Fusoguard
Fusoguard
Fusoguard
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Season-long<br />
footrot control<br />
Designed<br />
specifically<br />
for cattle<br />
SubQ<br />
administration<br />
Safe, inactivated<br />
bacterin<br />
SuprImm ®<br />
adjuvant system<br />
enhances DOI<br />
Easy to handle,<br />
economical and<br />
convenient<br />
FUSOGARD<br />
®<br />
Fusobacterium necrophorum Bacterin<br />
FUSOGARD ® Fusobacterium<br />
necrophorum Bacterin, the first<br />
F. necrophorum bacterin to help protect<br />
cattle against footrot, was designed with<br />
economics, convenience, beef quality<br />
assurance and solid disease protection in<br />
mind. Manufactured and marketed by<br />
Novartis Animal Vaccines, Inc., FUSOGARD<br />
provides the protection and safety of an<br />
inactivated bacterin while delivering seasonlong<br />
footrot protection.<br />
Benefits of FUSOGARD<br />
• Effective, season-long footrot protection.<br />
• Eliminates antibiotic use.<br />
• Enhances potential profitability.<br />
• Cost-effective.<br />
• Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) friendly<br />
with subcutaneous (SubQ) injection.<br />
FOOTROT<br />
Footrot is an infectious cattle disease that<br />
causes swelling and lameness in one or<br />
more feet. Although the disease is rarely<br />
fatal, the economic loss from treatment and<br />
the decrease in weight gains and production<br />
potential is substantial.<br />
The pathogenic agent identified as the<br />
primary cause of footrot is Fusobacterium<br />
necrophorum. Although it cannot penetrate<br />
Advanced Science from Novartis Animal Vaccines, Inc.<br />
FUSOGARD ® ... YOUR PROVEN<br />
ADVANTAGE AGAINST FOOTROT<br />
intact, healthy skin, the organism takes<br />
advantage of abrasions or puncture wounds<br />
in the foot region. It enters through the<br />
abrasion or puncture wound and lives in<br />
the rumen.<br />
Factors that predispose cattle to infection<br />
include abrasive surfaces, stones, frozen or<br />
dried mud, stubble and wet pens or bedding<br />
areas.<br />
If treatment of footrot is delayed, the disease<br />
can easily become chronic with a low<br />
prognosis for recovery. Delay in treatment<br />
also allows for deeper structures of the foot<br />
to become infected.<br />
ECONOMICS<br />
Lameness is one of the most costly problems<br />
producers face. When footrot strikes and<br />
lameness follows, production and profitability<br />
decrease.<br />
Feedyard Cattle Costs – Extensive<br />
lameness studies by the University of<br />
Nebraska reveal the potential loss<br />
associated with lameness in a feedyard.<br />
In the University of Nebraska study, lame<br />
cattle were, on average, sold 85 days after<br />
their arrival and weighed only 10 lbs. more
at time of sale than their<br />
entry weight. The total<br />
loss per lame animal was<br />
$121 per head ($14.28<br />
for feed cost for salvaged<br />
animals, $4.96 for<br />
medication and $101.76<br />
loss in value to all lame<br />
animals from the sale of<br />
the salvaged animals).<br />
The loss per head purchased<br />
amounted to $2.54<br />
– which increased the<br />
cost of gain by $0.50/cwt.<br />
Additionally, records<br />
from five large Western<br />
feedyards showed that<br />
lameness accounted for<br />
16% of cattle treated for<br />
health problems and 5%<br />
of deaths of feedyard<br />
animals.<br />
Cow/Calf, Stocker<br />
Costs – Economic<br />
losses are also seen in<br />
grazing cattle that get<br />
footrot. A three-year study<br />
conducted by Kansas State<br />
University showed that<br />
footrot-affected steers<br />
gained just 2.3 lbs./day<br />
while steers not infected<br />
with F. necrophorum<br />
gained 2.76 lbs./day.<br />
That’s a 0.46 lb./head/day<br />
loss! (And this loss is<br />
preventable.)<br />
Dairy Costs – Cornell<br />
University researchers<br />
estimate that lameness<br />
FIGURE 1: Lameness Score<br />
Days Post-Challenge<br />
FIGURE 2: Soft Tissue Swelling Score<br />
Days Post-Challenge<br />
FIGURE 3: Abscessation Score<br />
Days Post-Challenge<br />
Control<br />
Vaccinate<br />
Control<br />
Vaccinate<br />
Control<br />
Vaccinate<br />
0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe 4 = Holds foot up<br />
(of which footrot is<br />
considered a major factor)<br />
costs dairy producers $346<br />
per episode. This includes<br />
additional days open,<br />
involuntary culling and<br />
an average of 750 lbs.<br />
of lost milk production.<br />
Michigan State University<br />
researchers showed<br />
conclusively that lame<br />
cows were:<br />
• 3 times more likely<br />
than their nonlame<br />
herdmates to exceed<br />
the herd average for<br />
days to first service.<br />
• 16 times more likely<br />
to exceed the herd<br />
average for days open.<br />
• 16 times more likely<br />
to exceed the herd<br />
average for days in the<br />
breeding herd than<br />
nonlame cows.<br />
• 9 times more likely<br />
to exceed the herd<br />
average for services<br />
per pregnancy.<br />
• 8 times more likely<br />
to be culled.<br />
EFFICACY<br />
STUDIES<br />
DOCUMENT<br />
SUPERIOR<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
Extensive tests have<br />
been conducted by<br />
Novartis to demonstrate<br />
the effectiveness of<br />
FUSOGARD Bacterin.<br />
One trial involved 30 calves: 20 of the<br />
commingled calves were vaccinated<br />
SubQ with FUSOGARD (F. necrophorum)<br />
Bacterin and 10 were not vaccinated<br />
with FUSOGARD Bacterin. The<br />
vaccinated calves were administered<br />
2 mL of F. necrophorum Bacterin at<br />
Day 0 and Day 21.<br />
At Day 35 of the trial (14 days postsecond<br />
vaccination), all calves were<br />
challenged with a highly virulent strain<br />
(2X10 8 CFU/mL) of F. necrophorum.<br />
This challenge was greater than what<br />
animals would ordinarily encounter in<br />
the field.
During the 19 days post-challenge<br />
study, all calves in the trial were<br />
clinically evaluated for lameness,<br />
joint/soft tissue swelling and<br />
abscessation.<br />
Trial Results<br />
Vaccinated Calves<br />
• Only 3 of the 30 vaccinated calves<br />
showed mild lameness at 24 hours<br />
post-challenge. These three<br />
completely recovered by 16 days<br />
post-challenge.<br />
• Vaccinated animals showed no<br />
temperature spikes post-challenge.<br />
Only 3 of the 30 vaccinated calves<br />
displayed mild swelling, and this<br />
completely resolved before the end<br />
of the trial period.<br />
Nonvaccinated Calves<br />
• All nonvaccinated calves showed<br />
severe lameness at 24 hours post-<br />
challenge (Figure 1). Lameness did<br />
not resolve during the trial period.<br />
• All nonvaccinated animals had<br />
mild fevers (≥104°F) 4 to 5 days<br />
post-challenge.<br />
• All nonvaccinated calves exhibited<br />
severe swelling (Figure 2) and<br />
abscessation (Figure 3).<br />
Efficacy Trial Conclusions<br />
The study clearly indicates that<br />
FUSOGARD protects cattle against a<br />
virulent strain of F. necrophorum, as<br />
evidenced by significantly reduced<br />
lameness, soft tissue swelling and<br />
abscessation.<br />
The vaccinated group recovered<br />
quickly without antibiotic treatment.<br />
The nonvaccinated animals expressed<br />
chronic, severe infections that<br />
remained throughout the trial. These<br />
animals required antibiotic treatment<br />
at the end of the trial.<br />
FIGURE 4: Summary of Field Safety Trials<br />
“When we consider the cost of vaccinating<br />
vs. the cost of treatment, cost of labor to pull<br />
an animal, stress and lost weight gain or lost<br />
genetic expression, vaccinating for footrot<br />
should be standard protocol for feedyards and<br />
cow/calf producers. Vaccinating helps eliminate<br />
antibiotic use – a major concern in the industry.<br />
I recommend FUSOGARD ® Bacterin to my<br />
customers and use it in my own cow/calf herd.<br />
I know that it works.”<br />
– James Unwin, D.V.M., Red Barn Vet Clinic, Oakland, Neb.<br />
First Dose<br />
Second Dose<br />
Trial # # Animals #/Nodule % #/Nodule %<br />
1 200 15 7.5 7<br />
2 189 0 0 7<br />
3 208 7 3.3 12<br />
3.5<br />
3.7<br />
5.8<br />
SAFETY –<br />
THE CORNERSTONE<br />
OF PERFORMANCE<br />
Safety trials involving 597 mixedbreed<br />
cattle were conducted at three<br />
locations: Idaho, South Dakota and<br />
Nebraska. Each animal received a<br />
single 2-mL SubQ injection, followed<br />
by a booster, administered according<br />
to label directions. At 3 to 5 days postvaccination,<br />
each calf was palpated<br />
at the injection site for signs of swelling,<br />
pain or evidence of inflammation<br />
and/or abscessation (Figure 4).<br />
Trial #1 Results<br />
This trial involved 200 head of<br />
mixed-breed calves weighing<br />
500-600 lbs.<br />
• 7.5% (15 head) developed a<br />
slight nodule at the injection site<br />
after the first vaccination. This<br />
swelling was resolved within 10 days<br />
post-vaccination.<br />
• 3.5% (7 head) developed a slight<br />
nodule after the second dose. This<br />
swelling was completely resolved<br />
by 8 days post-vaccination.<br />
• No other local or systemic reactions<br />
were observed.<br />
Trial #2 Results<br />
Trial #2 consisted of 189 head of<br />
heavier calves: 65 10-month-old<br />
mixed-breed heifers averaging 825 lbs.<br />
and 124 head of similar age mixedbreed<br />
steers averaging 850 lbs.<br />
• 3.7% (7 head) developed pea-size<br />
nodules which were resolved by<br />
7 days post-vaccination.<br />
• No local or systemic reactions<br />
were observed after the first 2-mL<br />
vaccination.<br />
• No abscessed lesions or systemic<br />
reactions were observed for the<br />
duration of the trial.
Trial #3 Results<br />
The third trial involved 208 head of<br />
mixed-breed cattle weighing an average<br />
of 850 lbs.<br />
• 3.3% (7 head) developed small<br />
nodules after the first vaccination.<br />
These nodules were resolved by<br />
9 days post-vaccination.<br />
• 5.8% (12 head) developed small<br />
nodules after the second dose.<br />
These nodules were firm, small<br />
and resolved by 8 days post-<br />
vaccination (Figure 4).<br />
• No apparent pain, restlessness<br />
or systemic lesions were observed<br />
throughout the trial.<br />
Safety Trial Conclusions<br />
In safety studies involving nearly<br />
600 cattle, FUSOGARD Bacterin<br />
used according to label directions was<br />
shown to cause a minimal number<br />
of small reactions at the site of<br />
injection with complete resolution<br />
of the reactions by 7 to 10 days postvaccination.<br />
THE BENEFITS ADD UP<br />
SuprImm ® ADJUVANT<br />
SYSTEM ENHANCES<br />
PROTECTION<br />
A primary difference between<br />
FUSOGARD and conventional footrot<br />
preventative products is FUSOGARD’s<br />
adjuvant: SuprImm.<br />
SuprImm is a biodegradable adjuvant<br />
that delivers a prolonged release of<br />
protective antigens using a water-inoil-in-water<br />
emulsion process. The<br />
antigens incite the immune cells to<br />
hurry to the injection site to stimulate<br />
the immune response. The result:<br />
longer, more thorough protection!<br />
In addition to its excellent syringeability,<br />
FUSOGARD’s SuprImm adjuvant<br />
gives producers a conveniently wide<br />
window to schedule vaccination and<br />
subsequent vaccine boostering.<br />
• FUSOGARD is the only Fusobacterium necrophorum bacterin designed,<br />
developed and manufactured specifically for cattle.<br />
• FUSOGARD is safe and effective against severe, highly virulent<br />
F. necrophorum bacteria challenges – as proven in extensive field studies.<br />
• FUSOGARD’s economic advantages outweigh the cost of treatment,<br />
medication costs, feed conversion losses, lost milk production and<br />
manpower to pull lame cattle.<br />
• FUSOGARD features ease of handling – excellent syringeability, SubQ<br />
Beef Quality Assurance benefits, vaccination flexibility, safety<br />
of inactivated bacterin.<br />
• FUSOGARD’s unique SuprImm ® adjuvant provides extended duration<br />
of immunity to enhance disease protection longevity.<br />
• FUSOGARD is backed by the professionals at Novartis Animal Vaccines,<br />
the industry’s disease prevention leaders.<br />
© 2002, Novartis Animal Vaccines, Inc.<br />
NAVI-BD039-0702<br />
“Wet and muddy are synonymous with<br />
footrot. But that all changed when we<br />
incorporated FUSOGARD ® Bacterin at<br />
processing. While pens may still get wet<br />
and muddy, footrot is no longer a concern.<br />
Vaccinating for footrot is cost-effective, and<br />
vaccinating rather than treating is easier on<br />
the livestock and less labor-intensive.”<br />
Jerry Bohn, General Manager, Pratt Feeders, LLC, Pratt, Kan.<br />
FUSOGARD PROTOCOL<br />
FUSOGARD Bacterin is labeled for<br />
vaccination of healthy cattle 6 months<br />
of age or older. For adequate protection,<br />
vaccination with a single 2-mL dose<br />
SubQ followed by a second 2-mL dose<br />
60 days later.<br />
For feedyards, FUSOGARD’s persistent<br />
level of protection makes it<br />
advantageous to administer the first<br />
dose upon arrival into the feedyard<br />
and the second dose at reimplant,<br />
approximately 60 days later.<br />
For more information on FUSOGARD ®<br />
Fusobacterium necrophorum<br />
Bacterin, contact your local<br />
veterinarian, veterinary products<br />
distributor or Novartis Animal<br />
Vaccines, Inc. at 1-800-843-3386<br />
1-800-843-3386