28.04.2013 Views

J.'.~"";i'

J.'.~"";i'

J.'.~"";i'

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

Above all and first of all, thanks to ALLAH, whose care<br />

has supplied me with much strength to complete this work.<br />

I wish to express my deepest thanks and profound gratitude to Prof.<br />

Dr. Abd El-Moniem Abd El-Aziz Saleh. Professor ofObstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine , Zagazig University, for giving me<br />

the privilege of working under his supervision, for his continuos<br />

encouragement and his eminent guidance, I am extremely grateful to him.<br />

I am very grateful to Dr. Yousry Kamal Shallal ,<br />

Assistant Professor ofObstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty ofMedicine<br />

Zagazig University , for his careful guidance, great help and kind<br />

supervision all through this work, really, I am very appreciating his<br />

support.<br />

I am very grateful to Dr. Somia Hassan Abdalla. Assistant<br />

Professor of Biochemistry, Faculty ofMedicine, Zagazig University for<br />

her kindness and valuable assistance in the Biochemical studies ofthis<br />

work.<br />

I am very grateful to Dr. Hamed Mohamed Shalaby, lecturer of<br />

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University<br />

for his faithful guidance, keen supervision and kindness.<br />

My deep thanks to the head of the Department and all the staff<br />

members in Obstetrics and Gynaecological Department, Zagazig<br />

University who had helped me directly or indirectly to do this work. and<br />

lastly I extend my thanks to all the patients who had participated in<br />

this study.


...,<br />

Contents<br />

• Introduction and aim of the work<br />

• Review of literature<br />

- Hypertensive disorder in pregnancy<br />

- Etiology ofpreeclampsia<br />

- Pathogenesis ofpreeclampsia<br />

- Pathophysiology ofpreeclampsia<br />

- Diagnosis and classification ofpreeclampsia<br />

- Prediction ofPregnancy Induced Hypertension<br />

- Complications and prognosis of preelcampsia<br />

eclampsia<br />

- Management ofpregnancy induced hypertension<br />

- Lipoprotein (a)<br />

• Patients and Methods<br />

• Statistical Analysis<br />

• Results<br />

• Discussion<br />

• Summary and conclusions<br />

• Recommendations<br />

• References<br />

• Arabic summary<br />

1-2<br />

3<br />

6<br />

9<br />

10<br />

21<br />

37<br />

and 50<br />

57<br />

60<br />

71<br />

82<br />

86<br />

97<br />

101<br />

104<br />

105<br />

129


List of Abbreviations<br />

: Apolipoprotein.<br />

: Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.<br />

: Antithrombin III .<br />

: Colloid Osmotic Pressure.<br />

: Central Venous Pressure.<br />

: Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy<br />

: Fibrin Degradation Products.<br />

: Free Fatty Acids.<br />

: Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin.<br />

: High Density Lipoprotein.<br />

: Syndrom manifested by Haemolytic anaemia,Elevated liver<br />

Enzymes and Low platelet count.<br />

: Low Density Lipoprotein.<br />

: Lipoprotein (a).<br />

: Pregnancy Associated Plasma Proteins A.<br />

: Pregnancy Associated Plasma Proteins B.<br />

: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure.<br />

: Pre-eclamptic Toxaemia.<br />

: Prostaglandin .<br />

: Pregnancy induced hypertension.<br />

: Plasma Protein S<br />

: Transforming Growth Factor B.<br />

: Thrombocytopenic Purpura<br />

: Thromboxane.<br />

: Vascular Cell Adhesion molecule.


List of Figures<br />

) - Management ofmild preeclampsia 58<br />

2 - Suggested management of severe preeclampsia carious 59<br />

gestational stages<br />

3 - Structure ofa typical lipoprotein partical 64<br />

4 - Structure oflipoprotein (a) 64<br />

5 - Representative standard curve. 76<br />

6 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) in control and study 93<br />

groups.<br />

7 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean systolic blood 93<br />

pressure in control and study groups.<br />

8 -Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean diastolic blood 94<br />

pressure in control and study groups.<br />

9 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean arterial blood 94<br />

pressure in control and study groups.<br />

10 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean ofSGPT in 95<br />

control and study groups.<br />

11 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean SGOT in 95<br />

control and study group.<br />

12 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and proteinuria in 96<br />

control and study groups.


INTRODUCTION<br />

AND<br />

AIM OF THE WORK


Introduction<br />

Introduction<br />

Preeclampsia is a serious complication ofthe second halfof<br />

pregnancy that occurs with a frequency of5% to 15% . This disease<br />

is a leading cause of fetal growth retardation, infant and maternal<br />

morbidity and mortality. In the placental bed, fibrin and platelet<br />

deposition, thrombosis, and infarction occur and result in reduced<br />

placental perfusion . In severe disease disseminated intravascular<br />

coagulation may be present with platelet and fibrin deposition in<br />

many organs, including the brain, liver , and kidneys . Altered<br />

coagulability may be important in the pathogenesis ofpreeclampsia.<br />

(Robets, 1993) .<br />

Lipoprotein (a), a circulating lipoprotein particle, has been found to<br />

enhance blood coagulation by competing with plasminogen for its<br />

binding sites on fibrin clots and endothelial cells. This action is believed<br />

to be mediated by a structural homology (> 90%) between<br />

apoliopoprotcin (a) which is the carrier protein for lipoprotein (a) and<br />

plasminogen. The activation of plasminogen to form plasmin is the<br />

essential step necessary for the lysis of fibrin by plasmin<br />

(Dahlen, 1994).<br />

Many studies had demonstrated that elevated lipoprotein (a) levels<br />

are associated with atherogenesis and myocardial infarction. (Wang, et<br />

al. 1994) . Both in vitro and in vivo data indicate that lipoprotein (a)<br />

levels are elevated in preeclampsia and associated with the severity ofthe<br />

disease. This hypothesis is supported by observation of high lipoprotein<br />

(a) levels in a single family with two cases of severe preeclampsia.<br />

(Husby et al., 1996) .<br />

I


Aim of The Work<br />

Aim ofthe work<br />

Is to determine alteration ofLipoprotein (a) level in Preeclampsia,<br />

its predictive value and correltation with severity ofthe disease.<br />

2


·.1"<br />

_,;;t.<br />

REVIEW<br />

OF<br />

LITERATURE


I . HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS<br />

IN PREGNANCY<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Elevated blood pressure during pregnancy is a challenging clinical<br />

problem for which the approach to evaluation and treatment differs<br />

substantially from that employed in nonpregnant patients.<br />

First the diagnostic spectrum is broader since in addition to various<br />

forms of chronic hypertension, the patient may have a short-lived<br />

pregnancy specific form of hypertension i.e preeclampsia, The latter<br />

disorder is accompanied by substantially greater maternal and fetal risks<br />

than in uncomplicated essential hypertension. (Barron, 1995).<br />

Pregnancy may induce hypertension in women who are<br />

normotensive before pregnancy and may aggravate hypertension in those<br />

that are hypertensive before pregnancy. The clinical and laboratory<br />

characteristics of hypertension associated with pregnancy are difficult to<br />

differentiate from those ofhypertension independent ofpregnancy.<br />

As consequence, severe pregnancy-induced or pregnancy­<br />

aggravated hypertension is frequently confused with other diseases<br />

processes such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), acute<br />

glornerulonephiritis, and chronic essential hypertension occuring during<br />

pregnancy (Arias, 1993).<br />

Preeclampsia is a disorder ofthe second half ofpregnancy, which<br />

regresses after delivery. Its cause is not known but must lie within the<br />

gravid uterus. Hence although preeclampsia is conventionally defined by<br />

hypertension jt is not primarily a hypertensive disease. The raised blood<br />

pressure and other maternal signs by which it recognized are secondary<br />

features, reflections ofan intrauterine problem. (Redman, 1995).<br />

3


Review ofLiterature<br />

;. .: rhzr 211 il:Jba Jar; ce in<br />

prostaglandin metabolism is central to pathophysiology ofpreeclampsia.<br />

They cited an observed decrease in prostacyclin production and an<br />

increase in thromboxan A2 prostacyclin ratio. While this hypothesis may<br />

explain some hematological and biochemical peculiarities associated with<br />

preeclampsia, it fails to show the primary etiology (Abramovicl and<br />

Sibai, 1999).<br />

A more basic abnormality ofpreeclampsia is usually generalized<br />

arteriolar constriction and increased vascular sensitivity to pressor<br />

peptides and amines, An early abnormality noted in women who develop<br />

preeclampsia is failure ofthe second wave oftrophoplastic invasion into<br />

the spiral arteries of the .uterus. As result, there is failure of the<br />

cardiovascular adaptation to normal pregnancy, resulting in reduced<br />

cardiac output and plasma volume. These abnormalities also result in<br />

impaired tissue perfusion. (Abrarnovici and Sibai, 1999).<br />

Incidence of hypertension disorders of pregnancy:<br />

In some mysterious way, the presence of chorionic villi in certain<br />

woman incites vasospasm and hypertension. Moreover, to effect a cure<br />

the chorionic villi must be expelled or surgically removed. The<br />

vasospastic hypertensive state and related pathological changes some how<br />

induced by the presence of chorionic villi may not be so great that<br />

pregnancy need to be terminated prematurely (Pritchard, 1978).<br />

The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy acute and chronic,<br />

regardless the cause, are among the most serious medical complications<br />

that the pregnant female encounters. The majority of pregnancies<br />

complicated by hypertensive diseases do reasonably well, however there<br />

is a potential death to both the mother and the fetus (Zuspan, 1987).<br />

4


-f<br />

Etiology of Preeclampsia<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Endothelial cell activation or dysfunction appears to be the central<br />

of theme in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia, but 'what causes these<br />

endothelial changes in pre-eclampsia? Four hypotheses are currently the<br />

subject ofextensive investigation. For the sake ofclarity these hypotheses<br />

are described separately; however, it.should be stressed that they are not<br />

mutually exclusive but probably interactive.<br />

1- Placental ischemia.<br />

According to the Oxford Group Of Researchers, pre-eclampsia is a<br />

2-stage placental disease. The first stage is the process that affects the<br />

spiral arteries and results in deficient blood supply to the placenta. The<br />

second stage encompasses the effects ofthe ensuing placental ischemia<br />

on both the fetus and the mother (Smarason et a1.,1993).<br />

Placental ischemia as the cause ofendothelial cell dysfunction in<br />

pre-eclampsia is an attractivecoucept, but several concerns are<br />

conceivable that may dispute its validity. First, if placental ischemia is the<br />

actual cause of endothelial cell dysfunction, one would expect a closer<br />

correlation between the presence ofmaternal and fetal components ofthe<br />

disease. However, this is not the usual finding in clinical practice. Next,<br />

the chronology ofthe maternal components ofthe syndrome appears not<br />

to fit with the placental ischemia hypothesis. The finding ofsome recent<br />

studies suggest that endothelial cell involvement is already present in the<br />

first trimester (Taylor et at, 1990)<br />

2- Very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) versus toxicity-preventing<br />

activity.<br />

In pre-eclampsia, circulating free fatty acids (FFA) are already<br />

increased 15 to 20 weeks before the onset ofclinical disease. (Lorentzen<br />

et al., 1994). Sera from pre-eclamptic women have both a higer ratio of<br />

FFA to albumin cell uptake of FFA, which are further esterified into<br />

6


Review ofLiterature<br />

endothelial cell dysfunction characteristic ofpre-eclampsia (Easterling et<br />

at, 1990).<br />

Obesity is also associated with increased lipid availability,<br />

increased delivery, of FFA to tissue, higher cholesterol and triglycerides<br />

levels, insulin resistance, and hyperinsulinemia. (Unger, 1995).<br />

Severe early onset pre-eclampsia is also associated with a high<br />

incidence of underlying disorders such as protein S deficiency, activated<br />

protein C resistance [factor V mutation], and anticardiolipin antibodies,<br />

which may cause a more aggressive accelerated course ofthe disease by<br />

including an abnormal interaction between endothelial cells, platelets,<br />

leukocytes, and plasmatic coagulation and fibrinolytic factors.(Dekker et<br />

aI., 1995).<br />

8


Pathogenesis of pre- eclampsia<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

The exact nature ofthe primary event causing pre-eclampsia is not<br />

known. However, one of the initial events in this disease is abnormal<br />

placentation, in which the main feature is inadequate trophoblastic<br />

invasion ofthe maternal spiral arterioles. In normal pregnancy the wall of<br />

the spiral arteries is invaded by trophoblastic cells and transformed into<br />

large, tortuous channels that carry a large amount of blood to the<br />

intervillous space and are resistant to the effects of vasmotor agents.<br />

These physiologic changes are restricted in-patients with pre-eclampsia<br />

(Brosens, 1977).<br />

The anatomic and physiologic disruption ofnormal placentation is<br />

thought to lead to altered endothelial cell function and multiple organ<br />

damage (Shankil and Sibai ,1989). .<br />

The majority of pregnant women with chronic hypertension have<br />

essential hypertension. Rarely, the hypertension results from chronic<br />

renal disease, renal artery stenosis, pheochromocytoma,<br />

hyperaldosteronism, or other casuses (Lindheimer and Katz, 1985).<br />

In pre-eclampsia, absence of normal stimulation of the renin­<br />

angiotensin system, despite hypovolaemia, and increased vasucular<br />

sensitivity to angiotensin II and norepinephrine can be explained by a<br />

biologic dominance of TxA2 over prostacyclin. A reduction in urinary<br />

excretion of prostacyclin metabolites precedes the development of<br />

clinical disease, whereas TXA2 biosynthesis is increased in pre-eclampsia.<br />

Increased TxA2 production in pre-eclampsia is largely derived from<br />

platelets and the placenta. Placental prostacyclin production is reduced.<br />

(Dekker and Sibai, 1998).<br />

9


Pathophysiology of preeclampsia<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

In order to understand the disease process and the prevalence ofthe<br />

clinical signs of presentation it is important to understand the etiology<br />

and pathophysiology of the condition, ifthis is done, early diagnosis and<br />

potential prevention might be possible.<br />

Unfortunately, the etiology of pregnancy induced hypertension is<br />

still largely unknown. There has been much confusion over the role of<br />

many pathological findings in this condition and it is important to<br />

distinguish the signs caused by disease progression from those that are<br />

markers of the underlying process. This can he done if there is a<br />

recognizable stages for the disease process and it may be possible to use<br />

these changes as predictors of patient at risk. Much has been written the<br />

theories that have been put forward for the cause of preeclampsia<br />

described the pathological features found in end-stage disease. It is not<br />

necessary for hypertension in pregnancy to be manifested by<br />

preeclampsia (Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />

Moreover, signs found after maternal deaths from eclampsia may<br />

have little prevalence to earlier stages of preeclampsia (Walker and<br />

Gant, 1997). This may be the result of the disease process rather than the<br />

cause. Because of this controversy about the etiology of preeclampsia it<br />

was and still stated that preeclampsia is the disease of theories, any theory<br />

should explain higher incidence in women who firstly be exposed to<br />

chorionic villi (e.g. primigravida), in twin pregnancy, hydatidiform mole,<br />

preexisting vascular disease, women who are genetically predisposed to<br />

hypertension, and also should explain the improvement after expulsion or<br />

death of the fetus. Dietary deficiency, vasoactive compounds and<br />

endothelial dysfunction are implicated in the etiology of preeclampsia.<br />

10,


-.--<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Changes involved in the pathophysiology of<br />

(1) Vasospasm:<br />

preeclampsia and eclampsia<br />

Vasospasm is considered as the basic event in pathophysiology of<br />

preeclampsia. This concept. first advanced by (Gilhard, 1981) and was<br />

based on direct observation of small blood vessels in the nail beds.<br />

occular fundi. and bulbar conjunctiva and it has been reported and<br />

supported from histological changes seen in various' affected organs<br />

(Walker and Gant, 1997). Vasospasm is alternating process with<br />

segmental dilatation. which commonly accompanies the segmental.<br />

arteriolar spasm. probably contribute further to the development of<br />

vascular damage. since endothelial integrity may be compromised by<br />

stretched dilated segments (Cunningham et al., 1993). Vascular<br />

constriction causes resistance to blood flow and accounts for the<br />

development of arterial hypertension. It is likely that vaso-spasm itself<br />

also exerts a damaging effect on vessels. as the circulation in the vasa<br />

vasorum is impaired leading to vascular damage. Moreover angiotensin II<br />

causes endothelial cells to contract these changes lead to cellular damage<br />

and inter-endothelial cell leaks through which blood constituents.<br />

including platelets and fibrinogen are deposited subendothelialy (Walker<br />

and Gant, 1997).<br />

(2) Increased pressor response:<br />

Normally pregnant women develop refractoriness to infused<br />

vasopressors (catecholamines and angiotensin II). Increased vascular<br />

reactivity to pressor hormones in women in early preeclampsia has been<br />

identified by using either norepinephrin or angiotensin II and by using<br />

vasopressin.• (Gant et aI., 1973) demonstrated that increased vascular<br />

sensitivity to angiotensin II clearly preceded the onset ofpreeclampsia.<br />

11


Review ofLiterature<br />

(Oney and Kaulhausen,1982) found that nulliparous women who<br />

remained refractory to the pressor effect ofinfused angiotensin II were<br />

normotensive during pregnancy while women who subsequently became<br />

hypertensive, lost this refractoriness weeks before the onset of<br />

hypertension. Of women who required more than 8 ng/kg per minute of<br />

angiotensin II to provoke a standardized pressor response between 28 and<br />

32 weeks 90% remained normotensive throughout pregnancy. Conversely<br />

, among normotensive nulliparous women who required less than 8 ng/kg<br />

per minute at 28-32 weeks, to provoke pressor response, 90%<br />

subsequently developed overt hypertension, also this was observed in<br />

women with chronic hypertension who latter developed superimposed<br />

pre-eclamspia (Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />

(3) Supine pressor response:<br />

A hypertensive response induced by having the women assumed<br />

the supine position after lying laterally recumbant was demonstrated in<br />

some pregnant women by (Gant et al., 1974) . The majority of<br />

nulliparous women at 28-30 weeks, who had increased diastolic pressure<br />

of at least 20 mmHg when the maneuver was performed, later developed<br />

P.I.H. On the other hand, most women whose blood pressure did not<br />

elevate remained normotensive. These women who demonstrated supine<br />

response were also abnormally sensitive to infused angiotensin II, while<br />

those without a hypertensive response were normally refractory. The<br />

mechanism by which this maneuver incites a rise in blood pressure is not<br />

clear but it is likely a manifestation ofincreased vascular responsiveness<br />

or sympathetic overactivity in those who later will develop pregnancy<br />

induced hypertension (Sander et at, 1995).<br />

An identically performed study ofangiotensin II pressor response<br />

were conducted in women whose pregnancies were complicated by<br />

chronic hypertension and two groups were identified on the basis of<br />

12<br />

-.<br />

..-


--f'<br />

-,-<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

clinical outcome on serial determination ofvascular reactivity ofinfused<br />

angiotensin II. All women were refractory to angiotensin II between 21­<br />

25 weeks, however , women who subsequently developed pregnancy<br />

indueed hypertension began to lose this refractoriness after 27 weeks<br />

(Gaut et aI., 1977).<br />

It appears unlikely that the normally blunted pressor response to<br />

angiotensin II is due to down regulation or decreased affinity of<br />

angiotensin II vascular smooth muscle receptors. The metabolic rate of<br />

angiotensin II, in women with P.I.H. is not altered many studies have<br />

concluded that the blunted pressor response was due to decreased<br />

vascular responsive mediated in part by vascular endothelial synthesis of<br />

prostaglandins or prostaglandin like substances (Cunninghamm et al.,<br />

1975). Refractoriness to angiotensin II in pregnant women is abolished by<br />

large doses ofprostaglandin synthetase inhibitors (Evert et al., 1987).<br />

(4) Imbalance between prostaglandins in P.I.H :<br />

Previously the exact mechanism by which prostaglandins or related<br />

substances mediated vasular reactivity during pregnancy was unknown<br />

(Goodman et al., 1982).<br />

It is now well established that prostacyclin (PGh) and thromboxan<br />

A7, (TXA2) play an important role in the development ofpreeclampsia<br />

(Friedman, 1988 and Walsh, 1990) . PGh which is synthesized<br />

primarily by endothelial cells is a potent vasodialator and an inhibitor of<br />

platelet aggregation. In contrast TxA2 which is synthesized mainly by<br />

platelets is a potent vasoconstrictor and a stimulant of platelet<br />

aggregation. PGh is elevated in normal pregnant women and decreased.<br />

in pre-eclamptic patients. Because both are increased during normal<br />

pregnancy it has been thought that a major mechanism in the<br />

pathophysiologic changes of preeclampsia is an alteration in the ratio of<br />

TXA2 and PGh with a change in the direction ofTxA2 dominance. The<br />

importance of the change in this ratio in preeclampsia has been further<br />

13


Review ofLiterature<br />

proved by studies showing PGI2 biosynthesis preceding the development<br />

ofclinical disease (Fitzgerled et al, 1987).<br />

Schiff et al., (1988) reported a reduced incidence ofP.E.T. with<br />

low dose aspirin treatment which can selectively suppress the synthesis of<br />

platelet TxA2 without inhibiting the production of vascular PGI2.<br />

So, evidence from maternal plasma, maternal urine, fetal plasma,<br />

fetal vessels, amniotic fluid, and fetoplacental units has all supported the<br />

concept that P.I.H. is associated with a functional imbalance between<br />

PGI2 and TxA2(Schiff et al., 1988).<br />

Gong et al., (1993) demonstrated, by using peripheral blood<br />

mononuclear cells as a study model, increased TxA2 production in P.I.H.<br />

patients both with and without proteinuria and this may playa role in the<br />

development of hypertension and decreased placental blood flow. Of<br />

primary importance in his study was that the sera from P.E.T. woman<br />

with proteinuria contained a factor(s) that suppresses PGh production and<br />

enhances TxA2 synthesis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.<br />

The cause of the imbalance between PGh and TXA2 seems to be<br />

complicated and multifactorial. _To date there are several substances that<br />

have been reported to be changed in P.I.H. and are also known to affect<br />

the production of prostaglandins (PGs) in the humans (Gong et al.,<br />

1993).<br />

The first of these substances is progesterone which is capable of<br />

inhibiting POI2 production and its level is found to be increased in P.I.H.<br />

placentas (Walsh, 1988). The second is reactive oxygen species. It has<br />

been reported that the activity ofreactive oxygen species is increased in<br />

P.LH. and can change the pattern ofPGs production in favor of TxA2,<br />

synthesis (Dekker et al., 1991 and Wisdom et al., 1991). The third is<br />

mitogenic factor(s) which was recently discovered in the serum ofP.I.H.<br />

patient by Taylor et al., (1990) and has the ability to stimulate fibroblasts<br />

14<br />

-f


Review ofLiterature<br />

and is considered to be a growth factor' which in turn can generate<br />

reactive oxygen species (Meier et al., 1989) and this can eventually lead<br />

to imbalance of PGh and TXA2 as stated above . The fourth is<br />

lipoxygenase products that have been suggested to suppress PGI2<br />

synthesis and are known to be increased in P.l.H.<br />

Both PGh and TxA2 are derived from arachidonic acid through the<br />

action of cyclooxygenase. If the serum factor(s) described affect this<br />

special enzyme the production of PGh and TxA2 should be equally<br />

affected . However, the serum from P.E.T. women with proteinuria show<br />

only 'significant increased TxA2 synthesis' and has little effect on PGh<br />

formation. Therefore the reaction by this serum factor(s) may be located<br />

on the levels of TXA2 and PGh synthetase rather on the level of<br />

cyclooxygenase (Satoh et al., 1991).<br />

At least two vasoconstrictor mechanisms may be operative III<br />

preeclamptic women in whom arachidonic acid is converted by<br />

cyclooygenase into thromboxane A2with an accompanying reduction of<br />

prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2as evidenced by Cattela et al., (1990);<br />

Mitchell and Koenig, (1991) and Tannirandom et al., (1991). This<br />

pathway is responsive to low dose aspirin therapy. The second route is<br />

via lipoxygenase pathway, which results in an increased placental<br />

production of 15-hydroxy-eicosa-tetra-enoic acid. This inhibits<br />

prostacyclin production, resulting in further vasoconstriction (Mitchell<br />

and Koenig, 1991)<br />

In conclusion, it has been shown that there is an imbalance<br />

between PGh and TXA2 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells<br />

from patients with P.E.T., and a factor (s) was discovered especially in<br />

those with proteinuria and found to contribute at least in part to the<br />

abnornral production ofPGs however-the nature ofthis serum factor(s) is<br />

not yet fully understood (Gong et al., 1993).<br />

15


(5) Nitric oxide in P.tH. :<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

The role of nitric oxide-endothelium derived relaxing factor or its<br />

endothelial loss is unclear in P.I.H. , but experimental studies have<br />

proved that withdrawal ofnitric oxide from pregnant rats and guinea pigs<br />

resulted in the development ofa clinical picture similar to preeclampsia<br />

(Weiner et al., 1989). Nitric oxide appears to be important in the<br />

maintenance ofa low fetal vascular resistance in the placental circulation<br />

(Myatt et al., 1991).<br />

Fiona et al., (1996) found that. there were no significant<br />

differences in maternal serum nitrites concentrations between P.I.H.<br />

women and control group, but significant high serum nitrites<br />

concentrations were found in the umbilical venous serum in fetuses of<br />

P.I.H. group compared to control group. This increased nitrites<br />

concentration in fetoplacental circulation in P.I.H. group may support the<br />

hypothesis that, it may be compensatory response to improve blood flow<br />

or may playa role in limiting platelets adhesion and aggregation.<br />

Decreased nitric oxide release or production has not been shown to<br />

develop prior to the onset ofhypertension .. Thus, changes in nitric oxide<br />

release and concentrations in women with pregnancy induced<br />

hypertension appear to be the consequence ofhypertension and not the<br />

inciting event (Morns et al., 1996).<br />

(6) Hyperplacentosis :<br />

It was found that hyperplacentosis is a major factor influencing the<br />

development of pre eclampsia and this may occur in diabetes mellitus,<br />

multiple pregnancy, molar pregnancy and erythroblastosis fetalis<br />

(Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />

16<br />

.. .'T


Review ofLiterature<br />

next pregnancy or inability to recognize paternal antigens displayed by<br />

the fetus (Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />

Sutherland et al., (1981) postulated that the first pregnancy would<br />

help to immunize the patient against any future pregnancy to the same<br />

partner.<br />

Redman et at, (1978) found a higher incidence of HLA<br />

homozygosity in couples where mothers suffered from preeclampsia.<br />

Chen et al., (1994) found abnormalities of lymphocytes function in<br />

women with pregnancy induced hypertension. Other studies have<br />

demonstrated activation of neutrophils within the maternal circulation<br />

immunocytochemical studies have analyzed neutrophil elastase in term<br />

placenta, decidua & myometrium in women with pregnancy induced<br />

hypertension (Butterworth et al., 1991) . The vascular cell adhesion<br />

molecule (VCAM-I) is elevated in the sera of P.l.H. women and<br />

neutrophil activity partly mediated by this adhesion molecule, which<br />

encourage adhesion to the vascular endothelium (Lyall et al., 1994) .<br />

This could be part of the mechanism of endothelial cell dysfunction.<br />

These changes may act by a direct cellular effects or through release of<br />

cytokines which affect cellular function as they have been shown to affect<br />

the production of prostacyclin and thromboxane in human mononuclear<br />

cells thus affecting the vascular response in preeclampsia (Chen et al.,<br />

1993).<br />

Zhou et al., (1993), demonstated that there was an abnormality in<br />

the expression of the adhesion molecules in the extravillus trophoblast in<br />

pre-eclamptic pregnancies, and there was a failure in the expression of<br />

those associated with successful invasion into the myometrium. This<br />

could explain the secondary invasion that is associated with classical<br />

placental lesion of preeclampsia,<br />

18<br />

.,


Review ofLiterature<br />

Pregnancy associated plasma proteins A and B (PAPP-A and<br />

PAPP-B) and plasma protein S are found only in the serum of pregnant<br />

women. PAPP-A was reported to acquire its highest level in P.I.H. (Toop<br />

and Klopper 1981).<br />

PAPP-A being an inhibitor of fibrinolysis and also ofcomplement<br />

fixation, has been sugessted to play a role both in coagulation and in<br />

immunological changes in P.E.T. (Bischnoff, 1986). PPS, also found to<br />

be increased in pregnancy and further increased in P.E.T. and there is a<br />

close resemblence between PPS and antithrombin III and the former may<br />

be regarded as the placental equivelant ofthe latter. PPS could be well<br />

involved in coagulation and immunological changes in P.E.T. (Davey,<br />

1986).<br />

(8) Hyperdynamic circulation:<br />

Recent studies suggested that, the increased maternal cardiac<br />

output rather than the increased peripheral vascular resistance is the more<br />

common hemodynamic feature occuring with preeclampsia.<br />

Esterling et al., (1990) demonstrated that cardiac output values<br />

were significantly higher in preeclamptic patients than in normotensive<br />

ones. This elevation in cardiac output is already appeamt at 11weeks and<br />

remains in the puerperium despite resolution of Hypertension also they<br />

found that systemic vascular resistance of pre-eclamptic patients was<br />

always less than that of normotensive patients and remained lower in the<br />

postpartum period.<br />

The finding of hyperdynamic left ventricular function and<br />

decreased peripheral vascular resistance in preeclampsia may have an<br />

important role in selecting the best .approachto the treatment of severe<br />

hypertension in these patients by B-adrenergic blockers, rather than<br />

vasodilator drugs and open the possibility of screening patients at risk by<br />

measuring cardiac output at early gestation (Arias, 1993).<br />

19


Review ofLiterature<br />

On the other hand, the increase in the intra-vascular volume that<br />

normally occurs during pregnancy is minimal or completely absent in<br />

patients with preeclampsia. This limited blood volume expansion is<br />

probably the result of generalized vasoconstriction of capacitance vessels<br />

(Pickles et aI., 1989).<br />

20


.....<br />

,-<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Diagnosis And Classification Of Preeclampsia<br />

According to the American College of Obstericians and<br />

Gynecologists (ACOG)1985 , the diagnoses ofhypertension in pregnancy<br />

is made by anyone ofthe following criteria.<br />

1- A rise of30 mmHg or more in systolic blood pressure.<br />

2- A rise of 15 mmHg or more in diastolic blood pressure.<br />

3- A systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or more.<br />

4- A diastolic blood pressure of90 mmHg or more.<br />

These alternations in blood pressure should be observed on at least<br />

two different occasions at least 6 hours apart. (Cunningham et al., 1997)<br />

Hypertension in pregnancy is classified .Into the following<br />

groups:<br />

1- Pregnancy-induced hypertension.<br />

a. Preeclampsia.<br />

b. Eclampsia.<br />

2- Chronic hypertension of whatever cause but independent of<br />

pregnancy.<br />

3- Preeclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension.<br />

4- Transient hypertension.<br />

Each of these factors of hypertensive disorders defined by<br />

American Colleague of Obstetricians and Gynecologists<br />

(ACOG) as following:<br />

Pre-eclampsia:<br />

Hypertension associated with proteinuria, greater than 300 mgm/24<br />

hours urine collection or greater than 100mgmJdl in at least 2 random<br />

urine samples 6 hours or more apart, and/or greater than +1 pitting edema<br />

after 12 hours rest in bed or weight gain of5 pounds or more in 1 week or<br />

both after 20 weeks ofgestation (Chesley et at, 1985) (Arias; 1993). Or<br />

a syndrome which becomes detectable in the second halfofpregnancy<br />

21


Review ofLiterature<br />

which is defined in terms ofthe new development Ollljp-:nl;lIsiun and<br />

proteinuria. (De Swiet, 1995).<br />

Proteinuria:<br />

Protein is always present in urine in small amounts and it increases<br />

in normal pregnancy. The presence ofmeasurable protein can be due to<br />

an increase in the normal renal leakage or a specific increase from renal<br />

damage. The amount of protein found in urine will depend on the amount<br />

passing across the glomerulis and the amount reabsorbed by the tubules.<br />

The classic lesion in pre-eclampsia is glomerular endotheliosis. This is<br />

not a sign of damage but a pathophysiological change that will recover<br />

within days of delivery. It is alway's associated with proteinuria which<br />

consists mostly of albumin that implies leaks across the glomerular<br />

memberance. It is important to note that in more severe disease,<br />

proteinuria is less specific being associated with tubular proteins (James,<br />

1998).<br />

Edema:<br />

The pathological edema of preeclampsia is easily confused with<br />

physiological edema found in 80% of normal pregnant women<br />

physiological edema has not been shown to be precursor ofpathological<br />

edema (De Swiet, 1995).<br />

In one of the prospective studies, pregnant women with no edema<br />

or early and late onset edema, all had a similar incidence of preeclampsia<br />

(Robertson, 1971).<br />

During normal pregnancy there is a moderate fall in colloid<br />

osmotic pressure of the plasma and rise in hydrostatic pressure in the<br />

capillaries. This tends to increase fluid filteration from the intravascular<br />

compartments, but this is compensated by fluid reabsorption . For all<br />

these reasons, the detection ofedema is not useful clinically, nor should<br />

edema be included in the definition' of preeclampsia. Development of<br />

22<br />

',,"


Review ofLiterature<br />

edema is associated with higher rate ofweight gain, hence the numerous<br />

reports associating excessive weight gain with the development of<br />

preeclampsia (De Swist , 1995).<br />

Eclampsia:<br />

Convulsions occurring in a patient with preeclampsia without<br />

evident neurological disorder (Cunningham et al., 1997).<br />

Chronic hypertenion :<br />

The presence of sustained hypertension more than 140/90 mmHg<br />

or higher before pregnancy or before 20· weeks.(Cunningham et al.,<br />

1997).<br />

Preclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension:<br />

The occurrence of preeclampsia or eclampsia in women with<br />

chronic hypertension, to make this diagnosis it is necessary to document a<br />

rise of 30 mmHg or more in systolic or 15 mmHg more in diasolic blood<br />

pressure, associated with proteinuria, edema or both, and diagnosis<br />

requires documents ofunderlying chronic hypertension (Cunningham ct<br />

al., 1997).<br />

Transient hypertension:<br />

The development of hypertension during pregnancy or early<br />

puerperium in a previously normotensive women whose pressure<br />

normalizes within 10 days postpartum.<br />

23


1. Gestational hypertension (without proteinuria).<br />

a- Developing antenatally.<br />

b- Developingfor the first time in labor.<br />

c- Developing for the first time in the purperium.<br />

2. Gestational proteinuria (without Hypertension).<br />

a- Developingantenatally.<br />

b- Developingfor the first time in labor.<br />

c- Developingfor the first time in the purperium.<br />

3. Gestational proteinurichypertension (Pre-eclampsia).<br />

a- Developingantenatally.<br />

b- Developing for the first time in labor.<br />

c- Developing for the first time in the purperium.<br />

II. Chronic hypertension and chronic renal disease:<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Hypertension and/or proteinuria in pregnancy in a woman with<br />

chroinc hypertension or chronic renal disease diagnosedbefore, during,<br />

or after pregnancy. This group is subdividedinto.<br />

1. Chronichypertension(withoutproteinuria).<br />

2- Chronic renal disease (proteinuria with or without hypertension).<br />

3- Chronic hypertension with superimposed pre-eclampsia, proteinuria<br />

Developing for the first time during pregnancy in a woman with Known<br />

chronic hypertension.<br />

III. Unclassified hypertension and/or proteinuria:<br />

Hypertensionand/or proteinuriafound either:<br />

1. At first examinationafter the twentieth week of pregnancy(140 days)<br />

in a woman with known chronichypertension or chronic renal disease, or<br />

2. During pregnancy, labor, or the purperium, in a case in which<br />

informationis insufficient to permit classification?<br />

25<br />

...-


This category is subdivided into:<br />

a- Unclassified hypertension (without proteinuria).<br />

b- Unclassified proteinuria (without hypertension).<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

c-Unclassified proteinuric hypertension. (Davey and Mac Gillivary,<br />

1988)<br />

DIAGNOSIS OF SEVERE PREECLAMPSIA<br />

Symptoms<br />

For the diagnosis of preeclampsia, the committee on terminology<br />

requires acute hypertension in the latter half of pregnancy with<br />

proteinuria, or facial, digital or generalized edema or both (Chesley,<br />

1985).<br />

HEADACHE:<br />

Headache is unusual in milde cases but is increasingly frequent in<br />

more. severe disease. It is often frontal but may be occipital, and it is<br />

resistant to relief by ordinary analgesics. In women who develop<br />

eclampsia, severe headache almost invariably precedes the first<br />

convulsion (Cunningham et al., 1997). The cause ofheadache is usually<br />

inadequate blood pressure control, and it is an indication for aggressive<br />

treatment with hypotensive agents (Arias, 1993).<br />

EDEMA:<br />

Edema is included in the classic definition of preeclampsia and is<br />

used as a diagnostic feature in several classification system of<br />

hypertension in pregnancy. Pathological edema perhaps most notable in<br />

the face, occurs in 85 per cent of women with preeclampsia and is<br />

associated with a rapid increase in weight (Thomson et al., 1987).<br />

26


Review ofLiterature<br />

However, severe preeclampsia anu eclampsia 1".1h occur v' HHUUl<br />

edema and the perinatal mortality rate has been shown to be higher in<br />

preeclampsia without edema than in preeclampsia with edema<br />

(Vosburgh, 1976).<br />

Significant edema can also be, found in 80 per cent ofnormal<br />

pregnancies. In a prospective study ofedema in pregnancy the incidence<br />

of hypertension did not differ between those with and without edema<br />

(Robertson, 1971).<br />

EPIGASTRIC PAIN:<br />

Epigastric or right upper quadrant pain often is a symptom of<br />

severe preeclamsia and may be indicative of imminent convulsions. It<br />

may be the result ofstretching ofthe hepatic capsule, possibly by edema<br />

and hemorrhage, (Cunningham et al., 1989).<br />

Visual Disturbance:<br />

Bosco (1961) reported that headache, scotoma and blurred or<br />

decreased vision are common presenting symptoms demanding careful<br />

consideration.<br />

OLIGURIA:<br />

Oliguria is defined as urine output


Review ofLiterature<br />

though the blood pressure remains within the normal range, and the<br />

woman has appoximately a 60% chance of developing preeclampsia. If<br />

the test is negative, the likelihood of patient developing preeclampsia is<br />

about 1 in 100 (Dekker and Sibai, 1991).<br />

Isometric exercise test: Isometric hand - grip exercise is known to<br />

increase systemic arterial blood pressure, presumably resulting from<br />

increased systemic vascular resistance. Degani et al., (1985) subjected<br />

one hundered healthy primigravid women to an isometric hand - grip<br />

exercise test between 28 and 32 week's gestation. Each woman was<br />

placed in the left lateral position, and blood pressure was recorded at<br />

regular intervals until it remained stable. The patient then was instructed<br />

to press an inflated cuff of a calibrated sphygmomanometer to maximal<br />

voluntary contraction for 30 seconds for a three minute period of<br />

sustained isometric handgrip exercise. The patient then compressed the<br />

inflated sphygmomanometer at a tension level of 50% ofthe subject's<br />

previously determined maximal voluntary contraction. Blood pressure<br />

measurements were taken on the passive ann, and an increase in the<br />

diastolic pressure of 20 mmHg was taken as a positive isometric pressor<br />

response.<br />

The level of mean arterial blood pressure during the second<br />

trimester is a poor predictor of the future development ofeclampsia and<br />

might give the clinician a false sense of security when it is negative « 90<br />

mmHg) (Chesley and Sibai, 1987).<br />

Blood pressure alone is not always a dependable indicator of<br />

severity. For example, an adolescent woman may have 3 + proteinuria<br />

and convulsions while her blood pressure is 140/85 mmHg, whereas most<br />

women with blood pressure as high as 180/120 mmHg do not have<br />

seizures. (Cunningham et al., 1989).<br />

29


Review ofLiterature<br />

It is an indicator of disease severity and its presence is associated<br />

with substantial increase in the perinatal mortality rate (Naeye and<br />

Friedman, 1979).<br />

Davery and MacGilIiveray (1987) have suggested that proteinuria<br />

should be classified as severe if there are 2:: 3gm protein in a 24hr<br />

collection.<br />

The clinically oriented classification of the American Committee<br />

on Classification does not require proteinuria for the diagnosis of<br />

preeclampsia because it is usually of late onset in the course of the<br />

disease that the onest of convulsions may precede its appearance<br />

(Chesley and Sabiai, 1988).<br />

Retinal changes and ocular manifestations:<br />

Retinal vasoconstriction is the most obvious fourth sign in manifest<br />

preeclampsia, along with the classic symptom triad of hypertension,<br />

edema and proteinuria. The tonic constriction of retinal arteries may<br />

appear like a corkscrew. (Hollwich, 1979).<br />

Beside the narrowing of the vessels there is a slight edema of the<br />

posterior pole of the retina and the disc shows a slight lack ofdefinition<br />

of its margins. Cotton • wool exudate, retinal stria, and yellow - white<br />

focal retinal lesions may develop (Fastenderg et al., 1980)<br />

If the pregnancy is not terminated, the retinal edema may progress<br />

to flat detachment of the retina. The incidence of serious retinal<br />

detachment is about 1.2 per cent in preeclampsia and about IDA per cent<br />

in eclampsia (Fry, 1929).<br />

Bosco (1961) reported that retinal detachment is usally bilateral<br />

and frequently affects the lower portion of the retina and that it resolves<br />

spontaneously in the majority of cases within 2 weeks of labor.<br />

31


Review ofLiterature<br />

Blindness is an uncommon symptom of eclampsia with a 1 to 3<br />

percent incidence (Dieckman, 1952). There are different types of<br />

blindness associated with preeclampsia.<br />

... Retinal blindness may be secondary to serous detachment ofthe<br />

retine (Gass and Pautler, 1985). or retinal vascular thrombosis<br />

(Carpenter et at, 1953).<br />

... Acute ischemic optic neuropathy as a result of impairment ofthe<br />

blood supply to the prelaminer portion ofthe optic nerve head (Beck et<br />

at, 1980). This hypothesis is based on ophthalmoscopic findings and is<br />

currently not well founded.<br />

* Cortical blindness may be present in an eclamptic patient alone<br />

(Lau and Chan, 1987). or with impaired conscious level (Beeson and<br />

Duda, 1982; Colosimo et aI., 1985).<br />

Renal changes:<br />

In a study ofpatients with severe preeclampsia and severe oliguria<br />

unresponsive to a single fluid challenge, Clark et al., (1986), described<br />

three hemodynamic subsets:<br />

- Most patients were found to have low wedge pressures, mild to<br />

moderate elevations of systemic vascular resistance, and normal cardiac<br />

output. In these patients oliguria was associated with inadequate preload<br />

and responded rapidly to further crystalloid infusion.<br />

- A second group of patients were oliguric on the basis ofsevere<br />

systemic vasospasm and inadequate cardiac output. Oliguria in these<br />

patients responded to aggressive after load reduction.<br />

- A final group ofpatients appeared to be hypertensive principally<br />

on the basis of elevated cardiac output. These patients exhibited high<br />

cardiac output, hyperdynamic ventricular function, normal or mildly<br />

increased systemic vascular resistance and adequat preload, yet they were<br />

oliguric with urinary specific gravities exceeding 1030. Analysis ofthe<br />

32<br />

-_ .....


Review ofLiterature<br />

above hemodynamic parameters implies the presence of selective renal<br />

arteriospasm out of proportion to systemic vasospasm (Clark and<br />

Cotton, 1988).<br />

Hankines et al., (1984) documented the relationship between<br />

elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and delayed spontaneous<br />

postpartum diuresis in eclamptic women. They hypothesized that this<br />

phenomenon was secondary to the mobilization of extravascular fluid<br />

before diureses. Such observation may account for the occurance of<br />

postpartum cerebral and pulmonary edema in patients with pregnancy<br />

induced hypertension. Under these circumstances oliguria could<br />

potentially play an important role in the pathogenesis of these<br />

preeclampsia - related complications.<br />

The blood and urine laboratory values are used to calculate urine to<br />

plasma ratios of sodium (DIP Na), creatinine (UIP Cr), urea nitrogen and<br />

osmolality Free excretion of sodium is calculated by the formula (U/P Na<br />

+ UIP Cr) x 100. The renal failure index was also calculated by dividing<br />

urinary sodium concentration (mEqlL) by (UIP Cr). The interpretation of<br />

urinary diagnostic indices was based on the criteria proposed by Miller et<br />

al (1978).<br />

Table (2)<br />

Urine osmolality (mosm/kg ofwater)<br />

Urine sodium (mEq/L)<br />

Urine / plasma urea nitrogen<br />

Urine I plasma creatinine<br />

Renal failure index<br />

Fractional excretion sodium<br />

Urinary diagnostic indices in oliguria<br />

(Miller et al., 1978)<br />

33<br />

>500 8 40


Review ofLiterature<br />

these women had underlying hypertensive cardiovascular factors<br />

(Cunningham et at, 1986).<br />

The patients usually have generalized arterial vasospasm resulting<br />

in increased systemic vascular resistance (increased after load), reduced<br />

plasma volume (decreased preload), and increased left ventricular stroke<br />

work index (hyperdynamic heart). In addition, renal function is impaired,<br />

serum albumin is reduced, and capillary premeability is increased due to<br />

endothelial cell injury. Consequently, the above changes will predispose<br />

these patients to an increased risk of pulmonary edema (Benedtti et at,<br />

1985).<br />

There are clinical differences between pulmonary edema of organic<br />

heart disease and that of preeclampsia. Most cases of patients with<br />

preeclampsia occur in young women without previous histories of heart<br />

disease, with normal electrocardiogram, and without cardiomegally on<br />

chest x-ray films or echocardiogram. Also, the course ofthe disease in the<br />

preeclamptic patient is characterized by its slow response to therapy.<br />

Swan - Ganz catheter insertion is the best to diagnose the altered<br />

hemodynamics of pulmonary edema. Ifit is not feasible to insert a Swan ­<br />

Ganz catheter, a CVP line should be used. However CVP measurements<br />

are not as reliable as the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)<br />

(Benedetti et at, 1985).<br />

THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM:<br />

The brain can be involved in the pathological process of<br />

preeclampsia with eclampsia being one of the most extreme clinical<br />

manifestations of this involvement. The pathological features that can<br />

occur include cerebral edema, cerebral hemorrhage, petechial<br />

hemorrhages, thrombotic lesions and fibriboid necrosis (Hibbard, 1973;<br />

Sheehan and Lynch, 1973; Lopez. Liera et al., 1976). The major<br />

causes of maternal mortality from severe preelampsia are cerebral<br />

hemorrhage and cerebral edema (Benedtti and Quilligan, 1980).<br />

These changes are thought to be attributable to vascular damage.<br />

Cerebral edema is not a constant feature but may be seen on<br />

computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the brain in eclamptic T<br />

35


Review ofLiterature<br />

patients (Naheedy et al., 1985; Richards et al., 1988). The latter study<br />

showed cerebral edema to be present on CT scanning in 27 of43 women<br />

with neurological complications secondary to preeclampsia - eclampsia<br />

and this correlated with the duration ofintermittent seizures.<br />

Computerized tomograhy (CT) scanning shows that petechial<br />

cortical hemorrhages are most common, and these often involve the<br />

occipital lobe; however, the parietal and frontal lobes are also involved.<br />

(CT) scanning rarely describe diffuse cerebral edema or overt<br />

hemorrhage into the white matter, basal ganglia, or pons (Brown et al.,<br />

1988).<br />

36


111- Biochemica markers:<br />

* Uric acid.<br />

* Urinary calcium kallikrein and creatinine excretion.<br />

* Urinary excretion ofprostacyc1in metabolites.<br />

* Platelet angioetensin II receptors.<br />

* Platelet calcium response to arginine vasopressin.<br />

* Enzymes and Hormones,<br />

- Low unconjugated estriol concentration.<br />

- Maternal Serum inhibin A<br />

- Human choronic gonadotrophin (HeG).<br />

- Serotonin<br />

- Atrial Natriuretic peptide.<br />

* Clearance ofdehydro-iso-androsterone sulfate.<br />

IV· Hematological markers:<br />

* Plasma velum , hematocrit and hemoglobin.<br />

* Platelets count platelet volume.<br />

*Plasma factor VIII - related antigen activity.<br />

* Ratio offactor VIII to coagulant factor VIII.<br />

* Antithrombin III levels.<br />

*Thrombin antithrombin III levels.<br />

* Fibronectin.<br />

V - Ultrasonographic evaluation:<br />

* Doppler wave forms of utero-placental circulation.<br />

1 - Standard methods ofantenatal care:<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Antenatal visits are arranged monthly between 20-28 weeks,<br />

biweekly up to 36 weeks. and weekly there after until delivery. These<br />

visits are dominated by a check of blood pressure, urine and by<br />

determination of weight gain. The development ofpreeclampsia may be<br />

predicted on the basis of these standard variable has been addressed in<br />

several retrospective and some prospective studies. (Dekker and Sibai<br />

1991) .<br />

38


Proteinuria and microalbuminuria :<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

The most recent classification ofpreeclampsia require proteinuria<br />

(defined by excretion of 300mg or greater in 24hour urine specimens; this<br />

usually correlates with 30mg/dL on random sampling (O'Brien, 1992) .<br />

Micro-albuminuria 24 urinary albumin excretion> 30mg/L<br />

(30uglm) might become a clinical tool for predicting pre-eclampsia.<br />

Das et at, (1996), Lopez-Espinoza et al., (1986) found that<br />

proteinuric pre-eclampsia was not preceded by a phase of increasing<br />

albumin loss which could be detected by sensitive radio-immune assay<br />

techniques.<br />

Weight Gain:<br />

A sudden increase in weight may precede the development of<br />

preeclampsia, and indeed , excessive weight gain in some women is the<br />

first sign. A weight increase of about 1 pound per week is normal, but<br />

when weight gain exceeds more than 2 pounds in any given week, or 6<br />

pounds in a month, developing preeclampsia should be suspected, the<br />

suddenness of excessive weight gain is characteristic ofpreeclampsia<br />

rather than an increase distributed throughout gestation. Such a weight<br />

gain due almost entirely to abnormal fluid retention and is usually<br />

demonstrable before visible signs of non-dependent edema, such as<br />

swollen eyelids and puffy fingers. In cases of fulminating preeclampsia.<br />

Or eclampsia, fluid retention may be extreme and in these women, a<br />

weight gain of 10 or more is not unusual. The total weight gained during<br />

pregnancy, however, probably has no relation to preeclampsia unless a<br />

large component ofthe gain is edema. Stringent restriction ofweight gain<br />

is more likely to be detrimental rather than beneficial to both mother and<br />

fetus (Cunningham et al., 1994).<br />

40<br />

-...<br />

:....:...<br />

"'


Review ofLiterature<br />

gestation while there was no difference reported in urinary excretion rates<br />

ofcalcium between normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women.<br />

Millar et al., (1996), suggested that measurement of inactive<br />

urinary kallikrein, creatinine in a random urine sample collected between<br />

16-20 weeks gestation could be used for early prediction of pre­<br />

eclampsia.<br />

Urinary kallikrein excretion has been shown to increase in<br />

normotensive pregnancy , whereas in preeclampsia reduced levels as<br />

compared to non-pregnant subjects have been found (Baker, 1993).<br />

3- Urinary Excretion of Prostacyclin Metabolites:<br />

Evidence is accumulating that a relative deficiency of vascular<br />

prostacyclin plays an important role in the development ofpreeclampsia.<br />

(Fitzgerald et al., 1987) reported that a reduction in the urinary excretion<br />

of 2,3-dinor-6 keto- prostaglandin FI, a major metabolite ofprostacyclin,<br />

precede the development of clinical diseas.<br />

4 - Platelet angiotensin II receptors:<br />

(Dekker and Sibai 1991), showed that a physiologic fall in platelet<br />

angiotensin II binding occur in early pregnancy, which is parallel to that<br />

ofthe vascular response to angitensin II.<br />

lt was found that platelet angiotensin II receptors are increased in<br />

pre-elcampsia, problably as an expression of the altered angiotensin II<br />

levels; this increase was shown to precede the increase in blood pressure.<br />

S - Platelet calcium response to arginine vasopressin:<br />

An increase in the sensitivity of platelet calcium to argmme<br />

vasopressin was proposed to be useful as an early predictor of subsequent<br />

pre-eclampsia, it was shown that the sensitivity ofplatelet intracellular<br />

calcium levels to arginine vasopressin in pateint with subsequent pre­<br />

eclampsia is already increased at the end of first trimester, as compared<br />

with normotensive pregnancy (Zemel et al, 1990) .<br />

43


Review ofLiterature<br />

peptides include an increase in salt and water excretion, inhibition of<br />

angiotensin or norepinephrine-mediated vasoconstriction and reduction in<br />

secretion ofrenin and aldosterone (O'brien, 1990).<br />

The concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptides are increased in<br />

patients with various forms ofpregnancy-induced hypertension However,<br />

the etiology of this increase in hypertensive disorders ofpregnancy is<br />

unknown (Thomson et at, 1987; Miyamoto et at, 1988).<br />

Several factors mitigate against a role for atrial natriuretic peptide<br />

measurement in prediction ofpreeclampsia :<br />

- The rise in these values appear to occur after the onset ofhypertension<br />

and seems to mirror the rise in blood pressure (Hirai et al., 1988).<br />

2 - An elevation may be seen in patient with essential hypertension<br />

(SagneIJa et at, 1986).<br />

3- The measurement requires inhibition of digestion at time ofsampling<br />

and extraction before immunoassay. The complexity of the assay<br />

accounts for a large part of variability in results (Miyamoto et al.,<br />

1988).<br />

O'brien (1990) reported that, it appears that, measurement ofatrial<br />

natriuretic peptides will not provide a clinically important diagnostic aid<br />

in the detection ofpreeclampsia.<br />

IV- Hematologic markers:<br />

1 - Plasma volume, hematocrit and hemoglobin :<br />

The average plasma is fewer in-patients with pre-eclampsia. There<br />

IS evidence that plasma contraction may precede the blood pressure rise<br />

in pre-eclampsia at least in some of cases. The contraction ofplasma<br />

volume that is often observed in pre-eclampsia may be revealed by an<br />

elevation of or rise in hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit. (Hays et<br />

al., 1985).<br />

46


Review ofLiterature<br />

appear that measurement ofserum iron concentration, although valuable<br />

in confirmation, would be a poorpredictor ofpreeclampsia.<br />

4 - Coagulation factors:<br />

Evidence for the occurrence of abnormal coagulation processes and<br />

platelet activation was originally based on the finding as early as 1893, of<br />

fibrin deposits and thrombi in vessels ofvarious organs ofwomen who<br />

died of eclampsia. In later years, all factors of extrinsic and intrinsic<br />

coagulation system have been extensively studied in women with<br />

preeclampsia. A complicated coagulation index has been proposed to<br />

predict the clinical prognosis of pre-eclampsia (Davis, and Prentice,<br />

1992).<br />

Parameters which have been reported to indicate the subsequent<br />

development of the disease are anti-thrombin III and factor VIII<br />

consumption increase levels of Beta-thrombglobulin, a platelet specific<br />

released during platelet activation have also been reported in women with<br />

pre-eclampsia (Redman et at, 1977) .<br />

Weiner and Brandt, (1982) reported lower levels ofantithrombin<br />

activity in women with preeclampsia as compared to healthy pregnant<br />

women. The level ofantithrombin III (AT III) activity began to decline<br />

as much as 13 weeks prior to the development ofclinical manifestation.<br />

Recently, attention has been focused on plasma level of fibronectin,<br />

which is glycoprotein involved in coagulation, platelet function, tissue<br />

repair, and the vascular endothelial basement membrane. Fibronectin<br />

level was found to be markedly elevated in pre-eclamptic patients and<br />

correlated with low antithrombin III levels and with the degree of<br />

proteinuria (Saleh et at, 1987).<br />

5· Fibronectins :<br />

Fibronectins are a group of glycoproteins dispersed throughout the<br />

body that serve two major functions.<br />

48<br />

"l-


....<br />

-,:-"<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

a. Tissue fibronectins (insoluble fibronectin) present at the basement<br />

membranes of most tissues, appear to play an important role in tissue<br />

adhesiveness and cell-to-cell interaction.<br />

b. Plasma fibronectin (soluble fibronectin) functions as a non-specific<br />

opsonin important in the early phagocytic response to bacteria<br />

(Mosesson et al., 1980).<br />

Because fibronectin is present in the vascular endothelial basement<br />

membrane, moreover, circulating fibronectin levels may serve as a<br />

. marker for endothelial damage or disruption (Stubbs et at, 1984).<br />

The plasma fibronectin concentration rises approximately 20% during<br />

the third trimester of normal pregnancy and remains elevated throughout<br />

the six postpartum week (Hess et al., 1986).<br />

Lockwood et al. (1990) reported that many studies demonstrated<br />

increased plasma levels ofendothelial originated fibronectin precede the<br />

clinical signs of preeclampsia and may be useful for prediction ofthe<br />

disease.<br />

O'Brien (1990) reported that there is a clear association between<br />

preeclampsia and elevated levels ofplasma fibronectin, several methods<br />

of assay have been reported, the most common is turbidimetric method.<br />

This method is easy, inexpensive and suitable for automation, and thus<br />

could be performed easily in most clinical settings.<br />

Saleh et al. (1988) reported that fibronectin is a better marker for<br />

preeclampsia than either antithrobmin III or a2-antiplasmin and is a<br />

better correlate of reduced plasma colloid oncotic pressure than is<br />

proteinuria.<br />

The diagnosis value of fibronectin determination as a predictor of<br />

preeclampsia was studied by Lazarchick et al., (1986). In that study,<br />

plasma was studied for fibronectin ofpregnancy women. Using a cut off<br />

point value of 400 ug/ml. 94% ofsubjects who developed preeclampsia<br />

49


Review ofLiterature<br />

demonstrated an elevation before the onset ofhypertension and in 76%<br />

occurred at least 1 month before the onset of hypertension. So it appears<br />

that fibronectin as an excellent laboratory marker for preeclampsia.<br />

Magann and Martin (1995) reported that plasma fibronectin<br />

concentration is markedly elevated in patients with pre-eclampsia. Plasma<br />

fibronectin increased 3.6 ±1.9 weeks earlier than the onset of<br />

hypertension and/or proteinuria.<br />

Complications And Prognosis Of Preeclampisa And Eclampsia<br />

Maternal complications:<br />

Fetal complications :<br />

I. Maternal morbidity:<br />

A. Immediate complications:<br />

I. Maternal morbidity.<br />

II. Maternal mortality.<br />

1. Fetal morbidity.<br />

II. Fetal mortality.<br />

There are many complications that are although uncommon in PIH<br />

yet potentially lethal, especially ifseveral complications arise in the same<br />

individual. These complications are stated in Wein (1979).<br />

1. Cerebrovascular complications:<br />

Cerebral edema:<br />

Symptomatic cerebral edema developed in almost 6% ofwomen<br />

with eclampsia. Its genesis probably represents a continuum ofcentral<br />

nervous system lesions that result from eclampsia. We postulate that<br />

women with symptoms of extensive cerebral edema have a cytotoxic<br />

edema caused by ischemia that is intensified by a vasogenic edema<br />

associated with sudden ofsevere hypertension. (Cunningham & Diane<br />

.,2000)<br />

50<br />

­ .,


....<br />

'I, -<br />

2. Occular complications:<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

According to Richards (1986) , only IM3% ofcases ofPIH and<br />

eclampsia suffer from temporary blindness due to one ofthe following<br />

causes:<br />

MCentral retinal arteriolar or venous thrombosis.<br />

MEdema ofthe retina.<br />

MCentral disturbance of the visual center in the occipital lobe by edema or<br />

hemorrhage.<br />

MDetachment ofthe retina.<br />

- Disturbance ofthe optic nerve.<br />

- Psychogenic disturbances.<br />

- Intracranial venous thrombosis.<br />

3. Rena/complications:<br />

Acute renal failure is an extremely rare complication of P.I.H<br />

eclampsia and its development is usually a result ofeither acute tubular<br />

necrosis or rarely bilateral cortical necrosis.<br />

The pathogenesis ofacute renal failure continues to be the subject<br />

of extensive investigations and several pathologic mechanisms have been<br />

implicated as possible etiologic factors. The occurrence ofacute renal<br />

failure is usually associated with P.I.H complicated by abruptio placental<br />

and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) (Sibai et aI., 1990) .<br />

Therapeutic principles in the management of acute renal failure<br />

include supportive and dialytic treatment until renal function recovers.<br />

Once the maternal condition is stabilized, if the fetus is mature, delivery<br />

should be effected. Successful peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis have<br />

been reported for the treatment of acute renal failure in pregnancy.<br />

Peritoneal dialysis is associated with a lower risk of hypotension and<br />

rapid fluid shifts. (Hov, 1987).<br />

51


4. Hepatic complications:<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Ruptured subcapsular hematoma ofthe liver, liver rupture is a life­<br />

threatening but fortunately, relatively rare complication (Sibai et al.,<br />

1982) . In most instances, rupture involves the right lobe and is preceded<br />

by the development ofa parenchymal hematoma. The condition usually<br />

presents with severe epigastric pain that may persist for several hours<br />

before circulatory collapse. The presence ofruptured subcapsular liver<br />

hematoma resulting in shock is an indicator for massive transfusion of<br />

blood fresh frozen plasma and platelets as well as immediate laparotomy<br />

(Neerhof et al., 1989) .<br />

5. Pulmonary edema:<br />

Pulmonary edema can have more than one etiology. First, the<br />

pulmonary vascular hydrostatic pressure increases such as seen with left<br />

heart failure (cardiogenic pulmonary edema). In a review often P.I.H<br />

patients with Pulmonary edema Bendetti et al., (1985) found that the left<br />

ventricular failure to be the cause in two ofthe patients. (20%) .<br />

In P.I.H patients, another common mechanism involved in the<br />

genesis of pulmonary edema is an alternation in pulmonary capillary<br />

permeability. The most common clinical situation is the adult respiratory<br />

distress syndrome (ARDS) or so-called " shock lung ", Haernodynamic<br />

parameters are usually normal. Therapy usually requires intubation,<br />

mechanical ventillation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)<br />

(Sibai et al., 1987).<br />

The last major etiology ofpuhnonary edema in P.I.H patients is a<br />

reduction in colloid osmotic pressure" COP". Colloid osmotic pressure<br />

in normal pregnancy is between 22 and 24 mmHg. In contrast, patients<br />

with P.I.H. have demonstrated significantly lower COP values (Nguyen<br />

et aI., 1986).<br />

52<br />

-.-<br />

­1


,- -<br />

6. HELLP syndrome:<br />

ReviewofLiterature<br />

Pritchard in (1978) and Weinstein (1985) reported that about 5-<br />

10% of women with PJ.H develop the syndrome known as HELLP<br />

where:<br />

H =hemolysis,<br />

EI = elevated liver enzyme<br />

LP = low platelet count.<br />

The syndrome is reported to be associated with a high perinatal<br />

mortality (8-40%) and a significant maternal morbidity.<br />

The syndrome was first reported by prithchard et al., (1954) who<br />

explained three cases, one of whom survived, Mckay (1972) reported<br />

four cases with two developed liver rupture and one maternal mortality.<br />

Kitzmiller in (1974) has found the syndrome in three cases among four<br />

patients with eclamptic thrombocytopenia. Eight cases were reported by<br />

Goodlin et al. (1972) with perinatal mortality (44%) (Sibai, 1990) .<br />

Redman et al., (1982) have stated that the reduced platelets is due<br />

to increased peripheral consumption. This is supported by the bone<br />

marrow studies that show an increase ofmegakaryocytes. Walsh (1989)<br />

proved that the drop ofplatelet count is due to local platelet aggregation<br />

in the utero-placental vasculature due to deficiency of prostacylin<br />

synthesis in cells lining uteroplacental arteries.<br />

Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia ofthe syndrome is defined as<br />

the presence ofburr cells, chistocytes or polychromatasia on a peripheral<br />

smear. This red cell fragmentation is considered to be due to passage<br />

through small blood vessels that have intimal damage and fibrin deposits.<br />

( Sibai, 1990).<br />

At the time ofcesarian section ofpatients with HELLP syndrome,<br />

the liver was found to have a firm consistency with occasional<br />

subcapsular hemorrhage. Histological examination reveals small areas of<br />

53


Review ofLiterature<br />

hemorrhange with the adjacent liver cells showing degeneration . This<br />

liver cell damage is responsible for the elevated liver enzymes (Neerhcf<br />

et al., 1989) .<br />

The only cure for HELLP syndrome is delivery and, as the nature<br />

ofthe disease is one ofprogression, prolonged induction oflabour is to be<br />

avoided (Sibal, 1990) . Patients who have excessive bleeding should<br />

receive platelet transfusion either before or after delivery if the platelet<br />

count is less than 20,000/mm . Packed RBCs may be needed ifhematocrit<br />

value drops from continued hemolysis. There are several reports ofthe<br />

use ofantithrombin III in treatment ofP.I.H. with HELLP syndrome. The<br />

management is successful but more information about this approach<br />

needs to be obtained before it can be advocated (Weinstein, 1985).<br />

B. Remote maternal complications:<br />

1. Recurrent PoIB :<br />

According to Sibai, (1988), about one third ofwomen who have<br />

had eclampsia in their first pregnancy develop P.I.H in a later pregnancy.<br />

The prevealence of chronic hypertension in these women with recurrent<br />

P.I.H is high and low in those without recurrence.<br />

2. Recurrent hypertension :<br />

P.I.H and eclampsia do not result in chronic hypertension (Chesley<br />

and Cooper, 1986). It is found that 20 to 50% ofwomen who have<br />

suffered from P.I.H and eclampsia become hypertensive in later years.<br />

Women who develp P.I.H are either overt or occult hypertensive. Sooner<br />

or later all of them will become clearly hypertensive even if they never<br />

get pregnant. If hypertension is still present on the 10th day, the<br />

recurrence of hypertension is 59% while 21% in women whose blood<br />

pressure has returned to normal at that time (Browen et al., 1987).<br />

54


II. Maternal mortality:<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Maternal mortality seems to depend upon the functional integrity<br />

of the following organ system: renal, adrenal, cardiovascualr including<br />

microcirculation, uterus and placenta, liver and bone marrow . Anything<br />

which inhibits the functions ofthese organs reduces maternal homeostatic<br />

capacity, exaggerates the experssion of the disease in progress and<br />

decreases the chance for a successful outcome (Pritchard. 1985).<br />

Lopez-Lieraet at, (1976) studied the factors that influence<br />

maternal mortality and came up with the following:<br />

1. Type ofeclampsia:<br />

The highest mortality rate occurred in women with antepartum<br />

eclampsia (16.9%) .<br />

2. Age:<br />

In a group of73 cases ofteen age eclamptic patients, the mortality<br />

rate was 5.5% while it was 10% in another group of 89 cases who were<br />

30 years or older (Hidaka et at, 1990).<br />

3. Parity:<br />

Chesley (1978) reported that a higher proportion of multiparous<br />

have died than of women having had eclampsia as primigravidae.<br />

Cardiovascualr cases accounted for only 29% ofthe deaths ofeclamptic<br />

women.<br />

4. Twillpregnancy :<br />

The incidence of multiple pregnancy with eclampsia was about<br />

three times that ofthe general population and the maternal mortality rate<br />

for twin pregnancies is double the figure for the single pregnancy (7.8<br />

versus 3.5%) (Sibai, 1986).<br />

55


Fetal complications:<br />

I - Fetal morbidity :<br />

1. Fetalprematurity :<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Preterm labour may accur spontaneusly in cases of P.I.H and<br />

eclampsia. However, it is more likely to be due to artificial induction in<br />

the maternal interest (Ferris, 1988).<br />

Lin et at. (1982) found that hypertensive pregnant patients of<br />

different etiologise have three or four times more preterm deliveries than<br />

did the non-hypertensive women.<br />

2- Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR):<br />

Lin et al, (1983) found that fetal birth weight progressively<br />

increased with increasing blood pressure range till DBP of90 mmHg was<br />

reached above which birth weigh levelled off. They found that the<br />

incidence of IUGR in P.l.H patients was greater in women with<br />

prolonged hypertension (>4 weeks), heavy proteinurie (>3.5 g/24 hours)<br />

and in multiparous women than in nulliparous women.<br />

II. Fetal mortality:<br />

Sibai (1988) noticed that hypertension alone in the absence of<br />

protinuria was associated with a three fold rise in fetal death rate. The<br />

Combination of hypertension and proteinuria had a further three fold<br />

increase in the perinatal mortality rate. He concluded that 70% ofthe<br />

excess deaths were due to large placental infarcts, small placental size<br />

and abruptio placentae.<br />

Fetal asphyxia:<br />

The incidence offetal asphyxia was found to be increased in P.l.H<br />

patients as compared with normal pregnant women. The average one and<br />

the five minutes Apgar score in fetuses ofP.I.H mothers were 3 and 7<br />

respectively compared with 9 and 9 in normal pregnancy group and this<br />

was found to occur in 15% in women with P.I.H (Roberts et al., 1990).<br />

56


Review ofLiterature<br />

Management of pregnancy induced hypertension<br />

The most effective therapy for preeclampsia is delivery ofthe fetus and<br />

placenta in pregnancy at or near term in which the cervix is favorable<br />

labor should be induced in addition intravenous (IV) magnesieum sulfate<br />

(MgS04) should be used both during labor and postpartum to reduce the<br />

risk of convulsions. Disease severity and gestational age usually govern<br />

the decision to intervene and deliver a pareterm infant. (Abramovici and<br />

Sibai 1999).<br />

Mild Preeclampsia:<br />

All patients with mild preeclampsia should receive maternal and fetal<br />

evaluation at the time of their diagnosis .. Maternal evaluation includes<br />

measurements of blood pressure, weight, and urine protein, and<br />

questioning about symptoms of headache, visual disturbances and<br />

epigastric pain. Fetal evaluation should include ultrasonography to<br />

determine fetal growth and amniotic fluid volume, daily fetal movement<br />

count and nonsterss testing (or biophysical profile) at least once weekly<br />

(fig 1) (Abramovici and Sibai 1999).<br />

Laboratory evaluation includes determination of hematocrit,<br />

platelet counts every 2 days, and liver enzyme levels twice weekly. This<br />

evaluation is important since patients may develop thrombyctopenia and<br />

abnormal<br />

elevation.<br />

liver enzyme levels, even with minimal blood pressure<br />

Patients are instructed to receive a regular diet with no salt restriction and<br />

no restricted activity. Diuretics, antihypertensive drugs, and sedatives are<br />

not used .(Sibai , 1992).<br />

57


Introduction:<br />

L1POROTEIN (a)<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Cholesterol and its esters, triglycerides and phosholipids are all<br />

transported in plasma as lipoprotein particles. Free Fatty acids are<br />

transported bound to albumin. Lipoprotein particles comprise a peripheral<br />

envelope, consisting mainly ofphospholipids and free cholesterol (which<br />

have both water soluble polar and lipid soluble non-polar groups) with<br />

some apolipoproteins and a central non-polar core (mostly triglycerides<br />

and esterified cholesterol). The molecules in the envelope are distributed<br />

in a single in such a way that the polar groups face out towards the<br />

surrounding plasma, while the non-polar face inwards forming the lipid<br />

core in which the insoluble lipids are carried (Smith, 1990).<br />

Most lipoproteins are assembled in the liver or small intestine. Five<br />

main types oflipoprotein particles can be recognized:<br />

1. Chylomicrons: are large particles (largest size). consisting mainly of<br />

triglyserides 83% added to cholesterol and phosphate. They have the<br />

lowest density. They are formed in intestinal mucosa and reach systemic<br />

circulation via thoracic duct. They are the principle form in which dietary<br />

triglycerides are carried to the tissues.<br />

2. Very low density lipoproteins (YLDL): They are moderately large<br />

particles whose main component is of neutral lipid 78% (endogenous)<br />

added to cholesterol and phospholipid. They are mainly formed in liver<br />

and to a lesser extent by intestinal mucosa and are secreted into plasma<br />

from these two sites.<br />

3. Intermediate density lipoproteins (IDL or VLDL remnants:<br />

Arise from removal of triglycerides from VLDL during the<br />

transition from VLDLto LDL.<br />

4. Low-density lipoproteins (LDL): are cholesterol-rich particles,<br />

formed from IDL by the removal of more triglyceride and apolipoprotein<br />

A orB48 .<br />

60<br />

''1<br />

.....


i-<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

5. High density lipoproteins: are oftwo main types, HDL2 and HDL3.<br />

They probably transported from peripheral cells to the liver, prior to<br />

excrerion (Beckett, 1998).<br />

The apolipoproteins:<br />

The protein components ofthe lipoproteins, the apolipoproteins are<br />

a complex family of polypeptides that promote and control the lipid<br />

transport in plasma and uptake into tissues. They are classified into five<br />

main groups (ape-A, B, C, E and (a)), some ofwhich may be subdivided,<br />

and lastly apo (a).<br />

Apo A: these are synthesized in the liver and intestine. They are initially<br />

present in chylomicrons in lymph, but they rapidly transfer to lIDL.<br />

Apo B: is present in plasma in two forms, apoB100 and apoB48 chyle<br />

micron. ApaB100 is the protein component of LDL and is also present in<br />

VLDL and LDL . ApoB100 is recognized by specific receptors in<br />

peripheral tissues.<br />

Apo C: is a family of three proteins (apo CI, apo ClI and apo ClII) is<br />

synthesized in the liver and incorporated into HDL and LDL,<br />

chylomicron.<br />

Apo E: is synthesized in the liver, incorporated into HDL and transferred<br />

in the circulation to chylomicrons and VLDL. There are three major<br />

isoforrns (apoE2, apoE3 and apoE4) at a single genetic locus giving rise<br />

to genotypes (E3/3, E2/3, E2/4, etc.).<br />

Apo E is probably mainly involved in the hepatic intake of<br />

chylomicron remnants and IDL,<br />

tissues (Walker, 1990).<br />

since it binds to apo B receptors in-the<br />

Lipoprotein (a) "LP (a)":<br />

The lipoprotein (a) is sixth type oflipoprotein particles. It was first<br />

deteced in 1962. It consists of LDL particle to which a long polypeptide<br />

chain is attached by a disulfide bridge a single apo (a) having a high<br />

61


Review ofLiterature<br />

carbohydrate content and having a similar amino acid sequence to<br />

plasminogen, and is attached by a disulfide bond to the apoBl00. It is<br />

synthesized in the liver with a poor clearance from plasma it has 11<br />

phenotypes and 19 genotypes (Howard and pizzo, 1993).<br />

Lp (a) is carried in plasma on a protein carrier apolipoprotein (a)<br />

which was found to have a 90% structural homology to plasminogen.<br />

Inheritance of apolipoprotein (a) is controlled by a specific gene on<br />

chromosome No.6 (Wang et al., 1994).<br />

Lipoprotein(a) LP(a) is a distinct class oflipoprotein (as shown in<br />

table 3) that is structurally related to LDL, because both lipoprotein<br />

classes possess one molecule ofapo B-100 per particle and have similar<br />

lipid compositions.(Durington,1995 & Marcovina, ,1995) However<br />

unlike LDL, Lp(a) contains a carbohydrate-rich protein apo(a) that is<br />

covalently bound to the apo B-lOO through a disulfide linkage. The<br />

available evidence suggest that Lp(a) contains one molecule ofapo(a) and<br />

one molecule of apo B-IOO per Lp(a) particle (Albers, et al. 1996).<br />

Apo(a) is the unique protein componant of Lp(a) and exhibits a<br />

significant sequence homology with plasminogen and a high degree of<br />

variation in polypeptide chain length. Apo(a) is composed ofa serine<br />

protease domain and a kringle-containing domain unlike plasminogen,<br />

however, Lp(a) is not activated to form an active protease. The kringle<br />

that is contiguous with the protease domain, kringle 5, shares 85% amino<br />

acid homology with plasminogen kringle 5, whereas the kringle 4 domain<br />

has 78 to 88% amino acid homology with kringle 4 ofplasminogen.<br />

Apo(a) contains 10 distinct classes ofkringle 4-1ike domains that differ<br />

from each other in amino acid sequence. Kringle 4 type I and kringle 4<br />

types3 to 10 are present as a single copy on apo(a) particles. In contrast,<br />

kringle 4 type 2 is present in variable number ofrepeats (3 to> 40) and<br />

62


unesterified Apoliporobein<br />

cholesterol / Cholesteriyl Ester<br />

~i~ure (3) Structure of a typical lipoprotein partical<br />

Figure (4) Structure of lipoprotein (a)<br />

K = kringle PD=Protease domain T = repeats<br />

(Have1 and Kanc, 1995)


t-<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Table (3) Characteristics of Human plsam Lipoproteins<br />

Vartable Chylomicron VLDL lDL lOL HDL Lp(a)<br />

Density (glml)


Lipoprotein (a) as an atherogenic factor:<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Apolipoprotein (a) is a glycoprotein that is present in Lp(a) and has<br />

close structural homology with plasminogen (McLean et al., 1987). Both<br />

genes (of apolipoprotein (a) and plasminogen) are closely linked on the<br />

long arm of chromosome 6 (Frank et al., 1988) . These give suggestive<br />

evidence that the close homology ofLp(a) with plasminogen results in<br />

competitive inhibition of the fibrinolytic properties of plasminogen<br />

(Miles et al., 1989 and Harpel ct al., 1989).<br />

Competition of Lp(a) with plasminogen for binding to endothelial<br />

cells results in strongly down-regulated activation ofcell surface-bound<br />

plasminogen by tissue plasmiogen activator (t-PA), suggesting that Lp(a)<br />

may predispose to thrombotic complications (Edelberg et al., 1990).<br />

Association of Lp(a) to different conditions:<br />

1. Cardiovascular diseases:<br />

The suggestion that Lp(a) might be a risk factor for cardiovascular<br />

diseases goes back to the observations ofDahlen et al. (1972) who found<br />

that individuals with angina pectoris exhibit an extra pre-B band In<br />

lipoprotein electrophoresis far more frequently than the control group.<br />

In a series of subsequent reports, attempts were make to prove the<br />

identity of pre-B lipoprotein with Lp(a) and further to provide evidence<br />

that Lp(a) positive individuals are at a higher risk for atherosclerosis,<br />

cardiovascular diseases and myocardial infarction (Heiberg et at, 1974;<br />

Dahlen et al., 1976).<br />

It is now proved beyond doubt that Lp(a) is a potential independent<br />

risk factor for premature cardiovascular altherogenic disease (Berg et al.,<br />

1992).<br />

Accumulation of Lp(a) has been found in atherosclerotic lesions<br />

and it is now believed to be an atherogenic lipoprotein, elevated plasma<br />

levels greater than 30 mg/dl in humans appear to be associated with an<br />

66


+-<br />

L"<br />

, .-<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

increased risk for the development of CAD with a rate ofoccurrence<br />

estimated to be 2-5 times greater than in normal controls (Loscalzo,<br />

1990).<br />

2. Renal system :<br />

Diseases of the kidney and their accompanying signs (proteinuria<br />

and nephrotic syndrome) as well as end-stage renal disease and their<br />

treatment modalities (haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney<br />

transplantation) have all been found to increase Lp(a) plasma levels<br />

substantially (Bartens an Wanner, 1994).<br />

3. Liver:<br />

To determine the influence of liver disease on Lp(a)<br />

concentrations, Feely et al. (1992) compared its concentrations in<br />

patients with varying degrees of severity ofhepatic cirrhosis and patients<br />

with established coronary heart disease they found Lp(a) concentration to<br />

be raised in patients with coronary heart diseas and reduced in those with<br />

cirrhosis. Concentrations tended to be lower in those with more severe<br />

diseases.<br />

4. Hormones:<br />

Fluctuations III Lp(a) seem to occur in states of hormonal changes<br />

such as in diabetes mellitus, after estrogen treatment and during<br />

pregnancy (Bartens and Wanner, 1994).<br />

5. Smoking:<br />

Wersch et al.(1994) compared 68 non-smoking and 118 smoking<br />

pregnant women with a control group of 29 subjectively healthy, age<br />

matched non-smoking non-pregnant females. This comparison showed<br />

significantly higher Lp(a) values during the last trimester of gestation in<br />

non-smokers. The higher Lp(a) concentration in the plasma ofnon­<br />

smoking women during a normal pregnancy might be a physiologic<br />

necessity for adequate fetal growth. Lower levels ofLp(a) were seen in<br />

67


Review ofLiterature<br />

the last trimester ofthe smoking pregnant group, which is unfavorable for<br />

the normal development of the rapidly growing fetus in the last stage of<br />

the pregnancy.<br />

Lipoprotein (a) and pregnancy:<br />

I. Relation to normalpregnancy:<br />

The level of serum lipids, high density lipoproteins (HDL) and<br />

apolipoproteins are all increased in pregnancy. Serum triglycerides (TG)<br />

and serum total cholesterol (TC) increase steadily throughout pregnancy.<br />

In contrast serum Lp(a) levels increases until the 20th week and<br />

reaches a value which is 1.5 times higher than the IOth week. Thereafter,<br />

Lp(a) levels become constant until the late stage of pregnancy<br />

(Murakami et al., 1996).<br />

II. Relation tofetal growth retardation andfetal loss:<br />

Berg et aI. (1994) stated that a very high Lp(a) lipoprotein level in<br />

maternal serum during pregnancy was found to be associated with<br />

delivery of children with low birth weight.This suggests the possibility<br />

that a very high Lp(a) concentration may predispose to placental<br />

insufficiency, presumably arising from pathological changes in maternal<br />

uterine vessels in the placental bed.<br />

They suggested that a very high Lp(a) lipoprotein level may be a<br />

factor to consider in women who have repeated pregnancies with<br />

placental insufficiency and who give birth to children with low birth<br />

weight.<br />

Such conclusion is confirmed by another study stating that elevated<br />

Lp(a) levels occur in approximately 30% of women with recurrent<br />

miscarriages and may have a predictive value in these women (Bauer et<br />

aI., 1998).<br />

68<br />

>.


III. Lp (a) ill P.LH:<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

Wang et al, (1998) demonstrated an increased plasma Lp(a) levels<br />

in pregnant women with Preeclampisa and eclampsia in comparison to<br />

normal pregnancy. While its level was significantly higher in severe than<br />

in mild Preeclampisa. They concluded that Lp(a) level was associated<br />

with the severity ofdisease and may serve as a marker ofthe pathogenic<br />

process.<br />

A further study was done investigating women with a history of<br />

severe Preeclampisa and controls with a history ofnormal pregnancies<br />

only All were tested at least 10 weeks after delivery in the second halfof<br />

a normal menstrual cycle. None ofthe controls or patients were pregnant<br />

or used oral contraceptives. There was no statistically significant<br />

difference of Lp(a) level between the two groups (Van pampus et al.,<br />

1998).<br />

The data ofWang et al, 1998 in addition to those ofVanPampus<br />

et a1.1998 suggest that in Preeclampisa, levels of Lp(a) increase in<br />

relation with the severity of disease. After delivery, Lp(a) normalizes.<br />

This suggests a specific alteration of Lp(a) level in relation to<br />

Preeclampisa.<br />

Hypothesis suggesting the mechanism of action of Lp(a) in<br />

Preeclampisa (whether elevated Lp(a) is causative factor for<br />

P reeclampisa,<br />

In Preeclampisa, endothelial cell injury and altered endothelial cell<br />

function appear to play a pivotal role in the genesis ofall aspects ofthe<br />

multisystem damage, including renal and liver functions seen in<br />

Preeclampisa (Rodgers et al., 1998). Lp(a) has been shown to induce<br />

endothelial cell dysfunction (Hajjar et al., 1989).<br />

A recent hypothesis was laid suggesting that genetically<br />

determined elevated Lp(a) and its deposition in endothelial cells ofthe<br />

69


Review ofLiterature<br />

small vessels of placental bed initiates acute atherosis and related<br />

thrombosis in maternal uterine spiral arteries leading to insufficient<br />

perfusion ofthe placental bed and the clinical symptoms of Preeclampisa<br />

(Wang et al., 1998).<br />

A report of a family with two cases of severe Preeclampisa<br />

/eclampsia in which very high levels ofLp(a) has been found, suggests<br />

that a very high Lp(a) level could be one risk factor for Preeclampisa that<br />

is genetically determined (Husby et al., 1996).<br />

However, Dijurovic et al., (1997) made an examination of 154<br />

women with Preeclampisa (Preeclampisa group) and 76 healthy pregnant<br />

normotensive women (control group) .The Preeclampisa group was<br />

further dvided into the following subgroups: mild Preeclampisa, severe<br />

Preeclampisa and Preeclampisa with fetal growth retardation. They found<br />

that plasma levels ofLp(a) were lower in the total Preeclamptic group as<br />

well as in all ofthe Preeelampisa subgroups than in the control group as<br />

determined by quantitative electroimmunoassay (Dijurovic et al., 1997).<br />

Leerink et al. (1997) in the same year studied levels ofLp(a) and<br />

apolipoprotein (a) phenotype in women with a history ofPreeelampisa in<br />

a previous history (patient group) in comparison with women without<br />

Preeclampisa in their history (control group) . They found median Lp(a)<br />

levels in both groups to be equal as well as the apo (a) phenotype<br />

distribution in both groups concluding. that they do not contribute<br />

significantly to the pathogenesis ofPreeclampisa.<br />

70


PATIENTS<br />

AND<br />

METHODS


Patients and Methods<br />

Patients and Methods<br />

This study was carried out in Obstetrics, Gynecology Department<br />

and Biochemistry Department, Zagazig University Hospitals during the<br />

period from October 1999 till May 2001 .<br />

It included 60 primigravda of comparable age with single lesion<br />

pregnancy in their 3 rd trimester and with no history of medical disease<br />

before pregnancy such as renal disease, essential hypertension and<br />

autoimmune disease etc.<br />

The patients were selected from out patient clinic and obstetric<br />

emergency unit, Zagazig University Hospitals and were classified into<br />

three groups :<br />

proteinuria<br />

1st group included 20 normotensive pregnant women with negative<br />

2 nd group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled the criteria of<br />

mild preeclampsia:<br />

• Systolic blood pressure 140 - 160 mm Hg<br />

• Disatolic blood pressure 90 - 100 mm Hg<br />

• Proteinuria was 1 or 2 plus by dipstick testing<br />

3 00 group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled one or more<br />

ofthe criteria ofsevere preeclampsia:<br />

• Systolic blood pressure z 160 mm Hg<br />

• Diastolic blood pressure z 110 mm Hg<br />

71


..<br />

Procedure:<br />

Patients and Methods<br />

1 - Dilute plasma samples with sample Buffer prior to adding to the<br />

microtest wells. Serial dilutions were prepared as follows: 20 plasma to<br />

1ml was added of sample buffer and mix; then add 20 ul ofthis initial<br />

mixture to 1 ml ofsample buffer and mix; final dilution 1 : 2601.<br />

2 - Add 50 ul ofPET Buffer to each microtest well.<br />

3 - Add 20 ofeach Lp(a) standard (0 mg/I and 600 mg/l) to two separate<br />

wells in duplicate. (standards was added without further dilution with<br />

sample buffer). Add 20 ul ofeach diluted sample into a separate well. the<br />

positions place the strips in the frame cover with a lid or plastic film.<br />

Incubate for 60 minutes at room temperature on a micro-test plate shaker,<br />

speed 500 pm<br />

4 - Add 50 ul ofconjugate to each well using the 8-channel pipette .Cover<br />

with lid or plastic film and incubate for 15 minutes at 25 CO with agitation<br />

on a micro-test plate shaker.<br />

5 - Empty the plate contents and wash the strips four times with PET<br />

buffer: by filling the wells with PET buffer using a squeeze bottle, wait<br />

for 1 minute, empty the plate and remove droplet by tapping the strips<br />

and frame 4-5 times, face down, against absorbent material repeat do not<br />

allow plate to dry out.<br />

6 - Add 100 ul of substrate to each well using an 8-channel pipette or.<br />

Start the stop watch. Incubate the strips with cover on the micro-test plate<br />

shaker for 15 minutes at 25 C.<br />

7 - Add 50 ul sulfuric acid to each well. Add this with the same speed and<br />

order as you added the substrate . Agitate the plate for 5 minutes on a<br />

micro-test plate shaker to allow complete mixing and stabilization of<br />

color. The colored products is stable for 2 hours.<br />

8 - Read the absorbance at 492 nm in a micro-test plate reader.<br />

75


." '<br />

(Table 8) Measurement against Reagent blank:<br />

Pipette into test tubes<br />

Reagent Blank Sample<br />

Sample .......... 0.1 ml<br />

Solution 1 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />

Dist H2O 0.1 ml ...........<br />

Mix, incubate for exactly 30 minutes at 37 C<br />

Solution 2 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />

Patients and Methods<br />

Mix, allow to stand for exactly 20 min. at 20 to 25 C<br />

Sodium. 5 ml 5 ml<br />

Hydroxide<br />

(0.4 MoVl)<br />

Mix, read the absorbance of sample (Asample) against the reagent blank<br />

after 5 minutes.<br />

Calculation:<br />

(Table 9) Obtain the activity of GOT in the serum from the table:<br />

Absorbance Jl!l Absorbance Jl!l<br />

0.020 7 0.100 36<br />

0.030 10 0.110 41<br />

0.040 13 0.120. 47<br />

0.050 16 0.130 52<br />

0.060 19 0.140 59<br />

0.070 23 0.150 67<br />

0.080 27 0.160 76<br />

0.090 31 0.170 89<br />

Determination of (SGPT) by (Retiman et al., 1957) :<br />

u-oxoglutarate + DL-alanine GPT L-glutamate + pyruvate.<br />

pyruvate formed is measured by monitoring the concentration ofpyruvate<br />

hydrazone formed with 2.4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine.<br />

79


(Table 10) Reagents:<br />

Reagent 1 Phosphate buffer pH 7.2 100 mmolll<br />

aPT DL- alanine 80 mmolll<br />

Substrate 0.- ketoglutarate 4 mmol/l<br />

Reagent 2 2.4 dinitrophenyl hydrazien 4 mmol/l<br />

Color-reagent<br />

Procedure.<br />

Wavelength<br />

Hg 546 nm<br />

(530-550 run)<br />

Incubation temperature: 37 C<br />

(Table 11) Measurement against Reagent blank:<br />

Pipette into test tubes<br />

Reagent Blank Sample<br />

Sample I·' .•••••• 0.1 ml<br />

Solution 1 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />

Dist H2O 0.1 ml ". '" .....<br />

Mix, incubate for exactly 30 minutes at 37 C<br />

Solution 2 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />

Patients and Methods<br />

Mix, allow to stand for exactly 20 min. at 20 to 25 C<br />

Sodium. 5 mi 5 ml<br />

Hydroxide<br />

(0.4 Molll)<br />

Mix, read the absorbance of sample (Asample) against the reagent blank<br />

after 5 minutes.<br />

80


."<br />

(Table 12) Calculation:<br />

Obtain the activity ofGPT in the serum from the table:<br />

Absorbance ull Absorbance ull<br />

0.025 4 0.275 48<br />

0.050 8 0.300 52<br />

0.075 12 0.325 57<br />

O. 100 17 0.350 62<br />

O. 125 21 0.375 67<br />

0.150 25 0.400 72<br />

0.175 29 0.425 77<br />

0.200 34 0.450 83<br />

0.225 39 0.475 88<br />

0.250 43 0.500 94<br />

81<br />

Patients and Methods


Kruskal wallis test:<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

A non parametric test used when the variance are not homogeneous<br />

and it is equivalent to chi-squared.<br />

Level ofsignificance:<br />

For all above mentioned statistical tests done, the threshold of<br />

significance is fixed at 5% level.<br />

P value of> 0.05 indicates non significant.<br />

P value of< 0.05 indicates a significant results.<br />

P value of< 0.001 indicates a highly significant results.<br />

85<br />

).<br />

"".


]RESULTS


Results<br />

Results<br />

This work was conducted on 60 pregnant women selected from out<br />

patient clinic and obstetric Emergency unit of Zagazig University<br />

Hospital.<br />

They were classified into three groups:<br />

proteinuria<br />

1st group included 20 normotensive pregnant women with negative<br />

2 nd group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled the criteria of<br />

mild preeclampsia :<br />

• Systolic blood pressure 140 - 160 mm Hg<br />

• Disatolic blood pressure 90 - 100 mm Hg<br />

• Proteinuria was 1 or 2 plus by dipstick testing<br />

3 rd group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled one or more<br />

ofthe criteria ofsevere preeclampsia :<br />

• Systolic blood pressure 2': 160 mm Hg<br />

• Diastolic blood pressure 2': 110 mm Hg<br />

• Proteinuria 2': +++ by dipstick testing.<br />

The serum Lp(a) level of these patients was measured using an<br />

enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.<br />

All the women were primigravidae of comparable age and<br />

gestational age.<br />

86


Results<br />

The data was gathered and statistically analyzed and tabulated as<br />

follows:<br />

Table (13) Shows clinical parameters of control and study groups<br />

Maternal age 22.6 ± 3.4 25.6 ±4.3 25.7 ± 5.1<br />

(Years) (17.28) (16.34) (16.34)<br />

gestational age 33.35 ± 1.8 34.5 ±2.1 33.9 ± 1.9<br />

(Weeks) (30.36) (30-38) (28-36)<br />

S.B.P 110.6 ± 11.5 147 ± 7.3 174.5 ± 16.05<br />

nunHg (90-130) (140-160) (160 - 220)<br />

D.B.P 75.5 ± 7.6 94.5 ±4.3 116.7 ± 6.1<br />

mmHg (60 - 80) (90-100) (110 - 130)<br />

M.ARP 83.7 ± 7.9 112.1 ±4.8 136.05 ± 9.1<br />

mmHg (70-97) (107-120) (127.160)<br />

From this table noticethat :<br />

3.01 0.055 N.S<br />

1.475 0.23 N.S<br />

139.7 0.001 H.S<br />

283.2 0.001 H.S<br />

244.3 0.001 H.S<br />

- Mean Arterial Blood pressure in normal group ranged from 70-97 mm<br />

Hg & mean was 83.7±7.9 mm Hg.<br />

While MABP in mild PIH ranged from 107-120 & Mean was 112.1±<br />

4.8mm Hg and MABP in severe PIH ranged from 127-160 mm Hg &<br />

meanwas 136.05 ± 9.1 mm Hg.<br />

with a highly significant increase in PIH than control group.<br />

87<br />

.­<br />

T<br />

. -j


.;.<br />

Results<br />

Table (14) Shows biochemical parameter of control and study groups<br />

LP(a)<br />

mg/L<br />

SOPT<br />

SOOT<br />

Uric acid<br />

mg/dL<br />

Serum creatinine<br />

mg/dL<br />

Protienuria<br />

g/day<br />

306.5 ± 177.5<br />

(100-620)<br />

9.05 ± 5.8<br />

0-21)<br />

9.05 ±6.7<br />

(1-23)<br />

4.41 ± 1.22<br />

(2.2-6)<br />

0.76±0.15<br />

(0.5 - 1)<br />

Fromthis table noticethat:<br />

493.5 ± 156.9<br />

(230 - 730)<br />

14.4 ± 9.6<br />

(4-70)<br />

25.15 ±23.12<br />

(2-80)<br />

5.8 ± 0.86<br />

(4.4 - 7)<br />

0.81 ± 0.23<br />

(0.5 - 1.3)<br />

75.5 ± 34.25<br />

(30 - 100)<br />

573.5 ± 254.3<br />

(270 - 955)<br />

23.5 ± 18.95<br />

(7 - 90)<br />

30.55 ± 26.7<br />

(7- 90)<br />

6.6 ± 1.3<br />

(4.4 - 9)<br />

0.94 ±0.39<br />

(0.5 - 2)<br />

370 ± 201<br />

(100 - 500)<br />

9.32<br />

4.034<br />

5.81<br />

18.4<br />

2.29<br />

5.799<br />

- Showed the result ofLP(a) and Routin laboratory investigation.<br />

0.001 H.S<br />


Results<br />

There was a significant difference was found among the studied group.<br />

SGOT in control group was ranged from 1-23 f.! /L & mean was 9.05 ±<br />

6.7 f.! /L while SGOT in mild PIR ranged from 2-80 J.1 /L & mean was<br />

25.15 ± 23.12 /..l. /L and SGOT in severe Pili ranged from 7-90 J.1 /L &<br />

mean was 30.55 ± 26.7 f.! IL.<br />

By using F test there was a significantdifference was found in between<br />

the studied group .<br />

- Uric acid in normal group was ranged from 2.2-6 mg/dL& mean was<br />

4.41± 1.22 mg/dL while in mild PIH uric acid was ranged from 4.4-7<br />

mg/dL, mean was 5.8±0.86 mg/dL and in severe PIH uric acid ranged<br />

from 4.4-9 mg/dL & mean was 6.6±1.3 mg/dL .<br />

By using F. test there was a highly significant difference was found in<br />

between the studied group .<br />

- Serum creatinine in normal group ranged from 0.5-1mg/dL & mean was<br />

0.76±O.l5 mg/dL while in mild PIR serum creatinine ranged from 0.5-1.3<br />

mg/dL & mean was 0.81 ± 0.23 mg/dL & in severe PIR serumcreatinine<br />

ranged from 0.5 - 2 mg/dL & mean was 0.94 ± 0,39 mg/dL.<br />

By using F . test there was No significant difference in between the<br />

studied group .<br />

- proteinuria there was no proteinuria in normal group while proteinuria<br />

in mild PIH ranged from 30-100& mean was 75.5±34.25 mg/dL and in<br />

severe PIH proteinuria was ranged from 100-500 mg/dL & mean was<br />

370±201 mg/dL.<br />

The analysis of variance (F.test) there was a highly significant difference<br />

ofprotienuria between mild and severe groups .<br />

89


Results<br />

and severe PIR (p


Control Mild PIH Severe<br />

group PIH<br />

(Fig.6) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) 111 control and study groups<br />

Control Mild PIH Severe<br />

group<br />

PIH<br />

/ Mean S.B.P. 1<br />

(Fig.7) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean systolic blood<br />

pressure in control and study groups


Control Mild PIH Severe<br />

group<br />

PIH<br />

I<br />

Mean Lp(a)<br />

Ei Mean D.B.P. 1<br />

(Fig.8) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean Diastolic blood<br />

pressure in control and study groups<br />

Control Mild PlH Severe<br />

group PIH<br />

(El Mean ~p(a) I<br />

(Fig.9) I-iistogram showing lncatl Lp(a) and mean arterial blood<br />

pressure in colltrol and study groups


Control Mild PIH Severe<br />

group PIH<br />

Q Mean Lp(a)<br />

- - -<br />

Results<br />

(Fig. 10) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean of SGPT in<br />

" "<br />

control and study groups<br />

Control Mild PIH Severe<br />

group<br />

PIH<br />

I<br />

I<br />

Mean Lp(a)<br />

Mean SGOT<br />

(Fig. 1 1 ) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean of SGOT in<br />

control and study groups


Control Mild PlH Severe<br />

group<br />

PIH<br />

Results<br />

(Fig. 12) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and Proteinuria in control<br />

and study groups


.,.<br />

DISCUSSION


Discussion<br />

Staff et al . (1999) suggested that the elevated lipid content in the<br />

decidua basalis tissue and spiral arteries causes an acute atherosis, which<br />

is a histologic feature of PIR. It may enhance the formation oflipid<br />

peroxides, which are compounds that may induce endothelial dysfunction<br />

commonly associated with the pathophysiology ofPIR .<br />

In this study there was increase in Lp(a) level in the study b1fOUPS<br />

compared with control !,JfOUP . This increase was significant between<br />

control and mild PIH group (P


Discussion<br />

uric acid unfortunately I have not found a researches which support the<br />

previous correlation.<br />

In this study there is a direct relationship between the elevated<br />

Lp(a) and preeclampsia and can be used as a one of the predicator factors<br />

for preeclampsia.<br />

100<br />

-{<br />

-...


."1:.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

AND<br />

CONCLUSION


-··f<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

PIR is a serious complication ofthe second halfofpregnancy that<br />

occurs with a frequency of 5-15%, it is the most important form of<br />

hypertension in pregnancy accompanied by proteinuria with or with out<br />

edema. This disease is leading cause offetal growth retardation, infant<br />

morbidity and maternal death (Mabie et al; 1994).<br />

The high risk group consists of primigravida at extremes of<br />

childbearing period «17, >35 years old) with a family history specially<br />

the African- Americans. It accompanies most oftwin pregnancy chronic<br />

Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hydated form mole (Smith, 1993) .<br />

In the placental bed, fibrin and platelet deposition, thrombosis and<br />

infarction occurs and result in reduced placental perfusion. In severe<br />

disease disseminated intravascular coagulation may be present with<br />

platelet and fibrin deposition in many organs; including the brain, liver<br />

and kidneys, altered coagulation is important in the pathogenesis ofPIH<br />

(Roberts, 1993) •<br />

A considerable number of tests have been introduced to predict<br />

future occurrence of hypertension and proteinuria in pregnancy or to<br />

diagnose specific forms ofhypertensive disease, such as PIH . Most tests<br />

are related to one pathophysiological feature and although they may<br />

indicate the development of particular complications such as<br />

disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) ,their predictive value in<br />

the individual patient is too low to be ofa clinical value (Collins et al:<br />

1989)<br />

101


Summary and Conclusions<br />

LP(a), is a circulating lipoprotein particle which has been found to<br />

enhance blood coagulation by compating with plasminogen for its<br />

binding sites on fibrin clots and endothelial cells. This action is believed<br />

to be mediated by structural homology (>90%) between apolipoprotein<br />

(a), the carrier protein for Lp(a) and plasmenogen. The activation of<br />

plasminogen to form plasmin is the essential step necessary for the lysis<br />

offibrin by plasmin (Dahlen et al; 1994) .<br />

Both in vitro and in vivo data indicate that LP(a) is involved in the<br />

thrombotic and atherosclerotic processes that lead to a reduced blood<br />

flow (Wang et, at; 1998) •<br />

The aim of this work is to determine alteration ofLp(a) level in<br />

Preeclampsia, it's predictive value and correlation with severity ofthe<br />

disease.<br />

This study was conducted in Zagazige University Hospitals during<br />

the period from October 1999 till May2001 .<br />

This work was conducted on 60 pregnant women with gestational<br />

age ranged from 28-38 weeks divided into 2 main groups, 1st group was<br />

20 women with Normal pregnancy (not complicated by PIH) 2nd group<br />

comprises 40 pregnant women with preeclampsia and subdivided into 20<br />

women with mild preeclampsia 20 women with severe preeclampsia.<br />

Biochemical estimation ofthe level ofLP(a) was done for all the women<br />

ofthe group, three group control, mild and sever preeclampsia.<br />

All the data are made available about the patients considering<br />

maternal age, gestational age, S.B.P , D.B.P, M.A.B.P, SOPT, SGOT ,<br />

uric acid serum creatinine and proteinuria, levels ofLP(a) were tabulated<br />

and statistically studied to detect the significance of the difference<br />

between these data (Table 13-16) .<br />

102<br />

....


,.<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS


Recommendations<br />

Recommendations<br />

Finally searching for LP(a) in pre-eclampsia give us a good idea<br />

about the pathology ofthe disease, consequently it can be used as a good<br />

indicator ofthe disease.<br />

More work must be done to study factors that lead to production of<br />

this dangerous fraction Determination of LP(a) in serum and arterial<br />

blood wall must be done in other study simultaneously to help us to know<br />

more about the pathology of the disease and to remove the contradiction<br />

ofLp(a) levels among this studies and previous studies..<br />

104


'W'..<br />

REFEQ.ENCES


References<br />

References<br />

• Abramovici D.; and Sibai B.M. (1999) : Preeclampsia and<br />

eclampsia in manegment of high risk, Pregnancy 4 th ed. Chapter 43.<br />

by Queenan 1.T.library ofcongress cataloging in publication Data, P<br />

368-376.<br />

• Albers J.J.; Kennedy, H.; Marcovina, S.M. (1996) : Evidence that<br />

Lp(a) contains one molecule of apo(a) and one molecule ofapo B :<br />

Evaluation ofamino acid analysis data. lipid Res. j. ; 37 ; 192-196 .<br />

• Arias F. (1993) : Practical guide to high-risk pregnancy and delivery<br />

2 nd ed. Mosby Year book P 183-207 .<br />

• Atterbury J.L.; Groome L.J. and Baker S.L. (1996) : Elevated<br />

midtrimester mean arterial blood pressure in women with severe<br />

preeclampsia. Appl. Nurs. Res. Nov,.9(4) : 161-6.<br />

• Baker P.N. (1993) : Screening Tests for pregnancy induced<br />

hypertension in: Progress in obstet & Gynecol, volume 10, edited by.<br />

101m Studd. P. 59.<br />

• Barron W.M. (1995) : Hypertension in Medical disorders during<br />

pregnancy 2 nd (ed) Chapter I edited by Barron W.M.; lindheimer,<br />

M.D; Davison 1.M. Mosby Year book, inc PI : 36 .<br />

• Bartens W. and Wanner C. (1994) : New insights into atherogenic<br />

lipo proteins. Clin. invest.; 72 : 558 - 67 .<br />

• Bauer A.; Gardas A. and Ducbins K. T. (1998) : Antiphospho lipid<br />

antibodies and Lp(a) in women with recurrent fetal loss. Int. 1. obstet<br />

& Gynecol. ; 61 : 39-44 .<br />

• Beck R.W.; Gamel J.w., willcourt R.J. and Berman. G.(1980) :<br />

Acute Ischemic optic neuropathy in severe preeclampsia. Am. 1.<br />

Ophthalmol. 90 : 342.<br />

105


References<br />

• Beckette G.L. (1998) : Hyperlipidemia: Diagnosis and Mangrnent,<br />

Quoted from Laterature notes on clincial biochemisitry. Bulter worth<br />

ORTH, London.<br />

• Beeson J.H;.and Duda E.E. (1982): Computedaxial Tomography<br />

scan demonstration of cerebral edema in eclampsia preceded by<br />

Blindness.Arn.J. Obstet & Gynecol. 60 : 529 .<br />

• Benedetti J.J. and Quilligan E.J. (1980) : Cerebral edema in severe<br />

pregnancy indaced Hypertension. Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol137 : 860 .<br />

• Benedetti T.J; Kates, R. and William, S.(1985) : Hemodynomic<br />

observations in severe preeclampsia complicated by plumonary<br />

edema. And. obstet & Gynecol152 : 311-313 .<br />

• Benson R.G, (1982) : Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in<br />

Current obstet, Gynecol. (Diagnosis and Treatment) Th. edn. los<br />

Altose, California.<br />

• Berg K.; Dahlen G and Barress en A.L. (1992) : Lipo protein: An<br />

important genetic risk factor for atherosclerosis; in : Lusis, AJ.;<br />

Sparker, R.S (Eds): Molecular geneticsand coronary artery disease:<br />

Candidate genes and processses in atherosclerosis Basel Karger; 189­<br />

207 Monographs in Human Genetics.<br />

• Berg K.; Roald B. and Saude H. (1994) : High Lp(a) level in<br />

maternal serum may interfere with placental circulation and cause<br />

fetal growth retardation. Clin.J.; 46 : 52-6 .<br />

• Bischnof f.P.(1986) : Placenta 2,29. Quoted from Davy, 1986 D:<br />

Hypertension disorders of pregnancy . In Dewhurst Textbook of<br />

obstetrics & Gynecology for postgraduates, Ediatedby C.R whitfield<br />

Blackwell scientificpuplicationsoxford, London, Edinburgh P. 200 .<br />

• Bosco J.A. (1961) : Spontaneous non traumatic retinal detachment in<br />

pregnancy. AmJ. obstet & Gynecol . 82 : 208.<br />

106


.<br />

r-<br />

References<br />

• CliverS Goldenberg R.; Rouse D.; Hauth J. and , Roben, W.<br />

(1994) : Risk factors for Pre-eclampsia in nulliparous and Multiparous<br />

women. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol, 170 (l) : 289 .<br />

• Collins G.K; Dowse C.F. and Carline F. (1989) : Prevalence and<br />

risk Factors for micro and macro albuminuria in diabetic subjects and<br />

entire population of Nauru. Diabetes; 38 : 1602-1610 .<br />

• Colosimo C.; Fileni A.; Moschini M. and Guerrini. (1985): P C.T<br />

finding in eclampsia. Neuroradiology 27: 313 .<br />

• Cooper D.W.; Brennecke S.P.; Wilton, A.N. (1993) : Genetics of<br />

Preeclampsia. Hypertens pregn. ; 12 : 1-23 .<br />

• Craig. W.Y. , (1992) : Effect of sample storage on the assay of<br />

Lipoprotein (a) by commercially available Radial immunodiffusion<br />

and ELISA kits. Clin Chom, 3414 : 550-553.<br />

• Cunningham F.G.; Coxk, and Gant N.F. (1975) : Further<br />

observations on the nature ofpressor responsivity to Angiotensin 11 in<br />

human pregnancy. Am. 1. Obstet & Gynecol146 - 581 .<br />

• Cunningham F.G.; Pritchard J.A. and Hankins G.D.V. (1986) :<br />

Peripartum heart Failure: Idiopathic cardiomyopathy or compounding<br />

cardiovoscular events. Obstet. Gynecol 67 : 157.<br />

• Cunningham F.G.; Mac Donald P.e and Gant N.F. (1989) :<br />

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in williams obstetrics 18 th edn.<br />

Norwalk, connecticutsan Mateoca, california. Appleton & lange,<br />

• Cunningham F.G.; MacDonald P.C.; and Gaot N.F. (1993)<br />

Liver disease complicating Pregnancy . Williams obstet 19 th ed.<br />

Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange, 680 - 725 .<br />

• Cunningham F.G.;Mac Donald P.C;GanT N.F., leveno and<br />

Gilstrap. (1994) : William's Obstetrics 19th ed. Prentice-Hall<br />

international inc. Mass.<br />

109


References<br />

• Cunningham F.G; Mac DonaIs P.c.; Gant N.F.; Leveno K.J.;<br />

and Gilstrap L.C.(1997) : Hypertensive disorders in Pregnancy in<br />

Williams obstetrics. 20 th ed; Four Starn ford Plaza, Appleton and<br />

Lange, vol 11 : 693 - 745 .<br />

• Cunningham, F.G. and Diane Twickler, M.D. (2000) : Cerebral<br />

edema complicating eclampsia. Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol; 182 : 94 ­<br />

100.<br />

• DahlenG.; Ericson G.; Furberg C. and Lund Quist K. (1972) :<br />

Studies on an extra pre-beta lipoprotein fraction. Acta. Med. Scand.;<br />

Supple.; 531: 1<br />

• DahlenG.; Frick M.H and Berg K.(1976): Lipoprotein (a) Pre­<br />

Lipo protein and atherosclerosis and disease. Clin. Genet.; 9 : 558 .<br />

• Dahlen GH. (1994) : Lp(a) lipoprotein in cardiovascular disease<br />

(reviewj.Atherosclerosis ; 108:111-26.<br />

• Das V; Bhargava T.; Das S.K; and Pandey S. (1996)<br />

Microalbuminuria: a predictor, of pregnancy induced hypertension<br />

Bri. 1. Obstets & Gynecol, 103 : 928 - 930 .<br />

• Davery Kand Mac-Gillivray 1.(1987) : In the classification and<br />

definitions of the Hypertensive disorders of Pregnancy (edited by F.<br />

Sharp and E.M Symonds) New York: Perinatology Press.<br />

• Davey D. (1985) : Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy - progress in<br />

obstetrics & Gynecology vol. 5 edited by John Studd Churchill living<br />

stone.<br />

• Davey D.A. (1986) : Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in<br />

progress in obstetrics and gynecology for postgraduats. Edited by C.R<br />

whit field Black well Scientifc puplications ,Oxford London,<br />

Edinburgh, Boston, Palo Alto, Melbourne P : 200 .<br />

110


­..<br />

>.<br />

References<br />

• Davey D.A.; Macgillvary. (1988) : The classification and definitions<br />

of hypertensive disorders ofpregnancy. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol158 :<br />

892 - 898.<br />

• David M; Stamilio M.D.; Harish, M; Sehdev M.D; Mark. A;<br />

Morgan MD.; Kathleaen Propert S.C.D; and George A. Macones.<br />

M.D. M.S.C.E,. (2000) : Can antenatal clinical and biochemical<br />

markers predict the development ofsevere preeclampsia. AmJ. obstet<br />

& Gynecol; 182 : 589 - 594 .<br />

• Davis J.A.; and Prentice, C.R.M. (1992) : Coagulation changes in<br />

pregnancy induced Hypertension and growth retardution. AmJ. obstet<br />

Gynecol, 143 : 162 .<br />

• De Groot, c.J; Davidge, S.T.; Friedman S.A.; Mclaughin, M.K.<br />

(1996) : Plasma from Preeclamptic women increases human<br />

endothlinl cell prostacyclin production without changes in cellular<br />

enzym activity or mass. AmJ. obstet & Gynecol, 127 : 967 .<br />

• De Swie, T.M., (1995) : Medical Disease in obstetric practice,<br />

hypertensive disorders in pregnancy 2 nd ed by Queen charlotts, P :<br />

197-198.<br />

• Dean, A.G; Dean, F.A; Coulmbier, D. and Brendel, K.A : (1994)<br />

: Epiinfor version 6.02 A. word processing, Data Base and Statistics<br />

program for public Health CDC, USA.<br />

• Deganis S.; Abinader, E.; Eibschitz, I; Oettinger, M; Shapiro, I.;<br />

and Sharf, M. (1985) : Isometric exercise test for Prediction of<br />

preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 65 : 632 .<br />

• Dekker G.A. and Sibai H.M. (1991) : Early detection of<br />

Preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol. 165 . 160.<br />

111


References<br />

• Dekker G.A.; devries J.i.P.;Doelitzch, P.M.; Huijgen S.P.C; Von<br />

Blombergy B.M.E.; Jakobs, C. (1995) : Underlying disorders<br />

associated with severe early onset Preec1ampisa . Am.J. obstet &<br />

Gynecol.; 173 : 1042 - 8 .<br />

• Dekker G.A. and Sibai, B.M. (1998) : Etiology and pathogensis of<br />

preeclampsia : Current concepts Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol ; 179: 1359<br />

-75.<br />

• Dieckman W. J. (1952) : The Toxemia of Pregnancy (2 nd ed.) .<br />

Mosby, st. Louis.<br />

• Dijurovic S.; Husbty H. and Haugen G. (1997) : Plasma<br />

concentration of lipoprotein (a) and TGF- beta , 1 are altered in<br />

Preeclampsia clin-Gernet.; 52 : 371 - 6 .<br />

• Durrington P.N. (1995) : Lipoprotein (a) Baillieres . Clin<br />

Endocrinol Metab; 9: 773 - 795 .<br />

• Edelberg J.M.; Gonazalez-Gonow,M. and Pizzo S.V.(1990) : Lipo<br />

protein (a) inhibition of plasminogen activation by Tissue-Typ<br />

.plasminogen activator. Thromb. Res. ; 57 : 155-62.<br />

• Endresen M.J.; Tosti E; Heimlih ; LorenTzen B; and<br />

HenriksenT . (1994) : Effects of freefatty acids found increased in<br />

women who develop preeclampsia on the ability ofendothelial cell to<br />

produce prostacyc1in, cGMP and inhibit Platelet aggregation scand. J.<br />

Clin. lab. in rest; 54 : 549 - 57 .<br />

• Entman 8.S; Moore, R.M.; Richard son, L.D. and Killam, A.P.<br />

(1982) : Elevated Serum Iron in Toxiemia of pregnancy . AmJ.<br />

obstets & Gynecol.; 143 : 392 .<br />

• Entman, 8.S.; and Richard son, L.D. (1983) : Clinical applications<br />

of the altered iron kinetics of toxemia of pregnancy. And. Obstet &<br />

Gynecol., 146 : 568 - 74 .<br />

112<br />

....<br />

.;


References<br />

• Friedman S.A. (1988) : Preeclampsia : a review of the role of<br />

prostaglandins. AmJ. obstet Gynecol 71 : 122 - 37 .<br />

• Fry W.E. (1929) : Extensive Bilateral retinal detachment in<br />

eclampsia with complete reattachement : Report oftwo cases. Arch.<br />

Ophtha1. I : 604 .<br />

• Gant N.F.; Deley G.L.; Chand, S.; Whalley, P.J.; and Mac<br />

Donald P.C. (1973) : A study of Angiotensin 11 pressor response<br />

throughout primigrarid pregnancy. 1. Clin invest. 2 : 2682 .<br />

• Gant N.F.; Chands , Whalky , P.J; Mac Donal d, P.e. (1974) :<br />

The nature of pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II in human<br />

pregnancy. AmJ obstet Gynecol 34 : 854 .<br />

• Gant N.F.; Jiemenz, J.M.; Walley P.J.; Chand, S; and<br />

Macdonald, P.e.(1977) : A prospective study of Angiotensiv II<br />

pressor responsiveness in pregnancies complicated by chronic<br />

essential hypertension. AmJ. obstet & GynecolI27 : 369 .<br />

• GassJ. D.M. and Pautler, S.E. (1985) : Toxemia ofpregnancy<br />

pigment epitheliopathy mas querading as a heredomacular dystrophy<br />

Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc. 83 : 114 .<br />

• Gilhard L.C.(1981) : Pathophysiology of preeclampsia semin<br />

perinatal 14 , 147 - 151 Quoted from walker JJ , and Gant NF,<br />

Hypertension in pregnancy l" ed. by champan and Hall Medical<br />

center P. 69 .<br />

• Gong C.; Roda, W.; Grant, C.; Walker, J.; James, H.; and Mac<br />

killop, (1993): Production of prstacyclin and thromboxan A2 in<br />

mononuclear cells from preeclamptic women AmJ obstet gynecol 169<br />

: 1107 - IllO .<br />

• Goodlin J.F.; Chadwich, F. and Johnson L.J. (1972) : Out come of<br />

preeclamptic Cases Effect and complications. 1. pediatr : C.; 92 .<br />

114


References<br />

• Heiberg A.; Richard K. and Berg K. (1974) : On the relatiohship<br />

between Lp(a) lipo protein, Sinking Pre. Lipo protein and inherited<br />

hyper lipo proteinemia. Clin. Genet.; 5 : 144.<br />

• Hess L.W.; 0, Briens W.F.; Holmberg J.A.; Winkel; C.A.;<br />

Monaghan, P. and Hemming , V.G. (1986) : Plasma and aminotic<br />

fluid concentration offibronectin during normal pregnancy. Obstet &<br />

Gynecol ; 68 : 25 - 28 .<br />

• Hibbard LT, (1973) : Maternal mortality due to acute toxemia.<br />

Obstet & Gynecol 42 : 263 .<br />

• Hidaka A; Tomoda S. and Kidanaka T. (1990) : Prediction of<br />

Pregnancy induced Hypertensive (PIH) VII tho world congress of<br />

hypertension in pregnancy, Italy quoted from progress ofGynecol;<br />

vol. 10,<br />

• Hirari N, Yanaih ara T.; Nakawama, T., and Ishibashi shi M;<br />

(1998) : Plasma levels of Atrial natriuretic peptide during normal<br />

pregnancy and in pregnancy complicated by Hypertension .<br />

Am.J.Ostet. Gynecol vol. 159 .<br />

• Hollwich F. (1979): Ophthalmology. Georg thieme publishers,<br />

Stuttgar,T.<br />

• Hov S. (1987) : Pregnancy in women requiring dialysis for renal<br />

failure. AmJ. Kid Diseases; 18: 312.<br />

• Howard cuckle, Indera Sehmi and Richard Jones.(1998) :<br />

maternal serum inhibin A can predict preeclampsia Br.l. Obstet &<br />

Gynecol October vol. 105 P. 1101 - 1103 .<br />

• Howard G.c. and Pizzo, S.V. (1993) : Biology of disease of<br />

lipoprotein (a) and its role in atherosclerotic disease. Lab invest.; 69 :<br />

373.<br />

116


f"'<br />

,..--<br />

t<br />

References<br />

• Husby H.; Roald B.; SchJetLein R.; Nesheim RL. and Berg K.<br />

(1996) : High levels of Lp(a) Lipoprotein in a family with cases of<br />

severe preeclampsia. Clin. Genet: 5 : 47-49 .<br />

• James JW., (1998) : Current thoughts on the pathophysiology of<br />

preeclampsia-eclampsia. Progress in obstetrics and Gynecology, studd<br />

J, Robert Steven son House, United Kingdom Vol. 13 : 177 - 189 .<br />

• Kitzmiller J. (1974) : Hematological alterations in preeclampsia and<br />

eclampsia Br. Med. J.; 295 .<br />

• Kronenberg F.; Utermann G and Dieplinger H. (1996)<br />

Lipoprotein (a) in renal disease. Am.J. Kidney Dis.; 27 : 1-25.<br />

• Lackner C.; Cohen, J.C and Hobbs, H.H; (1993) : Molecular<br />

definition of the extreme size Polymorphism in apolipo protein (a).<br />

Rum. Mol. Genet; 2 : 933-940 .<br />

• Lau Spc and Chan EI. (1987) : cortical Blindness in toxemis of<br />

pregnancy : findings on computer tomography. Br. 1. Radial. 60 : 347<br />

,1987.<br />

• Lazarchick J.; Stubbs T.; Romein L.; Van-Dorsten J.P. and<br />

Loadholt C.B. (1986) : Predictive vlaue of fibroncetin levels in<br />

normotensive gravid women destined to become preeclamptic. Am. 1.<br />

obstet & Gynecol.; 154 : 1050 - 2<br />

• Leerink C.B.; De Vries C.V. and Van-der Klis P.R. (1997) :<br />

Elevated levels of Serum Lp(a) and apo (a) phenotype are not related<br />

to preeclampsia .Acta. Obstet. Gynecol .; 76: 625-8 .<br />

• Lin M.S., Redman L. and Han Sen 0.1. (1982) Pretenn<br />

deliveries in PIR. Hypertension; 4 : 56 - 9 .<br />

117


References<br />

• Lin M.S., Me Nay J. L. and Shepherd A. M.M. (1983) : Increased<br />

plasma non epinephrin accompanies persistant tachycardia after<br />

hydrelazine. Hypertension; 5 : 131 - 8 .<br />

• Lindheimer MD, and Katz, AI. (1985) : Acute renal failure in<br />

pregnancy in principles ofMedical therapy in pregnancy, edited by II<br />

Ngleicher. Plenum, New York.<br />

• Lockwood C.J. and Peters, J.H. (1990) : Increased plasma levels of<br />

ED cellulor fibronectin precede the clinical signs ofpreeclampsia.<br />

AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol.; 162 : 358 • 62 .<br />

• Lopez-Espinosa i.; Dher H.; Humphery S.S.; and Redman<br />

e.W.G. (1986): Urinary albumin excretion in pregnancy. BrJ. obstet<br />

& Gynecol. 93: 176 -181 .<br />

• Lopez-Liera M, Linores GR and Hotta J.L.H. (1976) : Maternal<br />

mortality rates in preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol. 124 : 149 .<br />

• Lorentzen B, Endresen MJ, Clausen T, Henri Ken T. (1994) :<br />

Fasting serum free fatty acids and Triglycerides are increased before<br />

20 weeks of gestation in women who later develop preeclampsia.<br />

Hypertens prcgn.; 13 : 103 - 9 .<br />

• Loscalzo J. (1990) : Lipoprotein (a) : A unique risk factor for<br />

atherosclerotic disease. Arteriosclerosis; 10 : 672-9 .<br />

• Lyall F, Greer • lA, and Boswell E. (1994) : The cell adhesion<br />

molecule, VCAM-l is selectively elevated in serum in preeclampsia:<br />

does this indicate the mechanism ofleucocyte activation. Br.Je obstet<br />

Gynecol, 101 : 485 - 487 .<br />

• Mabie W.e.; Hackman B.B. and Peters. J.H (1994) : Endothelidl<br />

Cell injury in pregnancy induced hypertension. Obstet. Gynecol.; 81 :<br />

227 .<br />

118<br />

'.


...<br />

....-<br />

t<br />

References<br />

• Magann Everett and James N.; Martin J.e. (1995) : Laboratory<br />

evaluation ofHypertensive gravidase obstet& Gynecol. Surv.; 50 (2) :<br />

138.<br />

• Marcovina S.M.; Morrisett, J.D.(l995) : Structure and Metabolism<br />

oflipoprotein (a) .Curr. Opin. Lipidol; 6: 136-145 .<br />

• Mattar F and Sibai 8.M. (2000): Eclampsia VIll Risk Factor for<br />

maternal morbidity. Am. 1. Obstets Gynecol. 182 : 307 - 12 .<br />

• Me lean J.W; Tomlinson J.E and Kauang, W.J. (1987) : cDNA<br />

sequence of human lipoprotein (a) in homologous to plasminogen.<br />

Nature; 330 : 132-7 .<br />

• Mckay D.G. (1972) : HELLP Syndrom in preeclampsia a case<br />

study of four cases with HELLP syndrorn. 1. obstet. Gynecol. Br.<br />

Common wealth; 7 : 25 - 30 .<br />

• Meekins K.; Tolyd T.p and kiland y. (1994) : Lipoprotein(a) in 56<br />

cases ofkidney diseases. AmJ. Obsetet . Gynaecol; 171:1289-95 .<br />

• Meier B, Radeke H.H, and Selle S. (1989) : Human fibroblast<br />

Release reactive oxygen species' in Response to interleukin I or<br />

Tumour necrosis factor. Biochemj; 263 : 539 - 45 .<br />

• Miles L.A.; Fless G.M. ; Levine E.G.; Scanu,A.M. and Plow E.F.<br />

(1989) : A potential basis for thrombotic risks assotiated with<br />

lipoprotein(a). Nature; 339 : 301·3 .<br />

• Miller J.G. 8.; Campbell, S.K; Albano, J.D.M; Higgins, B.R; and<br />

Clark ,A.D. (1996) : Early prediction of preeclampsia by<br />

measurement of kallikrin and creatinine in random urin sample Br.J.<br />

obstet & Gynecol. 103 : 421 - 426.<br />

• Miller T.R; Anderson R.J and Lians S.L. (1978) : Urinary<br />

Diagnostic indices in acute renal Failure. Ann intern. Med. 89: 47.<br />

119


References<br />

• Minawi M.; Shoukry M.; and Sheiba M. (1989) : Maternal<br />

Mortality in Egypt. Master thesis, obstet & Gynecol Kasr El Aini<br />

Hospital.<br />

• Mitchell MI, and Koenig, J.M. (1991) : Increased production of 15<br />

- hydroxyeicosate traenoic acid by plaacenta from pregnancies<br />

complicated by pregnancy induced hypertrension .Am. J. Obstet &<br />

Gynecol32 : 34 - 61 .<br />

• Miyamoto S.; Shimokowa H.; Sumioki H.; Touno A. and Nakano<br />

H. (1988) : Circadian rhythm of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide,<br />

aldosterones and blood pressure during the third trimester in normal<br />

and preeclamptic pregnancies .AmJ. Obstet. Gynecol; 158 : 393-9 .<br />

• Morns NH; Eaton. B.M. and Dekker G. (1996) : Nitric Oxide the<br />

endothelium derived relasing factor in pregnancy and preeclampsia.<br />

BLl. Obstet & Gynecol 103 : 4<br />

• Mosesson M.W,. and Amrani, D.L. (1980) : The structure and<br />

biological activities offibronectin. Blood; 56 : 145 - 9 .<br />

• Murakami M.; Gant G. and Mac Donald S.1. (1996) : Changes in<br />

Serum lipoprotein (a) levels related to hyper lipidemia during<br />

pregnancy and toxemia ofpregnancy . Clin. invest.; 75 : 671-3 .<br />

• Murphy J.F.; New Lamb R.G.; 0, Riodan J.; Coles KC.; and<br />

pearson J. (1988) : Relation ofhemoglobin level in the first trimester<br />

and second trimester to outcome in pregnancy; lancet, 1 : 992 - 994 .<br />

• Myatt L; Brewere, A; and Brock man, DE. (1991) : The action of<br />

nitric oxide in the perfused human fetal placental circulations .AmJ.<br />

Obstet & Gynecol 164 : 687 - 92 .<br />

• Naeye R.L; and Friedman E.A.(1979): Causes ofPerinatal death<br />

assotiated with gestational Hypertension and proteinuriaa .AmJ. of<br />

obstet & Gynecol , 133 : 8 .<br />

120<br />

-,;f


References<br />

• Roberts J.M.; Taylor R.N.; friedman S.A. and Goldfien. (1990) :<br />

New development in preeclampsia fetal Med. Rev.; in: a high risk<br />

pregnancy, calder, A(Ed.).<br />

• Roberts JM. (1993) : Pregnancy-related hypertension. In : Creasy<br />

RK. Resnik R, editiors. Maternal fetal medicine : Principles and<br />

practice. 3rd . Philadelphia: WB Saunders; P. 804-43.<br />

• Robertson E.G. (1971) : The natural history of edema during<br />

pregnancy journal of obstetrics and Gynecology of British common<br />

wealth 78 : 520 .<br />

• Rodgers G.M.; Taylor. R.N. and Roberts J.H. (1998) :<br />

Preeclampsia is associated with a serum factor cytotoxic to human<br />

endothelial cells .AmJ. Obstet. Gynecol.; 159 : 908-914 .<br />

• Sagnella G.A.; Markandn, M.D.; Shore, A.C. and Me Gregor,<br />

G.A. 1986 : Raised circulating levels ofatrialnatriuretic peptides in<br />

essential Hypertension lancet; I : 179-81 .<br />

• Saleh A.A.; Bottoms S.F.j Welch R.A.j Ali A.M.j Mariona F.G.<br />

and Mammen E.M. (1987) : Preeclampsia delivary and hemstatic<br />

system .Am. J. Obstet & Gynecol 157 : 331-336 .<br />

• Saleh A.A.; Bottoms S.F.j Norman G.; Farag A. and Mammen<br />

E.F. (1988) : Hemostasis in Hypertensive disorders ofpregnancy.<br />

Obstet & Gynecol . ; 71 : 719-722 .<br />

• Sander K: HansenJ.; GantN.F. and Victor R . (1995) :<br />

Sympathetic over activity in pregnancy induced hypertension.<br />

Abstract submitted to the 68 tho Scientific sessions ofthe American<br />

heart association, Anaheim, California, Nov.<br />

• Satoh K.j Seki H. and Sakamoto H. (1991) ; Role ofprostaglandin<br />

in pregnancy induced hypertension. AmJ. kidney Dis. 17 : 133-8<br />

123


References<br />

• Schiff E.; Pelec E. and Goldenbag M. (1988) : The use ofAspirin<br />

to prevent pregnancy induced Hypertension and lower the Ratio of<br />

thromboxane A2 to prostacyclin in Relatively high risk pregnancy N<br />

Engl : J Med. 321 : 351-6.<br />

• Shanklin, D.R.; and Sibai, B.M. (1989) : Ultrastructural aspects of<br />

preeclampsia. 1. Placental bed and uterine boundary vesels.<br />

AmJ.Obstet Gynecol; 161:735-741 .<br />

• Sheehan H.L. and Lynch J.B. (1973) : Pathology oftoxemia of<br />

pregnancy. London, Churchill living stone.<br />

• Sibai B.M.; Arderson G. D and Mc Gubin J.H. (1982) : Eclampsia<br />

and clinical significance oflaboratory findings obstet & Gynecol 59 :<br />

153-7 .<br />

• Sibai B.M. (1986) : Multiple pregnancy in Preeclampsia .Am.Lobstet<br />

& Gynecol.; 137 : 210 .<br />

• Sibai B.M.; Mabie H.C.; Harvey C.Jand GOD zalez AR, (1987) :<br />

Plumonary edema in severe preeclampsia eclampsia .Am.J. Obsetet<br />

Gynecol156 : 1174 .<br />

• Sibai B.M. (1988): Pit fulls in diagnosis and Management of<br />

preeclampsia .Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol; 159-1<br />

• Sibai B.M. (1990) : HELLP Syndrome (hemlysis, elevated liver<br />

enzymes, low plalelets count) .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 162 .<br />

• Sibai B.M. Harvey C.J. and Gerham, J.M. (1990) : Acute renal<br />

failure in PIR .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol.; 162 .<br />

• Sibai B.M.(1992): Management and counseling of patients with<br />

preeclampsia remote from term. clinical obstetrics and Gynecolgy<br />

35:426.<br />

• Smarason.Ask.; Sargentl.La Starkey P.M. Redman C.W.G.<br />

(1993) : The effect of placental syncytiotrophoblast microvillous<br />

membranes. from Normal and preeclamptic women on the growth of<br />

endothelial cells in vivo BrJ. obstet Gynecol ; 100 : 943-9 .<br />

124<br />

" i<br />

"'I<br />

1<br />

.,


References<br />

• Smith A.F. (1990) : Cited from teitz text book of clinical<br />

Biochemistry; 25 820-823.<br />

• Smith M.A. (1993) : Preeclampsia<br />

Prime Care; 20 ; 655-64 .<br />

• Socol M.L., weiner G.P.; lows G.; Rehnbeg K; Rossi E,C. (1985)<br />

: Platelet activation in preeclampsia .AmJ. Obstet, Gynecol, 151 : 494­<br />

497.<br />

• Staff, A.C.; Ranheim .; Khoury, J. and Henriksen T. (1999) :<br />

Increased contents ofphospholipids, cholesterol and lipid peroxides in<br />

decidual basalis in women with preeclampsia .Am.J. obstet, Gynecol.;<br />

180: 587·92 .<br />

• Stainer K; Marrison, R.; Pickles, C.J. and Cowley A.J. (1986) :<br />

Abnormalities of peripheral nervous tone in women with pregnancy<br />

induced Hypertension. Clin. Sei 70: 155-157 .<br />

• Stubbs T.M.; LaZarchick J. and Horger E.O. (1984): Plasma<br />

Fibrinocetin levels in preeclampsia : A possible biochimical marker<br />

for vascular endothelial damage .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 150 : 885­<br />

887 .<br />

• Suarez V.R.; Trelles, J.G.; and Miya hira J.M. (1996) : Urinary<br />

calcium III asymptomatic primigravida who later develop<br />

preeclampsia obstet & Gynecol. 87 : 79-82 .<br />

• Sutherland A, Cooper OW, and Howise P.w. (1981) : Incidence of<br />

sever preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol88 : 75-79 .<br />

• Tannirandom M.G.; Bergen T. and Bianouv .V.I. (1991) :<br />

Prostaglandin biosynthesis in preeclampsia. BrJ obstet & Gynecol 91<br />

: 225.<br />

125


References<br />

• Taylor R.N. Heilbron De, Roberts J.M. (1990) : Growth factor<br />

.activity in the Blood of women in whom preeclampsia develops is<br />

elevated from early pregnancy .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 163 : 1839­<br />

44.<br />

• Thomson A.M.; Hytten R.E. and Billewicz w.z; (1987) : The<br />

epideminology of edema during pregnancy Journal of obstetrics and<br />

Gynecology ofBritish Common wealth 74 : I .<br />

• Toop k, and Klepper A. (1981) : Placenta 3 (supl), 167, Quoted<br />

from Davey .D.A. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: in Dewhurst<br />

text book ofobstetrics and Gynecology for postgraduates. Ediated by<br />

C.R. Wietfield Blackwell scientific puplications, Oxford, London,<br />

Edinburgh, Boston, Palo Alto. Melbourne P. 200.<br />

• Torres, P.J; Escolar, G; Palacio, M;; GratacosE; Alonso p.L;<br />

Ordinas A. (1996) : Platelete Sensetivity to prostaglanding EI,<br />

inhibition is reduced in preeclampsia but not in non proteinuric<br />

gestational Hypertension. Br.J. Obstet & Gynecol 103 : 19 .<br />

• Unger RH. (1995) : Perspectives in diabetes lipotoxicity in the<br />

pathogensis ofobseity dependent NIDDM. Diabetes; 44 : 863-70 .<br />

• Valentine R.J.; Wallen K; Judsin P.T. and David Son T. (1988) :<br />

The role oflipoprotein (a) in inducing endothelial cell injury. Science;<br />

243 : 904 -10 .<br />

• Vanpampus M.G.; Vanden Ende A. and wolf H. (1998) : Elevated<br />

levels of lipoprotein (a) in women with preeclampsia .AmJ. Obstet.<br />

Gynecol.; 179 : 1103-1104 .<br />

• VosburghG.J.(1976): Blood pressure, edema, and proteinuria in<br />

pregnancy edema relationships. Progress in clinical and Biological Re<br />

search ,7 : 155 .<br />

126


References<br />

• Walker J.J. and Gant N.F. (1997): Hypertension in pregnancy. 5th<br />

ed by champan and Hall London. vol I, P : 39-65 .<br />

• Walker S.W. (1990) : Apolipoproteins and hyperlipidemia. Clin<br />

chemi; 36 (2) : 192-197 .<br />

• Walsh S.W. (1988) : Progesteron and estradiol production by normal<br />

and preeclamptic placenta .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol ; 71 : 222-6 .<br />

• Walsh. S.w. (1989) : Low dose aspirin, treatment for imbalance of<br />

increased thromboxane and decreased prostacyclin in preeclampsia .<br />

AmJ. Perinatology; 27: 120-7.<br />

• Walsh S.W. (1990) : Physiology of low dose aspirin Therapy for<br />

prevention ofpreeclampsia. Semin perinato. 14 : 152-70 .<br />

• Walsh SW. (1994): Lipid peroxidation in pregnancy. Hypertension<br />

pregn. 13 : 1-31.<br />

• Wang X.L.; Tam c., Me Gedie R.M. and Wilken D.E.L. (1994) :<br />

Determinats of Severity ofCoronary artery disease in Australian men<br />

and women. Circulation; 89: 1974-1978.<br />

• Wang J; Mimuro,S.; Lahoud R.; TrudingerB. and Wang,<br />

x.l.(1998) : Elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) in women with<br />

preeclampsia .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 178 : 146-9.<br />

• Wein. R.J. (1979) : Hypertension and Eclampsia in pregnancy.<br />

Practical obstetric problems, 5th. Ed.<br />

• Weiner .c.p; Brandt, and J. (1982): A modified activated partial<br />

thromboplastin time with the use ofaminotic fluid. A.1nJ. Obstet &<br />

Gynecol144 : 234.<br />

• Weiner c.P.; Martinez E, Zhulkchoasdi A. and Chestrut D.<br />

(1989) : In vitro Release of Endothelium derived relasing factor by<br />

acetylation is increased during the guinea pig pregnancy .AmJ. Obstet<br />

gynecol, 161 : 1599.<br />

127


References<br />

• Weinstein M. (1985): Preeclampsia with hemolysis elevated liver<br />

enzymes and thromboxytopenia. Obstet & Gynecol.; 66 : 161-7 .<br />

• Wersch J.W.; Van Mackelenbergh B.A and Ubachs J.M. (1994) :<br />

Lipoprotein (a) in smoking and non smoking pregnant women. Scand.<br />

1.Clin. Lab. invest.; 54 : 361-4 .<br />

• WiJJiam G.F; and jones, D.D. (1982) : Deoxcytidylate deaminase as<br />

an index of high risk pregnancy. Br.J. Obstet & Gynecol; 89 : 309­<br />

313 .<br />

• Wisdom S.J.; Wilson R. and Thomson J.A. (1991) : Antioxidant<br />

systems in normal pregnancy and pregnancy induced Hypertension.<br />

AmJ obstet & GynecoI 165 : 1601-4 .<br />

• Wood P.L.; and Durham, B.H. (1988): Change in plasma cystyl<br />

aminopeptidase oxytocinase between 30-40 weeks gestation as<br />

predictor ofPIH. Obstet & Gynecol, 72 : 850 - 852.<br />

• Zemel M.B.; Zemel, P.C.; Berry, B. and Novman, G. (1990) :<br />

Altered platelet calcium Metabolism an early predictor ofincreased<br />

vascular resistance and preeclampsia in urban and black women. N.<br />

EngU.Med, 323: 434-438 .<br />

• Zhou Y, Dames ky ,chiu k, Roberts JM and Fisher SJ (1993) :<br />

Preeclampsia is associated with abnormal expression of Adhesion<br />

.molecules by invasive cytotropho blast. J. Clin. Invest. 91 : 950-960.<br />

• Zuspan, F.P. (1987) : Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in :<br />

clinical obstetrics pauerstein, C.J. (editor) , wily medical publication.<br />

John Eiley and sons, New York, chichester, Brisbane, Toronto,<br />

Singapore; 654-665 .<br />

128


,-<br />

,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!