MVS Jan 2005.p65 - CBT Tape
MVS Jan 2005.p65 - CBT Tape
MVS Jan 2005.p65 - CBT Tape
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
With IFAHonorPriority = No, Java work can only use available<br />
CP capacity if there is no other non-Java work waiting to<br />
execute. It can be used when the Java workload is to use<br />
standard CP only when there is no other workload.<br />
zAAP PROJECTION TOOL<br />
According to IBM, ‘While zAAPs are capable of executing up<br />
to 100% of Java cycles, the reality is that most applications<br />
are not 100% Java’. It is estimated that around 50% to 70% of<br />
the actual Java workload will be off-loaded to zAAP.<br />
The amount of Java application code executed by zAAP(s) is<br />
dependent on the amount of Java cycles used by the relevant<br />
application(s) and on the zAAP execution mode selected.<br />
Hence, the amount of general purpose processor saved and<br />
in turn the cost benefits are expected to vary depending on the<br />
customer.<br />
To allow the customers to get an idea of the potential savings<br />
they can achieve by running their Java application in zAAP,<br />
IBM has also announced the zAAP Projection Tool. This tool<br />
basically collects the usage information of how much CPU<br />
time is used in executing Java code and categorizes it as<br />
eligible for the zAAP or not eligible. It is designed so that only<br />
code written in Java and Java system native code is enabled<br />
to run on a zAAP.<br />
You can run a Java workload representative of your production<br />
load and, through the Java log, this tool will report how much<br />
of the workload would potentially be shipped to zAAP.<br />
The tool runs under Java 2 Technology Edition, SDK 1.3.1,<br />
and hence can be used with lower versions of software than<br />
required for exploiting zAAP – for example with WAS 5.0 and<br />
CICS 2.2.<br />
This tool is useful in determining whether it is worth moving<br />
towards zAAP and, if so, the number of zAAPs that would form<br />
the optimal configuration for your workload.<br />
© 2005. Reproduction prohibited. Please inform Xephon of any infringement.<br />
15