the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...
the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ... the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...
Figure 4. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPH OF PSOC-1133 CHAR 330 msec Residence Time at 1000°C Figure 5. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPH OF A PREOXIDIZED COAL CHAR (PSOC-1133 1% Oxygen Added) 330 msec Residence Time at looooc 30
Introduction INFLUENCE OF PARTICLE STRUCTURE CHANGES ON THE RATE OF COAL CHAR REACTION WITH C02 K. A. Debelak, M. A. Clark and J. T. Malito Department of Chemical Engineering Vanderbi 1 t University Nashville, TN 37235 A coiiunon feature of gas-solid reactions is that the overall process involves several steps: (1) mass transfer of reactants and products from bulk gas phase to the internal surface of the reacting solid particle; (2) diffusion of gaseous reactants or products through the pores of a solid reactant; (3) adsorption of gaseous reactants on sol id reactant sites and desorption of reaction products from solid surfaces; (4) the actual chemical reaction between the adsorbed gas and solid. In studying gas-solid reactants, we are concerned with these four phenomena and other phenomena which affect the overall rate of reaction and performance of industrial equipment in which these gas-solid reactions are carried out. These other phenomena include: heat transfer, flow of gases and solids through reactors, and changes in the solid structure, all of which affect the rate of diffusion and surface area available for reaction. The reaction to be studied is the reaction between carbon and carbon dioxide to form carbon monoxide. This reaction is of importance for it is one o f the prime reactions occurring in coal gasifiers, and also it is a reaction on which there is data from other investigations (1-17). Considerable discrepancy has been found for activation energies which ranges from 48-86 kcal/mol and for reaction rate constants. This can be explained by the somewhat oversimplified view of the mechanism which was thought to be rate-controlling, and the simplification made in the corres- ponding reaction rate models. Gulbransen and Andrew (2) showed that the internal surface area of graphite increased during reaction with carbon dioxide and oxygen, Walker et al. (3) studied graphite rods for the possible correlations existing between reaction rates and changes in surface area during reaction. They concluded that the reaction develops new surface, to some extent, by enlarging the micropores of the solid but principally by opening up pore volume not previously available to reactant gas either because the capillaries were too small or because existing pores were unconnected. Surface area increased up to a point where rate of production of new surface equalled the destruction of old surface, after which surface area then continued to decrease. For the graphite-carbon dioxide reaction, Petersen (4) found that observed rates were not simple functions of the total available surface area as determined by low-temperature adsorptions prior to reaction, as might be expected if the reaction was chemical-reaction control 1 ed. 31
- Page 1 and 2: I / The Coking Properties of Coal a
- Page 3 and 4: Procedure : Hand picked lunips of c
- Page 5 and 6: Apparatus: The equipment for this t
- Page 7 and 8: the total pressure on the swelling
- Page 9 and 10: A comparison of the results obtaine
- Page 11 and 12: was used, however, general trends a
- Page 13 and 14: 1 D 13 3 G
- Page 16 and 17: Table 8 L_ Effect os FaeO Compo.lrl
- Page 18 and 19: i-l SPARE SAblPLE Plortlc 209 Figur
- Page 20 and 21: - z c 100,000 50,000 10,000 0 n 5,0
- Page 22 and 23: Flnure 9 SWELLltlG PROPERTIES OF PI
- Page 24 and 25: Fi ure 13 EFFECT OF TOTAL PRESSQRE,
- Page 26 and 27: TABLE 1. OPERATING CONDITIONS Opera
- Page 28 and 29: 1. . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. REFERE
- Page 32 and 33: Turkgodan et al. (18) studied the p
- Page 34 and 35: Materidl balance on packed bed Boun
- Page 36 and 37: These phenomena iiiay be described
- Page 38 and 39: Walker, P. L., Rusinko, F., and Aus
- Page 40 and 41: -""I- *I,".. I Dlrf".,on Co.1flcl.n
- Page 42 and 43: After a variable residence time, th
- Page 44 and 45: Changes in Char Chemistry The infra
- Page 46 and 47: 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28.
- Page 48 and 49: 0s-a 00-a OS'S 00-E os-2 00-2 02.1
- Page 50 and 51: COAL PYROLYSIS AT HIGH TEMPERATURES
- Page 52 and 53: actions, decreasing the secondary c
- Page 54 and 55: 01 40 60 TI MEISeC) 80 100 120 140
- Page 56 and 57: Reaction Temperature OC In-situ Ini
- Page 58 and 59: and the gas velocity is often repre
- Page 60 and 61: The mathematical model developed he
- Page 62 and 63: si sio Fraction of solid species i
- Page 64 and 65: Table 2. Differential Equations Mod
- Page 66 and 67: 1 60 I I RUN KE-5 50 T.1121K(1557'F
- Page 68 and 69: to condense excess steam, the press
- Page 70 and 71: conversion-time data.* The integrat
- Page 72 and 73: catalyzed and uncatalyzed runs were
- Page 74 and 75: CATALYTIC EFFECTS OF ALKALI METAL S
- Page 76 and 77: %me thermogravimetric measurements
- Page 78 and 79: than in steam. Figure 9 shows data
Introduction<br />
INFLUENCE OF PARTICLE STRUCTURE CHANGES ON THE<br />
RATE OF COAL CHAR REACTION WITH C02<br />
K. A. Debelak, M. A. Clark and J. T. Malito<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering<br />
Vanderbi 1 t University<br />
Nashville, TN 37235<br />
A coiiunon fe<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> gas-solid reactions is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall process involves<br />
several steps: (1) mass transfer <strong>of</strong> reactants and products from bulk gas phase<br />
to <strong>the</strong> internal surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reacting solid particle; (2) diffusion <strong>of</strong> gaseous<br />
reactants or products through <strong>the</strong> pores <strong>of</strong> a solid reactant; (3) adsorption<br />
<strong>of</strong> gaseous reactants on sol id reactant sites and desorption <strong>of</strong> reaction products<br />
from solid surfaces; (4) <strong>the</strong> actual chemical reaction between <strong>the</strong> adsorbed<br />
gas and solid.<br />
In studying gas-solid reactants, we are concerned with <strong>the</strong>se four phenomena<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r phenomena which affect <strong>the</strong> overall r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> reaction and performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> industrial equipment in which <strong>the</strong>se gas-solid reactions are carried out.<br />
These o<strong>the</strong>r phenomena include:<br />
he<strong>at</strong> transfer, flow <strong>of</strong> gases and solids through<br />
reactors, and changes in <strong>the</strong> solid structure, all <strong>of</strong> which affect <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />
diffusion and surface area available for reaction. The reaction to be studied<br />
is <strong>the</strong> reaction between carbon and carbon dioxide to form carbon monoxide.<br />
This reaction is <strong>of</strong> importance for it is one o f <strong>the</strong> prime reactions occurring<br />
in <strong>coal</strong> gasifiers, and also it is a reaction on which <strong>the</strong>re is d<strong>at</strong>a from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
investig<strong>at</strong>ions (1-17). Considerable discrepancy has been found for activ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
energies which ranges from 48-86 kcal/mol and for reaction r<strong>at</strong>e constants.<br />
This can be explained by <strong>the</strong> somewh<strong>at</strong> oversimplified view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mechanism which<br />
was thought to be r<strong>at</strong>e-controlling, and <strong>the</strong> simplific<strong>at</strong>ion made in <strong>the</strong> corres-<br />
ponding reaction r<strong>at</strong>e models.<br />
Gulbransen and Andrew (2) showed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> internal surface area <strong>of</strong> graphite<br />
increased during reaction with carbon dioxide and oxygen, Walker et al. (3)<br />
studied graphite rods for <strong>the</strong> possible correl<strong>at</strong>ions existing between reaction<br />
r<strong>at</strong>es and changes in surface area during reaction. They concluded th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
reaction develops new surface, to some extent, by enlarging <strong>the</strong> micropores<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid but principally by opening up pore volume not previously available<br />
to reactant gas ei<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>the</strong> capillaries were too small or because existing<br />
pores were unconnected. Surface area increased up to a point where r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />
production <strong>of</strong> new surface equalled <strong>the</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> old surface, after which<br />
surface area <strong>the</strong>n continued to decrease. For <strong>the</strong> graphite-carbon dioxide<br />
reaction, Petersen (4) found th<strong>at</strong> observed r<strong>at</strong>es were not simple functions <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> total available surface area as determined by low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure adsorptions<br />
prior to reaction, as might be expected if <strong>the</strong> reaction was chemical-reaction<br />
control 1 ed.<br />
31