the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...
the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...
the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
$<br />
m.<br />
1<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> m/mi-<br />
1.5<br />
0.1813<br />
0.9033<br />
0.3m<br />
3mm<br />
5gm<br />
Table 2<br />
Particle size d<strong>at</strong>a<br />
b=11.12 b=625<br />
4<br />
0.1813m<br />
0.9064<br />
0.3m<br />
3m<br />
5gm<br />
4<br />
0.0906m<br />
0.9064<br />
0.3m<br />
To demonstr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> results to be expected from <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory<br />
equ<strong>at</strong>ion 25) was numerically integr<strong>at</strong>ed to give values <strong>of</strong> m/m. for increasing<br />
values <strong>of</strong> Y using <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> kl and k2 indic<strong>at</strong>ed in Table and <strong>the</strong><br />
distributions in Table 2.<br />
diffusional and chemical cases were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using a method similar to th<strong>at</strong><br />
described by Leesley and Siddall (9) for pulverised fuel. Figures 1, 2 and<br />
3 show <strong>the</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> m/mi, <strong>the</strong> unburnt fraction <strong>of</strong> carbon remaining, with<br />
<strong>the</strong> dimensionless particle diameter Y for <strong>the</strong> three original distributions.<br />
In every case <strong>the</strong> combined curve mC+D/m; falls inside <strong>the</strong> envelope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />
extreme conditions <strong>of</strong> pure diffusional (mD/mi) and <strong>of</strong> pure chemical (mc/m;).<br />
The curves represented in <strong>the</strong>se figures (1,2, and 3) are not burnaway r<strong>at</strong>es<br />
but indic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> changing particle size distribution as <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch disappears.<br />
For example, in figure I, when 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch has burnt away (i.e. m/mi = 0.5)<br />
<strong>the</strong> combined case requires th<strong>at</strong> all particles <strong>of</strong> a size below 18% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
maximum particle size in <strong>the</strong> original b<strong>at</strong>ch must have disappeared.<br />
values for <strong>the</strong> pure diffusion case and pure chemical case are 34% and 12% respect-<br />
ively. Thus for a given carbon loading <strong>the</strong> carbon particle size distribution<br />
in <strong>the</strong> bed will be different for different combustion mechanisms and this will<br />
obviously influence important phenomena such as elutri<strong>at</strong>ion, and NO reduction<br />
by char. To cambine Figures 1 to 3 for comparison purposes <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a have been<br />
represented in Figure 4 as a r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> unburnt fraction for <strong>the</strong> combined case (m<br />
C+D)<br />
to th<strong>at</strong> for <strong>the</strong> diffusion case (%) as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle diameter<br />
Y. It is clearly seen th<strong>at</strong> as <strong>the</strong> original size distribution moves from a wide<br />
one (n=1.5, b=11.12) to a fine one (n=4.0, b=10,000) <strong>the</strong> difference between<br />
mC+D and % increases<br />
Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> t<br />
3mm<br />
5 gm<br />
For comparison <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> m/m; for <strong>the</strong> pure<br />
Corresponding<br />
The burnawayr<strong>at</strong>es<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch for each original size distribution and for a<br />
combustion mechanism where both diffsuion and chemical kinetics are acting<br />
simoultaneouslywere calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from equ<strong>at</strong>ion 26) and are shown in Figure 5. The<br />
burnaway r<strong>at</strong>e is higher for <strong>the</strong> distribution represented by n=4.0, b=10,000<br />
than for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two distributions as would be expected. Wh<strong>at</strong> is not evident<br />
301