J.'.~"";i'
J.'.~"";i'
J.'.~"";i'
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />
Above all and first of all, thanks to ALLAH, whose care<br />
has supplied me with much strength to complete this work.<br />
I wish to express my deepest thanks and profound gratitude to Prof.<br />
Dr. Abd El-Moniem Abd El-Aziz Saleh. Professor ofObstetrics and<br />
Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine , Zagazig University, for giving me<br />
the privilege of working under his supervision, for his continuos<br />
encouragement and his eminent guidance, I am extremely grateful to him.<br />
I am very grateful to Dr. Yousry Kamal Shallal ,<br />
Assistant Professor ofObstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty ofMedicine<br />
Zagazig University , for his careful guidance, great help and kind<br />
supervision all through this work, really, I am very appreciating his<br />
support.<br />
I am very grateful to Dr. Somia Hassan Abdalla. Assistant<br />
Professor of Biochemistry, Faculty ofMedicine, Zagazig University for<br />
her kindness and valuable assistance in the Biochemical studies ofthis<br />
work.<br />
I am very grateful to Dr. Hamed Mohamed Shalaby, lecturer of<br />
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University<br />
for his faithful guidance, keen supervision and kindness.<br />
My deep thanks to the head of the Department and all the staff<br />
members in Obstetrics and Gynaecological Department, Zagazig<br />
University who had helped me directly or indirectly to do this work. and<br />
lastly I extend my thanks to all the patients who had participated in<br />
this study.
...,<br />
Contents<br />
• Introduction and aim of the work<br />
• Review of literature<br />
- Hypertensive disorder in pregnancy<br />
- Etiology ofpreeclampsia<br />
- Pathogenesis ofpreeclampsia<br />
- Pathophysiology ofpreeclampsia<br />
- Diagnosis and classification ofpreeclampsia<br />
- Prediction ofPregnancy Induced Hypertension<br />
- Complications and prognosis of preelcampsia<br />
eclampsia<br />
- Management ofpregnancy induced hypertension<br />
- Lipoprotein (a)<br />
• Patients and Methods<br />
• Statistical Analysis<br />
• Results<br />
• Discussion<br />
• Summary and conclusions<br />
• Recommendations<br />
• References<br />
• Arabic summary<br />
1-2<br />
3<br />
6<br />
9<br />
10<br />
21<br />
37<br />
and 50<br />
57<br />
60<br />
71<br />
82<br />
86<br />
97<br />
101<br />
104<br />
105<br />
129
List of Abbreviations<br />
: Apolipoprotein.<br />
: Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.<br />
: Antithrombin III .<br />
: Colloid Osmotic Pressure.<br />
: Central Venous Pressure.<br />
: Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy<br />
: Fibrin Degradation Products.<br />
: Free Fatty Acids.<br />
: Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin.<br />
: High Density Lipoprotein.<br />
: Syndrom manifested by Haemolytic anaemia,Elevated liver<br />
Enzymes and Low platelet count.<br />
: Low Density Lipoprotein.<br />
: Lipoprotein (a).<br />
: Pregnancy Associated Plasma Proteins A.<br />
: Pregnancy Associated Plasma Proteins B.<br />
: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure.<br />
: Pre-eclamptic Toxaemia.<br />
: Prostaglandin .<br />
: Pregnancy induced hypertension.<br />
: Plasma Protein S<br />
: Transforming Growth Factor B.<br />
: Thrombocytopenic Purpura<br />
: Thromboxane.<br />
: Vascular Cell Adhesion molecule.
List of Figures<br />
) - Management ofmild preeclampsia 58<br />
2 - Suggested management of severe preeclampsia carious 59<br />
gestational stages<br />
3 - Structure ofa typical lipoprotein partical 64<br />
4 - Structure oflipoprotein (a) 64<br />
5 - Representative standard curve. 76<br />
6 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) in control and study 93<br />
groups.<br />
7 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean systolic blood 93<br />
pressure in control and study groups.<br />
8 -Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean diastolic blood 94<br />
pressure in control and study groups.<br />
9 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean arterial blood 94<br />
pressure in control and study groups.<br />
10 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean ofSGPT in 95<br />
control and study groups.<br />
11 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean SGOT in 95<br />
control and study group.<br />
12 - Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and proteinuria in 96<br />
control and study groups.
INTRODUCTION<br />
AND<br />
AIM OF THE WORK
Introduction<br />
Introduction<br />
Preeclampsia is a serious complication ofthe second halfof<br />
pregnancy that occurs with a frequency of5% to 15% . This disease<br />
is a leading cause of fetal growth retardation, infant and maternal<br />
morbidity and mortality. In the placental bed, fibrin and platelet<br />
deposition, thrombosis, and infarction occur and result in reduced<br />
placental perfusion . In severe disease disseminated intravascular<br />
coagulation may be present with platelet and fibrin deposition in<br />
many organs, including the brain, liver , and kidneys . Altered<br />
coagulability may be important in the pathogenesis ofpreeclampsia.<br />
(Robets, 1993) .<br />
Lipoprotein (a), a circulating lipoprotein particle, has been found to<br />
enhance blood coagulation by competing with plasminogen for its<br />
binding sites on fibrin clots and endothelial cells. This action is believed<br />
to be mediated by a structural homology (> 90%) between<br />
apoliopoprotcin (a) which is the carrier protein for lipoprotein (a) and<br />
plasminogen. The activation of plasminogen to form plasmin is the<br />
essential step necessary for the lysis of fibrin by plasmin<br />
(Dahlen, 1994).<br />
Many studies had demonstrated that elevated lipoprotein (a) levels<br />
are associated with atherogenesis and myocardial infarction. (Wang, et<br />
al. 1994) . Both in vitro and in vivo data indicate that lipoprotein (a)<br />
levels are elevated in preeclampsia and associated with the severity ofthe<br />
disease. This hypothesis is supported by observation of high lipoprotein<br />
(a) levels in a single family with two cases of severe preeclampsia.<br />
(Husby et al., 1996) .<br />
I
Aim of The Work<br />
Aim ofthe work<br />
Is to determine alteration ofLipoprotein (a) level in Preeclampsia,<br />
its predictive value and correltation with severity ofthe disease.<br />
2
·.1"<br />
_,;;t.<br />
REVIEW<br />
OF<br />
LITERATURE
I . HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS<br />
IN PREGNANCY<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Elevated blood pressure during pregnancy is a challenging clinical<br />
problem for which the approach to evaluation and treatment differs<br />
substantially from that employed in nonpregnant patients.<br />
First the diagnostic spectrum is broader since in addition to various<br />
forms of chronic hypertension, the patient may have a short-lived<br />
pregnancy specific form of hypertension i.e preeclampsia, The latter<br />
disorder is accompanied by substantially greater maternal and fetal risks<br />
than in uncomplicated essential hypertension. (Barron, 1995).<br />
Pregnancy may induce hypertension in women who are<br />
normotensive before pregnancy and may aggravate hypertension in those<br />
that are hypertensive before pregnancy. The clinical and laboratory<br />
characteristics of hypertension associated with pregnancy are difficult to<br />
differentiate from those ofhypertension independent ofpregnancy.<br />
As consequence, severe pregnancy-induced or pregnancy<br />
aggravated hypertension is frequently confused with other diseases<br />
processes such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), acute<br />
glornerulonephiritis, and chronic essential hypertension occuring during<br />
pregnancy (Arias, 1993).<br />
Preeclampsia is a disorder ofthe second half ofpregnancy, which<br />
regresses after delivery. Its cause is not known but must lie within the<br />
gravid uterus. Hence although preeclampsia is conventionally defined by<br />
hypertension jt is not primarily a hypertensive disease. The raised blood<br />
pressure and other maternal signs by which it recognized are secondary<br />
features, reflections ofan intrauterine problem. (Redman, 1995).<br />
3
Review ofLiterature<br />
;. .: rhzr 211 il:Jba Jar; ce in<br />
prostaglandin metabolism is central to pathophysiology ofpreeclampsia.<br />
They cited an observed decrease in prostacyclin production and an<br />
increase in thromboxan A2 prostacyclin ratio. While this hypothesis may<br />
explain some hematological and biochemical peculiarities associated with<br />
preeclampsia, it fails to show the primary etiology (Abramovicl and<br />
Sibai, 1999).<br />
A more basic abnormality ofpreeclampsia is usually generalized<br />
arteriolar constriction and increased vascular sensitivity to pressor<br />
peptides and amines, An early abnormality noted in women who develop<br />
preeclampsia is failure ofthe second wave oftrophoplastic invasion into<br />
the spiral arteries of the .uterus. As result, there is failure of the<br />
cardiovascular adaptation to normal pregnancy, resulting in reduced<br />
cardiac output and plasma volume. These abnormalities also result in<br />
impaired tissue perfusion. (Abrarnovici and Sibai, 1999).<br />
Incidence of hypertension disorders of pregnancy:<br />
In some mysterious way, the presence of chorionic villi in certain<br />
woman incites vasospasm and hypertension. Moreover, to effect a cure<br />
the chorionic villi must be expelled or surgically removed. The<br />
vasospastic hypertensive state and related pathological changes some how<br />
induced by the presence of chorionic villi may not be so great that<br />
pregnancy need to be terminated prematurely (Pritchard, 1978).<br />
The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy acute and chronic,<br />
regardless the cause, are among the most serious medical complications<br />
that the pregnant female encounters. The majority of pregnancies<br />
complicated by hypertensive diseases do reasonably well, however there<br />
is a potential death to both the mother and the fetus (Zuspan, 1987).<br />
4
-f<br />
Etiology of Preeclampsia<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Endothelial cell activation or dysfunction appears to be the central<br />
of theme in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia, but 'what causes these<br />
endothelial changes in pre-eclampsia? Four hypotheses are currently the<br />
subject ofextensive investigation. For the sake ofclarity these hypotheses<br />
are described separately; however, it.should be stressed that they are not<br />
mutually exclusive but probably interactive.<br />
1- Placental ischemia.<br />
According to the Oxford Group Of Researchers, pre-eclampsia is a<br />
2-stage placental disease. The first stage is the process that affects the<br />
spiral arteries and results in deficient blood supply to the placenta. The<br />
second stage encompasses the effects ofthe ensuing placental ischemia<br />
on both the fetus and the mother (Smarason et a1.,1993).<br />
Placental ischemia as the cause ofendothelial cell dysfunction in<br />
pre-eclampsia is an attractivecoucept, but several concerns are<br />
conceivable that may dispute its validity. First, if placental ischemia is the<br />
actual cause of endothelial cell dysfunction, one would expect a closer<br />
correlation between the presence ofmaternal and fetal components ofthe<br />
disease. However, this is not the usual finding in clinical practice. Next,<br />
the chronology ofthe maternal components ofthe syndrome appears not<br />
to fit with the placental ischemia hypothesis. The finding ofsome recent<br />
studies suggest that endothelial cell involvement is already present in the<br />
first trimester (Taylor et at, 1990)<br />
2- Very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) versus toxicity-preventing<br />
activity.<br />
In pre-eclampsia, circulating free fatty acids (FFA) are already<br />
increased 15 to 20 weeks before the onset ofclinical disease. (Lorentzen<br />
et al., 1994). Sera from pre-eclamptic women have both a higer ratio of<br />
FFA to albumin cell uptake of FFA, which are further esterified into<br />
6
Review ofLiterature<br />
endothelial cell dysfunction characteristic ofpre-eclampsia (Easterling et<br />
at, 1990).<br />
Obesity is also associated with increased lipid availability,<br />
increased delivery, of FFA to tissue, higher cholesterol and triglycerides<br />
levels, insulin resistance, and hyperinsulinemia. (Unger, 1995).<br />
Severe early onset pre-eclampsia is also associated with a high<br />
incidence of underlying disorders such as protein S deficiency, activated<br />
protein C resistance [factor V mutation], and anticardiolipin antibodies,<br />
which may cause a more aggressive accelerated course ofthe disease by<br />
including an abnormal interaction between endothelial cells, platelets,<br />
leukocytes, and plasmatic coagulation and fibrinolytic factors.(Dekker et<br />
aI., 1995).<br />
8
Pathogenesis of pre- eclampsia<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
The exact nature ofthe primary event causing pre-eclampsia is not<br />
known. However, one of the initial events in this disease is abnormal<br />
placentation, in which the main feature is inadequate trophoblastic<br />
invasion ofthe maternal spiral arterioles. In normal pregnancy the wall of<br />
the spiral arteries is invaded by trophoblastic cells and transformed into<br />
large, tortuous channels that carry a large amount of blood to the<br />
intervillous space and are resistant to the effects of vasmotor agents.<br />
These physiologic changes are restricted in-patients with pre-eclampsia<br />
(Brosens, 1977).<br />
The anatomic and physiologic disruption ofnormal placentation is<br />
thought to lead to altered endothelial cell function and multiple organ<br />
damage (Shankil and Sibai ,1989). .<br />
The majority of pregnant women with chronic hypertension have<br />
essential hypertension. Rarely, the hypertension results from chronic<br />
renal disease, renal artery stenosis, pheochromocytoma,<br />
hyperaldosteronism, or other casuses (Lindheimer and Katz, 1985).<br />
In pre-eclampsia, absence of normal stimulation of the renin<br />
angiotensin system, despite hypovolaemia, and increased vasucular<br />
sensitivity to angiotensin II and norepinephrine can be explained by a<br />
biologic dominance of TxA2 over prostacyclin. A reduction in urinary<br />
excretion of prostacyclin metabolites precedes the development of<br />
clinical disease, whereas TXA2 biosynthesis is increased in pre-eclampsia.<br />
Increased TxA2 production in pre-eclampsia is largely derived from<br />
platelets and the placenta. Placental prostacyclin production is reduced.<br />
(Dekker and Sibai, 1998).<br />
9
Pathophysiology of preeclampsia<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
In order to understand the disease process and the prevalence ofthe<br />
clinical signs of presentation it is important to understand the etiology<br />
and pathophysiology of the condition, ifthis is done, early diagnosis and<br />
potential prevention might be possible.<br />
Unfortunately, the etiology of pregnancy induced hypertension is<br />
still largely unknown. There has been much confusion over the role of<br />
many pathological findings in this condition and it is important to<br />
distinguish the signs caused by disease progression from those that are<br />
markers of the underlying process. This can he done if there is a<br />
recognizable stages for the disease process and it may be possible to use<br />
these changes as predictors of patient at risk. Much has been written the<br />
theories that have been put forward for the cause of preeclampsia<br />
described the pathological features found in end-stage disease. It is not<br />
necessary for hypertension in pregnancy to be manifested by<br />
preeclampsia (Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />
Moreover, signs found after maternal deaths from eclampsia may<br />
have little prevalence to earlier stages of preeclampsia (Walker and<br />
Gant, 1997). This may be the result of the disease process rather than the<br />
cause. Because of this controversy about the etiology of preeclampsia it<br />
was and still stated that preeclampsia is the disease of theories, any theory<br />
should explain higher incidence in women who firstly be exposed to<br />
chorionic villi (e.g. primigravida), in twin pregnancy, hydatidiform mole,<br />
preexisting vascular disease, women who are genetically predisposed to<br />
hypertension, and also should explain the improvement after expulsion or<br />
death of the fetus. Dietary deficiency, vasoactive compounds and<br />
endothelial dysfunction are implicated in the etiology of preeclampsia.<br />
10,
-.--<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Changes involved in the pathophysiology of<br />
(1) Vasospasm:<br />
preeclampsia and eclampsia<br />
Vasospasm is considered as the basic event in pathophysiology of<br />
preeclampsia. This concept. first advanced by (Gilhard, 1981) and was<br />
based on direct observation of small blood vessels in the nail beds.<br />
occular fundi. and bulbar conjunctiva and it has been reported and<br />
supported from histological changes seen in various' affected organs<br />
(Walker and Gant, 1997). Vasospasm is alternating process with<br />
segmental dilatation. which commonly accompanies the segmental.<br />
arteriolar spasm. probably contribute further to the development of<br />
vascular damage. since endothelial integrity may be compromised by<br />
stretched dilated segments (Cunningham et al., 1993). Vascular<br />
constriction causes resistance to blood flow and accounts for the<br />
development of arterial hypertension. It is likely that vaso-spasm itself<br />
also exerts a damaging effect on vessels. as the circulation in the vasa<br />
vasorum is impaired leading to vascular damage. Moreover angiotensin II<br />
causes endothelial cells to contract these changes lead to cellular damage<br />
and inter-endothelial cell leaks through which blood constituents.<br />
including platelets and fibrinogen are deposited subendothelialy (Walker<br />
and Gant, 1997).<br />
(2) Increased pressor response:<br />
Normally pregnant women develop refractoriness to infused<br />
vasopressors (catecholamines and angiotensin II). Increased vascular<br />
reactivity to pressor hormones in women in early preeclampsia has been<br />
identified by using either norepinephrin or angiotensin II and by using<br />
vasopressin.• (Gant et aI., 1973) demonstrated that increased vascular<br />
sensitivity to angiotensin II clearly preceded the onset ofpreeclampsia.<br />
11
Review ofLiterature<br />
(Oney and Kaulhausen,1982) found that nulliparous women who<br />
remained refractory to the pressor effect ofinfused angiotensin II were<br />
normotensive during pregnancy while women who subsequently became<br />
hypertensive, lost this refractoriness weeks before the onset of<br />
hypertension. Of women who required more than 8 ng/kg per minute of<br />
angiotensin II to provoke a standardized pressor response between 28 and<br />
32 weeks 90% remained normotensive throughout pregnancy. Conversely<br />
, among normotensive nulliparous women who required less than 8 ng/kg<br />
per minute at 28-32 weeks, to provoke pressor response, 90%<br />
subsequently developed overt hypertension, also this was observed in<br />
women with chronic hypertension who latter developed superimposed<br />
pre-eclamspia (Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />
(3) Supine pressor response:<br />
A hypertensive response induced by having the women assumed<br />
the supine position after lying laterally recumbant was demonstrated in<br />
some pregnant women by (Gant et al., 1974) . The majority of<br />
nulliparous women at 28-30 weeks, who had increased diastolic pressure<br />
of at least 20 mmHg when the maneuver was performed, later developed<br />
P.I.H. On the other hand, most women whose blood pressure did not<br />
elevate remained normotensive. These women who demonstrated supine<br />
response were also abnormally sensitive to infused angiotensin II, while<br />
those without a hypertensive response were normally refractory. The<br />
mechanism by which this maneuver incites a rise in blood pressure is not<br />
clear but it is likely a manifestation ofincreased vascular responsiveness<br />
or sympathetic overactivity in those who later will develop pregnancy<br />
induced hypertension (Sander et at, 1995).<br />
An identically performed study ofangiotensin II pressor response<br />
were conducted in women whose pregnancies were complicated by<br />
chronic hypertension and two groups were identified on the basis of<br />
12<br />
-.<br />
..-
--f'<br />
-,-<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
clinical outcome on serial determination ofvascular reactivity ofinfused<br />
angiotensin II. All women were refractory to angiotensin II between 21<br />
25 weeks, however , women who subsequently developed pregnancy<br />
indueed hypertension began to lose this refractoriness after 27 weeks<br />
(Gaut et aI., 1977).<br />
It appears unlikely that the normally blunted pressor response to<br />
angiotensin II is due to down regulation or decreased affinity of<br />
angiotensin II vascular smooth muscle receptors. The metabolic rate of<br />
angiotensin II, in women with P.I.H. is not altered many studies have<br />
concluded that the blunted pressor response was due to decreased<br />
vascular responsive mediated in part by vascular endothelial synthesis of<br />
prostaglandins or prostaglandin like substances (Cunninghamm et al.,<br />
1975). Refractoriness to angiotensin II in pregnant women is abolished by<br />
large doses ofprostaglandin synthetase inhibitors (Evert et al., 1987).<br />
(4) Imbalance between prostaglandins in P.I.H :<br />
Previously the exact mechanism by which prostaglandins or related<br />
substances mediated vasular reactivity during pregnancy was unknown<br />
(Goodman et al., 1982).<br />
It is now well established that prostacyclin (PGh) and thromboxan<br />
A7, (TXA2) play an important role in the development ofpreeclampsia<br />
(Friedman, 1988 and Walsh, 1990) . PGh which is synthesized<br />
primarily by endothelial cells is a potent vasodialator and an inhibitor of<br />
platelet aggregation. In contrast TxA2 which is synthesized mainly by<br />
platelets is a potent vasoconstrictor and a stimulant of platelet<br />
aggregation. PGh is elevated in normal pregnant women and decreased.<br />
in pre-eclamptic patients. Because both are increased during normal<br />
pregnancy it has been thought that a major mechanism in the<br />
pathophysiologic changes of preeclampsia is an alteration in the ratio of<br />
TXA2 and PGh with a change in the direction ofTxA2 dominance. The<br />
importance of the change in this ratio in preeclampsia has been further<br />
13
Review ofLiterature<br />
proved by studies showing PGI2 biosynthesis preceding the development<br />
ofclinical disease (Fitzgerled et al, 1987).<br />
Schiff et al., (1988) reported a reduced incidence ofP.E.T. with<br />
low dose aspirin treatment which can selectively suppress the synthesis of<br />
platelet TxA2 without inhibiting the production of vascular PGI2.<br />
So, evidence from maternal plasma, maternal urine, fetal plasma,<br />
fetal vessels, amniotic fluid, and fetoplacental units has all supported the<br />
concept that P.I.H. is associated with a functional imbalance between<br />
PGI2 and TxA2(Schiff et al., 1988).<br />
Gong et al., (1993) demonstrated, by using peripheral blood<br />
mononuclear cells as a study model, increased TxA2 production in P.I.H.<br />
patients both with and without proteinuria and this may playa role in the<br />
development of hypertension and decreased placental blood flow. Of<br />
primary importance in his study was that the sera from P.E.T. woman<br />
with proteinuria contained a factor(s) that suppresses PGh production and<br />
enhances TxA2 synthesis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.<br />
The cause of the imbalance between PGh and TXA2 seems to be<br />
complicated and multifactorial. _To date there are several substances that<br />
have been reported to be changed in P.I.H. and are also known to affect<br />
the production of prostaglandins (PGs) in the humans (Gong et al.,<br />
1993).<br />
The first of these substances is progesterone which is capable of<br />
inhibiting POI2 production and its level is found to be increased in P.I.H.<br />
placentas (Walsh, 1988). The second is reactive oxygen species. It has<br />
been reported that the activity ofreactive oxygen species is increased in<br />
P.LH. and can change the pattern ofPGs production in favor of TxA2,<br />
synthesis (Dekker et al., 1991 and Wisdom et al., 1991). The third is<br />
mitogenic factor(s) which was recently discovered in the serum ofP.I.H.<br />
patient by Taylor et al., (1990) and has the ability to stimulate fibroblasts<br />
14<br />
-f
Review ofLiterature<br />
and is considered to be a growth factor' which in turn can generate<br />
reactive oxygen species (Meier et al., 1989) and this can eventually lead<br />
to imbalance of PGh and TXA2 as stated above . The fourth is<br />
lipoxygenase products that have been suggested to suppress PGI2<br />
synthesis and are known to be increased in P.l.H.<br />
Both PGh and TxA2 are derived from arachidonic acid through the<br />
action of cyclooxygenase. If the serum factor(s) described affect this<br />
special enzyme the production of PGh and TxA2 should be equally<br />
affected . However, the serum from P.E.T. women with proteinuria show<br />
only 'significant increased TxA2 synthesis' and has little effect on PGh<br />
formation. Therefore the reaction by this serum factor(s) may be located<br />
on the levels of TXA2 and PGh synthetase rather on the level of<br />
cyclooxygenase (Satoh et al., 1991).<br />
At least two vasoconstrictor mechanisms may be operative III<br />
preeclamptic women in whom arachidonic acid is converted by<br />
cyclooygenase into thromboxane A2with an accompanying reduction of<br />
prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2as evidenced by Cattela et al., (1990);<br />
Mitchell and Koenig, (1991) and Tannirandom et al., (1991). This<br />
pathway is responsive to low dose aspirin therapy. The second route is<br />
via lipoxygenase pathway, which results in an increased placental<br />
production of 15-hydroxy-eicosa-tetra-enoic acid. This inhibits<br />
prostacyclin production, resulting in further vasoconstriction (Mitchell<br />
and Koenig, 1991)<br />
In conclusion, it has been shown that there is an imbalance<br />
between PGh and TXA2 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells<br />
from patients with P.E.T., and a factor (s) was discovered especially in<br />
those with proteinuria and found to contribute at least in part to the<br />
abnornral production ofPGs however-the nature ofthis serum factor(s) is<br />
not yet fully understood (Gong et al., 1993).<br />
15
(5) Nitric oxide in P.tH. :<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
The role of nitric oxide-endothelium derived relaxing factor or its<br />
endothelial loss is unclear in P.I.H. , but experimental studies have<br />
proved that withdrawal ofnitric oxide from pregnant rats and guinea pigs<br />
resulted in the development ofa clinical picture similar to preeclampsia<br />
(Weiner et al., 1989). Nitric oxide appears to be important in the<br />
maintenance ofa low fetal vascular resistance in the placental circulation<br />
(Myatt et al., 1991).<br />
Fiona et al., (1996) found that. there were no significant<br />
differences in maternal serum nitrites concentrations between P.I.H.<br />
women and control group, but significant high serum nitrites<br />
concentrations were found in the umbilical venous serum in fetuses of<br />
P.I.H. group compared to control group. This increased nitrites<br />
concentration in fetoplacental circulation in P.I.H. group may support the<br />
hypothesis that, it may be compensatory response to improve blood flow<br />
or may playa role in limiting platelets adhesion and aggregation.<br />
Decreased nitric oxide release or production has not been shown to<br />
develop prior to the onset ofhypertension .. Thus, changes in nitric oxide<br />
release and concentrations in women with pregnancy induced<br />
hypertension appear to be the consequence ofhypertension and not the<br />
inciting event (Morns et al., 1996).<br />
(6) Hyperplacentosis :<br />
It was found that hyperplacentosis is a major factor influencing the<br />
development of pre eclampsia and this may occur in diabetes mellitus,<br />
multiple pregnancy, molar pregnancy and erythroblastosis fetalis<br />
(Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />
16<br />
.. .'T
Review ofLiterature<br />
next pregnancy or inability to recognize paternal antigens displayed by<br />
the fetus (Walker and Gant, 1997).<br />
Sutherland et al., (1981) postulated that the first pregnancy would<br />
help to immunize the patient against any future pregnancy to the same<br />
partner.<br />
Redman et at, (1978) found a higher incidence of HLA<br />
homozygosity in couples where mothers suffered from preeclampsia.<br />
Chen et al., (1994) found abnormalities of lymphocytes function in<br />
women with pregnancy induced hypertension. Other studies have<br />
demonstrated activation of neutrophils within the maternal circulation<br />
immunocytochemical studies have analyzed neutrophil elastase in term<br />
placenta, decidua & myometrium in women with pregnancy induced<br />
hypertension (Butterworth et al., 1991) . The vascular cell adhesion<br />
molecule (VCAM-I) is elevated in the sera of P.l.H. women and<br />
neutrophil activity partly mediated by this adhesion molecule, which<br />
encourage adhesion to the vascular endothelium (Lyall et al., 1994) .<br />
This could be part of the mechanism of endothelial cell dysfunction.<br />
These changes may act by a direct cellular effects or through release of<br />
cytokines which affect cellular function as they have been shown to affect<br />
the production of prostacyclin and thromboxane in human mononuclear<br />
cells thus affecting the vascular response in preeclampsia (Chen et al.,<br />
1993).<br />
Zhou et al., (1993), demonstated that there was an abnormality in<br />
the expression of the adhesion molecules in the extravillus trophoblast in<br />
pre-eclamptic pregnancies, and there was a failure in the expression of<br />
those associated with successful invasion into the myometrium. This<br />
could explain the secondary invasion that is associated with classical<br />
placental lesion of preeclampsia,<br />
18<br />
.,
Review ofLiterature<br />
Pregnancy associated plasma proteins A and B (PAPP-A and<br />
PAPP-B) and plasma protein S are found only in the serum of pregnant<br />
women. PAPP-A was reported to acquire its highest level in P.I.H. (Toop<br />
and Klopper 1981).<br />
PAPP-A being an inhibitor of fibrinolysis and also ofcomplement<br />
fixation, has been sugessted to play a role both in coagulation and in<br />
immunological changes in P.E.T. (Bischnoff, 1986). PPS, also found to<br />
be increased in pregnancy and further increased in P.E.T. and there is a<br />
close resemblence between PPS and antithrombin III and the former may<br />
be regarded as the placental equivelant ofthe latter. PPS could be well<br />
involved in coagulation and immunological changes in P.E.T. (Davey,<br />
1986).<br />
(8) Hyperdynamic circulation:<br />
Recent studies suggested that, the increased maternal cardiac<br />
output rather than the increased peripheral vascular resistance is the more<br />
common hemodynamic feature occuring with preeclampsia.<br />
Esterling et al., (1990) demonstrated that cardiac output values<br />
were significantly higher in preeclamptic patients than in normotensive<br />
ones. This elevation in cardiac output is already appeamt at 11weeks and<br />
remains in the puerperium despite resolution of Hypertension also they<br />
found that systemic vascular resistance of pre-eclamptic patients was<br />
always less than that of normotensive patients and remained lower in the<br />
postpartum period.<br />
The finding of hyperdynamic left ventricular function and<br />
decreased peripheral vascular resistance in preeclampsia may have an<br />
important role in selecting the best .approachto the treatment of severe<br />
hypertension in these patients by B-adrenergic blockers, rather than<br />
vasodilator drugs and open the possibility of screening patients at risk by<br />
measuring cardiac output at early gestation (Arias, 1993).<br />
19
Review ofLiterature<br />
On the other hand, the increase in the intra-vascular volume that<br />
normally occurs during pregnancy is minimal or completely absent in<br />
patients with preeclampsia. This limited blood volume expansion is<br />
probably the result of generalized vasoconstriction of capacitance vessels<br />
(Pickles et aI., 1989).<br />
20
.....<br />
,-<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Diagnosis And Classification Of Preeclampsia<br />
According to the American College of Obstericians and<br />
Gynecologists (ACOG)1985 , the diagnoses ofhypertension in pregnancy<br />
is made by anyone ofthe following criteria.<br />
1- A rise of30 mmHg or more in systolic blood pressure.<br />
2- A rise of 15 mmHg or more in diastolic blood pressure.<br />
3- A systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or more.<br />
4- A diastolic blood pressure of90 mmHg or more.<br />
These alternations in blood pressure should be observed on at least<br />
two different occasions at least 6 hours apart. (Cunningham et al., 1997)<br />
Hypertension in pregnancy is classified .Into the following<br />
groups:<br />
1- Pregnancy-induced hypertension.<br />
a. Preeclampsia.<br />
b. Eclampsia.<br />
2- Chronic hypertension of whatever cause but independent of<br />
pregnancy.<br />
3- Preeclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension.<br />
4- Transient hypertension.<br />
Each of these factors of hypertensive disorders defined by<br />
American Colleague of Obstetricians and Gynecologists<br />
(ACOG) as following:<br />
Pre-eclampsia:<br />
Hypertension associated with proteinuria, greater than 300 mgm/24<br />
hours urine collection or greater than 100mgmJdl in at least 2 random<br />
urine samples 6 hours or more apart, and/or greater than +1 pitting edema<br />
after 12 hours rest in bed or weight gain of5 pounds or more in 1 week or<br />
both after 20 weeks ofgestation (Chesley et at, 1985) (Arias; 1993). Or<br />
a syndrome which becomes detectable in the second halfofpregnancy<br />
21
Review ofLiterature<br />
which is defined in terms ofthe new development Ollljp-:nl;lIsiun and<br />
proteinuria. (De Swiet, 1995).<br />
Proteinuria:<br />
Protein is always present in urine in small amounts and it increases<br />
in normal pregnancy. The presence ofmeasurable protein can be due to<br />
an increase in the normal renal leakage or a specific increase from renal<br />
damage. The amount of protein found in urine will depend on the amount<br />
passing across the glomerulis and the amount reabsorbed by the tubules.<br />
The classic lesion in pre-eclampsia is glomerular endotheliosis. This is<br />
not a sign of damage but a pathophysiological change that will recover<br />
within days of delivery. It is alway's associated with proteinuria which<br />
consists mostly of albumin that implies leaks across the glomerular<br />
memberance. It is important to note that in more severe disease,<br />
proteinuria is less specific being associated with tubular proteins (James,<br />
1998).<br />
Edema:<br />
The pathological edema of preeclampsia is easily confused with<br />
physiological edema found in 80% of normal pregnant women<br />
physiological edema has not been shown to be precursor ofpathological<br />
edema (De Swiet, 1995).<br />
In one of the prospective studies, pregnant women with no edema<br />
or early and late onset edema, all had a similar incidence of preeclampsia<br />
(Robertson, 1971).<br />
During normal pregnancy there is a moderate fall in colloid<br />
osmotic pressure of the plasma and rise in hydrostatic pressure in the<br />
capillaries. This tends to increase fluid filteration from the intravascular<br />
compartments, but this is compensated by fluid reabsorption . For all<br />
these reasons, the detection ofedema is not useful clinically, nor should<br />
edema be included in the definition' of preeclampsia. Development of<br />
22<br />
',,"
Review ofLiterature<br />
edema is associated with higher rate ofweight gain, hence the numerous<br />
reports associating excessive weight gain with the development of<br />
preeclampsia (De Swist , 1995).<br />
Eclampsia:<br />
Convulsions occurring in a patient with preeclampsia without<br />
evident neurological disorder (Cunningham et al., 1997).<br />
Chronic hypertenion :<br />
The presence of sustained hypertension more than 140/90 mmHg<br />
or higher before pregnancy or before 20· weeks.(Cunningham et al.,<br />
1997).<br />
Preclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension:<br />
The occurrence of preeclampsia or eclampsia in women with<br />
chronic hypertension, to make this diagnosis it is necessary to document a<br />
rise of 30 mmHg or more in systolic or 15 mmHg more in diasolic blood<br />
pressure, associated with proteinuria, edema or both, and diagnosis<br />
requires documents ofunderlying chronic hypertension (Cunningham ct<br />
al., 1997).<br />
Transient hypertension:<br />
The development of hypertension during pregnancy or early<br />
puerperium in a previously normotensive women whose pressure<br />
normalizes within 10 days postpartum.<br />
23
1. Gestational hypertension (without proteinuria).<br />
a- Developing antenatally.<br />
b- Developingfor the first time in labor.<br />
c- Developing for the first time in the purperium.<br />
2. Gestational proteinuria (without Hypertension).<br />
a- Developingantenatally.<br />
b- Developingfor the first time in labor.<br />
c- Developingfor the first time in the purperium.<br />
3. Gestational proteinurichypertension (Pre-eclampsia).<br />
a- Developingantenatally.<br />
b- Developing for the first time in labor.<br />
c- Developing for the first time in the purperium.<br />
II. Chronic hypertension and chronic renal disease:<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Hypertension and/or proteinuria in pregnancy in a woman with<br />
chroinc hypertension or chronic renal disease diagnosedbefore, during,<br />
or after pregnancy. This group is subdividedinto.<br />
1. Chronichypertension(withoutproteinuria).<br />
2- Chronic renal disease (proteinuria with or without hypertension).<br />
3- Chronic hypertension with superimposed pre-eclampsia, proteinuria<br />
Developing for the first time during pregnancy in a woman with Known<br />
chronic hypertension.<br />
III. Unclassified hypertension and/or proteinuria:<br />
Hypertensionand/or proteinuriafound either:<br />
1. At first examinationafter the twentieth week of pregnancy(140 days)<br />
in a woman with known chronichypertension or chronic renal disease, or<br />
2. During pregnancy, labor, or the purperium, in a case in which<br />
informationis insufficient to permit classification?<br />
25<br />
...-
This category is subdivided into:<br />
a- Unclassified hypertension (without proteinuria).<br />
b- Unclassified proteinuria (without hypertension).<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
c-Unclassified proteinuric hypertension. (Davey and Mac Gillivary,<br />
1988)<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF SEVERE PREECLAMPSIA<br />
Symptoms<br />
For the diagnosis of preeclampsia, the committee on terminology<br />
requires acute hypertension in the latter half of pregnancy with<br />
proteinuria, or facial, digital or generalized edema or both (Chesley,<br />
1985).<br />
HEADACHE:<br />
Headache is unusual in milde cases but is increasingly frequent in<br />
more. severe disease. It is often frontal but may be occipital, and it is<br />
resistant to relief by ordinary analgesics. In women who develop<br />
eclampsia, severe headache almost invariably precedes the first<br />
convulsion (Cunningham et al., 1997). The cause ofheadache is usually<br />
inadequate blood pressure control, and it is an indication for aggressive<br />
treatment with hypotensive agents (Arias, 1993).<br />
EDEMA:<br />
Edema is included in the classic definition of preeclampsia and is<br />
used as a diagnostic feature in several classification system of<br />
hypertension in pregnancy. Pathological edema perhaps most notable in<br />
the face, occurs in 85 per cent of women with preeclampsia and is<br />
associated with a rapid increase in weight (Thomson et al., 1987).<br />
26
Review ofLiterature<br />
However, severe preeclampsia anu eclampsia 1".1h occur v' HHUUl<br />
edema and the perinatal mortality rate has been shown to be higher in<br />
preeclampsia without edema than in preeclampsia with edema<br />
(Vosburgh, 1976).<br />
Significant edema can also be, found in 80 per cent ofnormal<br />
pregnancies. In a prospective study ofedema in pregnancy the incidence<br />
of hypertension did not differ between those with and without edema<br />
(Robertson, 1971).<br />
EPIGASTRIC PAIN:<br />
Epigastric or right upper quadrant pain often is a symptom of<br />
severe preeclamsia and may be indicative of imminent convulsions. It<br />
may be the result ofstretching ofthe hepatic capsule, possibly by edema<br />
and hemorrhage, (Cunningham et al., 1989).<br />
Visual Disturbance:<br />
Bosco (1961) reported that headache, scotoma and blurred or<br />
decreased vision are common presenting symptoms demanding careful<br />
consideration.<br />
OLIGURIA:<br />
Oliguria is defined as urine output
Review ofLiterature<br />
though the blood pressure remains within the normal range, and the<br />
woman has appoximately a 60% chance of developing preeclampsia. If<br />
the test is negative, the likelihood of patient developing preeclampsia is<br />
about 1 in 100 (Dekker and Sibai, 1991).<br />
Isometric exercise test: Isometric hand - grip exercise is known to<br />
increase systemic arterial blood pressure, presumably resulting from<br />
increased systemic vascular resistance. Degani et al., (1985) subjected<br />
one hundered healthy primigravid women to an isometric hand - grip<br />
exercise test between 28 and 32 week's gestation. Each woman was<br />
placed in the left lateral position, and blood pressure was recorded at<br />
regular intervals until it remained stable. The patient then was instructed<br />
to press an inflated cuff of a calibrated sphygmomanometer to maximal<br />
voluntary contraction for 30 seconds for a three minute period of<br />
sustained isometric handgrip exercise. The patient then compressed the<br />
inflated sphygmomanometer at a tension level of 50% ofthe subject's<br />
previously determined maximal voluntary contraction. Blood pressure<br />
measurements were taken on the passive ann, and an increase in the<br />
diastolic pressure of 20 mmHg was taken as a positive isometric pressor<br />
response.<br />
The level of mean arterial blood pressure during the second<br />
trimester is a poor predictor of the future development ofeclampsia and<br />
might give the clinician a false sense of security when it is negative « 90<br />
mmHg) (Chesley and Sibai, 1987).<br />
Blood pressure alone is not always a dependable indicator of<br />
severity. For example, an adolescent woman may have 3 + proteinuria<br />
and convulsions while her blood pressure is 140/85 mmHg, whereas most<br />
women with blood pressure as high as 180/120 mmHg do not have<br />
seizures. (Cunningham et al., 1989).<br />
29
Review ofLiterature<br />
It is an indicator of disease severity and its presence is associated<br />
with substantial increase in the perinatal mortality rate (Naeye and<br />
Friedman, 1979).<br />
Davery and MacGilIiveray (1987) have suggested that proteinuria<br />
should be classified as severe if there are 2:: 3gm protein in a 24hr<br />
collection.<br />
The clinically oriented classification of the American Committee<br />
on Classification does not require proteinuria for the diagnosis of<br />
preeclampsia because it is usually of late onset in the course of the<br />
disease that the onest of convulsions may precede its appearance<br />
(Chesley and Sabiai, 1988).<br />
Retinal changes and ocular manifestations:<br />
Retinal vasoconstriction is the most obvious fourth sign in manifest<br />
preeclampsia, along with the classic symptom triad of hypertension,<br />
edema and proteinuria. The tonic constriction of retinal arteries may<br />
appear like a corkscrew. (Hollwich, 1979).<br />
Beside the narrowing of the vessels there is a slight edema of the<br />
posterior pole of the retina and the disc shows a slight lack ofdefinition<br />
of its margins. Cotton • wool exudate, retinal stria, and yellow - white<br />
focal retinal lesions may develop (Fastenderg et al., 1980)<br />
If the pregnancy is not terminated, the retinal edema may progress<br />
to flat detachment of the retina. The incidence of serious retinal<br />
detachment is about 1.2 per cent in preeclampsia and about IDA per cent<br />
in eclampsia (Fry, 1929).<br />
Bosco (1961) reported that retinal detachment is usally bilateral<br />
and frequently affects the lower portion of the retina and that it resolves<br />
spontaneously in the majority of cases within 2 weeks of labor.<br />
31
Review ofLiterature<br />
Blindness is an uncommon symptom of eclampsia with a 1 to 3<br />
percent incidence (Dieckman, 1952). There are different types of<br />
blindness associated with preeclampsia.<br />
... Retinal blindness may be secondary to serous detachment ofthe<br />
retine (Gass and Pautler, 1985). or retinal vascular thrombosis<br />
(Carpenter et at, 1953).<br />
... Acute ischemic optic neuropathy as a result of impairment ofthe<br />
blood supply to the prelaminer portion ofthe optic nerve head (Beck et<br />
at, 1980). This hypothesis is based on ophthalmoscopic findings and is<br />
currently not well founded.<br />
* Cortical blindness may be present in an eclamptic patient alone<br />
(Lau and Chan, 1987). or with impaired conscious level (Beeson and<br />
Duda, 1982; Colosimo et aI., 1985).<br />
Renal changes:<br />
In a study ofpatients with severe preeclampsia and severe oliguria<br />
unresponsive to a single fluid challenge, Clark et al., (1986), described<br />
three hemodynamic subsets:<br />
- Most patients were found to have low wedge pressures, mild to<br />
moderate elevations of systemic vascular resistance, and normal cardiac<br />
output. In these patients oliguria was associated with inadequate preload<br />
and responded rapidly to further crystalloid infusion.<br />
- A second group of patients were oliguric on the basis ofsevere<br />
systemic vasospasm and inadequate cardiac output. Oliguria in these<br />
patients responded to aggressive after load reduction.<br />
- A final group ofpatients appeared to be hypertensive principally<br />
on the basis of elevated cardiac output. These patients exhibited high<br />
cardiac output, hyperdynamic ventricular function, normal or mildly<br />
increased systemic vascular resistance and adequat preload, yet they were<br />
oliguric with urinary specific gravities exceeding 1030. Analysis ofthe<br />
32<br />
-_ .....
Review ofLiterature<br />
above hemodynamic parameters implies the presence of selective renal<br />
arteriospasm out of proportion to systemic vasospasm (Clark and<br />
Cotton, 1988).<br />
Hankines et al., (1984) documented the relationship between<br />
elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and delayed spontaneous<br />
postpartum diuresis in eclamptic women. They hypothesized that this<br />
phenomenon was secondary to the mobilization of extravascular fluid<br />
before diureses. Such observation may account for the occurance of<br />
postpartum cerebral and pulmonary edema in patients with pregnancy<br />
induced hypertension. Under these circumstances oliguria could<br />
potentially play an important role in the pathogenesis of these<br />
preeclampsia - related complications.<br />
The blood and urine laboratory values are used to calculate urine to<br />
plasma ratios of sodium (DIP Na), creatinine (UIP Cr), urea nitrogen and<br />
osmolality Free excretion of sodium is calculated by the formula (U/P Na<br />
+ UIP Cr) x 100. The renal failure index was also calculated by dividing<br />
urinary sodium concentration (mEqlL) by (UIP Cr). The interpretation of<br />
urinary diagnostic indices was based on the criteria proposed by Miller et<br />
al (1978).<br />
Table (2)<br />
Urine osmolality (mosm/kg ofwater)<br />
Urine sodium (mEq/L)<br />
Urine / plasma urea nitrogen<br />
Urine I plasma creatinine<br />
Renal failure index<br />
Fractional excretion sodium<br />
Urinary diagnostic indices in oliguria<br />
(Miller et al., 1978)<br />
33<br />
>500 8 40
Review ofLiterature<br />
these women had underlying hypertensive cardiovascular factors<br />
(Cunningham et at, 1986).<br />
The patients usually have generalized arterial vasospasm resulting<br />
in increased systemic vascular resistance (increased after load), reduced<br />
plasma volume (decreased preload), and increased left ventricular stroke<br />
work index (hyperdynamic heart). In addition, renal function is impaired,<br />
serum albumin is reduced, and capillary premeability is increased due to<br />
endothelial cell injury. Consequently, the above changes will predispose<br />
these patients to an increased risk of pulmonary edema (Benedtti et at,<br />
1985).<br />
There are clinical differences between pulmonary edema of organic<br />
heart disease and that of preeclampsia. Most cases of patients with<br />
preeclampsia occur in young women without previous histories of heart<br />
disease, with normal electrocardiogram, and without cardiomegally on<br />
chest x-ray films or echocardiogram. Also, the course ofthe disease in the<br />
preeclamptic patient is characterized by its slow response to therapy.<br />
Swan - Ganz catheter insertion is the best to diagnose the altered<br />
hemodynamics of pulmonary edema. Ifit is not feasible to insert a Swan <br />
Ganz catheter, a CVP line should be used. However CVP measurements<br />
are not as reliable as the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)<br />
(Benedetti et at, 1985).<br />
THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM:<br />
The brain can be involved in the pathological process of<br />
preeclampsia with eclampsia being one of the most extreme clinical<br />
manifestations of this involvement. The pathological features that can<br />
occur include cerebral edema, cerebral hemorrhage, petechial<br />
hemorrhages, thrombotic lesions and fibriboid necrosis (Hibbard, 1973;<br />
Sheehan and Lynch, 1973; Lopez. Liera et al., 1976). The major<br />
causes of maternal mortality from severe preelampsia are cerebral<br />
hemorrhage and cerebral edema (Benedtti and Quilligan, 1980).<br />
These changes are thought to be attributable to vascular damage.<br />
Cerebral edema is not a constant feature but may be seen on<br />
computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the brain in eclamptic T<br />
35
Review ofLiterature<br />
patients (Naheedy et al., 1985; Richards et al., 1988). The latter study<br />
showed cerebral edema to be present on CT scanning in 27 of43 women<br />
with neurological complications secondary to preeclampsia - eclampsia<br />
and this correlated with the duration ofintermittent seizures.<br />
Computerized tomograhy (CT) scanning shows that petechial<br />
cortical hemorrhages are most common, and these often involve the<br />
occipital lobe; however, the parietal and frontal lobes are also involved.<br />
(CT) scanning rarely describe diffuse cerebral edema or overt<br />
hemorrhage into the white matter, basal ganglia, or pons (Brown et al.,<br />
1988).<br />
36
111- Biochemica markers:<br />
* Uric acid.<br />
* Urinary calcium kallikrein and creatinine excretion.<br />
* Urinary excretion ofprostacyc1in metabolites.<br />
* Platelet angioetensin II receptors.<br />
* Platelet calcium response to arginine vasopressin.<br />
* Enzymes and Hormones,<br />
- Low unconjugated estriol concentration.<br />
- Maternal Serum inhibin A<br />
- Human choronic gonadotrophin (HeG).<br />
- Serotonin<br />
- Atrial Natriuretic peptide.<br />
* Clearance ofdehydro-iso-androsterone sulfate.<br />
IV· Hematological markers:<br />
* Plasma velum , hematocrit and hemoglobin.<br />
* Platelets count platelet volume.<br />
*Plasma factor VIII - related antigen activity.<br />
* Ratio offactor VIII to coagulant factor VIII.<br />
* Antithrombin III levels.<br />
*Thrombin antithrombin III levels.<br />
* Fibronectin.<br />
V - Ultrasonographic evaluation:<br />
* Doppler wave forms of utero-placental circulation.<br />
1 - Standard methods ofantenatal care:<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Antenatal visits are arranged monthly between 20-28 weeks,<br />
biweekly up to 36 weeks. and weekly there after until delivery. These<br />
visits are dominated by a check of blood pressure, urine and by<br />
determination of weight gain. The development ofpreeclampsia may be<br />
predicted on the basis of these standard variable has been addressed in<br />
several retrospective and some prospective studies. (Dekker and Sibai<br />
1991) .<br />
38
Proteinuria and microalbuminuria :<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
The most recent classification ofpreeclampsia require proteinuria<br />
(defined by excretion of 300mg or greater in 24hour urine specimens; this<br />
usually correlates with 30mg/dL on random sampling (O'Brien, 1992) .<br />
Micro-albuminuria 24 urinary albumin excretion> 30mg/L<br />
(30uglm) might become a clinical tool for predicting pre-eclampsia.<br />
Das et at, (1996), Lopez-Espinoza et al., (1986) found that<br />
proteinuric pre-eclampsia was not preceded by a phase of increasing<br />
albumin loss which could be detected by sensitive radio-immune assay<br />
techniques.<br />
Weight Gain:<br />
A sudden increase in weight may precede the development of<br />
preeclampsia, and indeed , excessive weight gain in some women is the<br />
first sign. A weight increase of about 1 pound per week is normal, but<br />
when weight gain exceeds more than 2 pounds in any given week, or 6<br />
pounds in a month, developing preeclampsia should be suspected, the<br />
suddenness of excessive weight gain is characteristic ofpreeclampsia<br />
rather than an increase distributed throughout gestation. Such a weight<br />
gain due almost entirely to abnormal fluid retention and is usually<br />
demonstrable before visible signs of non-dependent edema, such as<br />
swollen eyelids and puffy fingers. In cases of fulminating preeclampsia.<br />
Or eclampsia, fluid retention may be extreme and in these women, a<br />
weight gain of 10 or more is not unusual. The total weight gained during<br />
pregnancy, however, probably has no relation to preeclampsia unless a<br />
large component ofthe gain is edema. Stringent restriction ofweight gain<br />
is more likely to be detrimental rather than beneficial to both mother and<br />
fetus (Cunningham et al., 1994).<br />
40<br />
-...<br />
:....:...<br />
"'
Review ofLiterature<br />
gestation while there was no difference reported in urinary excretion rates<br />
ofcalcium between normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women.<br />
Millar et al., (1996), suggested that measurement of inactive<br />
urinary kallikrein, creatinine in a random urine sample collected between<br />
16-20 weeks gestation could be used for early prediction of pre<br />
eclampsia.<br />
Urinary kallikrein excretion has been shown to increase in<br />
normotensive pregnancy , whereas in preeclampsia reduced levels as<br />
compared to non-pregnant subjects have been found (Baker, 1993).<br />
3- Urinary Excretion of Prostacyclin Metabolites:<br />
Evidence is accumulating that a relative deficiency of vascular<br />
prostacyclin plays an important role in the development ofpreeclampsia.<br />
(Fitzgerald et al., 1987) reported that a reduction in the urinary excretion<br />
of 2,3-dinor-6 keto- prostaglandin FI, a major metabolite ofprostacyclin,<br />
precede the development of clinical diseas.<br />
4 - Platelet angiotensin II receptors:<br />
(Dekker and Sibai 1991), showed that a physiologic fall in platelet<br />
angiotensin II binding occur in early pregnancy, which is parallel to that<br />
ofthe vascular response to angitensin II.<br />
lt was found that platelet angiotensin II receptors are increased in<br />
pre-elcampsia, problably as an expression of the altered angiotensin II<br />
levels; this increase was shown to precede the increase in blood pressure.<br />
S - Platelet calcium response to arginine vasopressin:<br />
An increase in the sensitivity of platelet calcium to argmme<br />
vasopressin was proposed to be useful as an early predictor of subsequent<br />
pre-eclampsia, it was shown that the sensitivity ofplatelet intracellular<br />
calcium levels to arginine vasopressin in pateint with subsequent pre<br />
eclampsia is already increased at the end of first trimester, as compared<br />
with normotensive pregnancy (Zemel et al, 1990) .<br />
43
Review ofLiterature<br />
peptides include an increase in salt and water excretion, inhibition of<br />
angiotensin or norepinephrine-mediated vasoconstriction and reduction in<br />
secretion ofrenin and aldosterone (O'brien, 1990).<br />
The concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptides are increased in<br />
patients with various forms ofpregnancy-induced hypertension However,<br />
the etiology of this increase in hypertensive disorders ofpregnancy is<br />
unknown (Thomson et at, 1987; Miyamoto et at, 1988).<br />
Several factors mitigate against a role for atrial natriuretic peptide<br />
measurement in prediction ofpreeclampsia :<br />
- The rise in these values appear to occur after the onset ofhypertension<br />
and seems to mirror the rise in blood pressure (Hirai et al., 1988).<br />
2 - An elevation may be seen in patient with essential hypertension<br />
(SagneIJa et at, 1986).<br />
3- The measurement requires inhibition of digestion at time ofsampling<br />
and extraction before immunoassay. The complexity of the assay<br />
accounts for a large part of variability in results (Miyamoto et al.,<br />
1988).<br />
O'brien (1990) reported that, it appears that, measurement ofatrial<br />
natriuretic peptides will not provide a clinically important diagnostic aid<br />
in the detection ofpreeclampsia.<br />
IV- Hematologic markers:<br />
1 - Plasma volume, hematocrit and hemoglobin :<br />
The average plasma is fewer in-patients with pre-eclampsia. There<br />
IS evidence that plasma contraction may precede the blood pressure rise<br />
in pre-eclampsia at least in some of cases. The contraction ofplasma<br />
volume that is often observed in pre-eclampsia may be revealed by an<br />
elevation of or rise in hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit. (Hays et<br />
al., 1985).<br />
46
Review ofLiterature<br />
appear that measurement ofserum iron concentration, although valuable<br />
in confirmation, would be a poorpredictor ofpreeclampsia.<br />
4 - Coagulation factors:<br />
Evidence for the occurrence of abnormal coagulation processes and<br />
platelet activation was originally based on the finding as early as 1893, of<br />
fibrin deposits and thrombi in vessels ofvarious organs ofwomen who<br />
died of eclampsia. In later years, all factors of extrinsic and intrinsic<br />
coagulation system have been extensively studied in women with<br />
preeclampsia. A complicated coagulation index has been proposed to<br />
predict the clinical prognosis of pre-eclampsia (Davis, and Prentice,<br />
1992).<br />
Parameters which have been reported to indicate the subsequent<br />
development of the disease are anti-thrombin III and factor VIII<br />
consumption increase levels of Beta-thrombglobulin, a platelet specific<br />
released during platelet activation have also been reported in women with<br />
pre-eclampsia (Redman et at, 1977) .<br />
Weiner and Brandt, (1982) reported lower levels ofantithrombin<br />
activity in women with preeclampsia as compared to healthy pregnant<br />
women. The level ofantithrombin III (AT III) activity began to decline<br />
as much as 13 weeks prior to the development ofclinical manifestation.<br />
Recently, attention has been focused on plasma level of fibronectin,<br />
which is glycoprotein involved in coagulation, platelet function, tissue<br />
repair, and the vascular endothelial basement membrane. Fibronectin<br />
level was found to be markedly elevated in pre-eclamptic patients and<br />
correlated with low antithrombin III levels and with the degree of<br />
proteinuria (Saleh et at, 1987).<br />
5· Fibronectins :<br />
Fibronectins are a group of glycoproteins dispersed throughout the<br />
body that serve two major functions.<br />
48<br />
"l-
....<br />
-,:-"<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
a. Tissue fibronectins (insoluble fibronectin) present at the basement<br />
membranes of most tissues, appear to play an important role in tissue<br />
adhesiveness and cell-to-cell interaction.<br />
b. Plasma fibronectin (soluble fibronectin) functions as a non-specific<br />
opsonin important in the early phagocytic response to bacteria<br />
(Mosesson et al., 1980).<br />
Because fibronectin is present in the vascular endothelial basement<br />
membrane, moreover, circulating fibronectin levels may serve as a<br />
. marker for endothelial damage or disruption (Stubbs et at, 1984).<br />
The plasma fibronectin concentration rises approximately 20% during<br />
the third trimester of normal pregnancy and remains elevated throughout<br />
the six postpartum week (Hess et al., 1986).<br />
Lockwood et al. (1990) reported that many studies demonstrated<br />
increased plasma levels ofendothelial originated fibronectin precede the<br />
clinical signs of preeclampsia and may be useful for prediction ofthe<br />
disease.<br />
O'Brien (1990) reported that there is a clear association between<br />
preeclampsia and elevated levels ofplasma fibronectin, several methods<br />
of assay have been reported, the most common is turbidimetric method.<br />
This method is easy, inexpensive and suitable for automation, and thus<br />
could be performed easily in most clinical settings.<br />
Saleh et al. (1988) reported that fibronectin is a better marker for<br />
preeclampsia than either antithrobmin III or a2-antiplasmin and is a<br />
better correlate of reduced plasma colloid oncotic pressure than is<br />
proteinuria.<br />
The diagnosis value of fibronectin determination as a predictor of<br />
preeclampsia was studied by Lazarchick et al., (1986). In that study,<br />
plasma was studied for fibronectin ofpregnancy women. Using a cut off<br />
point value of 400 ug/ml. 94% ofsubjects who developed preeclampsia<br />
49
Review ofLiterature<br />
demonstrated an elevation before the onset ofhypertension and in 76%<br />
occurred at least 1 month before the onset of hypertension. So it appears<br />
that fibronectin as an excellent laboratory marker for preeclampsia.<br />
Magann and Martin (1995) reported that plasma fibronectin<br />
concentration is markedly elevated in patients with pre-eclampsia. Plasma<br />
fibronectin increased 3.6 ±1.9 weeks earlier than the onset of<br />
hypertension and/or proteinuria.<br />
Complications And Prognosis Of Preeclampisa And Eclampsia<br />
Maternal complications:<br />
Fetal complications :<br />
I. Maternal morbidity:<br />
A. Immediate complications:<br />
I. Maternal morbidity.<br />
II. Maternal mortality.<br />
1. Fetal morbidity.<br />
II. Fetal mortality.<br />
There are many complications that are although uncommon in PIH<br />
yet potentially lethal, especially ifseveral complications arise in the same<br />
individual. These complications are stated in Wein (1979).<br />
1. Cerebrovascular complications:<br />
Cerebral edema:<br />
Symptomatic cerebral edema developed in almost 6% ofwomen<br />
with eclampsia. Its genesis probably represents a continuum ofcentral<br />
nervous system lesions that result from eclampsia. We postulate that<br />
women with symptoms of extensive cerebral edema have a cytotoxic<br />
edema caused by ischemia that is intensified by a vasogenic edema<br />
associated with sudden ofsevere hypertension. (Cunningham & Diane<br />
.,2000)<br />
50<br />
.,
....<br />
'I, -<br />
2. Occular complications:<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
According to Richards (1986) , only IM3% ofcases ofPIH and<br />
eclampsia suffer from temporary blindness due to one ofthe following<br />
causes:<br />
MCentral retinal arteriolar or venous thrombosis.<br />
MEdema ofthe retina.<br />
MCentral disturbance of the visual center in the occipital lobe by edema or<br />
hemorrhage.<br />
MDetachment ofthe retina.<br />
- Disturbance ofthe optic nerve.<br />
- Psychogenic disturbances.<br />
- Intracranial venous thrombosis.<br />
3. Rena/complications:<br />
Acute renal failure is an extremely rare complication of P.I.H<br />
eclampsia and its development is usually a result ofeither acute tubular<br />
necrosis or rarely bilateral cortical necrosis.<br />
The pathogenesis ofacute renal failure continues to be the subject<br />
of extensive investigations and several pathologic mechanisms have been<br />
implicated as possible etiologic factors. The occurrence ofacute renal<br />
failure is usually associated with P.I.H complicated by abruptio placental<br />
and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) (Sibai et aI., 1990) .<br />
Therapeutic principles in the management of acute renal failure<br />
include supportive and dialytic treatment until renal function recovers.<br />
Once the maternal condition is stabilized, if the fetus is mature, delivery<br />
should be effected. Successful peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis have<br />
been reported for the treatment of acute renal failure in pregnancy.<br />
Peritoneal dialysis is associated with a lower risk of hypotension and<br />
rapid fluid shifts. (Hov, 1987).<br />
51
4. Hepatic complications:<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Ruptured subcapsular hematoma ofthe liver, liver rupture is a life<br />
threatening but fortunately, relatively rare complication (Sibai et al.,<br />
1982) . In most instances, rupture involves the right lobe and is preceded<br />
by the development ofa parenchymal hematoma. The condition usually<br />
presents with severe epigastric pain that may persist for several hours<br />
before circulatory collapse. The presence ofruptured subcapsular liver<br />
hematoma resulting in shock is an indicator for massive transfusion of<br />
blood fresh frozen plasma and platelets as well as immediate laparotomy<br />
(Neerhof et al., 1989) .<br />
5. Pulmonary edema:<br />
Pulmonary edema can have more than one etiology. First, the<br />
pulmonary vascular hydrostatic pressure increases such as seen with left<br />
heart failure (cardiogenic pulmonary edema). In a review often P.I.H<br />
patients with Pulmonary edema Bendetti et al., (1985) found that the left<br />
ventricular failure to be the cause in two ofthe patients. (20%) .<br />
In P.I.H patients, another common mechanism involved in the<br />
genesis of pulmonary edema is an alternation in pulmonary capillary<br />
permeability. The most common clinical situation is the adult respiratory<br />
distress syndrome (ARDS) or so-called " shock lung ", Haernodynamic<br />
parameters are usually normal. Therapy usually requires intubation,<br />
mechanical ventillation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)<br />
(Sibai et al., 1987).<br />
The last major etiology ofpuhnonary edema in P.I.H patients is a<br />
reduction in colloid osmotic pressure" COP". Colloid osmotic pressure<br />
in normal pregnancy is between 22 and 24 mmHg. In contrast, patients<br />
with P.I.H. have demonstrated significantly lower COP values (Nguyen<br />
et aI., 1986).<br />
52<br />
-.-<br />
1
,- -<br />
6. HELLP syndrome:<br />
ReviewofLiterature<br />
Pritchard in (1978) and Weinstein (1985) reported that about 5-<br />
10% of women with PJ.H develop the syndrome known as HELLP<br />
where:<br />
H =hemolysis,<br />
EI = elevated liver enzyme<br />
LP = low platelet count.<br />
The syndrome is reported to be associated with a high perinatal<br />
mortality (8-40%) and a significant maternal morbidity.<br />
The syndrome was first reported by prithchard et al., (1954) who<br />
explained three cases, one of whom survived, Mckay (1972) reported<br />
four cases with two developed liver rupture and one maternal mortality.<br />
Kitzmiller in (1974) has found the syndrome in three cases among four<br />
patients with eclamptic thrombocytopenia. Eight cases were reported by<br />
Goodlin et al. (1972) with perinatal mortality (44%) (Sibai, 1990) .<br />
Redman et al., (1982) have stated that the reduced platelets is due<br />
to increased peripheral consumption. This is supported by the bone<br />
marrow studies that show an increase ofmegakaryocytes. Walsh (1989)<br />
proved that the drop ofplatelet count is due to local platelet aggregation<br />
in the utero-placental vasculature due to deficiency of prostacylin<br />
synthesis in cells lining uteroplacental arteries.<br />
Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia ofthe syndrome is defined as<br />
the presence ofburr cells, chistocytes or polychromatasia on a peripheral<br />
smear. This red cell fragmentation is considered to be due to passage<br />
through small blood vessels that have intimal damage and fibrin deposits.<br />
( Sibai, 1990).<br />
At the time ofcesarian section ofpatients with HELLP syndrome,<br />
the liver was found to have a firm consistency with occasional<br />
subcapsular hemorrhage. Histological examination reveals small areas of<br />
53
Review ofLiterature<br />
hemorrhange with the adjacent liver cells showing degeneration . This<br />
liver cell damage is responsible for the elevated liver enzymes (Neerhcf<br />
et al., 1989) .<br />
The only cure for HELLP syndrome is delivery and, as the nature<br />
ofthe disease is one ofprogression, prolonged induction oflabour is to be<br />
avoided (Sibal, 1990) . Patients who have excessive bleeding should<br />
receive platelet transfusion either before or after delivery if the platelet<br />
count is less than 20,000/mm . Packed RBCs may be needed ifhematocrit<br />
value drops from continued hemolysis. There are several reports ofthe<br />
use ofantithrombin III in treatment ofP.I.H. with HELLP syndrome. The<br />
management is successful but more information about this approach<br />
needs to be obtained before it can be advocated (Weinstein, 1985).<br />
B. Remote maternal complications:<br />
1. Recurrent PoIB :<br />
According to Sibai, (1988), about one third ofwomen who have<br />
had eclampsia in their first pregnancy develop P.I.H in a later pregnancy.<br />
The prevealence of chronic hypertension in these women with recurrent<br />
P.I.H is high and low in those without recurrence.<br />
2. Recurrent hypertension :<br />
P.I.H and eclampsia do not result in chronic hypertension (Chesley<br />
and Cooper, 1986). It is found that 20 to 50% ofwomen who have<br />
suffered from P.I.H and eclampsia become hypertensive in later years.<br />
Women who develp P.I.H are either overt or occult hypertensive. Sooner<br />
or later all of them will become clearly hypertensive even if they never<br />
get pregnant. If hypertension is still present on the 10th day, the<br />
recurrence of hypertension is 59% while 21% in women whose blood<br />
pressure has returned to normal at that time (Browen et al., 1987).<br />
54
II. Maternal mortality:<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Maternal mortality seems to depend upon the functional integrity<br />
of the following organ system: renal, adrenal, cardiovascualr including<br />
microcirculation, uterus and placenta, liver and bone marrow . Anything<br />
which inhibits the functions ofthese organs reduces maternal homeostatic<br />
capacity, exaggerates the experssion of the disease in progress and<br />
decreases the chance for a successful outcome (Pritchard. 1985).<br />
Lopez-Lieraet at, (1976) studied the factors that influence<br />
maternal mortality and came up with the following:<br />
1. Type ofeclampsia:<br />
The highest mortality rate occurred in women with antepartum<br />
eclampsia (16.9%) .<br />
2. Age:<br />
In a group of73 cases ofteen age eclamptic patients, the mortality<br />
rate was 5.5% while it was 10% in another group of 89 cases who were<br />
30 years or older (Hidaka et at, 1990).<br />
3. Parity:<br />
Chesley (1978) reported that a higher proportion of multiparous<br />
have died than of women having had eclampsia as primigravidae.<br />
Cardiovascualr cases accounted for only 29% ofthe deaths ofeclamptic<br />
women.<br />
4. Twillpregnancy :<br />
The incidence of multiple pregnancy with eclampsia was about<br />
three times that ofthe general population and the maternal mortality rate<br />
for twin pregnancies is double the figure for the single pregnancy (7.8<br />
versus 3.5%) (Sibai, 1986).<br />
55
Fetal complications:<br />
I - Fetal morbidity :<br />
1. Fetalprematurity :<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Preterm labour may accur spontaneusly in cases of P.I.H and<br />
eclampsia. However, it is more likely to be due to artificial induction in<br />
the maternal interest (Ferris, 1988).<br />
Lin et at. (1982) found that hypertensive pregnant patients of<br />
different etiologise have three or four times more preterm deliveries than<br />
did the non-hypertensive women.<br />
2- Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR):<br />
Lin et al, (1983) found that fetal birth weight progressively<br />
increased with increasing blood pressure range till DBP of90 mmHg was<br />
reached above which birth weigh levelled off. They found that the<br />
incidence of IUGR in P.l.H patients was greater in women with<br />
prolonged hypertension (>4 weeks), heavy proteinurie (>3.5 g/24 hours)<br />
and in multiparous women than in nulliparous women.<br />
II. Fetal mortality:<br />
Sibai (1988) noticed that hypertension alone in the absence of<br />
protinuria was associated with a three fold rise in fetal death rate. The<br />
Combination of hypertension and proteinuria had a further three fold<br />
increase in the perinatal mortality rate. He concluded that 70% ofthe<br />
excess deaths were due to large placental infarcts, small placental size<br />
and abruptio placentae.<br />
Fetal asphyxia:<br />
The incidence offetal asphyxia was found to be increased in P.l.H<br />
patients as compared with normal pregnant women. The average one and<br />
the five minutes Apgar score in fetuses ofP.I.H mothers were 3 and 7<br />
respectively compared with 9 and 9 in normal pregnancy group and this<br />
was found to occur in 15% in women with P.I.H (Roberts et al., 1990).<br />
56
Review ofLiterature<br />
Management of pregnancy induced hypertension<br />
The most effective therapy for preeclampsia is delivery ofthe fetus and<br />
placenta in pregnancy at or near term in which the cervix is favorable<br />
labor should be induced in addition intravenous (IV) magnesieum sulfate<br />
(MgS04) should be used both during labor and postpartum to reduce the<br />
risk of convulsions. Disease severity and gestational age usually govern<br />
the decision to intervene and deliver a pareterm infant. (Abramovici and<br />
Sibai 1999).<br />
Mild Preeclampsia:<br />
All patients with mild preeclampsia should receive maternal and fetal<br />
evaluation at the time of their diagnosis .. Maternal evaluation includes<br />
measurements of blood pressure, weight, and urine protein, and<br />
questioning about symptoms of headache, visual disturbances and<br />
epigastric pain. Fetal evaluation should include ultrasonography to<br />
determine fetal growth and amniotic fluid volume, daily fetal movement<br />
count and nonsterss testing (or biophysical profile) at least once weekly<br />
(fig 1) (Abramovici and Sibai 1999).<br />
Laboratory evaluation includes determination of hematocrit,<br />
platelet counts every 2 days, and liver enzyme levels twice weekly. This<br />
evaluation is important since patients may develop thrombyctopenia and<br />
abnormal<br />
elevation.<br />
liver enzyme levels, even with minimal blood pressure<br />
Patients are instructed to receive a regular diet with no salt restriction and<br />
no restricted activity. Diuretics, antihypertensive drugs, and sedatives are<br />
not used .(Sibai , 1992).<br />
57
Introduction:<br />
L1POROTEIN (a)<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Cholesterol and its esters, triglycerides and phosholipids are all<br />
transported in plasma as lipoprotein particles. Free Fatty acids are<br />
transported bound to albumin. Lipoprotein particles comprise a peripheral<br />
envelope, consisting mainly ofphospholipids and free cholesterol (which<br />
have both water soluble polar and lipid soluble non-polar groups) with<br />
some apolipoproteins and a central non-polar core (mostly triglycerides<br />
and esterified cholesterol). The molecules in the envelope are distributed<br />
in a single in such a way that the polar groups face out towards the<br />
surrounding plasma, while the non-polar face inwards forming the lipid<br />
core in which the insoluble lipids are carried (Smith, 1990).<br />
Most lipoproteins are assembled in the liver or small intestine. Five<br />
main types oflipoprotein particles can be recognized:<br />
1. Chylomicrons: are large particles (largest size). consisting mainly of<br />
triglyserides 83% added to cholesterol and phosphate. They have the<br />
lowest density. They are formed in intestinal mucosa and reach systemic<br />
circulation via thoracic duct. They are the principle form in which dietary<br />
triglycerides are carried to the tissues.<br />
2. Very low density lipoproteins (YLDL): They are moderately large<br />
particles whose main component is of neutral lipid 78% (endogenous)<br />
added to cholesterol and phospholipid. They are mainly formed in liver<br />
and to a lesser extent by intestinal mucosa and are secreted into plasma<br />
from these two sites.<br />
3. Intermediate density lipoproteins (IDL or VLDL remnants:<br />
Arise from removal of triglycerides from VLDL during the<br />
transition from VLDLto LDL.<br />
4. Low-density lipoproteins (LDL): are cholesterol-rich particles,<br />
formed from IDL by the removal of more triglyceride and apolipoprotein<br />
A orB48 .<br />
60<br />
''1<br />
.....
i-<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
5. High density lipoproteins: are oftwo main types, HDL2 and HDL3.<br />
They probably transported from peripheral cells to the liver, prior to<br />
excrerion (Beckett, 1998).<br />
The apolipoproteins:<br />
The protein components ofthe lipoproteins, the apolipoproteins are<br />
a complex family of polypeptides that promote and control the lipid<br />
transport in plasma and uptake into tissues. They are classified into five<br />
main groups (ape-A, B, C, E and (a)), some ofwhich may be subdivided,<br />
and lastly apo (a).<br />
Apo A: these are synthesized in the liver and intestine. They are initially<br />
present in chylomicrons in lymph, but they rapidly transfer to lIDL.<br />
Apo B: is present in plasma in two forms, apoB100 and apoB48 chyle<br />
micron. ApaB100 is the protein component of LDL and is also present in<br />
VLDL and LDL . ApoB100 is recognized by specific receptors in<br />
peripheral tissues.<br />
Apo C: is a family of three proteins (apo CI, apo ClI and apo ClII) is<br />
synthesized in the liver and incorporated into HDL and LDL,<br />
chylomicron.<br />
Apo E: is synthesized in the liver, incorporated into HDL and transferred<br />
in the circulation to chylomicrons and VLDL. There are three major<br />
isoforrns (apoE2, apoE3 and apoE4) at a single genetic locus giving rise<br />
to genotypes (E3/3, E2/3, E2/4, etc.).<br />
Apo E is probably mainly involved in the hepatic intake of<br />
chylomicron remnants and IDL,<br />
tissues (Walker, 1990).<br />
since it binds to apo B receptors in-the<br />
Lipoprotein (a) "LP (a)":<br />
The lipoprotein (a) is sixth type oflipoprotein particles. It was first<br />
deteced in 1962. It consists of LDL particle to which a long polypeptide<br />
chain is attached by a disulfide bridge a single apo (a) having a high<br />
61
Review ofLiterature<br />
carbohydrate content and having a similar amino acid sequence to<br />
plasminogen, and is attached by a disulfide bond to the apoBl00. It is<br />
synthesized in the liver with a poor clearance from plasma it has 11<br />
phenotypes and 19 genotypes (Howard and pizzo, 1993).<br />
Lp (a) is carried in plasma on a protein carrier apolipoprotein (a)<br />
which was found to have a 90% structural homology to plasminogen.<br />
Inheritance of apolipoprotein (a) is controlled by a specific gene on<br />
chromosome No.6 (Wang et al., 1994).<br />
Lipoprotein(a) LP(a) is a distinct class oflipoprotein (as shown in<br />
table 3) that is structurally related to LDL, because both lipoprotein<br />
classes possess one molecule ofapo B-100 per particle and have similar<br />
lipid compositions.(Durington,1995 & Marcovina, ,1995) However<br />
unlike LDL, Lp(a) contains a carbohydrate-rich protein apo(a) that is<br />
covalently bound to the apo B-lOO through a disulfide linkage. The<br />
available evidence suggest that Lp(a) contains one molecule ofapo(a) and<br />
one molecule of apo B-IOO per Lp(a) particle (Albers, et al. 1996).<br />
Apo(a) is the unique protein componant of Lp(a) and exhibits a<br />
significant sequence homology with plasminogen and a high degree of<br />
variation in polypeptide chain length. Apo(a) is composed ofa serine<br />
protease domain and a kringle-containing domain unlike plasminogen,<br />
however, Lp(a) is not activated to form an active protease. The kringle<br />
that is contiguous with the protease domain, kringle 5, shares 85% amino<br />
acid homology with plasminogen kringle 5, whereas the kringle 4 domain<br />
has 78 to 88% amino acid homology with kringle 4 ofplasminogen.<br />
Apo(a) contains 10 distinct classes ofkringle 4-1ike domains that differ<br />
from each other in amino acid sequence. Kringle 4 type I and kringle 4<br />
types3 to 10 are present as a single copy on apo(a) particles. In contrast,<br />
kringle 4 type 2 is present in variable number ofrepeats (3 to> 40) and<br />
62
unesterified Apoliporobein<br />
cholesterol / Cholesteriyl Ester<br />
~i~ure (3) Structure of a typical lipoprotein partical<br />
Figure (4) Structure of lipoprotein (a)<br />
K = kringle PD=Protease domain T = repeats<br />
(Have1 and Kanc, 1995)
t-<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Table (3) Characteristics of Human plsam Lipoproteins<br />
Vartable Chylomicron VLDL lDL lOL HDL Lp(a)<br />
Density (glml)
Lipoprotein (a) as an atherogenic factor:<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Apolipoprotein (a) is a glycoprotein that is present in Lp(a) and has<br />
close structural homology with plasminogen (McLean et al., 1987). Both<br />
genes (of apolipoprotein (a) and plasminogen) are closely linked on the<br />
long arm of chromosome 6 (Frank et al., 1988) . These give suggestive<br />
evidence that the close homology ofLp(a) with plasminogen results in<br />
competitive inhibition of the fibrinolytic properties of plasminogen<br />
(Miles et al., 1989 and Harpel ct al., 1989).<br />
Competition of Lp(a) with plasminogen for binding to endothelial<br />
cells results in strongly down-regulated activation ofcell surface-bound<br />
plasminogen by tissue plasmiogen activator (t-PA), suggesting that Lp(a)<br />
may predispose to thrombotic complications (Edelberg et al., 1990).<br />
Association of Lp(a) to different conditions:<br />
1. Cardiovascular diseases:<br />
The suggestion that Lp(a) might be a risk factor for cardiovascular<br />
diseases goes back to the observations ofDahlen et al. (1972) who found<br />
that individuals with angina pectoris exhibit an extra pre-B band In<br />
lipoprotein electrophoresis far more frequently than the control group.<br />
In a series of subsequent reports, attempts were make to prove the<br />
identity of pre-B lipoprotein with Lp(a) and further to provide evidence<br />
that Lp(a) positive individuals are at a higher risk for atherosclerosis,<br />
cardiovascular diseases and myocardial infarction (Heiberg et at, 1974;<br />
Dahlen et al., 1976).<br />
It is now proved beyond doubt that Lp(a) is a potential independent<br />
risk factor for premature cardiovascular altherogenic disease (Berg et al.,<br />
1992).<br />
Accumulation of Lp(a) has been found in atherosclerotic lesions<br />
and it is now believed to be an atherogenic lipoprotein, elevated plasma<br />
levels greater than 30 mg/dl in humans appear to be associated with an<br />
66
+-<br />
L"<br />
, .-<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
increased risk for the development of CAD with a rate ofoccurrence<br />
estimated to be 2-5 times greater than in normal controls (Loscalzo,<br />
1990).<br />
2. Renal system :<br />
Diseases of the kidney and their accompanying signs (proteinuria<br />
and nephrotic syndrome) as well as end-stage renal disease and their<br />
treatment modalities (haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney<br />
transplantation) have all been found to increase Lp(a) plasma levels<br />
substantially (Bartens an Wanner, 1994).<br />
3. Liver:<br />
To determine the influence of liver disease on Lp(a)<br />
concentrations, Feely et al. (1992) compared its concentrations in<br />
patients with varying degrees of severity ofhepatic cirrhosis and patients<br />
with established coronary heart disease they found Lp(a) concentration to<br />
be raised in patients with coronary heart diseas and reduced in those with<br />
cirrhosis. Concentrations tended to be lower in those with more severe<br />
diseases.<br />
4. Hormones:<br />
Fluctuations III Lp(a) seem to occur in states of hormonal changes<br />
such as in diabetes mellitus, after estrogen treatment and during<br />
pregnancy (Bartens and Wanner, 1994).<br />
5. Smoking:<br />
Wersch et al.(1994) compared 68 non-smoking and 118 smoking<br />
pregnant women with a control group of 29 subjectively healthy, age<br />
matched non-smoking non-pregnant females. This comparison showed<br />
significantly higher Lp(a) values during the last trimester of gestation in<br />
non-smokers. The higher Lp(a) concentration in the plasma ofnon<br />
smoking women during a normal pregnancy might be a physiologic<br />
necessity for adequate fetal growth. Lower levels ofLp(a) were seen in<br />
67
Review ofLiterature<br />
the last trimester ofthe smoking pregnant group, which is unfavorable for<br />
the normal development of the rapidly growing fetus in the last stage of<br />
the pregnancy.<br />
Lipoprotein (a) and pregnancy:<br />
I. Relation to normalpregnancy:<br />
The level of serum lipids, high density lipoproteins (HDL) and<br />
apolipoproteins are all increased in pregnancy. Serum triglycerides (TG)<br />
and serum total cholesterol (TC) increase steadily throughout pregnancy.<br />
In contrast serum Lp(a) levels increases until the 20th week and<br />
reaches a value which is 1.5 times higher than the IOth week. Thereafter,<br />
Lp(a) levels become constant until the late stage of pregnancy<br />
(Murakami et al., 1996).<br />
II. Relation tofetal growth retardation andfetal loss:<br />
Berg et aI. (1994) stated that a very high Lp(a) lipoprotein level in<br />
maternal serum during pregnancy was found to be associated with<br />
delivery of children with low birth weight.This suggests the possibility<br />
that a very high Lp(a) concentration may predispose to placental<br />
insufficiency, presumably arising from pathological changes in maternal<br />
uterine vessels in the placental bed.<br />
They suggested that a very high Lp(a) lipoprotein level may be a<br />
factor to consider in women who have repeated pregnancies with<br />
placental insufficiency and who give birth to children with low birth<br />
weight.<br />
Such conclusion is confirmed by another study stating that elevated<br />
Lp(a) levels occur in approximately 30% of women with recurrent<br />
miscarriages and may have a predictive value in these women (Bauer et<br />
aI., 1998).<br />
68<br />
>.
III. Lp (a) ill P.LH:<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
Wang et al, (1998) demonstrated an increased plasma Lp(a) levels<br />
in pregnant women with Preeclampisa and eclampsia in comparison to<br />
normal pregnancy. While its level was significantly higher in severe than<br />
in mild Preeclampisa. They concluded that Lp(a) level was associated<br />
with the severity ofdisease and may serve as a marker ofthe pathogenic<br />
process.<br />
A further study was done investigating women with a history of<br />
severe Preeclampisa and controls with a history ofnormal pregnancies<br />
only All were tested at least 10 weeks after delivery in the second halfof<br />
a normal menstrual cycle. None ofthe controls or patients were pregnant<br />
or used oral contraceptives. There was no statistically significant<br />
difference of Lp(a) level between the two groups (Van pampus et al.,<br />
1998).<br />
The data ofWang et al, 1998 in addition to those ofVanPampus<br />
et a1.1998 suggest that in Preeclampisa, levels of Lp(a) increase in<br />
relation with the severity of disease. After delivery, Lp(a) normalizes.<br />
This suggests a specific alteration of Lp(a) level in relation to<br />
Preeclampisa.<br />
Hypothesis suggesting the mechanism of action of Lp(a) in<br />
Preeclampisa (whether elevated Lp(a) is causative factor for<br />
P reeclampisa,<br />
In Preeclampisa, endothelial cell injury and altered endothelial cell<br />
function appear to play a pivotal role in the genesis ofall aspects ofthe<br />
multisystem damage, including renal and liver functions seen in<br />
Preeclampisa (Rodgers et al., 1998). Lp(a) has been shown to induce<br />
endothelial cell dysfunction (Hajjar et al., 1989).<br />
A recent hypothesis was laid suggesting that genetically<br />
determined elevated Lp(a) and its deposition in endothelial cells ofthe<br />
69
Review ofLiterature<br />
small vessels of placental bed initiates acute atherosis and related<br />
thrombosis in maternal uterine spiral arteries leading to insufficient<br />
perfusion ofthe placental bed and the clinical symptoms of Preeclampisa<br />
(Wang et al., 1998).<br />
A report of a family with two cases of severe Preeclampisa<br />
/eclampsia in which very high levels ofLp(a) has been found, suggests<br />
that a very high Lp(a) level could be one risk factor for Preeclampisa that<br />
is genetically determined (Husby et al., 1996).<br />
However, Dijurovic et al., (1997) made an examination of 154<br />
women with Preeclampisa (Preeclampisa group) and 76 healthy pregnant<br />
normotensive women (control group) .The Preeclampisa group was<br />
further dvided into the following subgroups: mild Preeclampisa, severe<br />
Preeclampisa and Preeclampisa with fetal growth retardation. They found<br />
that plasma levels ofLp(a) were lower in the total Preeclamptic group as<br />
well as in all ofthe Preeelampisa subgroups than in the control group as<br />
determined by quantitative electroimmunoassay (Dijurovic et al., 1997).<br />
Leerink et al. (1997) in the same year studied levels ofLp(a) and<br />
apolipoprotein (a) phenotype in women with a history ofPreeelampisa in<br />
a previous history (patient group) in comparison with women without<br />
Preeclampisa in their history (control group) . They found median Lp(a)<br />
levels in both groups to be equal as well as the apo (a) phenotype<br />
distribution in both groups concluding. that they do not contribute<br />
significantly to the pathogenesis ofPreeclampisa.<br />
70
PATIENTS<br />
AND<br />
METHODS
Patients and Methods<br />
Patients and Methods<br />
This study was carried out in Obstetrics, Gynecology Department<br />
and Biochemistry Department, Zagazig University Hospitals during the<br />
period from October 1999 till May 2001 .<br />
It included 60 primigravda of comparable age with single lesion<br />
pregnancy in their 3 rd trimester and with no history of medical disease<br />
before pregnancy such as renal disease, essential hypertension and<br />
autoimmune disease etc.<br />
The patients were selected from out patient clinic and obstetric<br />
emergency unit, Zagazig University Hospitals and were classified into<br />
three groups :<br />
proteinuria<br />
1st group included 20 normotensive pregnant women with negative<br />
2 nd group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled the criteria of<br />
mild preeclampsia:<br />
• Systolic blood pressure 140 - 160 mm Hg<br />
• Disatolic blood pressure 90 - 100 mm Hg<br />
• Proteinuria was 1 or 2 plus by dipstick testing<br />
3 00 group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled one or more<br />
ofthe criteria ofsevere preeclampsia:<br />
• Systolic blood pressure z 160 mm Hg<br />
• Diastolic blood pressure z 110 mm Hg<br />
71
..<br />
Procedure:<br />
Patients and Methods<br />
1 - Dilute plasma samples with sample Buffer prior to adding to the<br />
microtest wells. Serial dilutions were prepared as follows: 20 plasma to<br />
1ml was added of sample buffer and mix; then add 20 ul ofthis initial<br />
mixture to 1 ml ofsample buffer and mix; final dilution 1 : 2601.<br />
2 - Add 50 ul ofPET Buffer to each microtest well.<br />
3 - Add 20 ofeach Lp(a) standard (0 mg/I and 600 mg/l) to two separate<br />
wells in duplicate. (standards was added without further dilution with<br />
sample buffer). Add 20 ul ofeach diluted sample into a separate well. the<br />
positions place the strips in the frame cover with a lid or plastic film.<br />
Incubate for 60 minutes at room temperature on a micro-test plate shaker,<br />
speed 500 pm<br />
4 - Add 50 ul ofconjugate to each well using the 8-channel pipette .Cover<br />
with lid or plastic film and incubate for 15 minutes at 25 CO with agitation<br />
on a micro-test plate shaker.<br />
5 - Empty the plate contents and wash the strips four times with PET<br />
buffer: by filling the wells with PET buffer using a squeeze bottle, wait<br />
for 1 minute, empty the plate and remove droplet by tapping the strips<br />
and frame 4-5 times, face down, against absorbent material repeat do not<br />
allow plate to dry out.<br />
6 - Add 100 ul of substrate to each well using an 8-channel pipette or.<br />
Start the stop watch. Incubate the strips with cover on the micro-test plate<br />
shaker for 15 minutes at 25 C.<br />
7 - Add 50 ul sulfuric acid to each well. Add this with the same speed and<br />
order as you added the substrate . Agitate the plate for 5 minutes on a<br />
micro-test plate shaker to allow complete mixing and stabilization of<br />
color. The colored products is stable for 2 hours.<br />
8 - Read the absorbance at 492 nm in a micro-test plate reader.<br />
75
." '<br />
(Table 8) Measurement against Reagent blank:<br />
Pipette into test tubes<br />
Reagent Blank Sample<br />
Sample .......... 0.1 ml<br />
Solution 1 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />
Dist H2O 0.1 ml ...........<br />
Mix, incubate for exactly 30 minutes at 37 C<br />
Solution 2 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />
Patients and Methods<br />
Mix, allow to stand for exactly 20 min. at 20 to 25 C<br />
Sodium. 5 ml 5 ml<br />
Hydroxide<br />
(0.4 MoVl)<br />
Mix, read the absorbance of sample (Asample) against the reagent blank<br />
after 5 minutes.<br />
Calculation:<br />
(Table 9) Obtain the activity of GOT in the serum from the table:<br />
Absorbance Jl!l Absorbance Jl!l<br />
0.020 7 0.100 36<br />
0.030 10 0.110 41<br />
0.040 13 0.120. 47<br />
0.050 16 0.130 52<br />
0.060 19 0.140 59<br />
0.070 23 0.150 67<br />
0.080 27 0.160 76<br />
0.090 31 0.170 89<br />
Determination of (SGPT) by (Retiman et al., 1957) :<br />
u-oxoglutarate + DL-alanine GPT L-glutamate + pyruvate.<br />
pyruvate formed is measured by monitoring the concentration ofpyruvate<br />
hydrazone formed with 2.4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine.<br />
79
(Table 10) Reagents:<br />
Reagent 1 Phosphate buffer pH 7.2 100 mmolll<br />
aPT DL- alanine 80 mmolll<br />
Substrate 0.- ketoglutarate 4 mmol/l<br />
Reagent 2 2.4 dinitrophenyl hydrazien 4 mmol/l<br />
Color-reagent<br />
Procedure.<br />
Wavelength<br />
Hg 546 nm<br />
(530-550 run)<br />
Incubation temperature: 37 C<br />
(Table 11) Measurement against Reagent blank:<br />
Pipette into test tubes<br />
Reagent Blank Sample<br />
Sample I·' .•••••• 0.1 ml<br />
Solution 1 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />
Dist H2O 0.1 ml ". '" .....<br />
Mix, incubate for exactly 30 minutes at 37 C<br />
Solution 2 0.5 ml 0.5 ml<br />
Patients and Methods<br />
Mix, allow to stand for exactly 20 min. at 20 to 25 C<br />
Sodium. 5 mi 5 ml<br />
Hydroxide<br />
(0.4 Molll)<br />
Mix, read the absorbance of sample (Asample) against the reagent blank<br />
after 5 minutes.<br />
80
."<br />
(Table 12) Calculation:<br />
Obtain the activity ofGPT in the serum from the table:<br />
Absorbance ull Absorbance ull<br />
0.025 4 0.275 48<br />
0.050 8 0.300 52<br />
0.075 12 0.325 57<br />
O. 100 17 0.350 62<br />
O. 125 21 0.375 67<br />
0.150 25 0.400 72<br />
0.175 29 0.425 77<br />
0.200 34 0.450 83<br />
0.225 39 0.475 88<br />
0.250 43 0.500 94<br />
81<br />
Patients and Methods
Kruskal wallis test:<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
A non parametric test used when the variance are not homogeneous<br />
and it is equivalent to chi-squared.<br />
Level ofsignificance:<br />
For all above mentioned statistical tests done, the threshold of<br />
significance is fixed at 5% level.<br />
P value of> 0.05 indicates non significant.<br />
P value of< 0.05 indicates a significant results.<br />
P value of< 0.001 indicates a highly significant results.<br />
85<br />
).<br />
"".
]RESULTS
Results<br />
Results<br />
This work was conducted on 60 pregnant women selected from out<br />
patient clinic and obstetric Emergency unit of Zagazig University<br />
Hospital.<br />
They were classified into three groups:<br />
proteinuria<br />
1st group included 20 normotensive pregnant women with negative<br />
2 nd group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled the criteria of<br />
mild preeclampsia :<br />
• Systolic blood pressure 140 - 160 mm Hg<br />
• Disatolic blood pressure 90 - 100 mm Hg<br />
• Proteinuria was 1 or 2 plus by dipstick testing<br />
3 rd group included 20 pregnant women, they fulfilled one or more<br />
ofthe criteria ofsevere preeclampsia :<br />
• Systolic blood pressure 2': 160 mm Hg<br />
• Diastolic blood pressure 2': 110 mm Hg<br />
• Proteinuria 2': +++ by dipstick testing.<br />
The serum Lp(a) level of these patients was measured using an<br />
enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.<br />
All the women were primigravidae of comparable age and<br />
gestational age.<br />
86
Results<br />
The data was gathered and statistically analyzed and tabulated as<br />
follows:<br />
Table (13) Shows clinical parameters of control and study groups<br />
Maternal age 22.6 ± 3.4 25.6 ±4.3 25.7 ± 5.1<br />
(Years) (17.28) (16.34) (16.34)<br />
gestational age 33.35 ± 1.8 34.5 ±2.1 33.9 ± 1.9<br />
(Weeks) (30.36) (30-38) (28-36)<br />
S.B.P 110.6 ± 11.5 147 ± 7.3 174.5 ± 16.05<br />
nunHg (90-130) (140-160) (160 - 220)<br />
D.B.P 75.5 ± 7.6 94.5 ±4.3 116.7 ± 6.1<br />
mmHg (60 - 80) (90-100) (110 - 130)<br />
M.ARP 83.7 ± 7.9 112.1 ±4.8 136.05 ± 9.1<br />
mmHg (70-97) (107-120) (127.160)<br />
From this table noticethat :<br />
3.01 0.055 N.S<br />
1.475 0.23 N.S<br />
139.7 0.001 H.S<br />
283.2 0.001 H.S<br />
244.3 0.001 H.S<br />
- Mean Arterial Blood pressure in normal group ranged from 70-97 mm<br />
Hg & mean was 83.7±7.9 mm Hg.<br />
While MABP in mild PIH ranged from 107-120 & Mean was 112.1±<br />
4.8mm Hg and MABP in severe PIH ranged from 127-160 mm Hg &<br />
meanwas 136.05 ± 9.1 mm Hg.<br />
with a highly significant increase in PIH than control group.<br />
87<br />
.<br />
T<br />
. -j
.;.<br />
Results<br />
Table (14) Shows biochemical parameter of control and study groups<br />
LP(a)<br />
mg/L<br />
SOPT<br />
SOOT<br />
Uric acid<br />
mg/dL<br />
Serum creatinine<br />
mg/dL<br />
Protienuria<br />
g/day<br />
306.5 ± 177.5<br />
(100-620)<br />
9.05 ± 5.8<br />
0-21)<br />
9.05 ±6.7<br />
(1-23)<br />
4.41 ± 1.22<br />
(2.2-6)<br />
0.76±0.15<br />
(0.5 - 1)<br />
Fromthis table noticethat:<br />
493.5 ± 156.9<br />
(230 - 730)<br />
14.4 ± 9.6<br />
(4-70)<br />
25.15 ±23.12<br />
(2-80)<br />
5.8 ± 0.86<br />
(4.4 - 7)<br />
0.81 ± 0.23<br />
(0.5 - 1.3)<br />
75.5 ± 34.25<br />
(30 - 100)<br />
573.5 ± 254.3<br />
(270 - 955)<br />
23.5 ± 18.95<br />
(7 - 90)<br />
30.55 ± 26.7<br />
(7- 90)<br />
6.6 ± 1.3<br />
(4.4 - 9)<br />
0.94 ±0.39<br />
(0.5 - 2)<br />
370 ± 201<br />
(100 - 500)<br />
9.32<br />
4.034<br />
5.81<br />
18.4<br />
2.29<br />
5.799<br />
- Showed the result ofLP(a) and Routin laboratory investigation.<br />
0.001 H.S<br />
Results<br />
There was a significant difference was found among the studied group.<br />
SGOT in control group was ranged from 1-23 f.! /L & mean was 9.05 ±<br />
6.7 f.! /L while SGOT in mild PIR ranged from 2-80 J.1 /L & mean was<br />
25.15 ± 23.12 /..l. /L and SGOT in severe Pili ranged from 7-90 J.1 /L &<br />
mean was 30.55 ± 26.7 f.! IL.<br />
By using F test there was a significantdifference was found in between<br />
the studied group .<br />
- Uric acid in normal group was ranged from 2.2-6 mg/dL& mean was<br />
4.41± 1.22 mg/dL while in mild PIH uric acid was ranged from 4.4-7<br />
mg/dL, mean was 5.8±0.86 mg/dL and in severe PIH uric acid ranged<br />
from 4.4-9 mg/dL & mean was 6.6±1.3 mg/dL .<br />
By using F. test there was a highly significant difference was found in<br />
between the studied group .<br />
- Serum creatinine in normal group ranged from 0.5-1mg/dL & mean was<br />
0.76±O.l5 mg/dL while in mild PIR serum creatinine ranged from 0.5-1.3<br />
mg/dL & mean was 0.81 ± 0.23 mg/dL & in severe PIR serumcreatinine<br />
ranged from 0.5 - 2 mg/dL & mean was 0.94 ± 0,39 mg/dL.<br />
By using F . test there was No significant difference in between the<br />
studied group .<br />
- proteinuria there was no proteinuria in normal group while proteinuria<br />
in mild PIH ranged from 30-100& mean was 75.5±34.25 mg/dL and in<br />
severe PIH proteinuria was ranged from 100-500 mg/dL & mean was<br />
370±201 mg/dL.<br />
The analysis of variance (F.test) there was a highly significant difference<br />
ofprotienuria between mild and severe groups .<br />
89
Results<br />
and severe PIR (p
Control Mild PIH Severe<br />
group PIH<br />
(Fig.6) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) 111 control and study groups<br />
Control Mild PIH Severe<br />
group<br />
PIH<br />
/ Mean S.B.P. 1<br />
(Fig.7) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean systolic blood<br />
pressure in control and study groups
Control Mild PIH Severe<br />
group<br />
PIH<br />
I<br />
Mean Lp(a)<br />
Ei Mean D.B.P. 1<br />
(Fig.8) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean Diastolic blood<br />
pressure in control and study groups<br />
Control Mild PlH Severe<br />
group PIH<br />
(El Mean ~p(a) I<br />
(Fig.9) I-iistogram showing lncatl Lp(a) and mean arterial blood<br />
pressure in colltrol and study groups
Control Mild PIH Severe<br />
group PIH<br />
Q Mean Lp(a)<br />
- - -<br />
Results<br />
(Fig. 10) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean of SGPT in<br />
" "<br />
control and study groups<br />
Control Mild PIH Severe<br />
group<br />
PIH<br />
I<br />
I<br />
Mean Lp(a)<br />
Mean SGOT<br />
(Fig. 1 1 ) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and mean of SGOT in<br />
control and study groups
Control Mild PlH Severe<br />
group<br />
PIH<br />
Results<br />
(Fig. 12) Histogram showing mean Lp(a) and Proteinuria in control<br />
and study groups
.,.<br />
DISCUSSION
Discussion<br />
Staff et al . (1999) suggested that the elevated lipid content in the<br />
decidua basalis tissue and spiral arteries causes an acute atherosis, which<br />
is a histologic feature of PIR. It may enhance the formation oflipid<br />
peroxides, which are compounds that may induce endothelial dysfunction<br />
commonly associated with the pathophysiology ofPIR .<br />
In this study there was increase in Lp(a) level in the study b1fOUPS<br />
compared with control !,JfOUP . This increase was significant between<br />
control and mild PIH group (P
Discussion<br />
uric acid unfortunately I have not found a researches which support the<br />
previous correlation.<br />
In this study there is a direct relationship between the elevated<br />
Lp(a) and preeclampsia and can be used as a one of the predicator factors<br />
for preeclampsia.<br />
100<br />
-{<br />
-...
."1:.<br />
SUMMARY<br />
AND<br />
CONCLUSION
-··f<br />
Summary and Conclusions<br />
Summary and Conclusions<br />
PIR is a serious complication ofthe second halfofpregnancy that<br />
occurs with a frequency of 5-15%, it is the most important form of<br />
hypertension in pregnancy accompanied by proteinuria with or with out<br />
edema. This disease is leading cause offetal growth retardation, infant<br />
morbidity and maternal death (Mabie et al; 1994).<br />
The high risk group consists of primigravida at extremes of<br />
childbearing period «17, >35 years old) with a family history specially<br />
the African- Americans. It accompanies most oftwin pregnancy chronic<br />
Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hydated form mole (Smith, 1993) .<br />
In the placental bed, fibrin and platelet deposition, thrombosis and<br />
infarction occurs and result in reduced placental perfusion. In severe<br />
disease disseminated intravascular coagulation may be present with<br />
platelet and fibrin deposition in many organs; including the brain, liver<br />
and kidneys, altered coagulation is important in the pathogenesis ofPIH<br />
(Roberts, 1993) •<br />
A considerable number of tests have been introduced to predict<br />
future occurrence of hypertension and proteinuria in pregnancy or to<br />
diagnose specific forms ofhypertensive disease, such as PIH . Most tests<br />
are related to one pathophysiological feature and although they may<br />
indicate the development of particular complications such as<br />
disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) ,their predictive value in<br />
the individual patient is too low to be ofa clinical value (Collins et al:<br />
1989)<br />
101
Summary and Conclusions<br />
LP(a), is a circulating lipoprotein particle which has been found to<br />
enhance blood coagulation by compating with plasminogen for its<br />
binding sites on fibrin clots and endothelial cells. This action is believed<br />
to be mediated by structural homology (>90%) between apolipoprotein<br />
(a), the carrier protein for Lp(a) and plasmenogen. The activation of<br />
plasminogen to form plasmin is the essential step necessary for the lysis<br />
offibrin by plasmin (Dahlen et al; 1994) .<br />
Both in vitro and in vivo data indicate that LP(a) is involved in the<br />
thrombotic and atherosclerotic processes that lead to a reduced blood<br />
flow (Wang et, at; 1998) •<br />
The aim of this work is to determine alteration ofLp(a) level in<br />
Preeclampsia, it's predictive value and correlation with severity ofthe<br />
disease.<br />
This study was conducted in Zagazige University Hospitals during<br />
the period from October 1999 till May2001 .<br />
This work was conducted on 60 pregnant women with gestational<br />
age ranged from 28-38 weeks divided into 2 main groups, 1st group was<br />
20 women with Normal pregnancy (not complicated by PIH) 2nd group<br />
comprises 40 pregnant women with preeclampsia and subdivided into 20<br />
women with mild preeclampsia 20 women with severe preeclampsia.<br />
Biochemical estimation ofthe level ofLP(a) was done for all the women<br />
ofthe group, three group control, mild and sever preeclampsia.<br />
All the data are made available about the patients considering<br />
maternal age, gestational age, S.B.P , D.B.P, M.A.B.P, SOPT, SGOT ,<br />
uric acid serum creatinine and proteinuria, levels ofLP(a) were tabulated<br />
and statistically studied to detect the significance of the difference<br />
between these data (Table 13-16) .<br />
102<br />
....
,.<br />
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations<br />
Recommendations<br />
Finally searching for LP(a) in pre-eclampsia give us a good idea<br />
about the pathology ofthe disease, consequently it can be used as a good<br />
indicator ofthe disease.<br />
More work must be done to study factors that lead to production of<br />
this dangerous fraction Determination of LP(a) in serum and arterial<br />
blood wall must be done in other study simultaneously to help us to know<br />
more about the pathology of the disease and to remove the contradiction<br />
ofLp(a) levels among this studies and previous studies..<br />
104
'W'..<br />
REFEQ.ENCES
References<br />
References<br />
• Abramovici D.; and Sibai B.M. (1999) : Preeclampsia and<br />
eclampsia in manegment of high risk, Pregnancy 4 th ed. Chapter 43.<br />
by Queenan 1.T.library ofcongress cataloging in publication Data, P<br />
368-376.<br />
• Albers J.J.; Kennedy, H.; Marcovina, S.M. (1996) : Evidence that<br />
Lp(a) contains one molecule of apo(a) and one molecule ofapo B :<br />
Evaluation ofamino acid analysis data. lipid Res. j. ; 37 ; 192-196 .<br />
• Arias F. (1993) : Practical guide to high-risk pregnancy and delivery<br />
2 nd ed. Mosby Year book P 183-207 .<br />
• Atterbury J.L.; Groome L.J. and Baker S.L. (1996) : Elevated<br />
midtrimester mean arterial blood pressure in women with severe<br />
preeclampsia. Appl. Nurs. Res. Nov,.9(4) : 161-6.<br />
• Baker P.N. (1993) : Screening Tests for pregnancy induced<br />
hypertension in: Progress in obstet & Gynecol, volume 10, edited by.<br />
101m Studd. P. 59.<br />
• Barron W.M. (1995) : Hypertension in Medical disorders during<br />
pregnancy 2 nd (ed) Chapter I edited by Barron W.M.; lindheimer,<br />
M.D; Davison 1.M. Mosby Year book, inc PI : 36 .<br />
• Bartens W. and Wanner C. (1994) : New insights into atherogenic<br />
lipo proteins. Clin. invest.; 72 : 558 - 67 .<br />
• Bauer A.; Gardas A. and Ducbins K. T. (1998) : Antiphospho lipid<br />
antibodies and Lp(a) in women with recurrent fetal loss. Int. 1. obstet<br />
& Gynecol. ; 61 : 39-44 .<br />
• Beck R.W.; Gamel J.w., willcourt R.J. and Berman. G.(1980) :<br />
Acute Ischemic optic neuropathy in severe preeclampsia. Am. 1.<br />
Ophthalmol. 90 : 342.<br />
105
References<br />
• Beckette G.L. (1998) : Hyperlipidemia: Diagnosis and Mangrnent,<br />
Quoted from Laterature notes on clincial biochemisitry. Bulter worth<br />
ORTH, London.<br />
• Beeson J.H;.and Duda E.E. (1982): Computedaxial Tomography<br />
scan demonstration of cerebral edema in eclampsia preceded by<br />
Blindness.Arn.J. Obstet & Gynecol. 60 : 529 .<br />
• Benedetti J.J. and Quilligan E.J. (1980) : Cerebral edema in severe<br />
pregnancy indaced Hypertension. Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol137 : 860 .<br />
• Benedetti T.J; Kates, R. and William, S.(1985) : Hemodynomic<br />
observations in severe preeclampsia complicated by plumonary<br />
edema. And. obstet & Gynecol152 : 311-313 .<br />
• Benson R.G, (1982) : Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in<br />
Current obstet, Gynecol. (Diagnosis and Treatment) Th. edn. los<br />
Altose, California.<br />
• Berg K.; Dahlen G and Barress en A.L. (1992) : Lipo protein: An<br />
important genetic risk factor for atherosclerosis; in : Lusis, AJ.;<br />
Sparker, R.S (Eds): Molecular geneticsand coronary artery disease:<br />
Candidate genes and processses in atherosclerosis Basel Karger; 189<br />
207 Monographs in Human Genetics.<br />
• Berg K.; Roald B. and Saude H. (1994) : High Lp(a) level in<br />
maternal serum may interfere with placental circulation and cause<br />
fetal growth retardation. Clin.J.; 46 : 52-6 .<br />
• Bischnof f.P.(1986) : Placenta 2,29. Quoted from Davy, 1986 D:<br />
Hypertension disorders of pregnancy . In Dewhurst Textbook of<br />
obstetrics & Gynecology for postgraduates, Ediatedby C.R whitfield<br />
Blackwell scientificpuplicationsoxford, London, Edinburgh P. 200 .<br />
• Bosco J.A. (1961) : Spontaneous non traumatic retinal detachment in<br />
pregnancy. AmJ. obstet & Gynecol . 82 : 208.<br />
106
.<br />
r-<br />
References<br />
• CliverS Goldenberg R.; Rouse D.; Hauth J. and , Roben, W.<br />
(1994) : Risk factors for Pre-eclampsia in nulliparous and Multiparous<br />
women. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol, 170 (l) : 289 .<br />
• Collins G.K; Dowse C.F. and Carline F. (1989) : Prevalence and<br />
risk Factors for micro and macro albuminuria in diabetic subjects and<br />
entire population of Nauru. Diabetes; 38 : 1602-1610 .<br />
• Colosimo C.; Fileni A.; Moschini M. and Guerrini. (1985): P C.T<br />
finding in eclampsia. Neuroradiology 27: 313 .<br />
• Cooper D.W.; Brennecke S.P.; Wilton, A.N. (1993) : Genetics of<br />
Preeclampsia. Hypertens pregn. ; 12 : 1-23 .<br />
• Craig. W.Y. , (1992) : Effect of sample storage on the assay of<br />
Lipoprotein (a) by commercially available Radial immunodiffusion<br />
and ELISA kits. Clin Chom, 3414 : 550-553.<br />
• Cunningham F.G.; Coxk, and Gant N.F. (1975) : Further<br />
observations on the nature ofpressor responsivity to Angiotensin 11 in<br />
human pregnancy. Am. 1. Obstet & Gynecol146 - 581 .<br />
• Cunningham F.G.; Pritchard J.A. and Hankins G.D.V. (1986) :<br />
Peripartum heart Failure: Idiopathic cardiomyopathy or compounding<br />
cardiovoscular events. Obstet. Gynecol 67 : 157.<br />
• Cunningham F.G.; Mac Donald P.e and Gant N.F. (1989) :<br />
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in williams obstetrics 18 th edn.<br />
Norwalk, connecticutsan Mateoca, california. Appleton & lange,<br />
• Cunningham F.G.; MacDonald P.C.; and Gaot N.F. (1993)<br />
Liver disease complicating Pregnancy . Williams obstet 19 th ed.<br />
Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange, 680 - 725 .<br />
• Cunningham F.G.;Mac Donald P.C;GanT N.F., leveno and<br />
Gilstrap. (1994) : William's Obstetrics 19th ed. Prentice-Hall<br />
international inc. Mass.<br />
109
References<br />
• Cunningham F.G; Mac DonaIs P.c.; Gant N.F.; Leveno K.J.;<br />
and Gilstrap L.C.(1997) : Hypertensive disorders in Pregnancy in<br />
Williams obstetrics. 20 th ed; Four Starn ford Plaza, Appleton and<br />
Lange, vol 11 : 693 - 745 .<br />
• Cunningham, F.G. and Diane Twickler, M.D. (2000) : Cerebral<br />
edema complicating eclampsia. Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol; 182 : 94 <br />
100.<br />
• DahlenG.; Ericson G.; Furberg C. and Lund Quist K. (1972) :<br />
Studies on an extra pre-beta lipoprotein fraction. Acta. Med. Scand.;<br />
Supple.; 531: 1<br />
• DahlenG.; Frick M.H and Berg K.(1976): Lipoprotein (a) Pre<br />
Lipo protein and atherosclerosis and disease. Clin. Genet.; 9 : 558 .<br />
• Dahlen GH. (1994) : Lp(a) lipoprotein in cardiovascular disease<br />
(reviewj.Atherosclerosis ; 108:111-26.<br />
• Das V; Bhargava T.; Das S.K; and Pandey S. (1996)<br />
Microalbuminuria: a predictor, of pregnancy induced hypertension<br />
Bri. 1. Obstets & Gynecol, 103 : 928 - 930 .<br />
• Davery Kand Mac-Gillivray 1.(1987) : In the classification and<br />
definitions of the Hypertensive disorders of Pregnancy (edited by F.<br />
Sharp and E.M Symonds) New York: Perinatology Press.<br />
• Davey D. (1985) : Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy - progress in<br />
obstetrics & Gynecology vol. 5 edited by John Studd Churchill living<br />
stone.<br />
• Davey D.A. (1986) : Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in<br />
progress in obstetrics and gynecology for postgraduats. Edited by C.R<br />
whit field Black well Scientifc puplications ,Oxford London,<br />
Edinburgh, Boston, Palo Alto, Melbourne P : 200 .<br />
110
..<br />
>.<br />
References<br />
• Davey D.A.; Macgillvary. (1988) : The classification and definitions<br />
of hypertensive disorders ofpregnancy. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol158 :<br />
892 - 898.<br />
• David M; Stamilio M.D.; Harish, M; Sehdev M.D; Mark. A;<br />
Morgan MD.; Kathleaen Propert S.C.D; and George A. Macones.<br />
M.D. M.S.C.E,. (2000) : Can antenatal clinical and biochemical<br />
markers predict the development ofsevere preeclampsia. AmJ. obstet<br />
& Gynecol; 182 : 589 - 594 .<br />
• Davis J.A.; and Prentice, C.R.M. (1992) : Coagulation changes in<br />
pregnancy induced Hypertension and growth retardution. AmJ. obstet<br />
Gynecol, 143 : 162 .<br />
• De Groot, c.J; Davidge, S.T.; Friedman S.A.; Mclaughin, M.K.<br />
(1996) : Plasma from Preeclamptic women increases human<br />
endothlinl cell prostacyclin production without changes in cellular<br />
enzym activity or mass. AmJ. obstet & Gynecol, 127 : 967 .<br />
• De Swie, T.M., (1995) : Medical Disease in obstetric practice,<br />
hypertensive disorders in pregnancy 2 nd ed by Queen charlotts, P :<br />
197-198.<br />
• Dean, A.G; Dean, F.A; Coulmbier, D. and Brendel, K.A : (1994)<br />
: Epiinfor version 6.02 A. word processing, Data Base and Statistics<br />
program for public Health CDC, USA.<br />
• Deganis S.; Abinader, E.; Eibschitz, I; Oettinger, M; Shapiro, I.;<br />
and Sharf, M. (1985) : Isometric exercise test for Prediction of<br />
preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 65 : 632 .<br />
• Dekker G.A. and Sibai H.M. (1991) : Early detection of<br />
Preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol. 165 . 160.<br />
111
References<br />
• Dekker G.A.; devries J.i.P.;Doelitzch, P.M.; Huijgen S.P.C; Von<br />
Blombergy B.M.E.; Jakobs, C. (1995) : Underlying disorders<br />
associated with severe early onset Preec1ampisa . Am.J. obstet &<br />
Gynecol.; 173 : 1042 - 8 .<br />
• Dekker G.A. and Sibai, B.M. (1998) : Etiology and pathogensis of<br />
preeclampsia : Current concepts Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol ; 179: 1359<br />
-75.<br />
• Dieckman W. J. (1952) : The Toxemia of Pregnancy (2 nd ed.) .<br />
Mosby, st. Louis.<br />
• Dijurovic S.; Husbty H. and Haugen G. (1997) : Plasma<br />
concentration of lipoprotein (a) and TGF- beta , 1 are altered in<br />
Preeclampsia clin-Gernet.; 52 : 371 - 6 .<br />
• Durrington P.N. (1995) : Lipoprotein (a) Baillieres . Clin<br />
Endocrinol Metab; 9: 773 - 795 .<br />
• Edelberg J.M.; Gonazalez-Gonow,M. and Pizzo S.V.(1990) : Lipo<br />
protein (a) inhibition of plasminogen activation by Tissue-Typ<br />
.plasminogen activator. Thromb. Res. ; 57 : 155-62.<br />
• Endresen M.J.; Tosti E; Heimlih ; LorenTzen B; and<br />
HenriksenT . (1994) : Effects of freefatty acids found increased in<br />
women who develop preeclampsia on the ability ofendothelial cell to<br />
produce prostacyc1in, cGMP and inhibit Platelet aggregation scand. J.<br />
Clin. lab. in rest; 54 : 549 - 57 .<br />
• Entman 8.S; Moore, R.M.; Richard son, L.D. and Killam, A.P.<br />
(1982) : Elevated Serum Iron in Toxiemia of pregnancy . AmJ.<br />
obstets & Gynecol.; 143 : 392 .<br />
• Entman, 8.S.; and Richard son, L.D. (1983) : Clinical applications<br />
of the altered iron kinetics of toxemia of pregnancy. And. Obstet &<br />
Gynecol., 146 : 568 - 74 .<br />
112<br />
....<br />
.;
References<br />
• Friedman S.A. (1988) : Preeclampsia : a review of the role of<br />
prostaglandins. AmJ. obstet Gynecol 71 : 122 - 37 .<br />
• Fry W.E. (1929) : Extensive Bilateral retinal detachment in<br />
eclampsia with complete reattachement : Report oftwo cases. Arch.<br />
Ophtha1. I : 604 .<br />
• Gant N.F.; Deley G.L.; Chand, S.; Whalley, P.J.; and Mac<br />
Donald P.C. (1973) : A study of Angiotensin 11 pressor response<br />
throughout primigrarid pregnancy. 1. Clin invest. 2 : 2682 .<br />
• Gant N.F.; Chands , Whalky , P.J; Mac Donal d, P.e. (1974) :<br />
The nature of pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II in human<br />
pregnancy. AmJ obstet Gynecol 34 : 854 .<br />
• Gant N.F.; Jiemenz, J.M.; Walley P.J.; Chand, S; and<br />
Macdonald, P.e.(1977) : A prospective study of Angiotensiv II<br />
pressor responsiveness in pregnancies complicated by chronic<br />
essential hypertension. AmJ. obstet & GynecolI27 : 369 .<br />
• GassJ. D.M. and Pautler, S.E. (1985) : Toxemia ofpregnancy<br />
pigment epitheliopathy mas querading as a heredomacular dystrophy<br />
Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc. 83 : 114 .<br />
• Gilhard L.C.(1981) : Pathophysiology of preeclampsia semin<br />
perinatal 14 , 147 - 151 Quoted from walker JJ , and Gant NF,<br />
Hypertension in pregnancy l" ed. by champan and Hall Medical<br />
center P. 69 .<br />
• Gong C.; Roda, W.; Grant, C.; Walker, J.; James, H.; and Mac<br />
killop, (1993): Production of prstacyclin and thromboxan A2 in<br />
mononuclear cells from preeclamptic women AmJ obstet gynecol 169<br />
: 1107 - IllO .<br />
• Goodlin J.F.; Chadwich, F. and Johnson L.J. (1972) : Out come of<br />
preeclamptic Cases Effect and complications. 1. pediatr : C.; 92 .<br />
114
References<br />
• Heiberg A.; Richard K. and Berg K. (1974) : On the relatiohship<br />
between Lp(a) lipo protein, Sinking Pre. Lipo protein and inherited<br />
hyper lipo proteinemia. Clin. Genet.; 5 : 144.<br />
• Hess L.W.; 0, Briens W.F.; Holmberg J.A.; Winkel; C.A.;<br />
Monaghan, P. and Hemming , V.G. (1986) : Plasma and aminotic<br />
fluid concentration offibronectin during normal pregnancy. Obstet &<br />
Gynecol ; 68 : 25 - 28 .<br />
• Hibbard LT, (1973) : Maternal mortality due to acute toxemia.<br />
Obstet & Gynecol 42 : 263 .<br />
• Hidaka A; Tomoda S. and Kidanaka T. (1990) : Prediction of<br />
Pregnancy induced Hypertensive (PIH) VII tho world congress of<br />
hypertension in pregnancy, Italy quoted from progress ofGynecol;<br />
vol. 10,<br />
• Hirari N, Yanaih ara T.; Nakawama, T., and Ishibashi shi M;<br />
(1998) : Plasma levels of Atrial natriuretic peptide during normal<br />
pregnancy and in pregnancy complicated by Hypertension .<br />
Am.J.Ostet. Gynecol vol. 159 .<br />
• Hollwich F. (1979): Ophthalmology. Georg thieme publishers,<br />
Stuttgar,T.<br />
• Hov S. (1987) : Pregnancy in women requiring dialysis for renal<br />
failure. AmJ. Kid Diseases; 18: 312.<br />
• Howard cuckle, Indera Sehmi and Richard Jones.(1998) :<br />
maternal serum inhibin A can predict preeclampsia Br.l. Obstet &<br />
Gynecol October vol. 105 P. 1101 - 1103 .<br />
• Howard G.c. and Pizzo, S.V. (1993) : Biology of disease of<br />
lipoprotein (a) and its role in atherosclerotic disease. Lab invest.; 69 :<br />
373.<br />
116
f"'<br />
,..--<br />
t<br />
References<br />
• Husby H.; Roald B.; SchJetLein R.; Nesheim RL. and Berg K.<br />
(1996) : High levels of Lp(a) Lipoprotein in a family with cases of<br />
severe preeclampsia. Clin. Genet: 5 : 47-49 .<br />
• James JW., (1998) : Current thoughts on the pathophysiology of<br />
preeclampsia-eclampsia. Progress in obstetrics and Gynecology, studd<br />
J, Robert Steven son House, United Kingdom Vol. 13 : 177 - 189 .<br />
• Kitzmiller J. (1974) : Hematological alterations in preeclampsia and<br />
eclampsia Br. Med. J.; 295 .<br />
• Kronenberg F.; Utermann G and Dieplinger H. (1996)<br />
Lipoprotein (a) in renal disease. Am.J. Kidney Dis.; 27 : 1-25.<br />
• Lackner C.; Cohen, J.C and Hobbs, H.H; (1993) : Molecular<br />
definition of the extreme size Polymorphism in apolipo protein (a).<br />
Rum. Mol. Genet; 2 : 933-940 .<br />
• Lau Spc and Chan EI. (1987) : cortical Blindness in toxemis of<br />
pregnancy : findings on computer tomography. Br. 1. Radial. 60 : 347<br />
,1987.<br />
• Lazarchick J.; Stubbs T.; Romein L.; Van-Dorsten J.P. and<br />
Loadholt C.B. (1986) : Predictive vlaue of fibroncetin levels in<br />
normotensive gravid women destined to become preeclamptic. Am. 1.<br />
obstet & Gynecol.; 154 : 1050 - 2<br />
• Leerink C.B.; De Vries C.V. and Van-der Klis P.R. (1997) :<br />
Elevated levels of Serum Lp(a) and apo (a) phenotype are not related<br />
to preeclampsia .Acta. Obstet. Gynecol .; 76: 625-8 .<br />
• Lin M.S., Redman L. and Han Sen 0.1. (1982) Pretenn<br />
deliveries in PIR. Hypertension; 4 : 56 - 9 .<br />
117
References<br />
• Lin M.S., Me Nay J. L. and Shepherd A. M.M. (1983) : Increased<br />
plasma non epinephrin accompanies persistant tachycardia after<br />
hydrelazine. Hypertension; 5 : 131 - 8 .<br />
• Lindheimer MD, and Katz, AI. (1985) : Acute renal failure in<br />
pregnancy in principles ofMedical therapy in pregnancy, edited by II<br />
Ngleicher. Plenum, New York.<br />
• Lockwood C.J. and Peters, J.H. (1990) : Increased plasma levels of<br />
ED cellulor fibronectin precede the clinical signs ofpreeclampsia.<br />
AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol.; 162 : 358 • 62 .<br />
• Lopez-Espinosa i.; Dher H.; Humphery S.S.; and Redman<br />
e.W.G. (1986): Urinary albumin excretion in pregnancy. BrJ. obstet<br />
& Gynecol. 93: 176 -181 .<br />
• Lopez-Liera M, Linores GR and Hotta J.L.H. (1976) : Maternal<br />
mortality rates in preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol. 124 : 149 .<br />
• Lorentzen B, Endresen MJ, Clausen T, Henri Ken T. (1994) :<br />
Fasting serum free fatty acids and Triglycerides are increased before<br />
20 weeks of gestation in women who later develop preeclampsia.<br />
Hypertens prcgn.; 13 : 103 - 9 .<br />
• Loscalzo J. (1990) : Lipoprotein (a) : A unique risk factor for<br />
atherosclerotic disease. Arteriosclerosis; 10 : 672-9 .<br />
• Lyall F, Greer • lA, and Boswell E. (1994) : The cell adhesion<br />
molecule, VCAM-l is selectively elevated in serum in preeclampsia:<br />
does this indicate the mechanism ofleucocyte activation. Br.Je obstet<br />
Gynecol, 101 : 485 - 487 .<br />
• Mabie W.e.; Hackman B.B. and Peters. J.H (1994) : Endothelidl<br />
Cell injury in pregnancy induced hypertension. Obstet. Gynecol.; 81 :<br />
227 .<br />
118<br />
'.
...<br />
....-<br />
t<br />
References<br />
• Magann Everett and James N.; Martin J.e. (1995) : Laboratory<br />
evaluation ofHypertensive gravidase obstet& Gynecol. Surv.; 50 (2) :<br />
138.<br />
• Marcovina S.M.; Morrisett, J.D.(l995) : Structure and Metabolism<br />
oflipoprotein (a) .Curr. Opin. Lipidol; 6: 136-145 .<br />
• Mattar F and Sibai 8.M. (2000): Eclampsia VIll Risk Factor for<br />
maternal morbidity. Am. 1. Obstets Gynecol. 182 : 307 - 12 .<br />
• Me lean J.W; Tomlinson J.E and Kauang, W.J. (1987) : cDNA<br />
sequence of human lipoprotein (a) in homologous to plasminogen.<br />
Nature; 330 : 132-7 .<br />
• Mckay D.G. (1972) : HELLP Syndrom in preeclampsia a case<br />
study of four cases with HELLP syndrorn. 1. obstet. Gynecol. Br.<br />
Common wealth; 7 : 25 - 30 .<br />
• Meekins K.; Tolyd T.p and kiland y. (1994) : Lipoprotein(a) in 56<br />
cases ofkidney diseases. AmJ. Obsetet . Gynaecol; 171:1289-95 .<br />
• Meier B, Radeke H.H, and Selle S. (1989) : Human fibroblast<br />
Release reactive oxygen species' in Response to interleukin I or<br />
Tumour necrosis factor. Biochemj; 263 : 539 - 45 .<br />
• Miles L.A.; Fless G.M. ; Levine E.G.; Scanu,A.M. and Plow E.F.<br />
(1989) : A potential basis for thrombotic risks assotiated with<br />
lipoprotein(a). Nature; 339 : 301·3 .<br />
• Miller J.G. 8.; Campbell, S.K; Albano, J.D.M; Higgins, B.R; and<br />
Clark ,A.D. (1996) : Early prediction of preeclampsia by<br />
measurement of kallikrin and creatinine in random urin sample Br.J.<br />
obstet & Gynecol. 103 : 421 - 426.<br />
• Miller T.R; Anderson R.J and Lians S.L. (1978) : Urinary<br />
Diagnostic indices in acute renal Failure. Ann intern. Med. 89: 47.<br />
119
References<br />
• Minawi M.; Shoukry M.; and Sheiba M. (1989) : Maternal<br />
Mortality in Egypt. Master thesis, obstet & Gynecol Kasr El Aini<br />
Hospital.<br />
• Mitchell MI, and Koenig, J.M. (1991) : Increased production of 15<br />
- hydroxyeicosate traenoic acid by plaacenta from pregnancies<br />
complicated by pregnancy induced hypertrension .Am. J. Obstet &<br />
Gynecol32 : 34 - 61 .<br />
• Miyamoto S.; Shimokowa H.; Sumioki H.; Touno A. and Nakano<br />
H. (1988) : Circadian rhythm of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide,<br />
aldosterones and blood pressure during the third trimester in normal<br />
and preeclamptic pregnancies .AmJ. Obstet. Gynecol; 158 : 393-9 .<br />
• Morns NH; Eaton. B.M. and Dekker G. (1996) : Nitric Oxide the<br />
endothelium derived relasing factor in pregnancy and preeclampsia.<br />
BLl. Obstet & Gynecol 103 : 4<br />
• Mosesson M.W,. and Amrani, D.L. (1980) : The structure and<br />
biological activities offibronectin. Blood; 56 : 145 - 9 .<br />
• Murakami M.; Gant G. and Mac Donald S.1. (1996) : Changes in<br />
Serum lipoprotein (a) levels related to hyper lipidemia during<br />
pregnancy and toxemia ofpregnancy . Clin. invest.; 75 : 671-3 .<br />
• Murphy J.F.; New Lamb R.G.; 0, Riodan J.; Coles KC.; and<br />
pearson J. (1988) : Relation ofhemoglobin level in the first trimester<br />
and second trimester to outcome in pregnancy; lancet, 1 : 992 - 994 .<br />
• Myatt L; Brewere, A; and Brock man, DE. (1991) : The action of<br />
nitric oxide in the perfused human fetal placental circulations .AmJ.<br />
Obstet & Gynecol 164 : 687 - 92 .<br />
• Naeye R.L; and Friedman E.A.(1979): Causes ofPerinatal death<br />
assotiated with gestational Hypertension and proteinuriaa .AmJ. of<br />
obstet & Gynecol , 133 : 8 .<br />
120<br />
-,;f
References<br />
• Roberts J.M.; Taylor R.N.; friedman S.A. and Goldfien. (1990) :<br />
New development in preeclampsia fetal Med. Rev.; in: a high risk<br />
pregnancy, calder, A(Ed.).<br />
• Roberts JM. (1993) : Pregnancy-related hypertension. In : Creasy<br />
RK. Resnik R, editiors. Maternal fetal medicine : Principles and<br />
practice. 3rd . Philadelphia: WB Saunders; P. 804-43.<br />
• Robertson E.G. (1971) : The natural history of edema during<br />
pregnancy journal of obstetrics and Gynecology of British common<br />
wealth 78 : 520 .<br />
• Rodgers G.M.; Taylor. R.N. and Roberts J.H. (1998) :<br />
Preeclampsia is associated with a serum factor cytotoxic to human<br />
endothelial cells .AmJ. Obstet. Gynecol.; 159 : 908-914 .<br />
• Sagnella G.A.; Markandn, M.D.; Shore, A.C. and Me Gregor,<br />
G.A. 1986 : Raised circulating levels ofatrialnatriuretic peptides in<br />
essential Hypertension lancet; I : 179-81 .<br />
• Saleh A.A.; Bottoms S.F.j Welch R.A.j Ali A.M.j Mariona F.G.<br />
and Mammen E.M. (1987) : Preeclampsia delivary and hemstatic<br />
system .Am. J. Obstet & Gynecol 157 : 331-336 .<br />
• Saleh A.A.; Bottoms S.F.j Norman G.; Farag A. and Mammen<br />
E.F. (1988) : Hemostasis in Hypertensive disorders ofpregnancy.<br />
Obstet & Gynecol . ; 71 : 719-722 .<br />
• Sander K: HansenJ.; GantN.F. and Victor R . (1995) :<br />
Sympathetic over activity in pregnancy induced hypertension.<br />
Abstract submitted to the 68 tho Scientific sessions ofthe American<br />
heart association, Anaheim, California, Nov.<br />
• Satoh K.j Seki H. and Sakamoto H. (1991) ; Role ofprostaglandin<br />
in pregnancy induced hypertension. AmJ. kidney Dis. 17 : 133-8<br />
123
References<br />
• Schiff E.; Pelec E. and Goldenbag M. (1988) : The use ofAspirin<br />
to prevent pregnancy induced Hypertension and lower the Ratio of<br />
thromboxane A2 to prostacyclin in Relatively high risk pregnancy N<br />
Engl : J Med. 321 : 351-6.<br />
• Shanklin, D.R.; and Sibai, B.M. (1989) : Ultrastructural aspects of<br />
preeclampsia. 1. Placental bed and uterine boundary vesels.<br />
AmJ.Obstet Gynecol; 161:735-741 .<br />
• Sheehan H.L. and Lynch J.B. (1973) : Pathology oftoxemia of<br />
pregnancy. London, Churchill living stone.<br />
• Sibai B.M.; Arderson G. D and Mc Gubin J.H. (1982) : Eclampsia<br />
and clinical significance oflaboratory findings obstet & Gynecol 59 :<br />
153-7 .<br />
• Sibai B.M. (1986) : Multiple pregnancy in Preeclampsia .Am.Lobstet<br />
& Gynecol.; 137 : 210 .<br />
• Sibai B.M.; Mabie H.C.; Harvey C.Jand GOD zalez AR, (1987) :<br />
Plumonary edema in severe preeclampsia eclampsia .Am.J. Obsetet<br />
Gynecol156 : 1174 .<br />
• Sibai B.M. (1988): Pit fulls in diagnosis and Management of<br />
preeclampsia .Am.J. Obstet & Gynecol; 159-1<br />
• Sibai B.M. (1990) : HELLP Syndrome (hemlysis, elevated liver<br />
enzymes, low plalelets count) .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 162 .<br />
• Sibai B.M. Harvey C.J. and Gerham, J.M. (1990) : Acute renal<br />
failure in PIR .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol.; 162 .<br />
• Sibai B.M.(1992): Management and counseling of patients with<br />
preeclampsia remote from term. clinical obstetrics and Gynecolgy<br />
35:426.<br />
• Smarason.Ask.; Sargentl.La Starkey P.M. Redman C.W.G.<br />
(1993) : The effect of placental syncytiotrophoblast microvillous<br />
membranes. from Normal and preeclamptic women on the growth of<br />
endothelial cells in vivo BrJ. obstet Gynecol ; 100 : 943-9 .<br />
124<br />
" i<br />
"'I<br />
1<br />
.,
References<br />
• Smith A.F. (1990) : Cited from teitz text book of clinical<br />
Biochemistry; 25 820-823.<br />
• Smith M.A. (1993) : Preeclampsia<br />
Prime Care; 20 ; 655-64 .<br />
• Socol M.L., weiner G.P.; lows G.; Rehnbeg K; Rossi E,C. (1985)<br />
: Platelet activation in preeclampsia .AmJ. Obstet, Gynecol, 151 : 494<br />
497.<br />
• Staff, A.C.; Ranheim .; Khoury, J. and Henriksen T. (1999) :<br />
Increased contents ofphospholipids, cholesterol and lipid peroxides in<br />
decidual basalis in women with preeclampsia .Am.J. obstet, Gynecol.;<br />
180: 587·92 .<br />
• Stainer K; Marrison, R.; Pickles, C.J. and Cowley A.J. (1986) :<br />
Abnormalities of peripheral nervous tone in women with pregnancy<br />
induced Hypertension. Clin. Sei 70: 155-157 .<br />
• Stubbs T.M.; LaZarchick J. and Horger E.O. (1984): Plasma<br />
Fibrinocetin levels in preeclampsia : A possible biochimical marker<br />
for vascular endothelial damage .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 150 : 885<br />
887 .<br />
• Suarez V.R.; Trelles, J.G.; and Miya hira J.M. (1996) : Urinary<br />
calcium III asymptomatic primigravida who later develop<br />
preeclampsia obstet & Gynecol. 87 : 79-82 .<br />
• Sutherland A, Cooper OW, and Howise P.w. (1981) : Incidence of<br />
sever preeclampsia. AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol88 : 75-79 .<br />
• Tannirandom M.G.; Bergen T. and Bianouv .V.I. (1991) :<br />
Prostaglandin biosynthesis in preeclampsia. BrJ obstet & Gynecol 91<br />
: 225.<br />
125
References<br />
• Taylor R.N. Heilbron De, Roberts J.M. (1990) : Growth factor<br />
.activity in the Blood of women in whom preeclampsia develops is<br />
elevated from early pregnancy .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 163 : 1839<br />
44.<br />
• Thomson A.M.; Hytten R.E. and Billewicz w.z; (1987) : The<br />
epideminology of edema during pregnancy Journal of obstetrics and<br />
Gynecology ofBritish Common wealth 74 : I .<br />
• Toop k, and Klepper A. (1981) : Placenta 3 (supl), 167, Quoted<br />
from Davey .D.A. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: in Dewhurst<br />
text book ofobstetrics and Gynecology for postgraduates. Ediated by<br />
C.R. Wietfield Blackwell scientific puplications, Oxford, London,<br />
Edinburgh, Boston, Palo Alto. Melbourne P. 200.<br />
• Torres, P.J; Escolar, G; Palacio, M;; GratacosE; Alonso p.L;<br />
Ordinas A. (1996) : Platelete Sensetivity to prostaglanding EI,<br />
inhibition is reduced in preeclampsia but not in non proteinuric<br />
gestational Hypertension. Br.J. Obstet & Gynecol 103 : 19 .<br />
• Unger RH. (1995) : Perspectives in diabetes lipotoxicity in the<br />
pathogensis ofobseity dependent NIDDM. Diabetes; 44 : 863-70 .<br />
• Valentine R.J.; Wallen K; Judsin P.T. and David Son T. (1988) :<br />
The role oflipoprotein (a) in inducing endothelial cell injury. Science;<br />
243 : 904 -10 .<br />
• Vanpampus M.G.; Vanden Ende A. and wolf H. (1998) : Elevated<br />
levels of lipoprotein (a) in women with preeclampsia .AmJ. Obstet.<br />
Gynecol.; 179 : 1103-1104 .<br />
• VosburghG.J.(1976): Blood pressure, edema, and proteinuria in<br />
pregnancy edema relationships. Progress in clinical and Biological Re<br />
search ,7 : 155 .<br />
126
References<br />
• Walker J.J. and Gant N.F. (1997): Hypertension in pregnancy. 5th<br />
ed by champan and Hall London. vol I, P : 39-65 .<br />
• Walker S.W. (1990) : Apolipoproteins and hyperlipidemia. Clin<br />
chemi; 36 (2) : 192-197 .<br />
• Walsh S.W. (1988) : Progesteron and estradiol production by normal<br />
and preeclamptic placenta .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol ; 71 : 222-6 .<br />
• Walsh. S.w. (1989) : Low dose aspirin, treatment for imbalance of<br />
increased thromboxane and decreased prostacyclin in preeclampsia .<br />
AmJ. Perinatology; 27: 120-7.<br />
• Walsh S.W. (1990) : Physiology of low dose aspirin Therapy for<br />
prevention ofpreeclampsia. Semin perinato. 14 : 152-70 .<br />
• Walsh SW. (1994): Lipid peroxidation in pregnancy. Hypertension<br />
pregn. 13 : 1-31.<br />
• Wang X.L.; Tam c., Me Gedie R.M. and Wilken D.E.L. (1994) :<br />
Determinats of Severity ofCoronary artery disease in Australian men<br />
and women. Circulation; 89: 1974-1978.<br />
• Wang J; Mimuro,S.; Lahoud R.; TrudingerB. and Wang,<br />
x.l.(1998) : Elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) in women with<br />
preeclampsia .AmJ. Obstet & Gynecol; 178 : 146-9.<br />
• Wein. R.J. (1979) : Hypertension and Eclampsia in pregnancy.<br />
Practical obstetric problems, 5th. Ed.<br />
• Weiner .c.p; Brandt, and J. (1982): A modified activated partial<br />
thromboplastin time with the use ofaminotic fluid. A.1nJ. Obstet &<br />
Gynecol144 : 234.<br />
• Weiner c.P.; Martinez E, Zhulkchoasdi A. and Chestrut D.<br />
(1989) : In vitro Release of Endothelium derived relasing factor by<br />
acetylation is increased during the guinea pig pregnancy .AmJ. Obstet<br />
gynecol, 161 : 1599.<br />
127
References<br />
• Weinstein M. (1985): Preeclampsia with hemolysis elevated liver<br />
enzymes and thromboxytopenia. Obstet & Gynecol.; 66 : 161-7 .<br />
• Wersch J.W.; Van Mackelenbergh B.A and Ubachs J.M. (1994) :<br />
Lipoprotein (a) in smoking and non smoking pregnant women. Scand.<br />
1.Clin. Lab. invest.; 54 : 361-4 .<br />
• WiJJiam G.F; and jones, D.D. (1982) : Deoxcytidylate deaminase as<br />
an index of high risk pregnancy. Br.J. Obstet & Gynecol; 89 : 309<br />
313 .<br />
• Wisdom S.J.; Wilson R. and Thomson J.A. (1991) : Antioxidant<br />
systems in normal pregnancy and pregnancy induced Hypertension.<br />
AmJ obstet & GynecoI 165 : 1601-4 .<br />
• Wood P.L.; and Durham, B.H. (1988): Change in plasma cystyl<br />
aminopeptidase oxytocinase between 30-40 weeks gestation as<br />
predictor ofPIH. Obstet & Gynecol, 72 : 850 - 852.<br />
• Zemel M.B.; Zemel, P.C.; Berry, B. and Novman, G. (1990) :<br />
Altered platelet calcium Metabolism an early predictor ofincreased<br />
vascular resistance and preeclampsia in urban and black women. N.<br />
EngU.Med, 323: 434-438 .<br />
• Zhou Y, Dames ky ,chiu k, Roberts JM and Fisher SJ (1993) :<br />
Preeclampsia is associated with abnormal expression of Adhesion<br />
.molecules by invasive cytotropho blast. J. Clin. Invest. 91 : 950-960.<br />
• Zuspan, F.P. (1987) : Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in :<br />
clinical obstetrics pauerstein, C.J. (editor) , wily medical publication.<br />
John Eiley and sons, New York, chichester, Brisbane, Toronto,<br />
Singapore; 654-665 .<br />
128
,-<br />
,