Analytical and Forensic Toxicology
Analytical and Forensic Toxicology Analytical and Forensic Toxicology
Magic Answer Box? • Low volume, often old methodologies • Limits to every technique • Implies confirmation or exclusion • More toxic xenobiotics than named diseases
Magic Answer Box? • Old methodologies, limited samples • Limits to every technique • More toxic xenobiotics than named diseases
- Page 1 and 2: Analytical and Forensic Evan S. Sch
- Page 3 and 4: Content • Core Content of Medical
- Page 5: • Waived • Moderate complexity
- Page 9 and 10: Testing “You’re fired, Jack. Th
- Page 11 and 12: Assay Methods • Chromatography
- Page 13 and 14: • Salicylates • • • Spot Te
- Page 15 and 16: Co-oximetry • Spectrophotometry u
- Page 17 and 18: Spectrochemical • Produce light a
- Page 19 and 20: Immunoassays • Created due to nee
- Page 21: Non-competitive “Sandwich” assa
- Page 29 and 30: Competitive From Goldfranks 9th edi
- Page 31 and 32: Immunoassays • Old - radio immuno
- Page 33 and 34: Magnetic Microparticle Goldfranks 9
- Page 35 and 36: Rf = Rf migration distance of subst
- Page 37 and 38: TLC Goldfranks 9th edition
- Page 39 and 40: TLC Drawbacks • Multiple steps
- Page 41 and 42: Reverse phase chromatography • No
- Page 43 and 44: HPLC
- Page 45 and 46: Gas Chromatography • Expensive
- Page 47 and 48: Mass Spectrometry • Can serve as
- Page 49 and 50: MS Limits • Cannot separate enant
- Page 51 and 52: GC/MS • Expensive equipment • M
- Page 53 and 54: Hair Analysis • Hair grows ~1 cm/
- Page 55 and 56: • Amphetamines • Cannabinoids
Magic Answer Box?<br />
• Old methodologies, limited samples<br />
• Limits to every technique<br />
• More toxic xenobiotics than<br />
named diseases