siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
168 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 103<br />
enemy as belonging to the village of Oka hullo by means of a war<br />
club which they had left behind. It is uncertain whether this means<br />
that each town had its individual mark or whether the object<br />
identified was unique.<br />
It is only natural that war customs should have been among the first<br />
to recede from the memories of the later Choctaw, and in fact<br />
Cushman is practically the only relatively modern writer who<br />
mentions them—as usual in an emotional setting.<br />
The Choctaw warrior was equally as expert in deceiving his enemy<br />
as . . . the wild denizens of his native forests. When upon the war-path the<br />
Choctaws always went in small bands, which was the universal custom of<br />
their entire race, traveling one behind the other in a straight line; and, if in<br />
the enemy's territory, each one stepped exactly in the tracks of the one who<br />
walked before him, while the one in the extreme rear defaced, as much as<br />
possible, their tracks, that no evidence of their number, or whereabouts might<br />
be made known to the enemy. In these war excursions, the most profound<br />
silence was observed ; their communications being carried on by preconcerted<br />
and well understood signs made by the hand or head ; if necessary to be<br />
audible, then by a low imitative cry of some particular wild animal.<br />
The dignity of chieftainship was bestowed upon him who had proved himself<br />
worthy by his skill and daring deeds in war; and to preserve the valiant<br />
character of their chief, it was considered a disgrace for him to be surpassed<br />
in daring deeds by any of his warriors ; at the same time, it was also regarded<br />
as dishonorable for the warriors to be surpassed by their chief. Thus there<br />
were great motives for both to perform desperate deeds of valor—which they<br />
did ; nor did they wait for opportunities for the display of heroism, but sought<br />
perils and toils by which they might distinguish themselves. These war<br />
parties, gliding noiselessly like spectres through the dense forests, painted in<br />
the most fantastic manner conceivable, presented a wild and fearful appearance,<br />
more calculated to strike terror to the heart of the beholder than admiration.<br />
Though they advanced in small bodies and detached parties, yet in their<br />
retreats they scattered like frightened partridges, each for himself, but to unite<br />
again at a pre-arranged place miles to the rear. No gaudy display was ever<br />
made in their war excursions to their enemy's country. They meant business,<br />
not display, depending on the success of their expedition in their silent and<br />
unexpected approach, patient watching, and artful stratagems. To fight a<br />
pitched battle in an oiten field giving the enemy an equal chance, was to the<br />
Choctaws the best evidence of a want of military skill. Not unlike most of<br />
their race, they seldom invaded an enemy's territory from choice ; but woe to<br />
the enemy, who, attributing this to cowardice, should have the presumption to<br />
invade their country ; like enraged bears robbed of their young, they would find<br />
the Choctaw warriors, to a man, ready to repel them with the most desperate<br />
and fearless bravery ever exhibited by any race of men. Yet, to them, no less<br />
than to the whites, strategy was commendable, and to outwit an enemy and<br />
thus gain an advantage over him, was evidence of great and praiseworthy<br />
skill."<br />
As with all their race, so war was, in the estimation of the ancient Choctaws,<br />
the most patriotic avocation in which a man could engage ; they seldom began<br />
a war with another tribe, but rather waited for an attack; then no braver or<br />
•3 Cushman, Hist. Choc, Chick., and Natchez Inds., pp. 198-199.