cited, but no pole was ever planted over them, nor was there any "pole-<br />
pulling " ceremony, for, as will be seen farther on, the pole-planting business<br />
and the pole-pulling ceremony were introduced afterwards as new ceremonies,<br />
when the old bone-picking custom was abolished by the Choctaws.<br />
According to the number of corpses the bone pickers may be one or more<br />
days at work on their respective tasks. When the work is finished, from each<br />
place a procession is formed, and the cotfins are borne to the bone-house,<br />
whether situated far or near. As has been stated, it is well known on what<br />
day all are to meet at the bone-house, and every procession so manages its<br />
business as to arrive there on the appointed day. On their arrival the coffins<br />
are placed upon the ground, the uaourners crouch down around them, shroud<br />
their heads, then weep and wail a long time. When enough tears have been<br />
shed, the cofiins are placed in the bone-house, and all then t;ike their departure<br />
to their respective homes.<br />
After the bone-house has become full in consequence of successive deposits,<br />
the tradition says that men are appointed to cover the house all over with<br />
earth, which practically makes a burial mound.<br />
As Halbert points out, the tradition which he recorded differs<br />
from other narratives at this jDoint. It also differs in stating that<br />
the bones of the dead were synchronously brought to the burial scaffold.<br />
He suggests that these discrepancies may be accounted for by<br />
variations in usage, but to the present writer it looks as though the<br />
tradition had substituted a synchronous collection of bones on the<br />
scaffold for the synchronous burial of them in a mound. Occasion-<br />
ally deaths might have taken place near enough together for the bone