siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution siOBX; - Smithsonian Institution
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 103 PLATE 1 APUSHMATAHA
SOURCE MATERIAL FOR THE SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL LIFE OF THE CHOCTAW INDIANS By John R. Swanton INTRODUCTION Each of the larger tribes which formerly occupied portions of the Gulf region of our country had its own peculiar characteristics, and this was as true of those known to have belonged to the same linguistic stock as of tribes alien to one another in this respect. One associates with the Natchez a developed solar worship with a temple and perpetual fire, absolutism in government, and tragic funeral rites with the Creeks a highly developed clan system, a confederate organi- zation second in North America above Mexico to the Iroquois only, striking annual ceremonies, and prowess in war ; with the Chickasaw warlike prowess of a still higher order, second to none except perhaps that exhibited by the Iroquois, and a social organization reminiscent of both Creeks and Choctaw. The feeling of a student for the Choctaw, however, might be described as of a powerful indefinite- ness. Although during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the disparity in numbers between this tribe and the Creeks was probably not so great as it later became, the Choctaw were always, it is believed, the more populous and they appear to have been six or eight times as numerous as the Chickasaw. They lived as near to the French as the Creeks did to the English and much nearer than the Chickasaw. The important relation they bore to French colonial dominion, since they covered the flank of the Louisiana colony and the mouth of the Mississippi, was well recognized, and relations between them and the French, Spaniards, and Americans in succes- sion were constant and intimate. Friends and foes alike testify to their courage, and a modified form of their language had become a trade medium which extended throughout most of the territory of the present States of Mississippi and Louisiana and along the whole of the lower Mississippi River. Yet how poorly press agented were the Choctaw is shown by the fact that this trade language received its name either from the Chickasaw or the little Mobile tribe. The fact of the matter is there were few customs observable among them sufficiently striking to attract the attention of European travelers little " copy stuff," in other words, such as would interest officers of 1
- Page 1: T^ W^V^lf T^UItli^^I'MlfXtKKKX^,- s
- Page 9: ,\JL . S. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION B
- Page 13: CONTENTS Introduction 1 Historical
- Page 20 and 21: 2 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bul
- Page 22 and 23: 4 BIJKEAU OF AMEEICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 24 and 25: Q BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bul
- Page 26 and 27: 8 BUREAU OF AMEEICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bul
- Page 28 and 29: 10 BtTREAtJ OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [
- Page 30 and 31: 12 BIJEEAU OF AMEEICAlSr ETHNOLOGY
- Page 32 and 33: 14 BUBEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 34 and 35: 16 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 36 and 37: 18 BUREAU OF AMERICAN" ETHNOLOGY [B
- Page 38 and 39: 20 BITEEAU OP AMERICAIT ETHNOLOGY [
- Page 40 and 41: 22 BUKEAU OF AMEEICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 42 and 43: 24 BUREAU OF AMEEICAN" ETHNOLOGY [B
- Page 44 and 45: 26 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 46 and 47: 28 BTJEEATJ OF AMERICA^ ETHNOLOGY [
- Page 48 and 49: 30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 50 and 51: 32 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 52 and 53: 34 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 54 and 55: 36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 56 and 57: 38 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bd
- Page 58 and 59: 40 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bo
- Page 60 and 61: 42 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bu
- Page 62 and 63: 44 BUREAU OF AMERICAN" ETHNOLOGY [B
- Page 64 and 65: 46 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bo
SOURCE MATERIAL FOR THE SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL<br />
LIFE OF THE CHOCTAW INDIANS<br />
By John R. Swanton<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Each of the larger tribes which formerly occupied portions of the<br />
Gulf region of our country had its own peculiar characteristics, and<br />
this was as true of those known to have belonged to the same<br />
linguistic stock as of tribes alien to one another in this respect. One<br />
associates with the Natchez a developed solar worship with a temple<br />
and perpetual fire, absolutism in government, and tragic funeral rites<br />
with the Creeks a highly developed clan system, a confederate organi-<br />
zation second in North America above Mexico to the Iroquois only,<br />
striking annual ceremonies, and prowess in war ; with the Chickasaw<br />
warlike prowess of a still higher order, second to none except perhaps<br />
that exhibited by the Iroquois, and a social organization reminiscent<br />
of both Creeks and Choctaw. The feeling of a student for the<br />
Choctaw, however, might be described as of a powerful indefinite-<br />
ness. Although during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the<br />
disparity in numbers between this tribe and the Creeks was probably<br />
not so great as it later became, the Choctaw were always, it is<br />
believed, the more populous and they appear to have been six or<br />
eight times as numerous as the Chickasaw. They lived as near to the<br />
French as the Creeks did to the English and much nearer than the<br />
Chickasaw. The important relation they bore to French colonial<br />
dominion, since they covered the flank of the Louisiana colony and<br />
the mouth of the Mississippi, was well recognized, and relations<br />
between them and the French, Spaniards, and Americans in succes-<br />
sion were constant and intimate. Friends and foes alike testify to<br />
their courage, and a modified form of their language had become a<br />
trade medium which extended throughout most of the territory of<br />
the present States of Mississippi and Louisiana and along the whole<br />
of the lower Mississippi River. Yet how poorly press agented were<br />
the Choctaw is shown by the fact that this trade language received<br />
its name either from the Chickasaw or the little Mobile tribe. The<br />
fact of the matter is there were few customs observable among them<br />
sufficiently striking to attract the attention of European travelers<br />
little " copy stuff," in other words, such as would interest officers of<br />
1